Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes, that's a Canadian listed company with approved dual listing in the USA. They report to the TSX-V, not the OTC. They are still required to file in Canada to remain current in the USA. The SEC guidelines are for USA listed companies.
Can you provide a link to a law or regulation that shows a company cannot do business in any capacity with a CE company?
No, you show me ONE company on any tier of the OTCM that's current, verified, and tradeable that files nothing with the OTC.
Just bc I am saying they have to report, at minimum every quarter, to the OTCM with a quarterly filing to remain current does not mean OTCM is a regulator. OTCM has basic guidelines and stipulations that companies must meet or they cannot trade on the OTC. Then your proof that that is not the case was to show me companies that STOPPED FILING AND ARE NO LONGER TRADABLE?!?!?!? The OTC did that and they are not a regulator. How can they? Bc that's the agreement between the OTCM and the companies they list.
Nobody is saying they are a regulator. Wtf man?
Companies have to file with the OTCM to remain current and actively traded. That's literally the entire point of the conversation. It's like you don't understand that a company doesn't have to be SEC reporting in order to be under the jurisdiction and control of the SEC. Then like a total moron you start sending me dark/defunct companies that haven't filed and are not tradeable. I seriously hope you don't drive a car around other people.
Nobody said they are. The OTC requires up to date filings and information to be current and in good standing. There are companies with no operations, no revenues, no employees, nothing and you can still buy them bc they have met the minimum requirements to be listed. Being a publicly traded company is not a license to do whatever you want. Show me this list of companies that you're talking about though.
Cool, show me.
Try actually reading what I said. I never said they have to report to the SEC.
It's cool. I'm not trying to piss people off here (honestly). I'm just correcting wrong information when I see it.
Exactly. All I pointed out was that TXTM is required to release all material information in a timely manner. Timely manner means when a company is required to report at the very minimum (quarterly). There is no acceptable practice of hoarding positive information until it best suits the company.
By your insane logic any company that isn't SEC reporting can basically do anything they want and that's clearly not the case.
Not being SEC reporting doesn't mean you get to ignore long established guidelines for reporting material information. They are publicly listed stock in the USA. It's really not difficult to understand.
Important clarification: Not disclosing material information to shareholders in a prompt and timely manner is a violation of SEC securities laws. Becoming a publicly traded company in the USA automatically comes with the obligation to follow these rules. There is no saving information for some time in the future. Here you can find a link to the entire document...https://www.sec.gov/about/offices/oia/oia_corpfin/princdisclos.pdf
As if you weren't in this for a quick gain 5+ years ago? You didn't get into this knowing it would take this long. I'm sure you knew full well that it potentially could take time, but that's just basic risk vs reward analysis. If someone told you that you would be holding going into 2024 you probably would have never bought in. You don't get special troop leader status for holding longer than others and then blaming them for coming in later. You're asking us if you're the only honest person here when you yourself are guilty of hyping the potential with your "guaranteed analysis" of "97%+ inside ownership" for this "worthless shell"....Yeah, the great businessman and creator of wealth and prosperity for himself and others around him, Frederick P. Jones, is being brought to his knees by Dinogreeves. I can see it now, Madison Ave., New York, Dancing Bear and Talisman have Mr. Jones on Zoom call in the conference room and they are sweating bullets as they have to inform him that a "cigarette salesman from 7-11" has DESTROYED their hopes of creating a LNG behemoth.
From what I found it looks like TXTM sued Canouse/Berman and that civil suit was thrown out today by the court. From my understanding, and correct me if I'm wrong, that just leaves the judgement against TXTM in favor of Canouse/Berman for the $530k+ awarded last year.
It's not FUD at all. I looked up the dismissal and there's nothing online for today so I asked, you provided, and I found it. 🤣
@krtek I'm not a paid member so I cannot respond to PM's. To answer your question, IMHO, the topic you wrote me about is not an actual issue for what's going on here. I do agree with the public response that was given here. I don't spend any time worried about that number.
Thank you
Does anybody have a link to this "dismissal"? Court dismissals are done by presiding judges, not by a company's management.
Forgive me for my ignorance on this permit as it looks like it's from the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, and not the air quality permit from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. Is this a permit to operate a business along Louisiana coastal waters? Ontario James is a coastal resources "scientist", so....
More of the same, but written much better and without the sloppy, mud dragging from ole J. Dick.
I think it means that the pipeline has been purged, inspected for faults and leaks, and is currently pressurized with nitrogen in an idled state waiting for the next phase of development. I believe nitrogen is a heavier gas so it's probably used to push out lighter gas. It's used in the food industry to purge oxygen from containers and to create nonreactive atmospheres. I'll let Third Coast clarify and educate us on it though. I'm just guessing based on what I think it might be.
Anybody remember the Tweets about "Don't you wanna know" and buying presents for Christmas, and being generous with the massive wealth that TXTM is going to bless investors with, etc? This is just the stuff I have left on my phone, StockTwits is loaded with more information. Proof of stock promotion by TXTM management:
Nice!! TY.
It's not difficult for a company to never become CE. All you have to do is file basic information akin to filling out an application at McDonald's. I'd say 99% of companies that get the CE absolutely deserve the CE.
Yes. I've posted screenshots of statements that were made online by TXTM and the promoters they worked with. It's a fact those statements were made. It's my OPINION that it was done to commit securities fraud. That remains an opinion until all the facts come out and the issue is resolved in the public eye by either a court or OTCM. You act like we're the ones with no brain. You are literally not understanding common sense conversations.
There are thousands of companies on the OTC. A very small percentage of them get a CE. An even smaller percentage of them have the CE lifted. It's clear and obvious that having a CE lifted IS a rare occurrence.
Dude, nobody has to talk about TXTM exactly how you want TXTM talked about. I'm allowed to have my opinion. I'm allowed to post the evidence and proof of my claim that TXTM is a fraud, which I've done. Stop demanding that every commenter say things that you approve of. My God.
It doesn't benefit me at all. It's just what morally and rightfully should happen to frauds. It's a natural human condition to not like lies and scams. The fact you're completely incapable of grasping the idea that people do things all the time for no financial gain is extremely disturbing.
Thank you very much, sir!! That's the kind of info we like around here.
I want the ticker delisted, the fraud exposed and fully investigated, and I want the board to be taken down from iHub. That's all I want.
Have you even fully contemplated what you're claiming about me? You're saying that I get paid to post negatively about TXTM, yet I'm also deleting the comments that I'd allegedly need to exist in order for me to get paid. It's almost as if you haven't actually mentally worked out your claim to its logical conclusion.
That's not how it works. Nobody in a sane, rational world has ever said that people have to go around disproving every crazy claim ever made. Basic logic states that YOU must prove something exists if you claim it does. I can't believe I'm having this conversation with an adult.
Well, if you could read you'd see that it's not Wikipedia. Second, we are not making a claim, you are. The burden of proof lies with the person MAKING THE CLAIM. If you are going to claim that iHub users are committing federal crimes then you will provide evidence or your post will be removed. This is literally grade school logic we're talking about.
I just liked the detailed info. There must be permit filings somewhere locally that a good reporter dug up, or the info was given to them by Delfin. I just hadn't seen that anywhere else. I think that's a better article than the NGI article that appeared to attempt to cast a shadow of doubt back over the project.
Very specific information in that article I haven't seen anywhere else...
I just made a Delfin Midstream YouTube channel after it occurred to me that their Delfin LNG video wasn't on there. Now it's easy to share the video around the internet if anybody is looking for a quick rundown on the project.
https://www.youtube.com/@DelfinMidstreamunofficia-hj7hj