Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
LMAO! Yep somebody bought! Another desperate Treaty attempt to make the price go up! Unfortunately there are lots that think it's still over valued and were happy to get .0001 thus foiling the attempt once again.
The real question is how would anyone but the buyer know it was an incomplete buy order and the buyer failed to enter an AON? It's obvious somebody sold at .0001 again.
Wonder if Treaty knows how bad their trained monkeys make them look?
Case 2:15-cv-02451-CJB-JVM Document 189-1
Plaintiff produced its entire investigative file on April 21, 2015, which consisted primarily ofthe
Defendants' own records. Since Klein's clients produced no documents (except a few by
Blackburn) and instead dumped them at WarRoom (a third party document imaging vendor),
Plaintiff subpoenaed those documents, and all parties received the same 313,000 documents at
the time Plaintiffreceived them, which was September 14, 2016. The documents Plaintiff
intends to use at trial from the WarRoom production were identified on Plaintiffs trial exhibit
list in early February.
So why does Treaty think lying about everything is going to help them? That's a huge flashing neon sign of pure desperation! And what's all that lying doing for the stock???
Down 75% to .0001 on almost double the volume.
Historical TECO Price Data
1 Week 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0 100k 25k 0 -
1 Month 0.0005 0.0005 0.000001 0.0000 0 274k 23k -0.0004 -80.00%
3 Months 0.0009 0.0009 0.000001 0.0000 0 2M 71k -0.0008 -88.89%
Everybody knows Treaty has nothing! Turdski even admitted to it!
Case 2:15-cv-02451-CJB-JVM Document 182
Turdski admits Max got his rig back.
22 Of course, I did not know at the time, but there
23 was a drilling rig in Belize that apparently was under
24 some sort of nebulous dispute with a gentleman by the
25 name of Max Maxie. And Max Maxie was very vocal on the
1 Internet about getting his rig back.
2 It's our understanding that he somehow managed to
3 get that back from Belize, don't actually to this day
4 know how he did it, but that's what we understand to be
5 the case.
In fact Turdski admits No Assets.
22 What we did not know, or I certainly did not know
23 at the time, was that the physical assets of the
24 company, the drilling rigs and the wireline equipment
25 and all of that, was held on a lien by Hackmeyer Group
1 out of Florida and out of here in Texas. That was
2 completely unknown to me.
3 Q. Let me stop you there. Who is the Hackmeyer
4 Group?
5 A. They're a group of individuals who put in money
6 into Treaty.
7 Q. And they have a lien on all of Treaty's physical
8 assets?
9 A. All of Treaty's physical assets. We did not know
10 that until we took the trip to Belize.
JUST MORE PROOF OF THE TREATY CLOWN GAMES!
Maybe the Rockettes should try a new song and dance routine. The stupidity is only driving potential shareholders away!
LMAO! Thanks for confirming Treaty is toast!
Serioulsy. People should now believe TECO mainuplates IHUBS Community Sentiment Chart???
Check out the Community Sentiment Chart today. It's pegged out.
TECO is BULLISH and ready to get our Belize rig drilling.
LMAO! Accurate as of today! Perhaps someone should talk to Treaty about the time of month they try the ole "Bullish Community Sentiment Scam". They wouldn't want to be caught up in another fraud case would they?
LMAO! Yeah it's pegged out alright!
Search
TECO
Price$.00Change.00Chg %-50.00%
Predictions All-time: 2,604 Total Predictions in last 90 Days: 6
Price Chart for TECO
MarAprMay0.00000.00020.00040.00060.0008
Community:
0% Voted Up
100% Voted Down
55%
Accuracy
Sentiment Meter: Help Bearish
TECO
Looks like somebody got caught in a lie again!
Treaty Energy Corporation (TECO) had an unusual volume change in their trades. 6 days ago
Down 75% to .0001 on almost double the volume.
Historical TECO Price Data
1 Week 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0 100k 25k 0 -
1 Month 0.0005 0.0005 0.000001 0.0000 0 274k 23k -0.0004 -80.00%
3 Months 0.0009 0.0009 0.000001 0.0000 0 2M 71k -0.0008 -88.89%
JUST MORE PROOF OF THE TREATY CLOWN GAMES!
It's right in the post in big bold letters! Very easy to find.
lol! Treaty can't even afford to put out a free 8k. So obviously they can't hire good propagandists.
Yep. Nothing but an effort to unload the shares on unsuspecting investors! If Treaty were really trying to be legit, 8ks would have been filed. They are free. There would have been an election of the officers, and all supposed actions would be openly available to the public like every other legit company. Instead they continue to use the same old tactics with claims by only the same "select few" with absolutely no proof. Sadly Treaty can only offer lies, fake claims of drilling rigs, bogus Canadian deal, and personal attacks because Treaty has NOTHING. The REAL TRUTH can be read verbatim on PACER.gov in the following case and document. Indisputable testimony given under oath by the Treaty conspirators.
Case 2:15-cv-02451-CJB-JVM Document 182
Turdski admits Max got his rig back.
22 Of course, I did not know at the time, but there
23 was a drilling rig in Belize that apparently was under
24 some sort of nebulous dispute with a gentleman by the
25 name of Max Maxie. And Max Maxie was very vocal on the
1 Internet about getting his rig back.
2 It's our understanding that he somehow managed to
3 get that back from Belize, don't actually to this day
4 know how he did it, but that's what we understand to be
5 the case.
Turdski admits No Assets.
22 What we did not know, or I certainly did not know
23 at the time, was that the physical assets of the
24 company, the drilling rigs and the wireline equipment
25 and all of that, was held on a lien by Hackmeyer Group
1 out of Florida and out of here in Texas. That was
2 completely unknown to me.
3 Q. Let me stop you there. Who is the Hackmeyer
4 Group?
5 A. They're a group of individuals who put in money
6 into Treaty.
7 Q. And they have a lien on all of Treaty's physical
8 assets?
9 A. All of Treaty's physical assets. We did not know
10 that until we took the trip to Belize.
Turdski admits the fake Canadian deal.
Quote:
_______The Big Daddy lie_________________________________
Yes, the 20% assignment on the Canadian deal was verified by several of us by more than one source. Treaty is in business! Our BOD and large investors did a great job putting this all together.
________________________________________
Contrary to this claim which no evidence has ever been posted to prove.
2 Q. Is Treaty currently running a business? Is it
3 operating?
4 A. Treaty is an operating company certainly from a
5 legal perspective. From an actual operating
6 perspective, it's not.
15 Q. But it doesn't have any revenues currently?
16 A. It does not.
1 It has no producing revenue currently at all.
Just another lie from Treaty!
Bullshine Selling into the run up?
Q. Mr. Mulshine, you also sold some of your own
15 Treaty shares during this time period in January of 2012
16 during the lead-up to the announcement of the claimed
17 oil strike in Belize; is that correct?
18 A. I don't remember. I sold very, very small
19 percentage of my stock literally to survive. I had to
20 eat.
Main Consultants that were working for Treaty headquarters.
23 Q. I'm handing you now a document that has been
24 marked as Exhibit 72.
25 Exhibit 72 is an e-mail from you to Frank Itak
1 and Ray Amanollahi dated January 29th, 2012, with the
2 subject line, TECO revision one of news release. Do you
3 recognize Exhibit 72?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Is this an e-mail that you sent?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Who are Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi?
8 A. Amanollahi. They are two consultants that were
9 working for Treaty headquarters.
10 Q. What were these gentlemen doing for Treaty?
11 A. They were doing investor communications through
12 social media.
13 Q. So on Sunday, January 29th, 2012, which was the
14 day before Treaty made the public announcement of its
15 claimed oil strike in Belize, you sent a draft of that
16 release to Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi?
17 A. Right.
18 Q. Why were you sending a draft of the press release
19 to these two individuals?
20 A. They were working for the headquarters, for
21 Andrew Reid, and they're responsible for social media
22 communication with shareholders.
23 And they were -- and I was asked to get
24 information to them so that they could handle
25 shareholder inquiries and shareholder information
1 through their social media after the news release went
2 out so they had to be informed as to what we were
3 talking about.
4 Q. So you wanted them to be prepared to push the
5 news out on social media that Treaty was planning to
6 announce on Monday morning?
7 A. They were being prepared so that when the news
8 release went out Monday, and I didn't want them to do
9 it.
10 Headquarters had them under agreements to do
11 social media communication of investor information, and
12 they would never put anything out until after it was
13 already public information by news release. So they had
14 to be informed.
15 Q. You wrote that you wanted to be sure that the
16 release had major impact. Do you see that?
17 A. Yeah.
18 Q. Why did you want the release to have major
19 impact?
22 A. It's totally arbitrary. I was a shareholder,
23 too, and the shares were at one-tenth the price of what
24 I got in at.
1 in deep, deep doo-doo at the time.
2 And we wanted to see the company -- everybody
3 believed we had an incredibly positive release coming
4 out. And everybody prayed to God it would affect the
5 stock in a positive way because everybody had lost a lot
6 of money at that point.
7 Q. You wanted the press release on the claimed oil
8 strike in Belize to have a major impact because you
9 wanted to be able to make money on the shares that you
10 were holding?
11 A. No.
21 Q. Right. So you were never able to sell your
22 stake, the shares that you had, because the stock price
23 never went up and staid up at a level that would enable
24 you to cash out basically.
25 A. No, that's not the -- I expected Treaty Energy to
1 be a very successful oil and gas company.
2 Q. And you would sell your shares and make money?
3 A. I would keep them as long-term investments in my
4 retirement account. I would sell some when I needed it
5 to pay the mortgage, yes.
Investors hear it loud and clear. I'm not buying it. Neither are shareholders and investors
Obviously what is posted is different.
The link and court document has been posted many times. Anybody that can read and comprehend can get a copy to see for themselves:
Case 2:15-cv-02451-CJB-JVM Document 182
We'll leave the fake posts, added script, and altered documents to the Treaty crew. Those are also available in the court record ;)
Almost forgot about the "undisputed facts".
From Treaty's CEO: Under Oath!
22 Of course, I did not know at the time, but there
23 was a drilling rig in Belize that apparently was under
24 some sort of nebulous dispute with a gentleman by the
25 name of Max Maxie. And Max Maxie was very vocal on the
1 Internet about getting his rig back.
2 It's our understanding that he somehow managed to
3 get that back from Belize, don't actually to this day
4 know how he did it, but that's what we understand to be
5 the case.
22 What we did not know, or I certainly did not know
23 at the time, was that the physical assets of the
24 company, the drilling rigs and the wireline equipment
25 and all of that, was held on a lien by Hackmeyer Group
Page 62
1 out of Florida and out of here in Texas. That was
2 completely unknown to me.
3 Q. Let me stop you there. Who is the Hackmeyer
4 Group?
5 A. They're a group of individuals who put in money
6 into Treaty.
7 Q. And they have a lien on all of Treaty's physical
8 assets?
9 A. All of Treaty's physical assets. We did not know
10 that until we took the trip to Belize.
2 Q. Is Treaty currently running a business? Is it
3 operating?
4 A. Treaty is an operating company certainly from a
5 legal perspective. From an actual operating
6 perspective, it's not.
15 Q. But it doesn't have any revenues currently?
16 A. It does not.
1 But it has no producing revenue currently at all.
And here it is for all to see:
Contrary to fictitious clown stories claiming "Without admitting or denying the allegations" in paragraph 2 which only applies to "Defendant Treaty regarding the Commission’s non-monetary claims."
2. The Commission has reached an agreement with Defendant Treaty regarding the Commission’s non-monetary claims. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission’s Complaint, Defendant has consented to the entry of a judgment permanently enjoining it from future violations of the federal securities laws. The determination of the appropriate amount of monetary relief has been deferred pending motion by the Commission.
The allegations of the Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In connection with the Commission’s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from appropriate non-parties.
11. Consistent with 17 C.F.R. 202.5(f), this Consent resolves only the non-monetary claims asserted against Defendant in this civil proceeding.
Defendant acknowledges that no promise or representation has been made by the Commission or any member, officer, employee, agent, or representative of the Commission with regard to any criminal liability that may have arisen or may arise from the facts underlying this action or immunity from any such criminal liability. Defendant waives any claim of Double Jeopardy based upon the settlement of this proceeding, including the imposition of any remedy or civil penalty herein. Defendant further acknowledges that the Court's entry of a permanent injunction may have collateral consequences under federal or state law and the rules and regulations of self-regulatory organizations, licensing boards, and other regulatory organizations. Such collateral consequences include, but are not limited to, a statutory disqualification with respect to membership or participation in, or association with a member of, a self-regulatory organization. This statutory disqualification has consequences that are separate from any sanction imposed in an administrative proceeding. In addition, in any disciplinary proceeding before the Commission based on the entry of the injunction in this action, Defendant understands that it shall not be permitted to contest the factual allegations of the complaint in this action.
That's one of the cases where Treaty and the gang of cons tried to suppress peoples freedom of speech rights for exposing their scam which Treaty lost.
LMAO! Bullish! LMAO! Down 75% to .0001 on almost double the volume!
Gotta be those mysterious NSSers cause no shareholder would sell that low.
OOOPPPSSS!
Still $2 higher than what it's worth.
NSS abettors will twist the truth to fit their agenda that Treaty Energy has no naked shorts
•The fraudsters start the next round of “pumping” the stock—sometimes even with made-up press releases or expert statements—and point to the rising price as evidence of its performance, which falsely inflates the price even more.
•The fraudsters keep it up until eventually “dumping” their shares for a huge profit and leaving investors scrambling to get rid of worthless stock as the price plummets. Fraudsters often claim the stock is under attack to encourage investors to hold positions by implying hedge fund control, naked short selling, or other conspiracy theories to mask the shares being dumped.
Contrary to fictitious clown stories claiming "Without admitting or denying the allegations" in paragraph 2 which only applies to "Defendant Treaty regarding the Commission’s non-monetary claims."
2. The Commission has reached an agreement with Defendant Treaty regarding the Commission’s non-monetary claims. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission’s Complaint, Defendant has consented to the entry of a judgment permanently enjoining it from future violations of the federal securities laws. The determination of the appropriate amount of monetary relief has been deferred pending motion by the Commission.
The allegations of the Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d) the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In connection with the Commission’s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from appropriate non-parties.
11. Consistent with 17 C.F.R. 202.5(f), this Consent resolves only the non-monetary claims asserted against Defendant in this civil proceeding.
Defendant acknowledges that no promise or representation has been made by the Commission or any member, officer, employee, agent, or representative of the Commission with regard to any criminal liability that may have arisen or may arise from the facts underlying this action or immunity from any such criminal liability. Defendant waives any claim of Double Jeopardy based upon the settlement of this proceeding, including the imposition of any remedy or civil penalty herein. Defendant further acknowledges that the Court's entry of a permanent injunction may have collateral consequences under federal or state law and the rules and regulations of self-regulatory organizations, licensing boards, and other regulatory organizations. Such collateral consequences include, but are not limited to, a statutory disqualification with respect to membership or participation in, or association with a member of, a self-regulatory organization. This statutory disqualification has consequences that are separate from any sanction imposed in an administrative proceeding. In addition, in any disciplinary proceeding before the Commission based on the entry of the injunction in this action, Defendant understands that it shall not be permitted to contest the factual allegations of the complaint in this action.
They certainly do!
All part of the ploy:
•The fraudsters start the next round of “pumping” the stock—sometimes even with made-up press releases or expert statements—and point to the rising price as evidence of its performance, which falsely inflates the price even more.
•The fraudsters keep it up until eventually “dumping” their shares for a huge profit and leaving investors scrambling to get rid of worthless stock as the price plummets. Fraudsters often claim the stock is under attack to encourage investors to hold positions by implying hedge fund control, naked short selling, or other conspiracy theories to mask the shares being dumped.
So prove it! Paste a copy of the title that shows Treaty really owns it.
That will show Reid and Shafer committed perjury.
Anything else will only prove once again Treaty's Musketeer club members never tell the truth.
Not to mention the $500K offer to buy it and the leasing agreements from 2 legitmate companies in belize who wanted to contract with Max.
Treaty's Lyin Cryin Mouseketeer club caught in a another lie again!
US Law when in the US the courts found the title to be Treaty's. The courts determined that 13 times.
No Max was LHAO! Turdski was red faced when he got caught down there trying to sell everything off in hurry.
22 What we did not know, or I certainly did not know
23 at the time, was that the physical assets of the
24 company, the drilling rigs and the wireline equipment
25 and all of that, was held on a lien by Hackmeyer Group
1 out of Florida and out of here in Texas. That was
2 completely unknown to me.
3 Q. Let me stop you there. Who is the Hackmeyer
4 Group?
5 A. They're a group of individuals who put in money
6 into Treaty.
7 Q. And they have a lien on all of Treaty's physical
8 assets?
9 A. All of Treaty's physical assets. We did not know
10 that until we took the trip to Belize.
Max's Rig
2 It's our understanding that he somehow managed to
3 get that back from Belize, don't actually to this day
4 know how he did it, but that's what we understand to be
5 the case.
6 So obviously that asset doesn't exist there
7 anymore.
Treaty's Lyin Cryin Mouseketeer Club will make up any lie to get innocent investors to buy their shares! Such lowlifes would even lie to their own mothers just to push the agenda. However, put them under oath and the real truth comes out. All listed right here in this court document for all to see!
Case 2:15-cv-02451-CJB-JVM Document 182
A few previously posted excerpts:
Turdski Depo
Turdski admits Max got his rig back.
22 Of course, I did not know at the time, but there
23 was a drilling rig in Belize that apparently was under
24 some sort of nebulous dispute with a gentleman by the
25 name of Max Maxie. And Max Maxie was very vocal on the
1 Internet about getting his rig back.
2 It's our understanding that he somehow managed to
3 get that back from Belize, don't actually to this day
4 know how he did it, but that's what we understand to be
5 the case.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129636389
Turdski admits No Assets.
22 What we did not know, or I certainly did not know
23 at the time, was that the physical assets of the
24 company, the drilling rigs and the wireline equipment
25 and all of that, was held on a lien by Hackmeyer Group
Page 62
1 out of Florida and out of here in Texas. That was
2 completely unknown to me.
3 Q. Let me stop you there. Who is the Hackmeyer
4 Group?
5 A. They're a group of individuals who put in money
6 into Treaty.
7 Q. And they have a lien on all of Treaty's physical
8 assets?
9 A. All of Treaty's physical assets. We did not know
10 that until we took the trip to Belize.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129636624
Turdski admits the fake Canadian deal.
Quote:
_______The Big Daddy lie_________________________________
Yes, the 20% assignment on the Canadian deal was verified by several of us by more than one source. Treaty is in business! Our BOD and large investors did a great job putting this all together.
________________________________________
2 Q. Is Treaty currently running a business? Is it
3 operating?
4 A. Treaty is an operating company certainly from a
5 legal perspective. From an actual operating
6 perspective, it's not.
15 Q. But it doesn't have any revenues currently?
16 A. It does not.
1 It has no producing revenue currently at all.
Just another lie from Treaty's big daddy crew and proof the abettor's will say anything.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129647262
Bullshine Depo
Selling into the run up?
Q. Mr. Mulshine, you also sold some of your own
15 Treaty shares during this time period in January of 2012
16 during the lead-up to the announcement of the claimed
17 oil strike in Belize; is that correct?
18 A. I don't remember. I sold very, very small
19 percentage of my stock literally to survive. I had to
20 eat.
Main Consultants that were working for Treaty headquarters.
23 Q. I'm handing you now a document that has been
24 marked as Exhibit 72.
25 Exhibit 72 is an e-mail from you to Frank Itak
1 and Ray Amanollahi dated January 29th, 2012, with the
2 subject line, TECO revision one of news release. Do you
3 recognize Exhibit 72?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Is this an e-mail that you sent?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Who are Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi?
8 A. Amanollahi. They are two consultants that were
9 working for Treaty headquarters.
10 Q. What were these gentlemen doing for Treaty?
11 A. They were doing investor communications through
12 social media.
13 Q. So on Sunday, January 29th, 2012, which was the
14 day before Treaty made the public announcement of its
15 claimed oil strike in Belize, you sent a draft of that
16 release to Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi?
17 A. Right.
18 Q. Why were you sending a draft of the press release
19 to these two individuals?
20 A. They were working for the headquarters, for
21 Andrew Reid, and they're responsible for social media
22 communication with shareholders.
23 And they were -- and I was asked to get
24 information to them so that they could handle
25 shareholder inquiries and shareholder information
1 through their social media after the news release went
2 out so they had to be informed as to what we were
3 talking about.
4 Q. So you wanted them to be prepared to push the
5 news out on social media that Treaty was planning to
6 announce on Monday morning?
7 A. They were being prepared so that when the news
8 release went out Monday, and I didn't want them to do
9 it.
10 Headquarters had them under agreements to do
11 social media communication of investor information, and
12 they would never put anything out until after it was
13 already public information by news release. So they had
14 to be informed.
15 Q. You wrote that you wanted to be sure that the
16 release had major impact. Do you see that?
17 A. Yeah.
18 Q. Why did you want the release to have major
19 impact?
22 A. It's totally arbitrary. I was a shareholder,
23 too, and the shares were at one-tenth the price of what
24 I got in at.
1 in deep, deep doo-doo at the time.
2 And we wanted to see the company -- everybody
3 believed we had an incredibly positive release coming
4 out. And everybody prayed to God it would affect the
5 stock in a positive way because everybody had lost a lot
6 of money at that point.
7 Q. You wanted the press release on the claimed oil
8 strike in Belize to have a major impact because you
9 wanted to be able to make money on the shares that you
10 were holding?
11 A. No.
21 Q. Right. So you were never able to sell your
22 stake, the shares that you had, because the stock price
23 never went up and staid up at a level that would enable
24 you to cash out basically.
25 A. No, that's not the -- I expected Treaty Energy to
1 be a very successful oil and gas company.
2 Q. And you would sell your shares and make money?
3 A. I would keep them as long-term investments in my
4 retirement account. I would sell some when I needed it
5 to pay the mortgage, yes.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129600347
No Seimic and no wireline done! Another lie being put out by the gang.
16 Q What would you need? What sort of
17 information would Treaty need to come up with an
18 estimation?
19 A Well, one would be seismic -- some kind of
20 seismic studies there to give us an idea of the
21 extent of any anomalies, the geometry of the anomaly,
22 the extent of the field. We didn't have that.
23 Secondly, we needed a wireline log to give
24 us some porosity and to give us some oil in place
25 calculations based on that. We didn't have that. To
1 go by this, no.
LMAO!!! STICKS to locate the well!
1 company from Oklahoma called Southern Locators, and
2 he was what I call sticks.
3 Q What does that mean?
4 A Witch sticks.
5 MR. DUGAN: Drowsing with --
6 THE WITNESS: Yes.
7 MR. DUGAN: You know, you hold two sticks,
8 and it's dubious.
9 THE WITNESS: Yes.
10 MR. DUGAN: It's a liability.
11 THE WITNESS: Yes.
12 BY MS. COX:
13 Q Is it not a very sophisticated way to
14 locate oil?
15 A It is not. I mean, no good geologist would
16 want to be associated with something like that. We
17 don't look -- we don't find oil with those things.
18 Q And so what is it called? They're called
19 sticks?
20 A I'm not sure what they're called. This guy
21 just came down and said oil is here at 800 feet and
22 1200 feet, and I'm not sure what the technique was or
23 what, but this is prior to me being there.
24 So I was down there to mudlog this well,
25 and so now at this point I'm going to look to see if
Page 23
1 there's anything around 800 feet and look to see if
2 there's anything 1200 feet, where I want to focus on.
3 Q Did you -- besides just knowing that he
4 said there was oil at 800 or 1200, did they give you
5 any reports to look at?
6 A No.
7 Q Okay.
8 A No, nothing. You know, I figure out, okay,
9 I'll just come in there, and I'll look at the samples
10 if there's something there, and we had a mudlogging
11 unit system there with the red gas coming out of the
12 mud.
13 Q What type of mud logging system was it?
14 A It was a Geospect Mudlogging system or what
15 we call a hot-wire system, and it basically is simply
16 an electronic system to suck the gas from the
17 drilling mud as we're drilling. And if there's any
18 gas in there, it will show up, show some increase in
19 hydro -- in possible gas.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129590350
I think she was too busy giving lip service to listen to what Turdsky was saying. Probably still thinks Treaty has the other equipment also.
Straight from Cryin Lyin's master, Turdkey's own words, under oath no less!
22 Of course, I did not know at the time, but there
23 was a drilling rig in Belize that apparently was under
24 some sort of nebulous dispute with a gentleman by the
25 name of Max Maxie. And Max Maxie was very vocal on the
1 Internet about getting his rig back.
2 It's our understanding that he somehow managed to
3 get that back from Belize, don't actually to this day
4 know how he did it, but that's what we understand to be
5 the case.
OOOPS! Did somebody get caught lyin again???
Yep and the best they can do is cry and lie and post love letters to each other because they've been exposed and have absolutely nothing to show for Treaty.
.000001 (5 ZEROS) That's like a new all time low isn't it?
Love those little temper tantrums from the Queen!
There also may be instances where a company insider or paid promoter provides false and misleading excuses for why a company’s stock price has recently decreased. For instance, these individuals may claim that the price decrease is a temporary condition resulting from the activities of “naked” short sellers. The insiders or promoters may hope to use this misinformation to move the price back up so they can dump their own stock at higher prices. Often, the price decrease is a result of the company’s poor financial situation rather than the reasons provided by the insiders or promoters
Yep somebody was dumb enough to pay the inter day high price. You think that same person person is still holding at .000001 (5 zeros correct?) I do know at least one person who sold then was foolish enough to buy back in for a greater loss even though he knew Treaty was a scam. Wonder what his portfolio looks like with all those ZEROS. Does it show an actual value or just ZERO for the total?
Just more proof nothing has changed.
Good luck with that! Treaty couldn't get to .10 at the height of the scam with the professional rip off crew. You think the clown brigade is going to make it? BWAWAWAWWAWAAAAA!!!! BTW thanks for digging up those old posts. They still ring as true today as they did back then!
Still holding 5 zeros. Think they need to hire better people. Some of them are just not working out.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=117063278
Who's says they're not?
I find it incredulous that people working for Treaty would try to cover up the fraud committed which they perpetrated.
Treaty claiming they are producing 100-200 bpd and then reporting 3 bpd to the TRCC is FRAUD.
Treaty claiming a major oil find and reporting a proven reserve on dry wells is FRAUD.
Stealing an oil rig and trying to deny it is theft and Fraud Admitted to by Turdski in his deposition after court ordered it to be returned to Mack
Planting false posts on a chart to perpetrate fraud against individuals is also libel, defamation, and a crime against the courts.
Nor does it cover false statements being reported as fact to deceive investors.
I suppose you don't understand that the forward looking statement doesn't apply to penny stocks and Bulshine put that in the PRs to deceive people.
NEXT!