Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Me too!!! Too many wasted years
HDG - I'm glad you did not have Option c) Our knucklehead CEO opts for GIA in ROW.
There is no one sharper than Levin
JL - I've been trying to follow your thinking here. Is the bottom line that you believe the pricing of generic V (for Marine indication) will be higher than AMRN V for CVD?
I believe JT said they will continue full steam ahead (right off the cliff)
In that case it would be infringement on Reduce It patents which has not been litigated. Correct? (trying to keep up here)
Napolean's idiot here, so pardon if a dumb question. But, does the fact there may have been one with TG>500 hurt our case?
So nothing in NJ?
AGM - is that the annual shareholders meeting? If so, when and where is the next one?
Very interesting
Moon - as you implied, bond should only cover Marine sales. How would they figure that out?
JL - FWIW, any input you could provide Covington might be beneficial. For my money, you know more about the science/technicals than anyone.
RAF - FWIW you are spot on. Very good analogy and one could think of thousands of others
Posted - how does such a scenario play out (for shareholders)? Tia
Yes, one person completely ill-equipped to evaluate
If JT decides to GIA in EU it will cement his legacy as the dumbest SOB to ever walk the earth. The guy is scary.
Kiwi - $1B for EU market is only $2/share
Well, just waded in one last time (famous last words). Just musing here, but maybe it's time to write this one off. With the devastation throughout the market, there maybe better venues to recoup AMRN losses. We won't hear squat from "management" as it appears they're bent on the same dopey path.
That said, any ideas besides AMRN?
LBL - others have opined the past couple days that we should seek help from certain members of Congress. With the current crisis there has been much outrage that US pharma is so beholding to overseas supply. Given the subjective nature of the entire case, this is yet another reason why Du's ruling is so unbelievable.
Anyway, any thoughts on seeking congressional help?
Why?
Take a hike
Any suggestions on how we get JT to sell? The guy is an idiot who I'm sure still thinks he can GIA both in US and EU.
His few posts here have me suspicious. For one thing, he keeps saying Du is a patent "expert". From everything I can find, this was her first patent case.
If I may. Yes, the litigation is only about the Marine indication. But, the whole problem is doctors will prescribe the generic for the CV indication. It's F'd up.
It still blows me away how billions of dollars can be at stake over such subjective issues. Talk about a F'd up system!
I hear ya Kiwi. I was speaking more to his dopey GIA mindset and not settling the case. (or course we don't know if he ever turned down any offers or could have settled)
louie - it's too bad the emails can't go straight to JT. He led us into this mess. Elizabeth should just forward everything onto him.
HDG - what is your take on odds of a successful appeal?
Been doing the same Kiwi. God help us!!
So LBL's number comes down to $780B? Just trying to follow.
So, eight, you don't think we stand a chance on appeal?
The things I could say Mateo....
Thx!!
Seriously? Really? Why do you think certain people fought so hard and lied so much to keep Cavanaugh off the Supreme Court (by far the most disgusting display of human behavior I have ever seen)? Those certain people do not want judges who will adhere to the Constitution and follow the law. They want judges who will legislate/create law from the bench (i.e. Activists)
Not trying to get political here but, truth is truth
Hamoa - You hit on something that bothers me (well, much bothers me). You said;
"On appeal, I think it likely that the panel will look at Mori and, at best (for Amarin), say, “This study, given its small size, low trig level population, different baseline trig levels between the EPA and DHA arms, etc, does not clearly render the Amarin patents obvious."
I totally agree. Can the appeals court look at Du's use of Mori? What I'm getting at is there is much talk how she erred in her methodology, however, she also totally screwed the pooch on the technical side as well. Mori proved nothing with regards to TG > 500.
To me, that in itself, should be grounds for overturning Du. She completely whiffed on the science/technical stuff.
According to the guy on Jeffries call, this was her first patent case
Yes she did. I’m surprised, given DU’s error, that the odds of winning appeal aren’t higher than 50%
Make no mistake, managements first agenda is lining their own pockets. Whatever it takes
Little bit of a dead cat bounce this morning
So an appeal to the current litigation goes thru the 9th circuit? If so, AMRN is toast. No way it gets reversed.