Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's not true at all. Shareholders who've done their DD know completely different.
You made a point of the $6,000 receipt. I'm asking your thoughts on the other receipts
Yeah but the bill of sales since then or $18,696, $14,335 and $9,821 for 2011-2013. Care to elaborate on those?
Yeah, just read the purpose of this hearing. The boot boys are it it again...appears they haven't learned yet...
I'm not sure if any of the shareholders care at this point. Even if it did, any content good or bad would be twisted and diluted. Speaking for myself, I don't care, others can chime in as they see fit
See rhe first sticky...fully explained. There is zero mention is "scienter" or even implied. Otherwise this type bias would be grounds for appeal. Remember "the inference of impropriety" applies. No judge would subject themselves to this and our themselves at risk for disceplenary action.
Please see the top sticky and you'll see there's no need for more lawyers criminal or civil. And I doubt MW needs a criminal defense team, there's no mention of any wrong doing.
I don't see any proof of that. And knowing MW personally I doubt every malicious statement made.
Then show us the link....it was never provided by all that jazz when he posted it. I've saved every post of his. It's not there.
I do agree with the first sentence. "Haven't made a dent" in persuading shareholders. Our DD is solid and speaking for myself, I'm convinced MW and Ifus will win both cases and convinced that Ifus is a solid company with a solid product (unique on top of that) and will grow exponentially over the coming years. Solid investment.
3rd paragraph. The transcripts are clear. Nothing unnerving at all. Damming for the boot bots AND if you'll notice, everything he answered he made cleae reference to the evidence. In fact, it's all straight forward. He built the guilty case for the boot boys right under their nose. Their lawyer was too stupid to have it stricken from the record. Even though that would have been difficult, it really shows me their guilt as NONE OF IT was objected to.
But the boot boys showed their fears. Their lawyer actually asked MW about ihub posters, me and a few others. They wanted to know "how we got the information." I'd say, come look me up SA and JS, but I know you won't. You don't have the nads for it. I'm ya huckleberry! lolol
I also found it amazing the twisted nonsense they brought up to really distract from the heart of the case. I won't go into detail but in reading this I see the cowardess in these two. I thought these two were more intelligent than this. But....thinking back on how they were caught and terminated in tge first place, not surprising. Oh btw, yes their letters of termination are included in tge state file. They both signed for them since they were DHLd to them. The shareholders count was also included...91% in support of MW terminating these two for cause.
In all, the case is already decided, tge signature and drop of the gavel is a mere formality. Boot boys are done.
2nd paragraph. The only stage that's set is for the boot brothers. Neither case in the federal or state court mentions ANY criminal activity by MW. The fact is its not even mentioned. So the truth is MW's in no danger of criminal charges.
The boot boys however are mentioned several times for criminal activity and are making every attempt they can to prevent charges from being filed but tge shareholders have already mobilized so that thought is mute. Regardless of what's settled with Ifus or SE, the shareholders are going to see justice.
And btw boot boys, the wheels over your fraud will be in motion very very soon. The fraud you committed under oath with the patent office is a very serious crime.
The state file is very damming boot boys. The evidence presented is not reversible and there's no way out of it.
Lastly, JS is a convicted felon wife-woman beater already. Goes to show his character, not to mention he's a fall down drunk. He's already waiting to go to jail and serve his sentence from his most recent attempt to play Rocky with his wife and his own daughter has a permanent restraining order against him for abuse.
SA has more than 22 felony indictments against him now along with 12 already in progress to prosecute. Yes, fraud, money laundering and racketeering are part of this. He's looking at 100+ years in the joint himself. His mafia contacts won't tolerate him being cornered like this, risk is to hight he'll turn on them....might be in witness protection before long. He's already surrendered his passport and I know his boat's been seized by the feds.
Again character....
So yes the stage is set but not for MW. He'll wall away from this clean. Why? Because he is clean.
I'll respond to this by paragraph.
First I think there's confusion over "pitty" versus support. I don't think any shareholder pitty MW, but we do support him. The two aren't even closely related. It'll start to come together as I respond to each paragraph.
Hope this helps. Oh and btw, we don't support MW out of pitty, we believe in him and thus the support.
Please sticky this post for accuracy.
Hmmmm. Let's tests this theory. Nothing has ever been proven that MW lied under oath. Never even mentioned. The boot boys however have lied under oath and that's thoroughly documented (see patent application signed under osth).
The figures were posted in here by all that jazz in early 2015 but when asked to provide a link, sadly, none provided. Peach posted the actual numbers and did provide a link in mid 2015, so the numbers recently posted are in fact inaccurate.
Reviewing Pacer and having the copy of the full state case file in hand, I can say with 100% certainty your numbers are NOT the numbers presented in court documents.. let me draw your attention to the "forensic accountantants" that JS and SA allegedly sent to review the two page financials in early 2015 (which still cracks me up). Would it surprise you that those two pages are part of the state case file? They are and sgain the information recently posted is VERY inaccurate.
So again, these numbers have never been accurate AND it's never even once mentioned MW has ever lied about anything.
I defer to your post #43004 to start. None of that post is accurate as it doesn't exist and I agree with you (since we as shareholders know better) there is no point to argue.
Who knows, maybe there is information we've missed. I've asked (like you) to provide proof....although I doubt any exists.
For the sake of being accurate:
1) Millions in Income: please show me once where MW promised this
2) Shiny new equipment Again, show me where MW promised this. It's never been posted on FB or anywhere else.
3) Dozens of new distributors We have distributors, don't know if it's "dozens" by I don't recall where MW ever promised this
4) lots of new products We have new products and new product lines. Please define "lots." Again, where was this ever posted by MW?
The results:
A) $37,000 total revenue in 2013 & $258,000 loss (Court document) I've just re looked at the court docs, this is inaccurate
B) $150 total revenue in 2014 (Walther's deposition) Same as ! above
C) $150 total revenue in 2015 (Walther's deposition) Same as A&B above
D) $0 total revenue so far in 2016 Please show me any proof of this, as I know differently.
Please sticky this post.
For those who are interested, and for the sake of accuracy, this is right out of Pacer, what the Judge ACTUALLY said:
"In reviewing the Amended Thirty Party Claim, it appears that Supreme Energy attempted to smuggle in a new claim arising under section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. In the initial Third Party Claim, Supreme Energy did not allege this claim.
Nothwithstanding the fact that this Court finds a claim was insufficiently pleaded, Supreme Energy did not seek leave of the Court prior to alleging this claim. Accordingly, this Court is sua sponte dismissing Count II in Supreme Energy’s Amended Third Party Claim"
There is no mention of "scienter" or "fraud" and there is no "being handed over for investigation or prosecution of MW" or even implied.
Complete bs that's never been said and won't happen lololol that cracks me up. The SA cdf's are reafy for the looney bin....lolol
Like I said that post should be sticky as a reminder
And yet none of that was said by the judge. It appears to me the SA CDF is despirate. Quoting things never said....
Agreed. And it would be grounds for an appeal and disciplenary action for bias.
I never agreed to that. I know him personally and know he's not a liar. Farthest thong from it
This is taken completely put of context lololol.
Give a link where this is actually said....
Another SA miserterpretation. The door's still open to re file.
Especially since 1. It's true and 2. Never had been disputed
I see no rebuttal to this and find that interesting
Who's "they?" SA and JS? I would agree.
Not dismissed in the state case. And only dismissed in tge fed case.
BTW, tell us what's happening on the 31st.
That's another misquote.
That's nonsense, that's a gross misinterpretation of what was actually said.
Frustration from the SA and JS cabal bcs they know Ifus is moving forward. They also know they have no chance in court and even said so themselves.
I want another million shares. I don't think anyone's stolen from me. Quite frankly no one speaks for me except me.
Yeah right. You mean a judge's over exaggerated interpretation posted in here of written nonsense. That written reality has been so mis stated it's pathetic.
Show me a contract or anything that says he was hired for anything but civil. Show me one action he defended mw or Ifus criminally.
......that's what I thought...none!
Actually there is. I've saves several, want me to repost? Maybe we should sticky one for ID clarification
Nice twist but nothing true. First he was hired strictly civil and tge proof of that is what's happened. Eg he's only represented mw on civil case, nothing criminal. And first year law student from Miami State would tell you to do the same as the boot boys and go out and hire a SEPARATE law firm for criminal issues which mw has not done.
I think this whole "what the judge said" business is beyond over exaggerated. Just because she said he tried to sneak the counter in and adding JS doesn't imply anything except what was said znd documented. Nothing more nothing less.
This is very interesting cabalderdash and it's generated from the boogie woogie boot brothers.
It's been proven and admitted by SA and JS they entered into the agreement with intent (criminal intent followed). The timeline is mute.
SA and JS intended to commit fraud. They intended to take over Ifus and all but buried the shareholders and this is backed up with evidence.
Since the cabal loves to point fingers, I will point one directly to the patent application. They signed this under oath knowing it to be wrong. Are they dense? BTW thus is made a material fact in both cases fed and state.
So please explain this SA and js.
Don't know and dint care anything about it. Wasn't my investment then and there is no rollover to Ifus.
Yet I see no charges, no mention of this in any court document and no assimilation there ever was, such as criminal defense team, special prosecutor or anything