Followers | 300 |
Posts | 13,009 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/30/2013 |
Twitter Profile: | Temporarily Unavailable |
Follow on Twitter: | Follow @ Temporarily Unavailable |
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Most of us understand why the number of registered users does not have a direct correlation with stock price.
Revenue and shareholder value is what affects demand...and there has yet to be any evidence that MSRT is effectively executing a revenue generating strategy; i.e.The number of registered users is largely irrelevant without correlative revenue growth.
In all my years I've never seen anything like it.
Is this what happened to MSRT?
$4.20 target lol:
MSRT has done nothing but plummet ever since.
Um. Again - Comparing the results of 200 individual trades to the performance of an entire sector/index is sort of odd...because the index doesn't take into account market timing, which is a variable inherent to the individual "trade recommendations."
In any event, and regardless of whether we compare it to a poorly performing index, 75% losses overall is laughable when there existed plenty of opportunities to make money instead of losing so horrifically. These ARE
PENNY STOCKS by the way.
MSRT target of $4.20lol
••NEWS••SF WEEKLY: IVXX TO REMAIN A NON-PROFIT
Be careful folks. Bagholder stocks are subject to a lot of fabricated hype.
Here's another source indicating IVXX will remain not-for-profit through 2016 and likely until 2018, according to the language in the bill (ouch).
Nothing happens quickly when it comes to government: Don't be fooled by claims that IVXX's status as a not-for-profit changes in "Jan. 2016." It's simply not true.
http://m.sfweekly.com/sanfrancisco/news-marijuana-medical-marijuana-medical-cannabis-cannabis-california-cannabis-industry-association-ab-266-sb-643-rob-bonta-jerry-bro/Content?oid=4160490
Things sure are slow over at 420Investor, huh? lol
Still no forecast for when that $4.20 target is going to hit?
Um. Again - Comparing the results of 200 individual trades to the performance of an entire sector/index is sort of odd...because the index doesn't take into account market timing, which is a variable inherent to the individual "trade recommendations."
In any event, and regardless of whether we compare it to a poorly performing index, 75% losses overall is laughable when there existed plenty of opportunities to make money instead of losing so horrifically. These ARE
PENNY STOCKS by the way.
MSRT target of $4.20lol
Ha. Okay. Good luck.
I guess the overall loss of 75% on 200 "trade recommendations" explains why we keep seeing that one trade posted over and over lol
What happened to the $4.20 target?
MSRT has plummeted nearly 25% since the 420Investor service's buy "recommendation" just last month.
I have no idea what could have possibly made that "recommendation" seem like a good idea at the time.
Pretty odd witnessing all these consistently horrible, baseless "recommendations."
As far as "the market" is concerned, dispensary licenses in-and-of-themselves have zero "true value" when the company to whom the licenses are issued is structured in a way that cannot benefit shareholders.
Simple stuff.
Be careful folks: TRTC is horrifically overvalued.
Don't let the typical end-of-year price action fool you. Exits over .095 are golden.
GWPH DOWN 22% FROM 420INVESTOR "TRADE RECOMMENDATION."
Not sure what could have possibly substantiated the 420Investor service's "recommendation" to buy this way up at $84...but as usual...it has panned out quite horribly.
It never fails.
See ya at $46!
Looks topped.
Momentum for MSRT is strongly bearish. The 14 period SSO is falling as investors sell shares and drive the price lower.
OBV is also bearish...indicating the obvious lack of interest we've learned to expect from a 420Investor touted stock.
Does 420Investor still stand behind that $4.20 target? My guess is the service will continue denying the target even existed...despite it being on record.
This one is headed for .50.
Does MSRT stand out in a similar way that PHOT did according to the 420Investor service?
PHOT was touted by the failed 420Investor service as the best bet in the sector...until it got suspended by the SEC for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme and lost 95% of its value.
So does MSRT "stand out" like 420Investor's other favorite stock, PHOT?
Comparing the results of 200 individual trades to the performance of an entire sector/index is sort of odd...because the index doesn't take into account market timing, which is a variable inherent to the individual "trade recommendations."
In any event, and regardless of whether we compare it to a poorly performing index, 75% losses overall is laughable when there existed plenty of opportunities to make money instead of losing so horrifically. These ARE
PENNY STOCKS by the way.
MSRT target of $4.20lol
Hilarious. TRTC is using an incentive paid to a totally separate company to pump the stock?
lol This story looks more pitiful every day.
Exits above .095 today are golden. Headed lower overall.
No value for shareholders = No value for shares. Simple.
Don't get trapped folks.
200 "trade recommendations" resulting in 75% losses overall is pretty terrible. No getting around it.
Is MSRT still aimed at that $4.20 target call or is it down miserably since then?
The 420Investor service has made 200 "trade recommendations" which have resulted in 75% losses overall.
How many of those were IPOW trades?
Just saw where the 420Investor service's most recent MSRT "trade recommendation" was a LOSS of 18%.
Yikes.
What happened to that $4.20 target?
Is this just going to keep getting more hilarious?
TRTC continues to trade precisely according to our projections.
Our unmatched accuracy isn't the product of magic, it's the product of objective analysis.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
New 52wk lows ahead.
Yeah. But, um, it traded what - only $900 volume?
So uh....yeah...there is literally no one that cares.
Post Unavailable
Additional Information
TLDR. Records also indicate the 420Investor service even "recommended" buying PHOT again at .36...touting that it was the best bet in the sector...only to later "recommend" folks sell, but only after having incurred a 66% LOSS.
For those who don't know - PHOT, 420Investor's most adamantly "recommended" stock, was ultimately suspended by the SEC for allegations related to...you guessed it...A PUMP & DUMP SCHEME.
So again - is CANL worse than PHOT? Or are they indeed strikingly similar?
You know the 420Investor service is desperate to find relevance when it's proudest accomplishment is pointing out that CANL is a downer...after it had already plummeted.
Is CANL worse than 420Investor's most "recommended" stock of all time - PHOT?
PHOT is down 99% from 420Investor's buy "recommendation" at .46.
Sooo worse than PHOT orrrrr basically exactly the same?
Ouch. Just saw where the 420Investor service's most recent MSRT "trade recommendation" was a LOSS of 18%.
Yikes.
What happened to that $4.20 target?
That begs the question - why do folks suggest that they have screenshots of negative reviews that have mysteriously disappeared from the site?
See... Penny stocks suck less when you snag 85% gains...instead of 75% losses. lol
It never fails.
85% gain on this trade. Another killer trade alerted by @Orion_Arm #KindFinance
Funny how that reality seems clear to just about everyone but the cannabis stock "expert" service with its 75% losses since inception. lol
$4.20 target lol .95
Extraordinarily Overvalued
Very predictably, the number of market participants capable of being fooled into buying shares this overvalued is dwindling.
Unfortunately, there still exists vast downside as TRTC struggles to fund proposed operations.
The strong likelihood for more toxic financing and an increase to authorized shares is daunting...and this will continue to be reflected by share price.
The deal here is simple: No value for shareholders = No value for shares.
Be wary of hype...because no hype could justify TRTC's pps.
Our level of accuracy continues to go unmatched. Don't. Get. Trapped.
Sure thing.
#420Investor reviews. Ouch. pic.twitter.com/4mHhV5uhnc
— •K|ndF|nance• (@Orion_Arm) December 17, 2015
Can't help but feel bad when I see 420Investor reviews like this one:
Was it a CANL trade that "wiped out" this guy's portfolio? Or was it the many horrible "recommendations" by 420Investor in general? Just curious.
The 200 trades "recommended" by the 420Investor service since inception have resulted in overall losses of ~76%.
200 trades represent quite a few opportunities to make money...
But nope. 76% losses instead.
How many of those 200 trades were CANL trades?
WHO REMEMBERS THIS?: Who remembers this post about $PHOT's vote for increasing the share count just prior to the SEC's halt? #420Investor pic.twitter.com/tnFbSehW24
TLDR. Why have so many 420Investor "trade recommendations" resulted in unmitigated losses?
Seems like it should be obvious that managing losses in penny stocks is critical.
Who would allow 76% losses in PENNYSTOCKS?
420Investor "trade recommendations" have resulted in 76% losses. Not someone else's "trade recommendations" - 420Investor's "trade recommendations."
It's simple.
Could have bought CANL at the 52wk high and been better off.