Shutting down.....
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Is a post off topic, if the poster uses abbreviations for phrases, such as "icw"?
Or am I supposed to learn every shortcut known to man?
What if this part of your cut/paste of cotton's post, matters?
Continue into May 2021, since this order is in limbo (not filed), we are looking for a positive clue as to the status of our CT's fate (over 60 days in limbo):
A REPOST OF COTTON’S POST
YOU SAID YOU WILL SELL.
SELL NOW!!
Continue into May 2021, since this order is in limbo (not filed), we are looking for a positive clue as to the status of our CT's fate (over 60 days in limbo):
$$$$$
"WEIL:\97841486\4\58399.0011\73217.0004
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------------x
:
In re : Chapter 11 Case No.
:
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al. : 08-13555 (SCC)
:
Debtors. : (Jointly Administered)
:
--------------------------------------------------------------------x
ORDER DENYING (I) MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF NO. 60984);
(II) MOTION TO JOIN REX WU PURSUANT TO RULE 19(A) (ECF NO. 61003);
AND (III) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT (ECF NO. 61013)
The Court having considered the following motions filed by Christopher P. Wossilek and
Phillip Wossilek (the “Wossileks”): (i) Motion to Compel Filing of the Important Covenants of
LBH Annual Certificates (ECF No. 60984, as amended at ECF No. 60986, the “Motion to
Compel”), (ii) Memorandum of Law in Support of Rex Wu to Join Their Motion Under Rule
19(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures (ECF No. 61003, the “19(a)
Motion”), (iii) Motion for Summary Judgment for the Motion to Compel Filing of the Important
Covenants of LBH Annual Certificates (ECF No. 61013, the “Motion for Summary Judgment,”
and together with the Motion to Compel and 19(a) Motion, the “Motions”); and the Court having
considered the timely objections by the Plan Administrator to the Motion to Compel, the 19(a)
Motion, and the Motion for Summary Judgement; and the Court having considered all of the
joinders and statements filed in connection with the Motions (collectively, the “Joinders”)
[ECF Nos. 60874, 60887, 60976, 60988, 60992, 60993, 60994, 60995, 61005, 61006, 61009,
61012, 61061, and 61062]; and the Court having considered the prior proceedings in these
chapter 11 cases, and the Court having jurisdiction to decide the Motions and the relief requested
therein in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a)-(b) and 1334 and the Amended Standing Order of
08-13555-scc Doc 61063 Filed 03/05/21 Entered 03/05/21 12:50:13 Main Document
Pg 10 of 11"
When searching the document below, using "redemption price", I do like what I see, for instance:
The redemption price for the subordinated debentures is 100% of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest Page S-8
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1083328/000104746903033240/a2119989z424b2.htm
But, referring to the prospectus for LEHLQ,
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1083328/000104746903033240/a2119989z424b2.htm
the phrase "accelerated redemption" is not in that document.
Do you have a link to the Press Release that says the CA was filed with FINRA on 3/30/2021?
I don't see anything here about anything happening on or about, March 30, 2021:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CLHI/news
What difference does it make that a poster or a mod has a negative opinion of the stock?
Most deleted posts offer a poster way to protest the deletion. What happens when you protest the deletion, here?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/myremovedposts.aspx
I sure would like someone, with power make changes, to look at this post:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=163219696
Sigh, and no I don't have asthma.
Is there a graph/chart/list available to us common folk, that shows the number of posts per day, for a stock specific board? Covering a span of a year would be nice.
Seems like withholding the transcript, is the usual way the transcriber gets to sell copies of the transcript, without competition. Hopefully someone will file a motion that includes the transcript. That's how I get most of the transcripts that I have stashed away.
All I know is that there is no mention of US Bank, on this page:
https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/mx8lmbli/colorado-bankruptcy-court/united-western-bancorp-inc/
Has anyone ever seen a web site correct an error, this fast?
Mr. sidedraft,
It looks like that’s probably an error on our part. We’ve adjusted the database accordingly. Thanks for letting us know.
Aaron
https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/mx8lmbli/colorado-bankruptcy-court/united-western-bancorp-inc/
I sent a query to Plainsite, about this entry:
https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/mx8lmbli/colorado-bankruptcy-court/united-western-bancorp-inc/
Is there a way that I can change the order in which columns appear?
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/mr-cooper-COOP/trades
For my purposes, the column titled Exch. needs to go away, and be replaced by Time.
View the entire letter here(Document #7):
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17319334/in-re-lehman-brothers-holdings-inc/
Brought to everyone for free, by PACER users, that use the RECAP browser add-on.
Do you have a link for that transcript?
Your link is not properly formed, I get:
Page not found
That black dude is what happens when one gets put in a trance with BLM megaphones blasting your eardrums with gas lighting chants.
The female, on the other hand, obviously has a bunch of functioning synapses. All she had to do was say that he was wrong, and define racism. He then sat there like a kid with a skull full of mush, looking around for some talking points to parrot.
There is something magical about the word no, it hasn't been used nearly enough.
http://www.stationgossip.com/2021/04/the-leftistwoke-are-new-racist-but-they.html
I just discovered a new fool of the day, Devan Cole.
CNN reporter claims impossible to know baby’s gender at birth
https://www.oann.com/cnn-reporter-claims-impossible-to-know-babys-gender-at-birth/
Here is a tip from someone that never interned at the BBC:
1. Stand to the side of the baby
2. Place baby on his/her back
3. Remove diaper
4. Move his/her knees 6" apart
4. Take a look
There are massive human rights violations going on, on the southern border, at the command of Joe Biden.
Well, it's obvious that it is way past time for the UN to assert it's almighty powers, and swoop down on Biden with jets firing missiles, flame throwers, and whatever else the UN might have available.
What price do you use as PAR value?
.... do you think the Preferred will go back to Par value ....
I wonder if the real reason for the delay in the CA(that's corporate, action for you non-CLHI folks), is that FINRA has more questions than young Robert has answers.
Also real companies don't have to write books about corporate actions, just tell the lawyer what is wanted, things get filed, and FINRA puts the impending action on their DAILY LIST page.
Notice the word missing from this link:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/shocking-video-shows-alleged-murder-of-uber-eats-driver-during-washington-d-c-carjacking/ar-BB1f2gN3?ocid=msedgntp
The missing word is BLACK, it's in here:
The girls, both black, are only 13 and 15 years old.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/horror-caught-video-13-15-year-old-girls-murder-driver-dc-walk-past-body-look-cellphone/
How many times have you looked at a stock, and thought that it was too good to be true? Some times however, it turns out to be pure gold.
On the other-hand, what I see here seems to be too shitty to be a real company. Too shitty is hard to overcome.
If you scroll all of the way down, there is this little message:
Trade definitions are based on the mid-price and are indicative only
Which means, calling a trade a buy or a sell, based on iHub's BUY IND. color bar, is sometimes a mistake.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/NASDAQ/mr-cooper-COOP/trades
Because FINRA has rule 6490, corporate approval of a split doesn't mean squadouche.
I wonder how long an IN-DEPTH review can take?
Recently, through its power under Rule 6490, as more fully explained below, FINRA has, with the support of the SEC, expanded its impact on the small-cap marketplace by conducting in-depth reviews of issuers in conjunction with the processing of corporate actions, and denying such corporate action requests in record numbers.
https://lawcast.com/2015/03/10/sec-supports-finras-rule-6490-authority-corporate-actions/
This part doesn't make sense:
.... the issuance of 100,000,000 post-split common shares on a million-to-one basis ....
I can assume that Robert Stephenson will receive 100,000,000 common shares, but why include this part, "on a million-to-one basis"?
Is whoever wrote your quote, telling the world that Stephenson only has 100 common shares pre-split?
Document 349 and the Exhibit are available below:
Document 349.0
Document 349.1 Exhibit
I just now got Doc 349 from PACER, and because I use the RECAP addon, that document is now available, for free, here:
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4274605/worlds-inc-v-activision-blizzard-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
Just to be sure, take a few minutes to wander around their web site:
http://www.globalpoletrusiongroup.com
This stock is toast.
What office does "Tommy" hold?
Is there a list somewhere, that shows the total cost in USD, Euro, or some other currency, for all acquisitions so far?
Or, was something else traded for all these acquisitions?
Acquisitions have a cost, what is it?
REM state.
United Western Bancorp authorized some preferreds, but never issued any.
======================================================
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
- -
no shares outstanding
Common stock, par value $0.0001; 50,000,000 shares authorized;
29,376,858 shares at June 30, 2010 and
29,345,522 shares at December 31, 2009 outstanding, respectively
======================================================
Look on page numbered 3, near the bottom:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/944725/000094472510000019/form10q.htm
Is "par" the same number as "liquidation preference", for preferreds?
What is "these"?
Side, so where do you believe these are coming from?
United Western Bancorp did not have preferred shares, only commons.
I see this:
here:
https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/mx8lmbli/colorado-bankruptcy-court/united-western-bancorp-inc/
But my questions are, who is doing the official listing, and where is the evidence of such a listing located.
I've not seen anything that says that United Western Bancorp, a Colorado corp., is now/actually US Bancorp, a Delaware corporation.