Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
No surprise since they followed Examiner comments but OUTSTANDING!!
Sweden old pal, me as well!
IronMike I think that’s a winner!
BSB sorry was not here then but your wager would have meant AF putting his own money at risk based on his opinion of the outcome. Pretty much like you and me and fellow longs. Belated “Way to Go.” GLTAL
MI: Yep.
hmuney- it is noteworthy that LP is identified as an inventor. USPTO 2109 Inventorship [R-10.2019]:
II. AN INVENTOR MUST CONTRIBUTE TO THE CONCEPTION OF THE INVENTION
The definition for inventorship can be simply stated: "The threshold question in determining inventorship is who conceived the invention. Unless a person contributes to the conception of the invention, he is not an inventor. … Insofar as defining an inventor is concerned, reduction to practice, per se, is irrelevant [except for simultaneous conception and reduction to practice…”
Swen: maybe ask again, nicer...
Breadcrumbs
sentiment: prescient
MI thx for excellent quote. Might be my second tattoo, we’ll have to see what happens...
Agree. Oops I’m cheerleading! Wait -
Maybe I believe ski is correct! Oh never mind!
Hey GUS I don’t have time to read back over dozens of posts also u mischaracterize my posts but fair points to you Tx for reply, GLTAL!!!
So GUS - if ur claimed knowledge is anecdotal based on 2 situations (likely entirely distinguishable), you don’t know about publication or ASCO procedures, you “don’t think [delay of TLD] is based on journal publication or ASCO” but you don’t say why you think or “don’t think” so and you don’t offer any other explanation for delay, why are you posting anything?! I’m pretty sure that the readers of this Board are aware that company management said TLD would be presented in September but thanks anyway for that nugget.
MI to Gus Newbie: BOOM!
Other corporate uses of $21M — https://www.birthdayinabox.com/pages/suggested-party-supply-list
This makes no sense whatsoever. I do not understand unless shorts are convinced no TLD till 5/18 or thereabouts.
iwas: You Go!
Captain and bio - this is ur lawyer talking. Let’s be careful out there!!
Go minions!!
MI -Ha! I have invested only since about last June (iwasadiver is an ex-client now friend and not uncoincidentally my across-the-street neighbor) but I refused to pay the $19.95 upgrade till I wanted to private message you on your collective bio-investor group. Let’s figure how to find one another Tx!
Hire good real estate lawyers. But nothing in this field is inevitable or certain, as with anything else worthwhile.
MI not sure why you feel need to reinvest but I’m kinda the same. I’m in 42d year of law practice have done small real estate on the side. I have earned/created more wealth in 10 years of very very part time relatively small investment in real estate than working professional spouse and I have saved and earned thru diligent investment over those 42. Leverage + 1031 + tax advantages are a pretty powerful combo IMO. Honestly most of the funds I have in NWBO are from the sale of one property. Anyway it’s a nice break and something different with which to be occupied
Also very quick tout - I think with COVID and remote work and income disparity favoring relatively high income folks we’re in the first year of a 10+ year boom in high quality desirable residential properties. IMO
GO LAWYERS!
Minor functionary to accomplish approvals including but nothing limited to Canada, eh?
MI Den:
I was on the fence whether NWBO would stay independent, my thinking also has changed. I figured maintaining the possibility of remaining independent was among other things to create a bargaining position so that a couple of big pharma could not illegally conspire to hold down buyout price and/or as an ultimate fallback. Which certainly could have been or even still could be the case.
But where are the “tells” to keep the threat of going it alone viable? There are plenty of things NWBO could have done - added BOD members with company build- out capabilities, hire or line up consultants and a dozen more that would not amount to any more of a disclosure than other things that have happened. And while some of those could have been done without publicity, what is the point of a "private threat" if that's not an oxymoron anyway?
As time passes there either need to be active measures to demonstrate the ability to remain independent AND build a company, or not.
Last effort there was IMO FlaskWorks.
The Co as you point out are doing nothing preparatory to building a manufacturing company - capacity, talent, marketing - nothing. And as more time passes any realistic threat is eroding pretty fast.
I think management played that hand as long as they needed to in order to get what LP and her Team feel is an acceptable BO offer. More specifically I think that pretty quickly after the Co became unblinded -- the results were compelling and they NDA’ed the results to one or more qualified buyers and reached a deal in principle pretty quickly.
As far as explaining the strenuous info lockdown- the buyer would have essentially the identical interest in the most effective rollout as does NWBO.
LP and the managers I am aware of have no apparent expertise at building an operating manufacturer and provider of biotherapeutics - buying Cognate is NOT experience in creating a major biopharmaceutical company. And why the heck would she want to do that?
LP wants to make DC Vax the SOC for hard tumor cancers - the next step in bringing DC Vax to market for glioblastomas. Where is the best spot for her to do that? At NWBO while building a biotherapeutic from scratch? Or paid off for her 100s of millions of shares and as part of a major pharma with all the support in the world?
IMO. GLTAL.
Judge yes volume but an amazingly low bar
Iron Mike- welcome to the party!!!
Thank MI
MI your post 370138 seemed a strong possibility based on the Board’s understanding at the time. Since it seems that the Company is not in the ASCO roster would you mind updating for all of us? Thank you so much in advance GLTAL
BB I do not think you are off base.
Happy: Touche. Then you and I will be ones this time!
Soj: I see the virulence of attacks as bullish. IMO
Agree. Amen. GLTAL and patients.
Flipper Thank You and safe travels
Sir Pump I always enjoy ur posts I missed on 12 April all in on 19th. GgggggggggggggggoooooooooooooooooooooooooooNWBOvvvvvvveeerrrrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyy lllllllllllooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnngggggggggggggggggg!!!!!!!!!
Flip and Bio excellent intel as always thx on a key question. A Monday b4 market is a likely day and time and warrant extensions plus a nudge from LL on Friday suggest it will be in April. IMO
Well done. Love this Board! GLTAL