Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No small amount of irony there.
"It's obvious that dbmm is growing their business." Seriously? They don't even answer the damned phones any more. Insofar as an up-list feeding frenzy is concerned, I get it and have sufficient shares to join in on said frenzy. However, for the company to show some non-lethargic numbers might well do them a world of good in the eyes and consideration of the Judge. IMO, a jump in revenues in that last Q could have helped their cause tremendously.
Millions and millions of $$ billed within a billions and billions of $$ industry and the PPS is .............??????
IMO, this fish rots from the head right on down.
What you're saying is that while awaiting 'up-listing', they're doing absolutely nothing to grow the business and will miraculously rise from their self-imposed grave were the judge to rule in their favor? Does this sound even remotely possible? Does this sound like a solid business plan?
False information. The actual OS count DID increase from 745 mil to 757 mil some months back if memory serves. Just sayin'.
Golly. You figure Google will have a database predicated upon opinion brought forth by an ihub/dbmm member? Will have to try that. Could be interesting.
If infractions can all be repaired "in less than 15 minutes" or even "a few days", one might wonder how something that simple could have happened to begin with? Especially considering their crack legal and accounting teams. IMO, of course.
Fact? Proof, perhaps or whimsy? Just sayin'.
Only because the judge is dragging it out, perhaps to let it wither and die on the vine all by themselves?
Why is that, you figure?
If the topic was how long it took to make profit, dbmm will, more than likely, never make the list.
Quote: "Digital Clarity which already has earned many IT industry awards."
Many? Links, please.
Fantastic comparison! You figure Tesla ever had to go, hat in hand, to loan sharks for money? SMH
Sooooo.... what do pink and the 10th century have to do with anything?
Further, despite the highly applauded Amanda Gambit; yes, the Judge is in control.
I googled all of them. Couldn't find a one that is trading without benefit of profit for in excess of ten years ----- bro.
In all of those filings, please note there isn't a hint at even coming close to profitability. That's been over a decade now. Have we not pointed that out over 7000 times?
Agreed. .02 to .04 upon listing is possible. That should also be the exit point (or earlier) without some proof that profitability is more than just a word.
Link to timeline parameters, please.
Quote: "DBMM shareholders have read each link from both SEC and DBMM." Highly doubtful and extremely unlikely. IMO, of course.
Proof please. Link to proof, please.
Mark's nose, perhaps.
Would agree if salient proof accompanied those numbers. Just sayin'.
Why not try answering the points proferred?
Seeing as how they're so completely open about everything (except financials, of course), coupled with the 'good-time-Charlie' billing numbers and continued lack-luster PPS, wouldn't it be interesting to see the results of a polygraph test or even a voice-stress analyzer? Ain't never gonna happen, of course, but wouldn't it be cool?
Is what you are saying is that they're holding off on producing a profit until they've been 'up'-listed? That they're not seeking or accepting new business in this, the dark period? Wouldn't they make a much better case for themselves if their Q's reflected even the slightest bit of growth? Wouldn't the judge see such improvement as a point in their favor? Sandbagging the judge at this point would be a verrrrry dangerous strategy.
Predicated upon that which the last couple of Q's revealed, should the judge cut them loose on the investing public once again, an immediate r/s would be instituted in order to put the DBMM ATM back on line.
IMO, of course.
Poor Reggie. All that tech savvy and still can't pull a profitable quarter. Maybe an image change? How 'bout a man-bun, perhaps?
Nope. I've seen all 7000 of those posts. No discernible 'proof'.
Certainly in one fashion or another, your statement is accurate.
No one has mentioned the fact that after filing their last Q "ON TIME" it was amended twice just two weeks later. Whats the over/under that the same will take place with the latest offering? Just sayin'.
All of which means exactly zero until the judge rules. FACT!
Sorry. Don’t see a damned thing to warrant all the euphoria. They filed on time —- bfd! As a matter of fact, I predicted that they WOULD file on time. I mean, what the hell else do they have to do?
And when said DD goes back as far as the eye can see, revealing fail after fail (including, no doubt, their soon-to-be-released chapter), why is that inconvenient "proof" rejected -- even vilified as "ancient history". In short, belief in one's due diligence is admirable but can hardly be construed as hard proof.
DBMM will the runner from .0001 to .10 to .40+ after up list
Who cares what happened in 16th century? LOL
Last time around they were (gasp!) early, as I recall. Prolly because they thought a ruling was close. S'prise!
No need. We’ve gone over it “7000 times”. Just like the “current” thing that only materialized after being held at gunpoint. But, hey, in a week or so, they’ll produce yet another q that’ll undoubtedly indicate mediocre volume with growing debt. BUT, the OS count will remain firm. What good little do-bees.
Acknowledged. Have never thought otherwise. Trading on the grays, however, is hardly that which a company doing business for over a decade should find palatable. It is what it is, however.
And yet, this charmer is languishing in the .02 to .04 area. What's wrong with this picture?