Moving the Shrimp to Fiji, if the plan works.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This calls for a spirit reading. It looks like the owners woke up, and are offering the whole company at 37,500.
What do you think?
You might also watch for a play behind a delisting or Reverse Split. The R/S would be a proactive view from management to remain on the American Exchange and stay out of the pinks.
You might also watch for a play behind a delistin or Reverse Split. The R/S would be a proactive view from management to remain on the American Exchange and stay out of the pinks.
In a good market, greenbackers might get some pop and drop action on their recomendations. This market is crap, and it might be a good play to buy into tax selling. The financials do appear to be improving, but they really need to roll up their sleeves and work to trim the S,G, and A.
I would think that the LSRAF shares would be converted to TWKGQ shares, not cancelled. It would be about a 1 for five exchange, and then the La Salle holders would get voting rights, but would lose their liquidation preference.
This spread is unreal. If I was as stubborn as the sellers, I know I would have a bid at at least half of the ask.
Effectively speaking, I have been the AX since I came here. I ran it up from the lows, then widened the spread, and I have been on the bid ever since.
I just lost my premium subscription to IHUB, so I can't sent private messages. I need to subscribe, but that will take some time. I am working on getting my credit card debt under control, and I can't use them until I do.
I have to wonder why someone would place an order for only 5000 shares at this price. I know I would have plae it for at least 25,000; and would have recieved all of the shares, or the bid would now be .009
woo hoo, some brave soul spent $50.00
It will take buyers, not liars. I figure it is time to go away for a few months. Nothing is moving that I have any interest in.
GM, the death star, traded a $4.97. Another 4 pennies and you could have shorted it. It might make one more try at $5 before it goes to zero. I suppose we are the lucky ones with a seven year scenario of how it really ends.
The financial statements seem to indicate that the acquisitions were accretive, so dilution is not the correct word.
Hello speculators and investors. I just became the latest boardmarker. I had some friends in this one a few years ago.
Apparently they tendered my shares today, and maybe my brand new shiny, never been driven, new car smell share will appear tommorrow or next week.
It seems that my broker didn't even give me my one share. I suppose I should call them and ask if they allow outright theft as well as veiled deception in the industry.
TTYS means Tempy told you so. Did anybody short that GM last week?
I wonder why there is so little interest here? It's kind of funny to me that they answered my biggest question about them in the latest 10-q. They seem like they are on the ball, and on the level.
Man, what a spread. No dealers here?
It took me a mere couple of minutes to create a legal argument in defense of any disclosure that would appear to violate the rule. Any Lawyers out there want to hire me as an advisor and strategist, or do you see the loophole? I could drive a truck through it.
It looks like Wiki has a good reasoning of the WHY, but not a full text implementation. Perhaps a user should contribute it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_Fair_Disclosure
Here is the official SEC page on the effect:
http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-7881.htm
Any cheap way around the law and into a $500 night on the town is a good way.
I know I shouldn't ask Lifegear to do my work for me, but how much would you bet that if I say that I am going to look up Regulation FD, for legal parameters of PR vs. website releases that he will too?
Reg FD, is the legal reason that companies publish $500 PR's. I think it is a US law, and if I remember correctly, this company is located in Bermuda.
That is strange if you moved up gently. When you bid shares up and don't fit the MM's minimum quantity, the quoted bid won't change. Your order probably wasn't visible to other brokers until you struck the ask.
Another installment of trading 101.
Based on the structures they have named, this one looks like the more secure bet; but there is quite a difference in capital outlay for the amount of security. Still, the first fifty million plus comes this way, and 30 million gave the shareholders $10.50. Unless the new capitalization plan just drops from the sky, this one sees complete reimbursement before the tranwreck gets a penny. I actually am betting on the wreck and think the wheels are already in motion to drop it out in the MBO. That is strictly a speculation which I consider an opinion, not fact.
Save yourself. I am not nuts, I just have some.
Once upon a time, I left a large order at the bid, and started buying nibbles at the ask. I never got quantity, and the stock tripled before my low ball bid expired.
Even fools can have meatballs.
Not if the guy with the money can understand word spaghetti, and has a pair between his legs.
Wishing doesn't get it. It takes people with money and orders at the ask.
That's so true. You have to turn on the flame, and then watch.
Trenwick trading for Dummies 101. Class is in session. Place an order for 25K shares at .009 and see how fast your order gets filled.
Don't they teach you how the market works in Germany?
If you wish to purchase, you place the order at the ask. The spread is the MM's share, and he will not give you any until after his are filled. If you purchase at the ask, you take away from the MM's inventory. If he cannot fill your order at that price he gives you a partial and moves your price to the bid, and the ask moves away. He can then proceed to purchase back the shares he just sold you before you get another partial fill
My own perception is that the hidden information is for the benefit of all. I just don't know why they chose to hide it. It gives the opposite impression of cowardly digression to hidden crimes.
The 2005 quarterly is posted on EDGAR, which means that a party has taken responsibilty for their accuracy and is subject to prosecution or tort action regarding the statements contained.
I am not really complaining about the spaghetti, but day after day it gets pretty tiresome. I would like to see something more meaty. I could swear that Lifegear just posted something about a "small" intercompany debt, and that they mentioned something about $87 million, which isn't small according to my seven year old nephew.
We get free verbal spaghetti courtesy of the JPL. What are you saying? Isn't this spaghetti nutritious enough?
Can someone explain to the JPL that my shares are in trust to a seven year old who acquired them from a grandpa who passed as a result of the 911 disaster and would like to know what this all means in terms which he can understand.
Affairs concluded, but a small debt of what?? $87 million is a small debt? This company must be huge, why is it so cheap>
Why is La Salle so cheap? Didn't the 8k say they are first in line for all distributions?
Your quote is so much less than incriminating, it scares me.
It is so nice to start the morning with a kiss from Italy.
It's too bad that the only latin lingo I know is Spanish
Que buen dia, senorina; y muchos besos.
I researched the SEC site directly. Many of the filings don't appear to cost a thing. Apparently this stock wasn't de-registered, so the filings are necessary if you acquire a 5% interest. Old directors should have filed 3's or 4's if they relinquished any holdings over 5%. They lost their directors seats according to the court actions, so wouldn't need to file if they never sold or bought since or never held more than 5%. Otherwise they would be required to update their holdings information or face SEC scrutiny, according to my reading of the requirements. We could probably assume that they junked their stock, and face the scrutiny if the dog ever grows teeth. I doubt that the SEC uses its teeth often enough. I don't doubt that it has them.