Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
My on-line brokerage #'s are screwy with BTOO
It shows last trade at 10:21, but every time I refresh, it's showing varied volume. One time it's 1.46 million shares, the next time 1.24 million, the next time 1.5 million, the next time 1.06 million, but the 10:21 never changes.
Something's up or the brokerage site is not on the rails.
Still waiting at .017.
________________________________________________________________
Now last trade at 10:29, but at every refresh, I'm getting volume 1.5 million, 1.4 million, 1.1 million???
In at .017, but watching closely. Could run hard or slow walk back from here. The news may filter and cause this one to keep the run going as more take notice.
Bo
Thanks Mach...watch BTOO - fingerprint recognition & news!
Got fortunate with my entry in XKEM.
Still trying to get into BTOO here. It may bust out from here (.018/.019). It has made a nice run already, so watch it closely. I much prefer the early entries..lol.
Biometrics 2000 Corporation Officially Launches BioSTouch
9/14/2004 9:30:00 AM
SPRINGFIELD, Mass., Sep 14, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Biometrics 2000 Corporation ( BTOO ) officially launched today its BioSTouch, an addition to the BioTouch fingerprint recognition product line. Biometrics 2000's BioSTouch incorporates an improved BioTouch fingerprint recognition engine using a fast 32 bit RISC/DSP processor. New hardware improvements to the biometric core, an addition of a rugged stainless steel outer shell and the integration of a tough Barantec keypad make the BioSTouch Biometrics 2000's most advanced product for fingerprint access control. Biometrics 2000 also offers a very fast 1-to-many-user search function on the BioSTouch. The search function is tested to search 220 users in up to 2 seconds or less. Other than access control, the BioSTouch is also designed to collect user time logs and display time on its large LCD screen for Time and Attendance applications. Among the expected users of this system will be those seeking Time and Attendance. Biometrics 2000's BioTouch product line is designed to eliminate employee "Buddy Punching" and provide employee tracking, thus greatly reducing losses to any company that uses the BioTouch system.
"The addition of the BioSTouch to the BioTouch product line makes the product family well balanced. Access control providers can now offer a unit for external use that withstands a good amount of vandalism. Our BioTouch systems are wonderful, now one can use our systems for access control and at the same time use the entry information to generate an accurate payroll," said Robert Encarnacion, Sr. Biometrics Project Manager.
The BioSTouch is in production and is available through Biometrics 2000's sales and distribution channels. Joe Turek, President and CEO, states, "The BioTouch core is solid in performance. The release of the BioSTouch shows that we don't only care about what's running on the inside but that we also care about maintaining reliability in our products. As you can see, the BioTouch product line is frequently updated with what the industry needs in fingerprint access control and time and attendance."
About Biometrics 2000
BIOMETRICS 2000 Corporation ( BTOO ) designs, markets, re-sells and integrates biometrics and wireless devices into existing electronic access control systems, time tracking systems, health care systems and data security systems. Biometrics 2000 is also a developer of a biometric-based device that monitors child/parent identification. Biometrics 2000 developed a proprietary electronic assess control system for physical security. To learn more about the company, visit www.biometrics2000.com.
XKEM, still at good entry, but starting to move fast.
I saw the news right before the bell.I worked my butt off to get in at .0261 early.
Xechem Receives a Broad U.S. Patent for Second Generation Paclitaxel
9/14/2004 6:30:00 AM
NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J., Sep 14, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Xechem International, Inc. ( XKEM ) Xechem International, Inc., ("Xechem") announced today, that it has received its eighth U.S. patent related to Paclitaxel (TAXOL(R)). The United States Patent and Trademark Office has granted Xechem a broad patent # 6,765,015 B2 with 37 claims for the second generation paclitaxel. This patent award extends the validity of the patents granted in China, Australia, New Zealand and seven European countries including Austria, Belgium, Ireland, France, Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Xechem now has over 20 international and domestic patents covering Paclitaxel and next it's generation taxane analogs.
Paclitaxel was developed by the National Cancer Institute ("NCI"), National Institutes of Health ("NIH") and first marketed by Bristol Myers Squibb ("BMS") under the trade name TAXOL(R) for the treatment of ovarian cancer, thereafter breast cancer and Kaposi's Sarcoma.
Dr. Ramesh C. Pandey, Chairman and CEO said, "We are extremely pleased and excited that a very broad patent protection has now been granted in the United States, giving further recognition to our long standing achievement in the science of taxanes, which started with developing paclitaxel as a generic drug. We plan to explore other uses of these new analogs in the future, including areas such as the paclitaxel coated stent market."
Update On Xechem Anti-Trust Lawsuit Against Bristol Myers Squibb
On June 23, 2004, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the holding of the Federal District Court's earlier decision and rejected BMS' plea for summary judgment dismissal. The case has been returned to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois for further consideration. Xechem's complaint alleges BMS violated both, the Clayton and Sherman Antitrust Act and as a result is seeking damages of $150 million dollars.
About Xechem
Xechem International, Inc., is a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company focusing on anti-cancer, anti-viral (including HIV/AIDS), anti-fungal and anti-bacterial products from natural sources including microbial and marine organisms. Some of the key areas of Xechem are development of phyto-pharmaceuticals and other proprietary technologies including those used in the treatment of Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") designated orphan diseases.
This news release contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are intended to be covered by safe harbors created thereby. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, including: (i.) the ability of Xechem to successfully obtain a judgment against BMS in the referenced lawsuit and it is expected that BMS will present a forceful defense; and (ii.) the ability of Xechem to successfully launch NICOSAN(TM)/HEMOXIN(TM) or Paclitaxel. There can be no assurances that Xechem will prevail in its efforts. Other factors may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of Xechem to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements of Xechem expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
SOURCE: Xechem International, Inc
XKEM is busting at the .026 gate. We'll see
how long brokers can manipulate the trading by freezing the ask at .026. With broad patents in the United States for their cancer drug, I can't be held back for long.
XKEM...someone had a pantload of shares to sell at .0261. There's no other valid reason ask hasn't moved with all of the early buys.
john...I know many are buckled in and waiting,
and the same anticipation and waiting has been going on since 2002.
Like many I've been buckled and plan to stay that way, but to be honest, I'm more bored and uninterested as time goes on starting 3 weeks ago today (news leaked of the 800 A/S).
Same waiting. Same unanswered questions for quite a while. I mentioned in a post week that I took quite a bit of time reviewing the news since late 2002 until the present. Many statements of events on promised dates never transpired or were left hanging with further questions. The inter-twining of companies, with similar corporate officers in many is questionable, all are shells or companies with horrid 10Q's and 10K's. It's been 1 month since the meeting of the partners, Atty Glenn and whoever else in Canada. Information from the meeting was promised in a pr. All I saw was $10,000,000 appearing from nowhere from a shell company. I advised last week where this money may have orginiated and why.
As for withholding the announcement of good news...it's been 3 months since Carolyn's initial finding's dropped the share price 50% within 1 trading day, and it has since fallen from there. There is either very good news from Carolyn, or news similar or worse than the first results. If it was the latter, the no comment is the correct stradegy, and the focus now turns to the new site. In fact today's pr is trying to now focus our attention on just that, without a mention of Carolyn. It points to something already known, and I simply believe the company is betting and hoping like we are that the Oreo pipe is a winner. It is definitely in the same area as 2 successful finds for Shore Gold and Debeers.
For me at least, it seems like we are back in the middle of May waiting for results. I hope I'm dead wrong on Carolyn's recent results, but it would be damaging to pr something equal or worse than what was initially reported. The silence makes no sense if it is good news, which is why I'm looking now to the Oreo pipe as the one with promise. And I do think it has great promise. : ) It is the first one site drilled from the survey and in a good neighborhood so to speak.
A good result would certainly make me forget the many of the open ends of the last 2 years. : ) It's just after seeing CMKX world (company and message boards) for a few months now, I'm trying to stay interested, but it is fast turning into the same boring noise, signifying nothing. This board is by far the best to keep it real and interesting to the point at hand.
Diamonds and bulk mining efforts would certainly wake me up!
I'm still eating popcorn for the long term, but soon I'll be doing in my sleep if the movie doesn't change soon. I wish there was shell with the stock symbol SSDD. We would have been in Vegas long ago. : )
Be well, Bo
With no insight from CMKX on Carolyn,
the results of our current drilling efforts is now emerging as the focus of the market's attention.
Company communication in August indicated the remaining results from Carolyn would be in 2 or 3 weeks ago. Results of similar, or even lesser findings than before would be my guess as to why there has been no mention.
Hoping everyone's week is a good one. : )
Bo
howdy, I'm betting your post was responding
to Casper's post of 12089, and not mine of 12090.
You had me scratching my head for a minute...lol. I read your post about the MM signals. It said it was in response to mine, but I didn't mention anything about MM sigs.
Whew, what a relief. To keep this monster in perspective, I need to preserve all the brain cells I can. : ) I thought I'd lost a few for a second there.
Have a good one. : )
Bo
Evening all. Thank you Downunder and Joye...
I've been out more than in the last 2 days and didn't realize Dr.D. is back.
Joye, I see you were a busy girl...Great work!
I'm not sure if there is any discussion from Dr.D. beyond his short posts, but developing the information on his flyovers is one of the keys I'm hoping comes to light. My post of yesterday touched on the keys that I humbly felt would raise and sustain pps growth. The diamond recovery results from Carolyn and Oreo are 2 biggies. However confirming what Dr.D. and his friend saw interests me as well. If there are multiple rigs run by CMKX and/or the JV partners not previously known to shareholders or the market, that is news of value. More sample results over more areas increase the chances of a successful find. I do see Dr.D. confirms what I mentioned. Follow up questions should be directed to CMKX and the JV partners for confirmation or clarification of what he saw.
I just wanted to touch briefly on the dividend discussion, solely as it relates to CMKX's pps. I know some are rightfully mentioning it, but are suggesting in 2 weeks, then 1 week after that, our PPS will fly because that is their "distribution dates".
In a post I made within the last week, as well as the post yesterday, I've looked at past history at what drives our pps. If history is any guide, process of elimination led me to the factors I mentioned as catalysts for our pps rise. Respectfully, at this point I don't see dividend distribution as being included as a factor. At least how I view it, the declaration date and date of registration would have been when the market valued such events.
So, back in late July and early August, heck yea...I thought that from the announcement dates of UCAD and CIM's dividends, we would see a rise in pps because of the incredible amount of buying pressure going on during that time. In a normal world, buying pressure at the asking price should result in a higher pps. The higher pps would be justified as the time got closer to the cutoff dates, as demand for CMKX increased even more, but we saw none of that. It flies in the face of every market theory from "Random Walk" to "Beta Sensitivity" to "Efficient Market" among others, that I have studied during my life.
Fast forward now to today. The declaration dates and registration dates have come and gone. I contend that if great news on diamond recovery occurs, the pps will rise accordingly no matter if it is tomorrow, or on the date the share dividends of UCAD or CIM are payable. I don't see the dividend distribution dates as a catalyst to a pps rise simply on their merit. The buying pressure from the dividend opportunities have come and gone.
In the past, history has shown us that nothing else (dividends included) moves the share price to sustained high levels, except positive results from what CMKX is in business to do.
As with everything else buzzing around CMKX, the bottom line is... it's all about the diamonds.
Be well,
Bo
One final question, then I gtg. Do
macrodiamonds have to be present in these small test samples for it to proceed to bulk drilling?
Or, does a high concentration of microdiamonds equate to the same positive conclusion to proceed ahead?
I ask because what our test drilling is a mere fraction of the bulk sampling done by Shore Gold and Debeers/Kensington. We of course will not be reporting finds equal to theirs. However proceeding to that stage will be very encouraging and exciting. Then when we bulk sample, we'll see similar results. : ) I'm just trying to gage what our expectations should truly be in the test drillings we are currently doing.
Tks...Bo
Sounds like you know from which you speak. I'm
sure when Dr.D. returns, this will be the new "topic of the day", and a very important one.
Thanks again Drillbit,
Bo
Thanks Drillbit. Would it be your opinion
what Dr.D. and his friend saw could well be true because the logistics and cost of such rigs are not beyond our means?
I'll defer further comment until I hear from Dr.D. and the company on this, but curious if you felt it would be logistically and economically feasible for us to already have multiple rigs in place over various sites.
Thanks for your insight,
Bo
Late lunchtime thoughts...
Since we have seen that nothing else except diamond finds will move our pps, there are just 2 or 3 things I'm looking for at this point.
Carolyn Results:
Carolyn results cannot hurt us, only help us at this point. From the timetable they gave 1 month ago, the results should be in and known. It was UCAD's news about Carolyn's results a few months back that dropped the pps from .001/.0012 to the .0003/.0004 we are seeing today. After the news, the price immediately fell to .0006 by the end of the day of UCAD's news and settled to where it is today. News along the same lines (which don't meet expectations) should be but a short term drop in pps, because it is truly in the Oreo pipe where our greatest promise lies. It is the Oreo pipe that the TDEM and Airborne survey identified. Carolyn was drilled prior to the results of such testing.
If Carolyn is better than expected and warrants bulk sampling, then our days will be better from that point forward.
Oreo Results:
Does anyone know when the test results for the current efforts here are expected? I don't think any information is out on that yet, but just curious if anyone has insight on this.
A positive Carolyn result would only feed into the anticipation of the Oreo results. Good or bad with Carolyn, many including myself are awaiting results from the Oreo drill samples. : )
Many rigs?...
Prior to Dr.D. leaving for an out of country venture, he stated that during a flyover of our claims, multiple worksites and drilling rigs were spotted. I mention it only because I'm sure when he comes back and posts again, many will be on attack-mode to get more specifics from him. I'm sure he'll again confirm this. What I am truly curious about are the ANSWERS from CMKX and/or JV partners about this fact.
There are maybe 1 or 2 other things of importance, but given that diamond recovery results were the triggers of pps movement to higher levels in the past, I'm going to stay focused on the above in the near future.
Be well,
Bo
Given SGGM, then GEMM is a bargain at .04.
I with you Sir Zen...
I belted out the same numbers as possible O/S and short positions in CMKX.
There was once a saying I read that went:
Just when I thought I was going to make ends meet, someone moved the ends.
CMKX defines that saying.
Onward... : )
Bo
Still thinking here...
Climbing out of the president of SGGM's Fan Club chair for a minute, and hopping back up on the padded saddle seat on the fence to look at the goods and bads.
The Goods:
WOW. From .01 to .35+ in 1 week based on the pr! Maybe it is based on 5% ownership of CMKX and maybe it isn't, but today's rise without check or hint of MM short selling or artificial walls means something is up and right around the corner. The examples are numerous of a surprising rise in pps followed by a pr. In this case, the pr may well be from CMKX and the results from the Carolyn pipe. Further, who knows how SGGM can play a role in cash dividends. As stated before, so much market logic is being tested here, I'm ruling nothing out as such a connection is already in place. : )
The Bads:
The retired exec and very good friend I confer with from time to time on bigger board issues, touched base with me late today. We talked big board issues as usual, then he asked about CMKX, as I had mentioned it to him in the past. He admitted today's SGGM movement could be very good for us, but watch it close. His great fear is that UC's shares in CMKX may be restricted, but those of close family and friends (business or personal) are not. He cautioned that $10,000,000 from a shell like SGGM just doesn't appear out of thin air. He advised that if those family and friends of UC profited greatly from CMKX's summertime price increase, this $10,000,000 was their money (and possibly UC's through them) that was part of that profit. Part or all of the $10,000,000 is slowly filtered (invested) back in the shell creating public interest an buying pressure. Keep in mind, the $10,000,000 was their money to begin with. They paid themselves by using the shell. The shell currently still has no or very little value, but the pps is high resulting in another windfall for the friends and family of UC, and possibly UC himself, again making money on the backs of unsuspecting SGGM investors.
Ok, jumping off the fence and finding my way back to the president's chair. I respect this gentleman and totally see his viewpoint. However, they don't call it CMKXtreme for nothin'.
Very little surprises me anymore. So, with that...
G I V E M E A N SSSSSSSSS
G I V E M E A GGGGGGGGG
G I V E M E ANOTHER GGGGGGGGGG
G I V E M E A MMMMMMMMM
What's that spell??
DIVIDEND!
LOUDER!!!
D I V I D E N D
All from a brain which after following this stock is indeed popcorn right now...
Pres of SGGM Fan Club
Exactly Mach. Excellent point.
SGGM .35 @ close. 3 MM's positioned at .40...
1 MM @ .45, and 3 MM's @ .51!!
I know we can't think of it this way...or can we...that our 200 billion shares are now worth 70 billion dollars. Nice cash divy if there is some ingenious and legal way to pull it off for us.
Anymore, twists and turns have defied all logic. So even though logically I know the comment above can't be true, since when has logic meant anything recently...so here's hoping. : )
Be well,
SGGM's fan club president
May the good Lord see that maybe
our cash dividend is coming out of this.
Who really knows...but just in case....
Go SGGM Go!!! Run like wind you dirty pup!
Bo aka SGGM's fan club president. I have no clue what they have other than 5% of us, but I promise to serve honorably in my duty...
elo..you are either right on the money or
something STINKS that is really big.
SGGM has NO VALUE AND JUST PAID $10,000,000 to CMKX.
The ONLY VALUE THEY HAVE IS 5% of CMKX minus $10,000,000....
....and they are at .35 and we (THE CLAIM OWNER!) are at .0003 and .0004.
If it wasn't so hysterically funny, I might be crying right now.
But as investors...all our work, all our DD, all our support, all of our right investment decisions in investing in CMKX at low levels, dissecting every possibility of value that truly does exist with CMKX, and what do we see? A resurrected shell with and A/S higher than ours, only 5% of our value minus $10 M, and they are up about 3500% in 1 week. LMAO still.
God bless us and pass the ice.
Bo
LMAO...just signed back on. You have to be kidding me right??
SGGM's ask is at .30????
Still laughing here!!! too funny
The word for the day on CMKX has to be....
HOLD
and pass the popcorn and Captains.
Unreal..lolol Bo
GM all. I hope the weekend was a good
one for everyone, and a safe one for those in the path of the storm.
If I could humbly point out one thing that if it hasn't been clear by now, after this weekend, should be...
The rumors, the hearsay, the inaccuracy of what comes from the races far outweight what is true and factually reported. Mach's report from Seatlle and jdvm's report this weekend were both on point, and the exception rather than the rule. They are both to be commended.
Also, we have learned as in every other race, nothing that comes from the races affects the pps at all.
I tend to keep my comments only on those things that can be banked on as facts, so even though it was a fun and productive weekend here, peeking in every now and then didn't reveal anything to comment on. The stale pps today, once again is proof of all the above.
It's narrowed down our options of what we need to look at.
R. Walker gave insight on what CMKX's O/S would be when they filed for the OTCBB. I'll say again, for those expecting a pr on O/S, I contend it will most likely be found in the SEC filings at that time, not in any pr.
So, neither dividends, pre-paid cards, cash infusion, percentage ownership in other companies, race rumors, O/S insight, week long meetings, E & A involvement, paltalk, then no paltalk, theories, OTCBB, TDEM's and ariel magnetic surveys, nor mostly buys at the ask, is moving our share price.
Make no mistake, all of the above are important and have built a base, however our bottom line for pps growth is laser focused on only 2 things:
1) Diamond recovery
2) MM illegal manipulation
An MM at this weeks race (Daryl) told jdvm, "...mm's are not happy with JEFF, because he keeps the price down. Also, he said, that JEFF is a known shorter."
Be cautioned, this statement does not mean that JEFF is doing anything illegal. However, any investigation Atty Glenn is doing on illegal trading issues likely target this MM. So, it's to be seen and the result can only be to our benefit, not detriment.
Also, I note that Stockpatrol has issued its THIRD report on CMKX. Why is Mr. Bernstein so worried about us? What makes an ex-convict like Mr. Berstein so passioned as to continue to write half-truth's and inaccurate conclusions? If he is wrong, Mr. Bernstein better hope he doen't have to face Atty Glenn in a Statement Under Oath regarding charges of libel, slander or conspiracy for securties trading manipulation.
So let's be on the watch for what comes from any MM manipulation from Atty Glenn. This will move our pps.
As for the diamond recovery, it speaks for itself.
I believe we are about to hear very soon regarding this issue.
Again, this is our most key pps mover.
All else to date (mentioned earlier) has shown us clearly what we REALLY need to focus on to see positive, sustained pps growth.
Be well, Bo
Correction in my #10782 post.
The post should read:
SGGM - 950 billion Authorized Shares
CMKX - 800 billion Authorized Shares
Sorry about any confusion there.
The A/S is what I meant and just mistyped it. It doesn't change at all the point of the post because A/S is what I wanted to type in the first place. : )
Bo
Good morning dmc, see below...
I'm not assuming anything my friend. : ) Here it is:
_______________________________________________________________
CMKX -- CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) April 17, 2003
CASAVANT MINING KIMBERLITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)
Nevada 0-26919
(State or other jurisdiction (Commission (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation) File Number) Identification)
1481 W. Warm Springs Road, Suite 133, Las Vegas, Nevada 89014
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (702) 946-6747
ITEM 9. REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE
On April 15, 2003, Casavant Mining Kimberlite International, Inc. ("CMKI") entered into an agreement with
Urban Casavant, President of the Company,
whereby Mr. Casavant agreed to place his shares
of CMKI common stock in escrow for a period of three (3) years.
During the period of time in which Mr. Casavant's shares are in escrow, Mr. Casavant has agreed not to sell, pledge,
or otherwise dispose of any of the shares placed in escrow.
However, Mr. Casavant does retain all other rights afforded
to him by virtue of owning the shares, including voting
rights and rights to dividends and other distributions.
Mr. Casavant's shares are being held in escrow
by the Law Offices of Thomas C. Cook, Ltd.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
(a) Share Lockup Agreement dated April 15, 2003
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Date: April 17, 2003
Casavant Mining Kimberlite International, Inc.
By: /s/ Urban Casavant
Urban Casavant, President
Share Lockup Agreement
This Share Lockup Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into this ___ day of April, 2003 by and between Urban Casavant, an individual resident in the State of Nevada (hereinafter referred to as "Casavant"), Casavant Mining Kimberlite International,
a Nevada corporation ("CMKI"), and
Thomas C. Cook and Associates, Ltd., a Nevada professional
law corporation (hereinafter referred to as "TCC").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Casavant currently is an affiliate of CMKI, by virtue of the fact that he is currently the president of CMKI and is the holder of record of six hundred million (600,000,000) common shares of CMKI, represented by certificate number 5171 (the "Shares"); and
WHEREAS, Casavant and CMKI believe that it would be in the best interests of CMKI and its shareholders for the Shares to be held in escrow for a period of time; and
WHEREAS, Casavant and CMKI have mutually chosen to utilize TCC as the Escrow Agent.
NOW, THEREFORE, Casavant, CMKI and TCC and hereby agree as follows:
1. Escrow of Shares. Casavant shall place the Shares directly into the custody of TCC. The share certificates shall not be released from the custody of TCC until three years pass from the date of execution of this Agreement (the "Escrow Term"). During such Escrow Term, Casavant hereby agrees that he will be unable to sell, transfer, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of the Shares. During the Escrow Term, Casavant will retain all other rights afforded to him as a shareholder of CMKI, including but not limited to the receipt of dividends when declared and voting rights.
2. Break of Escrow. Upon the expiration of the Escrow Term, TCC shall, within five (5) business days from the expiration of the Escrow Term, release to Casavant the Shares.
3. TCC Not Underwriter or Broker/Dealer. It is expressly understood and agreed by the parties that TCC is acting only in the capacity of an escrow agent, and therefore shall not partake in any activity which would cause TCC to be classified as an underwriter, a broker or a dealer as defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any other relevant federal or state securities law, rule, or regulation.
4. Amendment and Modification . Subject to applicable law, this Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented only by a written agreement signed by Casavant, TCC and CRS.
5. Waiver of Compliance; Consents.
5.1 Any failure of any party to comply with any obligation, covenant, agreement or condition herein may be waived by the party entitled to the performance of such obligation, covenant or agreement or who has the benefit of such condition, but such waiver or failure to insist upon strict compliance with such obligation, covenant, or agreement or condition will not operate as a waiver of, or estoppel with respect to, any subsequent or other failure.
5.2 Whenever this Agreement requires or permits consent by or on behalf of any party hereto, such consent will be given in a manner consistent with the requirements for a waiver of compliance as set forth above.
6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between and among the parties and supersedes any prior understandings and agreements among them respecting the subject matter of this Agreement.
7. Agreement Binding. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
8. Attorneys' Fees. In the event an arbitration, suit or action is brought by any party under this Agreement to enforce any of its terms, or in any appeal therefrom, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees to be fixed by the arbitrator, trial court, and/or appellate court.
9. Computation of Time. In computing any period of time pursuant to this Agreement, the day of the act, event or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday, in which event the period shall begin to run on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday.
10. Governing Law. This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada. The parties agree that any litigation relating directly or indirectly to this Agreement must be brought before and determined by a court of competent jurisdiction within the State of Nevada.
11. Indemnification. Casavant and CMKI hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless TCC, its partners, employees, agents, representatives, assigns, and controlling persons from any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs, and expenses and any legal or other expenses in giving testimony or furnishing documents in response to a subpoena or otherwise (including, without limitation, the cost of investigating, preparing or defending any such action, suit, proceeding, or claim, whether or not in connection with any action, suit, proceeding or claim for which they are a party), as and when incurred, directly or indirectly, caused by, relating to, based upon or arising out of the services pursuant to this agreement so long as TCC has not committed intentional or willful misconduct, or shall not have acted negligent or grossly negligent, in connection with the services which form the basis of the claim for indemnification. This paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement.
12. Further Action. The parties hereto shall execute and deliver all documents, provide all information and take or forbear from all such action as may be necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of the Agreement.
13. Confidentiality. The parties shall keep this Agreement and its terms confidential, but any party may make such disclosures as it reasonably considers are required by law or necessary to obtain financing. In the event that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are not consummated for any reason whatsoever, the parties hereto agree not to disclose or use any confidential information they may have concerning the affairs of other parties, except for information which is required by law to be disclosed. Confidential information includes, but is not limited to, financial records, surveys, reports, plans, proposals, financial information, information relating to personnel contracts, stock ownership, liabilities and litigation.
14. Costs, Expenses and Legal Fees. Whether or not the transactions contemplated hereby are consummated, each party hereto shall bear its own costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees).
15. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under present or future laws effecting during the term hereof, such provision shall be fully severable and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision never comprised a part hereof; and the remaining provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by the illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision or by its severance herefrom. Furthermore, in lieu of such illegal, invalid and unenforceable provision, there shall be added automatically as part of this Agreement a provision as similar in nature in its terms to such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision as may be possible and be legal, valid and enforceable.
16. Counterparts and Facsimile Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. For purposes of this Agreement, facsimile signatures shall be treated as originals until such time that applicable pages bearing non-facsimile signatures are obtained from the relevant party or parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands this ___ day of April, 2003.
Urban Casavant, an individual Thomas C. Cook and Associates, Ltd.,
("Casavant") a Nevada professional corporation
("TCC")
By: /s/ Urban Casavant By: /s/ Thomas c. Cook
Urban Casavant Thomas C. Cook, Esq., President
Casavant Mining Kimberlite International, a
Nevada corporation ("CMKI")
By: /s/ Urban Casavant
Urban Casavant, President
sand, I agree about eagerly wanting to
know more from the meeting and testing results.
More important, I do agree with the first part of your first sentence and that serves to prove my point. I myself haven't and have never stated that I would put faith in a recently risen shell, again which only adds to my arguement. SMMG which you refer to as the shell has only 5% of the claims of CMKX, a higher A/S, 200 billion issued as restricted shares, and an O/S greater than that. Obviously over the last 2 days someone is liking SGGM based on their linkage with CMKX.
My point is if the market sees value in SMMG with only a 5% stake in CMKX, then what should CMKX itself be?
I contend the market has either way under valued CMKX's pps, or I underestimated the number of NSS on the market which has kept the price down.
Bo
SGGM now .09 - 10:17:40
Let me start discussing it further...
Right now SGGM's share price is 200 times higher than CMKX. (.08/.0004).
Let's go very conservative on the O/S for SGGM. Let's say SGGM's O/S is 210 billion. (this includes the 200 billion RS).
This leaves them a tradable float of merely 10 billion, with still a 950 billion share A/S which is known to the market.
Let's forget for 1 minute that CMKX has multiple times more intrisic value than SGGM. Let's assume they were valued equally.
Thus if their SGGM's share price is 200 times CMKX, then how does this relate to the O/S given my conservative suggestion above? 10 billion x 200= 2 trillion shares.
Does anyone in their right mind think that CMKX has a 2 trillion share float??
I don't.
Either I am underestimating the naked shorting problem here, or there is the biggest disparity in Share Pricing I have ever seen.
But reality paints an even more impressive picture because the fact is clear that CMKX has MANY TIMES MORE VALUE THAN SGGM.
To me this is interesting folks. Something is either very rotten here, or we may well be on the verge of a historic breakout. : )
I welcome anybody's thoughts.
Be well, Bo
onyx...you're going to make me say this aren't you?...
For once I agree with Sterling.
What he wrote sounds much like my posts of yesterday.
I only once speculated numbers in a valuation model a few weeks back, but it was based on much of what is known and comparisons from neighboring companies.
Here for once, he is doing the same thing for the most part, based on facts and perspective I do agree with.
I think the contrasts of SGGM and CMKX are profound given what we see in share price difference.
SGGM - 950 billion outstanding shares
CMKX - 800 billion outstanding shares
SGGM issued 200 billion restricted shares. Restricted or not, they are still part of the O/S. Being that they are only part of their O/S, we can safely say SGGM's O/S > 200 billion shares.
CMKX's O/S is unknown...HOWEVER, if you saw in my post yesterday, Urban's shares (51%) are RESTRICTED SHARES just like the 200 billion of SGGM are restricted. Urban's shares are restricted until 2006.
SGGM owns only 5% of CMKX's claims.
CMKX IS THE CLAIM OWNER, CONTROLLING the VAST MAJORITY of claims which are KNOWN to have over 100 anomalies!
SGGM's last trade at 9:46:10 - .08/share.
CMKX's last trade at 9:56:46 - .0004/share.
The contrast is profound.
Say SGGM's O/S is 400 billion (including the 200 billion RS)
Say CMKX's O/S is 400 billion (remember Joel...)
Let's quickly recall Urban's shares. Aren't they restricted as well?? You bet they are.
Thus, we can conclude that SGGM and CMKX could have roughly the same O/S and tradable float.
The contrast is profound and worthy of further discussion.
Be well, Bo
Thanks for that Drill. I wasn't sure because
I knew they were near 2 million acres this summer, but I thought Melvin recently mentioned that some smaller claims that didn't reveal anomalies were not renewed. 1.4 or 2 million works for me.
2 million acres just makes the .12 vs .0003 comparison all the more compelling.
SGGM has 950 billion A/S
CMKX has 800 billion A/S
If restricted shares are not considered at all by MM's in their pricing of a stock, then they must also then respect Urban's shares in the same way. Thus Urban may well have bought up the A/S to prevent an attempted hostile takeover. This would reflect favorably in our pps as opposed to dilution.
SGGM is evidence of this.
If MM's consider the 200 billion restricted shares in their pricing of SGGM, then there is truly something wrong with the disparity as I have said in past posts.
Below is Urban's share lockup agreement.
Bo
_______________________________________________________________
CMKX -- CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) April 17, 2003
CASAVANT MINING KIMBERLITE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)
Nevada 0-26919
(State or other jurisdiction (Commission (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation) File Number) Identification)
1481 W. Warm Springs Road, Suite 133, Las Vegas, Nevada 89014
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (702) 946-6747
ITEM 9. REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE
On April 15, 2003, Casavant Mining Kimberlite International, Inc. ("CMKI") entered into an agreement with
Urban Casavant, President of the Company,
whereby Mr. Casavant agreed to place his shares
of CMKI common stock in escrow for a period of three (3) years.
During the period of time in which Mr. Casavant's shares are in escrow, Mr. Casavant has agreed not to sell, pledge,
or otherwise dispose of any of the shares placed in escrow.
However, Mr. Casavant does retain all other rights afforded
to him by virtue of owning the shares, including voting
rights and rights to dividends and other distributions.
Mr. Casavant's shares are being held in escrow
by the Law Offices of Thomas C. Cook, Ltd.
ITEM 7. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
(a) Share Lockup Agreement dated April 15, 2003
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Date: April 17, 2003
Casavant Mining Kimberlite International, Inc.
By: /s/ Urban Casavant
Urban Casavant, President
Share Lockup Agreement
This Share Lockup Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into this ___ day of April, 2003 by and between Urban Casavant, an individual resident in the State of Nevada (hereinafter referred to as "Casavant"), Casavant Mining Kimberlite International,
a Nevada corporation ("CMKI"), and
Thomas C. Cook and Associates, Ltd., a Nevada professional
law corporation (hereinafter referred to as "TCC").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Casavant currently is an affiliate of CMKI, by virtue of the fact that he is currently the president of CMKI and is the holder of record of six hundred million (600,000,000) common shares of CMKI, represented by certificate number 5171 (the "Shares"); and
WHEREAS, Casavant and CMKI believe that it would be in the best interests of CMKI and its shareholders for the Shares to be held in escrow for a period of time; and
WHEREAS, Casavant and CMKI have mutually chosen to utilize TCC as the Escrow Agent.
NOW, THEREFORE, Casavant, CMKI and TCC and hereby agree as follows:
1. Escrow of Shares. Casavant shall place the Shares directly into the custody of TCC. The share certificates shall not be released from the custody of TCC until three years pass from the date of execution of this Agreement (the "Escrow Term"). During such Escrow Term, Casavant hereby agrees that he will be unable to sell, transfer, pledge, hypothecate or otherwise dispose of the Shares. During the Escrow Term, Casavant will retain all other rights afforded to him as a shareholder of CMKI, including but not limited to the receipt of dividends when declared and voting rights.
2. Break of Escrow. Upon the expiration of the Escrow Term, TCC shall, within five (5) business days from the expiration of the Escrow Term, release to Casavant the Shares.
3. TCC Not Underwriter or Broker/Dealer. It is expressly understood and agreed by the parties that TCC is acting only in the capacity of an escrow agent, and therefore shall not partake in any activity which would cause TCC to be classified as an underwriter, a broker or a dealer as defined under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any other relevant federal or state securities law, rule, or regulation.
4. Amendment and Modification . Subject to applicable law, this Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented only by a written agreement signed by Casavant, TCC and CRS.
5. Waiver of Compliance; Consents.
5.1 Any failure of any party to comply with any obligation, covenant, agreement or condition herein may be waived by the party entitled to the performance of such obligation, covenant or agreement or who has the benefit of such condition, but such waiver or failure to insist upon strict compliance with such obligation, covenant, or agreement or condition will not operate as a waiver of, or estoppel with respect to, any subsequent or other failure.
5.2 Whenever this Agreement requires or permits consent by or on behalf of any party hereto, such consent will be given in a manner consistent with the requirements for a waiver of compliance as set forth above.
6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between and among the parties and supersedes any prior understandings and agreements among them respecting the subject matter of this Agreement.
7. Agreement Binding. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
8. Attorneys' Fees. In the event an arbitration, suit or action is brought by any party under this Agreement to enforce any of its terms, or in any appeal therefrom, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees to be fixed by the arbitrator, trial court, and/or appellate court.
9. Computation of Time. In computing any period of time pursuant to this Agreement, the day of the act, event or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday, in which event the period shall begin to run on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday.
10. Governing Law. This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada. The parties agree that any litigation relating directly or indirectly to this Agreement must be brought before and determined by a court of competent jurisdiction within the State of Nevada.
11. Indemnification. Casavant and CMKI hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless TCC, its partners, employees, agents, representatives, assigns, and controlling persons from any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs, and expenses and any legal or other expenses in giving testimony or furnishing documents in response to a subpoena or otherwise (including, without limitation, the cost of investigating, preparing or defending any such action, suit, proceeding, or claim, whether or not in connection with any action, suit, proceeding or claim for which they are a party), as and when incurred, directly or indirectly, caused by, relating to, based upon or arising out of the services pursuant to this agreement so long as TCC has not committed intentional or willful misconduct, or shall not have acted negligent or grossly negligent, in connection with the services which form the basis of the claim for indemnification. This paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement.
12. Further Action. The parties hereto shall execute and deliver all documents, provide all information and take or forbear from all such action as may be necessary or appropriate to achieve the purposes of the Agreement.
13. Confidentiality. The parties shall keep this Agreement and its terms confidential, but any party may make such disclosures as it reasonably considers are required by law or necessary to obtain financing. In the event that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are not consummated for any reason whatsoever, the parties hereto agree not to disclose or use any confidential information they may have concerning the affairs of other parties, except for information which is required by law to be disclosed. Confidential information includes, but is not limited to, financial records, surveys, reports, plans, proposals, financial information, information relating to personnel contracts, stock ownership, liabilities and litigation.
14. Costs, Expenses and Legal Fees. Whether or not the transactions contemplated hereby are consummated, each party hereto shall bear its own costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees).
15. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable under present or future laws effecting during the term hereof, such provision shall be fully severable and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision never comprised a part hereof; and the remaining provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected by the illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision or by its severance herefrom. Furthermore, in lieu of such illegal, invalid and unenforceable provision, there shall be added automatically as part of this Agreement a provision as similar in nature in its terms to such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision as may be possible and be legal, valid and enforceable.
16. Counterparts and Facsimile Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. For purposes of this Agreement, facsimile signatures shall be treated as originals until such time that applicable pages bearing non-facsimile signatures are obtained from the relevant party or parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands this ___ day of April, 2003.
Urban Casavant, an individual Thomas C. Cook and Associates, Ltd.,
("Casavant") a Nevada professional corporation
("TCC")
By: /s/ Urban Casavant By: /s/ Thomas c. Cook
Urban Casavant Thomas C. Cook, Esq., President
Casavant Mining Kimberlite International, a
Nevada corporation ("CMKI")
By: /s/ Urban Casavant
Urban Casavant, President
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Boomage indeed! Great word to describe it. : )
Does anyone else see the disparity in what
I'm saying in my last post between the pps of SGGM and CMKX?
SGGM pays 10 million dollars PLUS 200 billion shares for owning only 5% of CMKX, and is trading over .10.
CMKX is the owner of the claims in over 1.4 million acres of land in a diamond rich region, with an A/S LEVEL LESS THAN SGGM, and we are at .0003???????
Is this how you all see this?
If so, then there must be a good end to this story and it will be soon. : )
gmann11103, excellent. This shows that a company
with an A/S of 950 billion shares can trade at .12!!!...soley for owning a SMALL part of CMKX's windfall.
At least for me, this goes directly back to the point that share structure of CMKX is something only the company knows, and will prove most interesting if our O/S is low and there is a naked short issue. This along with valuation news has great potential for us.
I mean let's look at this. SGGM is announcing a 200 billion share issuance, and they own a SMALL PERCENTAGE in CMKX, and they trade at .12!!!!??????
CMKX is the claim holder. We've got the goods. If SGGM is at .12 at a 200 billion share issuance, what should we be trading at????
This story is getting very good indeed.
Bo
Tim, I agree and now that a pattern and trend
have developed, what's it's telling me is to hold CMKX.
I've looked at the history & fundementals of the other companies. Only because of their ties with CMKX have they risen. No other factors or fundementals are impressive. In fact, UCAD's last 10Q was fugly. Obviously the market sees value in CMKX, and the pps increases in these other companies have shown this to be true. Our time will come soon.
Good test results and a good share structure is our fuel for pps growth.
There is no reason at this point to think that answers shouldn't be known soon.
Be well,
Bo
Prior to Dr.D. leaving last week, he mentioned
in one of his last posts that he and a friend charted CMKX's claims and flew over the entire area. He advised that there were 4-5 drilling rigs in operation on what he felt were our claims.
I e-mailed him, but I am assuming it got to him just after he left.
Hopefully upon his return, he can fill in more of the details about this. I've been curious, and more so now knowing the size of the current site. I always did like Oreos. : )
Also, it's race weekend so here's hoping far more insight from Urban can be given on many current issues at hand.
Keep passing the oreos and popcorn.
Bo
LoL Narvo. Doesn't that happen all the time? : )
The minute you say something, the opposite happens, or when you stay quiet, something passes you by.
I've been quiet all week about mentioning EMTK. I don't have a dime in it, but look at this weeks chart.
They seem to be a ground floor company, with great news about Microsoft linkage. Their chart this week (and I'm follow today's trades) is truly remarkable. I figured on Tuesday what goes up must come down. I felt the same thing yesteday. Today I'm just watching with amazement and glad for those that got in this one.
As for CMKX, keep that kind of popcorn coming.
8 miles by 5 miles!
Let them hit paydirt with these samples so to proceed to bulk sampling, and we'll be more than fine.
With that, I'll make the Sam's Club run for the bulk sized Pop Secret. So rest easy all, they'll be enough for everyone. : )
This is now getting interesting.
Bo
GZFX starting up. Last-.04 B/A .04/.04
I'm with you BBP, and thanks. The sting isn't
overwhelming because I was blessed to have him for 40 years, and I know I'll see him again. Some aren't fortunate to say that.
As for CMKX, Amen BBP!
The cards have been dealt and the bets are all made. I'm ready to see a winning hand. : )
Bo
Me too buddy. Hope your night is a good one as well. : )
I'm with you there Sir Mach. I had been adding early on at
.0001 and .0002. Up until last Monday, I had no intention on selling a single share.
And who knows, maybe I'll be kicking myself for doing so. I'm happy with what I have and hope it does work out for all of us.
My seat is softer on the fence with free shares and all, and maybe it makes me look with a clearer focus at both sides of this story. I don't plan to buy in or add regardless of the price at this point, but I see nothing wrong at all with holding every share to see how this plays out.
I will say this, daytraders, large investors and institutions are mostly on that same fence for now. Great valuation news, surprising low O/S news, or news of a buyout will have many big players jumping off the fence in a very big way, and upward we will go fast.
Stay well my friend, Bo
Mach, I agree with you. So much so that
the reasons you state for sitting back and watching it unfold, is a position I took last Monday (10 days) ago.
What I'm about I hope does not offend. I truly am on the fence. CMKX is either poised on providing investors with a historic windfall, or show a side all too familiar with many OTCBB's and Pinksheets.
CMKX now has a trail of unanswered questions or issues dating back to PR's beginning in January of 2003, and some would say even before that. It seems that from, and all along the path, continuing up to this date those same disconnects and mini-mysteries within comments and pr's rarely get clarification.
It's always good to read someone's insight on the whole Nevada Minerals/CMKX/CIM/UCAD/ECPN/GEMM/MOUSE (sorry it's late, j/k on the mickey thing..lol) clustered web of dealings or relationships. However every interpretation I have read has embelished on different results, different timing issues, different payment methods, different restricted periods..etc.
If the pr's are this confusing (and they are), each day and new comment of pr only adds to the trail of the same, but nothing is clarified.
I could go on, but I'm not trying to bash. I think it is important to know as shareholders what to expect with such promised dividends. I think it is important for a company who states they are retiring shares, to not be diluting to the tune of 500 billion earlier this year, then continue to state you are retiring shares, and increase your A/S to 800 billion. I have to be honest, that threat of further dilution up to this amount isn't a comforting thing. It is also 180 degrees opposite of the pr's and comment. Some say that it is still not a lie if they said one thing and did another, because that thing which they did was not mentioned in the pr. Nope it's not a lie. It is however, misleading.
Ok, I know I'm not being quiet now, and not being so good at sitting back to wait, but if you truly take about an hour of your time like I did tonight and read each pr and make notes, the disconnects and mini-mysteries do stand out. Imagine being a CMKX shareholder last year and promised a dividend of CIM. I repeat, last year!
Nothing shows in your account of any value through now, and you find out recently that 40 billion shares in THIS CIM dividend are what is being promised yet again.
So, let me get this straight and please correct me if I'm wrong..if 40 billion is just the dividend portion we will have, what in God's name is to be the A/S and O/S figures for CIM? 40b? 50? 100b? more!? Further, the OTCBB figures many have debated are in my opinion based on CMKX's A/S. So which A/S is correct...~780 billion? or 1.4 Trillion based on the CIM/CMKX dividend ratio?
Better yet than hearing one more shareholder theory...since we are shareholders of CMKX, CMKX NEEDS TO EXPLAIN AND CLARIFY what is occurring here and what to expect.
Good grief...I never planned on typing on and on here. And I I simply wanted to say, bottom line...I know everything is on CMKX's timeline if we are to believe something very good is about to happen. However, looking back from January 2003, there are more unanswered question than answered. I honestly hope clarification is soon. They certainly have enough of our money lining their pockets. Simple answers to basic fundementals, and clarification about many pr's isn't a lot to ask in return.
It's more comforting sitting in a free share position. But I feel for the people who bought in at .0012, .0011, .001, .0009, .0008, .0007, .0006, .0005, .0004 and even at .0003. Selling at .0002 is the only way 98% of investors who sell are going to be able to do so.
Again, those like me who remember IBZT, many got hurt by trusting in what seemed to be a sure thing. For the first 3 months of this year, IBZT was the play of the year, and maybe the lifetime. Today it trade at 95% lower than it's high levels, just over 1/2 cent.
I'm going to wait it out like all of us. I hold close to the reports you made of the man you met at the races and the confidences you shares with him, and him telling you to hold your shares. My prayers petition this be so, and are what keep me here, still long with what I am holding.
You may remember me mentioning the 2nd year anniversary of my dad's accident a couple weeks back. Well this Saturday, 2 years ago at 9:10pm was when he died. I thought he was going to make it. He was beginning to recover when the surprise came. Like many, there are many loving and good reasons I would give to my family and others. I want so badly to be able to devote 100% of my time living in his honor and memory. Business is just ok here and times are tough being a single dad. I know many could use the same break to make a better life for their family and others.
So if he told you to hold, but was misleading you knowing there was nothing of value to report, but simply so he can dilute at higher supported prices for his profit, then our reaction as shareholders should be firm and swift.
Stepping off the soapbox. I'll sit quietly and wait now. I do hope we have a chance to all meet and celebrate the good fortune that came our way as a result of what he said and assured to you.
Be well all, Bo