Yep. Nothing but an effort to unload the shares on unsuspecting investors! If Treaty were really trying to be legit, 8ks would have been filed. They are free. There would have been an election of the officers, and all supposed actions would be openly available to the public like every other legit company. Instead they continue to use the same old tactics with claims by only the same "select few" with absolutely no proof. Sadly Treaty can only offer lies, fake claims of drilling rigs, bogus Canadian deal, and personal attacks because Treaty has NOTHING. The REAL TRUTH can be read verbatim on PACER.gov in the following case and document. Indisputable testimony given under oath by the Treaty conspirators.
Case 2:15-cv-02451-CJB-JVM Document 182
Turdski admits Max got his rig back.
22 Of course, I did not know at the time, but there
23 was a drilling rig in Belize that apparently was under
24 some sort of nebulous dispute with a gentleman by the
25 name of Max Maxie. And Max Maxie was very vocal on the
1 Internet about getting his rig back.
2 It's our understanding that he somehow managed to
3 get that back from Belize, don't actually to this day
4 know how he did it, but that's what we understand to be
5 the case.
Turdski admits No Assets.
22 What we did not know, or I certainly did not know
23 at the time, was that the physical assets of the
24 company, the drilling rigs and the wireline equipment
25 and all of that, was held on a lien by Hackmeyer Group
1 out of Florida and out of here in Texas. That was
2 completely unknown to me.
3 Q. Let me stop you there. Who is the Hackmeyer
4 Group?
5 A. They're a group of individuals who put in money
6 into Treaty.
7 Q. And they have a lien on all of Treaty's physical
8 assets?
9 A. All of Treaty's physical assets. We did not know
10 that until we took the trip to Belize.
Turdski admits the fake Canadian deal.
Quote:
_______The Big Daddy lie_________________________________
Yes, the 20% assignment on the Canadian deal was verified by several of us by more than one source. Treaty is in business! Our BOD and large investors did a great job putting this all together.
________________________________________
Contrary to this claim which no evidence has ever been posted to prove.
2 Q. Is Treaty currently running a business? Is it
3 operating?
4 A. Treaty is an operating company certainly from a
5 legal perspective. From an actual operating
6 perspective, it's not.
15 Q. But it doesn't have any revenues currently?
16 A. It does not.
1 It has no producing revenue currently at all.
Just another lie from Treaty!
Bullshine Selling into the run up?
Q. Mr. Mulshine, you also sold some of your own
15 Treaty shares during this time period in January of 2012
16 during the lead-up to the announcement of the claimed
17 oil strike in Belize; is that correct?
18 A. I don't remember. I sold very, very small
19 percentage of my stock literally to survive. I had to
20 eat.
Main Consultants that were working for Treaty headquarters.
23 Q. I'm handing you now a document that has been
24 marked as Exhibit 72.
25 Exhibit 72 is an e-mail from you to Frank Itak
1 and Ray Amanollahi dated January 29th, 2012, with the
2 subject line, TECO revision one of news release. Do you
3 recognize Exhibit 72?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Is this an e-mail that you sent?
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Who are Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi?
8 A. Amanollahi. They are two consultants that were
9 working for Treaty headquarters.
10 Q. What were these gentlemen doing for Treaty?
11 A. They were doing investor communications through
12 social media.
13 Q. So on Sunday, January 29th, 2012, which was the
14 day before Treaty made the public announcement of its
15 claimed oil strike in Belize, you sent a draft of that
16 release to Mr. Itak and Mr. Amanollahi?
17 A. Right.
18 Q. Why were you sending a draft of the press release
19 to these two individuals?
20 A. They were working for the headquarters, for
21 Andrew Reid, and they're responsible for social media
22 communication with shareholders.
23 And they were -- and I was asked to get
24 information to them so that they could handle
25 shareholder inquiries and shareholder information
1 through their social media after the news release went
2 out so they had to be informed as to what we were
3 talking about.
4 Q. So you wanted them to be prepared to push the
5 news out on social media that Treaty was planning to
6 announce on Monday morning?
7 A. They were being prepared so that when the news
8 release went out Monday, and I didn't want them to do
9 it.
10 Headquarters had them under agreements to do
11 social media communication of investor information, and
12 they would never put anything out until after it was
13 already public information by news release. So they had
14 to be informed.
15 Q. You wrote that you wanted to be sure that the
16 release had major impact. Do you see that?
17 A. Yeah.
18 Q. Why did you want the release to have major
19 impact?
22 A. It's totally arbitrary. I was a shareholder,
23 too, and the shares were at one-tenth the price of what
24 I got in at.
1 in deep, deep doo-doo at the time.
2 And we wanted to see the company -- everybody
3 believed we had an incredibly positive release coming
4 out. And everybody prayed to God it would affect the
5 stock in a positive way because everybody had lost a lot
6 of money at that point.
7 Q. You wanted the press release on the claimed oil
8 strike in Belize to have a major impact because you
9 wanted to be able to make money on the shares that you
10 were holding?
11 A. No.
21 Q. Right. So you were never able to sell your
22 stake, the shares that you had, because the stock price
23 never went up and staid up at a level that would enable
24 you to cash out basically.
25 A. No, that's not the -- I expected Treaty Energy to
1 be a very successful oil and gas company.
2 Q. And you would sell your shares and make money?
3 A. I would keep them as long-term investments in my
4 retirement account. I would sell some when I needed it
5 to pay the mortgage, yes.
