who the hell falls for that crap???

we used to see Lee Majors from time to time :)

Nice!! I grew up in Cocoa Beach in the 70's :)

I HAVE had them deleted, and I'm not happy about it.

just watched 'Step Into Liquid' and 'Riding Giants' the other night :))))

I think that's one of the shots of Laird at Cortez tho..insaneeeeeee.

is that photo of Laird at Cortez Banks??

beats me.I put this into the 'another scammer took my money' pile.

you should check out here resume. I can deal with it. I love her. Pretty tired of overly sweet Paula.

thanks for the info!

good to hear.. I can't wait for the day when Peter and Anna can publically talk to shareholders again.

imvho..we had a winner, and a lot of investors that were willing to hang in as things development...but LACK OF COMMUNICATION and lack of financial disclosure has killed it.

absolutely valid points. The paper trail is painfully obvious. I suppose all it would take is a very sympathetic judge, and one that UNDERSTANDS all the laws that have been broken here.

but...most of the time my faith in the justice system...well..you know...GVRP...QBID..RMOO...the list goes on and on.

I have NO doubt that no matter what the outcome, the dirt on the system will be exposed..and that is indeed a good thing!!

and, yes..the Catch 22 is painfully obvious. And, yes, I think SOME kind of 'settlement' will be the final outcome. Last trade value? maybe. Refund of orginal purchase? maybe. Refund and 4 years of interest? Maybe? Full blown buy in? I just don't see it.

The fat lady hasn't sung yet...but I think she's been dipping into the propofol...

that's what I've said all along. The brokers will simply refund all $'s based on the trade transaction of record, and close the door on it.

try calling him.

yup. long gone now. I'll just stick this in the 'could have been' folder for now. If it comes back, fine. If not, I'll close it out if I need the tax offset.

MRDAF 0.11 -87.24%

grrrr

ugh. I'm officialy down 85%.

I got nuthin else...just my lack of faith in politicians :)

stranger things have happened in politics ;)

which is a politicians polite way of saying 'I don't have time to screw with this. Go away".

changes are irrelevant. the fact THEY ARE FILED is all that counts. Doesn't matter if it's a bunch of zeros. IT'S FILED.

of course they are. ALL them more reason for BCIT to NOT miss a filing.

Megas must bring filings up to date EVERY SINGLE TIME..that's the only way he has any ground to stand on. If he's not going to communicate to shareholders, and rely on the grassroots internet to do the work, then he MUST have NO holes the DTCC, etc can point at. Every filing MUST be complete, all i's dotted and t's crossed. no excuse.

as long as Megas (and others who want justice) can ALWAYS point to BCIT and say 'we've done everything that was asked and we're fully compliant', that only makes the case stronger.

I'm all for 'reasonable things'.

so...does this constitute a legally binding settlement offer to the DTCC? Seems like there are an awful lot of people that post here that would NOT like to settle for .15 a share...of course..the 'some amount to be determined in damages' is open to a lot of interpretation :)) (and..for the record..I don't have enough shares that it makes any difference to me).


We call on these organizations do what is required of them by current statute:

* Since there are no remaining “fraudulent shares” after the “Pino Lawsuit” settlement agreement, for the DTCC to lift the “Global Lock” and resume settlement and clearing services for Energy Source, Inc. (f/k/a Bancorp International Group, Inc. – BCIT.OB)
* And, for the DTCC and brokers abide by REG SHO Rule 203(b)(3) and either facilitate the delivery of physical stock certificates to all shareholders desiring such as required by Uniform Commercial Code § 8-508 or ensure current shareholder positions are backed up by good shares purchased through the open markets.
* Or, for brokers to compensate shareholders with a settlement of 15 cents per share which is the price of the last legitimate trade on the open market, plus some amount to be determined in damages for the opportunity cost of this settlement amount being locked up for four years.

-

yes...In full context...but, it's not written clearly enough.

it should have said something like:

"The alledged counterfiters/company hijackers/POSING TO BE officers of BCIT, as well as Stock Brokers and MM's, went on and sold millions of shares in the fraudulant company stock, for a number of weeks AFTER THE REAL CEO of BCIT notified them of the fraudulent shares."

I would have thought that would be a little more to the point.

either way. we still wait.

ya know..I JUST finally read the Grassley letter really thoroughly...
(work and all that).

WHY..does it say this:?

The complaints go on to allege that BCIT then went on and sold millions of shares in fraudulent company stock.

isn't the whole point that BCIT did NOT sell the shares, but brokers and MM, etc. sold naked short??

Yes..I know it's referring to the sentence before....just wondering if it could have been worded differently..

oh well.. It's late, and I'm being picky :)

not quite there on BING yet...but close..

http://www.bing.com/search?q=montal+dtcc&form=OSDSRC


(I love BING)..

of course not. And the attornies in my family saw it for exactly what it was (or tried to be).

and I still stand my statement of having an attorney on my side if I get sued.

and now..back to our regularly scheduled BCIT madness.

not sure why that was directed at me..but..I agree with ya ;) It's just $.

and that's what makes America great :)

yup :(

thanks. maybe I'll read it later.


or not.


:)

hmm..can't get to the link...can you cut and paste the cliff notes?

:)

good times. good times.

:)

LOLOL :) ahhh..the good old days.

that's where you (and many others are SOOO wrong). Having enough family in the legal feild, it's just plain foolish to represent yourself if YOU are on the recieveing end of a lawsuit. Common sense...even if you were not (and we weren't) guilty of doing anything more than buying stock from our brokers. It's still a lawsuit.

yeah...and, honestly...ya never hear any PR's, or news media, or anything aboutit. It's just there.