Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Absolutely! She's got to be reading all posts here and understands full well what true 'non-sense' is all about!
Giving up the company ATM has got to be gut-wrenching. Hence the full court press.
Hate to beat a dead horse (oh, maybe I do) BUT had they "done it all" when SEC mandated to do so, this would all be moot. FACT.
All agreed to. BUT, all of that is supposed to magically change once revocation is no longer the threat.
All tongue-in-cheek. Not making any dough but lots to laugh at with our little company. I say we petition Linda to hold another Conference Call. Just like in the good old days.
The company has been equally delinquent in the release of information. Perhaps they're in cahoots with the SEC to fold the circus tent and go private? Now THERE'S a conspiracy theory!
Abject bullshit another possibility.
Love it! Another dreaded 'Conspiracy Theory' has reared its ugly head on dbmm. Doesn't get any better than this!
One way to look at the situation at hand is this; IF our band of gypsies played by all the rules and produced all that they were supposed to prior to the SEC stepping in, the PPS would be mired down here anyway predicated upon their dismal numbers. Of course, they might have tried another R/S but the end result would, IMO, be not much different than now. BUT, there IS a shot that the judge will sign them out of their self-imposed purgatory thereby creating an immediate flurry of activity and undoubtedly jacking up the PPS. Money could be made by all as the new troupe of bagholders move in only to have that PPS tank one more time due to lousy numbers.
Oh, the irony.
All IMO, of course.
Well ... so much for the Halloween surprise.
Maybe the company lawyer (Maranda) could read the judge her rights.
Quote: I think people got suckered into selling by these RED painters of 400 share trades
Yeah. That must've been it.
Shorts? Just another dbmm conspiracy theory.
LOL -- Something new, perhaps? That's some 14th century stuff right there. ROFLMAO!
What, pray tell, is happening in the background? Just facts, please. No rope-a-dope.
Thank you for that.
Ummmmm ... the 'shorts' argument is blullshit. IMO, of course.
Positive posts haven't done a helluva lot either. N'est pas? Just sayin'.
LOL
Further, the query was directed to another member. Thanx anyway.
Your proclaiming something to be "non-sense" doesn't make it magically so.
Can it be postponed indefinitely?
Yup. Heard it over 1000 times.
Don't see why not. That seems to be the case thus far.
Thanx. Cannot ask for anything more.
Oh, the potential is here, all right. It'll be a flip of the coin as to the judge's decision. Unless, of course, she chooses to let it dangle, rot on the vine and just blow away. What's missing on the other board is the financials, as you know. The financials here have been produced at the point of the SEC's gun but are anything but stellar.
OT -- The Pennsy is my favorite RR. lol
Yes, you're right, the point is MOOT. No need to wait.
Because you said it many multiples of times. Why?
LOL -- I have NEVER, not once, stated unequivocally that this would not rise from the ashes. See? That's the difference. A heap of impressive DD pointing proudly to the company's accomplishments means jack shit until the judge says it does.
Yes, you certainly did say the same thing multiple time. Saying it did nothing. This could also be the end!
IMO, of course.
ROFLMAO -- Your saying so doesn't make it happen. If it did, we'd all be rich.
See below -- read.
For the thousandth and one time -- prove that it's going to take place.
So why is it still used as a bellwether here?
Not only is stating, point-blank, that it "can't go down" incorrect but certainly non-factual as well. But, of course, we've been over this 1000 times to no avail.
True to form. Totally expected.
If memory serves, Steve Baughman was unaware of his lofty appointment until someone from this board contacted him on the matter. It appeared as if SB was being used as an entree into the music world which included his close association with rapper '50 Cent'.
Hardly conceivable that the issue was discussed "more than 1,000 times on this (or any other) board".
The company's former name was RTGV (RTG Ventures) and it does go back over a decade. Then came the name change and two reverse splits totaling 100,000/1. Lots and lots of LMMFAO's over the years and not a single dollar in profits.