InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 45574
Next 10
Followers 0
Posts 1071
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/24/2004

Re: sandgoat post# 10793

Friday, 09/03/2004 10:37:28 AM

Friday, September 03, 2004 10:37:28 AM

Post# of 45574
sand, I agree about eagerly wanting to
know more from the meeting and testing results.

More important, I do agree with the first part of your first sentence and that serves to prove my point. I myself haven't and have never stated that I would put faith in a recently risen shell, again which only adds to my arguement. SMMG which you refer to as the shell has only 5% of the claims of CMKX, a higher A/S, 200 billion issued as restricted shares, and an O/S greater than that. Obviously over the last 2 days someone is liking SGGM based on their linkage with CMKX.

My point is if the market sees value in SMMG with only a 5% stake in CMKX, then what should CMKX itself be?
I contend the market has either way under valued CMKX's pps, or I underestimated the number of NSS on the market which has kept the price down.

Bo


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.