Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Perhaps she did not repeat herself with revocation being a foregone conclusion?
Yes, please. If you don't mind.
That was funny. Samantha thinks Judge is a baby.
Proof, please. Link?
Please direct me to the link that states the judge has ruled in favor of the company -- THIS company.
All I want is PROOF, not whimsy, conjecture or wishful thinking that dbmm is going to soar to those heights. Can you provide that?
Up list will happen and .10 to .40+ will happen. DBMM last 2 years were great and much much more to come right after up list Hmm. Haha.
Precisely what was great about the last two years? rofl. Although, I guess escaping the guillotine for that amount of time would be considered 'great' if you haven't done jack for a decade. lmao.
Have there even been any recent 'tweets' by King Reginald? I don't have twitter so I don't know. But, if business is booming right along as they seem to feel would take place after the 'unpleasantness', one would think they'd be quite boisterous about it. They've gone 'dark' before but this is pitch black, IMO.
Only trouble is -- that post was not in response to anything you wrote. N'est pas?
Nothing "all good" until judge so rules. Have we not gone over this 7001 times?
Have you alerted them to the fact?
Maybe the SEC wishes to give it another year? Why must they have "to let it go"?
Of course. Annnnnd, we've discussed 8000 times how it is that nothing being said here will have any bearing on what the judge decides but that hasn't stopped anyone from stating their opinion ----- has it?
SEC literally has nothing to cry about
Nope. Gotta call Bullshit on that one. Not without a hefty R/S, anyway. Guarantees can't make it so. I.M.O.
Wow! Talk about "non-sense".
The "email" from "Dan" said that Arrayit and RRBB have not communicated since Oct 2018, but there is these inconvenient facts from Jan 2019
Which is exactly why they don't publish the name. 50 or 100 self absorbed nuisances calling to satisfy their own insecurities.
Much appreciated.
Is there any way to monitor the OS structure of this non-reporting entity? Inquiring minds want to know.
Word! Looks like the fit is finally hitting the shan.
I have no reason to doubt the veracity of your posts. There's been some heavy-duty lying going on here but your posts were not among them. IMO, of course.
Right on! IF they dodge the bullet (anything can happen at this point), there would most likely be a flurry of activity and an immediate boost in the PPS. Without solid information indicating profitability, however, the euphoria would quickly die and back to triple-ott territory -- until the next R/S. All IMO, of course.
Seriously? The missive wasn't an official communique. It was a bloody email. Not saying I believe it or not but it can't be dismissed as a result of a missed space.
I doubt seriously that anyone here referred to IR as an "idiot", particularly early on when there were some serious questions in need of answering. IR made it clear that the only answers they had to give were the falsehoods being force-fed by management, imo.
Predicated upon the lackluster reception given to anything being tweeted, it would appear as if FINANCIALS are the only thing capable of driving this thing -- in one direction or the other. IMO, of course.
Imagine the impact that information could have if only the financials would somehow, magically appear. Oh ...... Wait ....... There are no financials. There is no SEC mandated proof.
Just sayin'.
The decision is out..
Apparently, 'tweets' no longer having the desired impact. Most companies would drool to be able to report numbers like these. And yet .........
Just sayin'.
Coulda been IR maybe? Cashing in her paycheck?
Were the company to provide verifiable information, INCLUDING but not limited to, SEC mandated reporting, the tale would be in the data and trips to the facility would not be necessary. IMO, of course.
No doubt about it. The doubt lies elsewhere, however.
Don’t recall having asked.
Very upbeat. Could you reveal the source or sources of your understanding of things to come, please?
Certainly is a conversation piece!
You can bet your bottom dollar that "many will be surprised". Which camp, however? And, will we live long enough to see it?