Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Q1 Coverage Update;
SunTrust: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1gB2YESBJV7RTlRRjdCNkJVT00/view?usp=sharing
HCW:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1gB2YESBJV7VDRERktMYnJJWmM/view?usp=sharing
PS: Thanks for posting the scripts update Staccani. TRx back to ATH trend. I hope things will accelerate from here
Thx staccani
leading into the interim readout event this year, we reiterate our buy rating and $10 price target.
We expect study to continue until completion. At this point, we reiterate our view that the probability of an early stop for efficacy is low: (1) for such a pivotal trial, it is likely that investigators will want to preserve their alpha for the full data analysis (i.e., the interim stopping rule is likely to be very stringent, in the more conservative case being the Peto stopping boundary of p<0.001, which will severely limit its conditional power); and (2) as the first-in-class CV outcomes trial with a skeptical regulatory panel, it is not clear that the magnitude and strength of an early benefit will outweigh the value of robust, full-study results. As a relevant historical example, the Ivabradine and Outcomes in Chronic Heart Failure (SHIFT) trial was not stopped early despite showing significant effect at the second interim analysis (endpoint of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization HR=0.77, p<0.0001, crossed boundary of p<0.001), in part because a previous study (in a different population) was negative (Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5:294-302).
1Q16 in numbers. Reported yesterday, net product revenue for the first quarter was $25.3M. Management reiterates its guidance for FY16 sales revenue in the range of $105–150M. On the operating front: COGS were $6.9M (-18% QoQ), SG&A costs were $28M (+19% QoQ), R&D costs were $13.7M (+3% QoQ), driven by continued enrollment in REDUCE-IT. Under GAAP, Amarin reported a net loss of $29.8M, or basic and diluted loss per share of $0.16. The company exited the quarter with cash and cash equivalents of $81.4M.
Valuation and risks. Our price target of $10 is based on an equally-weighted composite of: (a) $10.20/share, as a 35x multiple of taxed and diluted FY22 GAAP EPS of $1.24 discounted back to FY16 at 25%; and (b) an NPV of $9.61/share (discount rate 12%, growth rate 2%). Risks to our investment thesis and target price include: (1) failure of the REDUCE-IT study; (2) Vascepa commercial ramp-up and/or peak sales not meeting our projections; (3) delay or failure of Vascepa to obtain FDA approval in the ANCHOR indication; and (4) further competitive disruption of the omega-3 market by generics and/or OTC supplements beyond our model.
New coverage by HCW, price target @ $10.
Not able to post the link if the coverage, will try to copy and paste here;
Events tracking to our projection, interim analysis on tap for Sep/ Oct. As we edge closer and closer to REDUCE-IT’s topline results in 2018, this past quarter finally provided the investment community with some material updates regarding the trial progress, which has, until recently, only been a topic of speculation: (1) REDUCE-IT has reached its target enrollment and now has over 8,000 patients in the study; and (2) the onset of approximately 60% of target primary cardiovascular events have been reached, triggering preparations of the pre-specified interim analysis by the DMC, with a decision to be made (early stop/study continue; we expect the study to continue, see next bullet) in Sep/Oct. The first is self-evident; the second and more important announcement has potentially positive implications for the final outcome of the study: the actual ongoing event rate for the study is tracking not only very closely to the company’s internal projections, but also to our own independent projections (see appendix). For the past year, we have guided that under the assumption of a placebo event rate of 5.2% (used for study’s power calculation) and a 15% relative risk reduction (also for power calculation), the 967th event (60% of all events) is expected to occur in February-March 2016; company’s announcement of the 60% event trigger was made on the last day of March, likely with the actual event having occurred earlier that month (note: the data analysis time of 6 months is longer than we expected). Under this now publicly announced event timetable, assumptions can be made on the two factors at play here: if one assumes that the estimated relative risk reduction is actually below 15% (in which case, the study may not be powered to detect an effect), then that would require the placebo event rate to be not just lower than 5.2%, but starkly lower (at the level of ~4.7%). From our prior review of diabetes literature, we find it unlikely (but plausible) for the placebo event rates for extended MACE events to be that low: across 29 diabetes outcome trials for just the core MACE endpoint (without coronary revascularization and hospitalization for unstable angina, the extended MACE endpoint used in REDUCE-IT), with baseline CVD was 5.19% (Am Heart J 2011;161:210-219). Ahead of the expected heightened volatility, volume and likely share price appreciation, we believe, leading into the interim Events tracking to our projection, interim analysis on tap for Sep/ Oct. As we edge closer and closer to REDUCE-IT’s topline results in 2018, this past quarter finally provided the investment community with some material updates regarding the trial progress, which has, until recently, only been a topic of speculation: (1) REDUCE-IT has reached its target enrollment and now has over 8,000 patients in the study; and (2) the onset of approximately 60% of target primary cardiovascular events have been reached, triggering preparations of the pre-specified interim analysis by the DMC, with a decision to be made (early stop/study continue; we expect the study to continue, see next bullet) in Sep/Oct. The first is self-evident; the second and more important announcement has potentially positive implications for the final outcome of the study: the actual ongoing event rate for the study is tracking not only very closely to the company’s internal projections, but also to our own independent projections (see appendix). For the past year, we have guided that under the assumption of a placebo event rate of 5.2% (used for study’s power calculation) and a 15% relative risk reduction (also for power calculation), the 967th event (60% of all events) is expected to occur in February-March 2016; company’s announcement of the 60% event trigger was made on the last day of March, likely with the actual event having occurred earlier that month (note: the data analysis time of 6 months is longer than we expected). Under this now publicly announced event timetable, assumptions can be made on the two factors at play here: if one assumes that the estimated relative risk reduction is actually below 15% (in which case, the study may not be powered to detect an effect), then that would require the placebo event rate to be not just lower than 5.2%, but starkly lower (at the level of ~4.7%). From our prior review of diabetes literature, we find it unlikely (but plausible) for the placebo event rates for extended MACE events to be that low: across 29 diabetes outcome trials for just the core MACE endpoint (without coronary revascularization and hospitalization for unstable angina, the extended MACE endpoint used in REDUCE-IT), with baseline CVD was 5.19% (Am Heart J 2011;161:210-219). Ahead of the expected heightened volatility, volume and likely share price appreciation, we believe, leading into the interim Events tracking to our projection, interim analysis on tap for Sep/ Oct. As we edge closer and closer to REDUCE-IT’s topline results in 2018, this past quarter finally provided the investment community with some material updates regarding the trial progress, which has, until recently, only been a topic of speculation: (1) REDUCE-IT has reached its target enrollment and now has over 8,000 patients in the study; and (2) the onset of approximately 60% of target primary cardiovascular events have been reached, triggering preparations of the pre-specified interim analysis by the DMC, with a decision to be made (early stop/study continue; we expect the study to continue, see next bullet) in Sep/Oct. The first is self-evident; the second and more important announcement has potentially positive implications for the final outcome of the study: the actual ongoing event rate for the study is tracking not only very closely to the company’s internal projections, but also to our own independent projections (see appendix). For the past year, we have guided that under the assumption of a placebo event rate of 5.2% (used for study’s power calculation) and a 15% relative risk reduction (also for power calculation), the 967th event (60% of all events) is expected to occur in February-March 2016; company’s announcement of the 60% event trigger was made on the last day of March, likely with the actual event having occurred earlier that month (note: the data analysis time of 6 months is longer than we expected). Under this now publicly announced event timetable, assumptions can be made on the two factors at play here: if one assumes that the estimated relative risk reduction is actually below 15% (in which case, the study may not be powered to detect an effect), then that would require the placebo event rate to be not just lower than 5.2%, but starkly lower (at the level of ~4.7%). From our prior review of diabetes literature, we find it unlikely (but plausible) for the placebo event rates for extended MACE events to be that low: across 29 diabetes outcome trials for just the core MACE endpoint (without coronary revascularization and hospitalization for unstable angina, the extended MACE endpoint used in REDUCE-IT), with baseline CVD was 5.19% (Am Heart J 2011;161:210-219). Ahead of the expected heightened volatility, volume and likely share price appreciation, we believe, leading into the interim
No Scripts Updated till now for week ending 29-04
I am leaving the office to attend a conference, sorry for not being able to update the scripts
"As of the date of this report, we had 47 patent applications in the United States that have been either issued or allowed and more than 30
additional patent applications are pending in the United States. Such 47 allowed and issued applications include the following:
• 2 issued U.S. patents directed to a pharmaceutical composition of Vascepa in a capsule that have terms that expire in 2020 and 2030,
respectively,
• 1 issued U.S. patent covering a composition containing highly pure EPA that expires in 2021,
• 36 U.S. patents covering the use of Vascepa in either the MARINE or anticipated ANCHOR indication that have terms that expire in 2030,
• 3 additional patents related to the use of a pharmaceutical composition comprised of free fatty acids to treat the ANCHOR patient population with a term that expires in 2030,
• 2 additional patents related to the use of a pharmaceutical composition comprised of free fatty acids to treat the MARINE patient population with a term that expires in 2030,
• 1 additional patent related to a pharmaceutical composition comprised of free fatty acids and uses thereof to treat both the MARINE and ANCHOR patient populations with a term that expires in 2030,
• 1 additional patent related to a formulation of EPA/DHA and uses thereof with a term that expires in 2030, and
• 1 additional patent related to the use of Vascepa to treat obesity with a term that expires in 2030."
10K
"We expect that our net cash used in operations during the three months ended March 31, 2016 will be the highest of any quarterly net cash used in operations during 2016, with reductions in net cash used in operations after March 31, 2016 resulting from anticipated increased collections from expected higher revenues and the timing of certain year-end expenses which were paid in the first quarter of 2016."
"We believe that our cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our projected operations for at least the next twelve months"
From the 10K
SunTrust Robinson Q1-2016 Preview
- We raised 1Q16 sales to $30.1M (from $26.9M) vs. the Street’s $26.7M & lowered our LPS to -$0.11 (from -$0.12) vs. Street’s -$0.11 on higher sales. We maintained our FY2016E sales/LPS at $121.6M/-$0.34 (vs AMRN’s $105M- $120M range) vs. Street’s $125.5M/-$0.40. Our 1Q16E Vascepa sales are $29.6M (+$3.2M, +90% YoY vs. TRx growth +53% YoY +12% price) as the ANCHOR & JELIS promotion ramps. Interim read out of the REDUCE-IT trial is the next catalyst. Reiterate Buy/$6PT, supported by DCF.
- AMRN's ascent is one that could be interesting for a few Big Pharma that have a presence in primary care due to the LOE’s on the statins, & other TG lowering agents like Tricor & Lovaza . AMRN's Vascepa therefore may appear very attractive to suitors. On the competitive front, Omthera was FDA approved in May 2014, but is not yet marketed due to supply issues.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1gB2YESBJV7Y2V2VFRSZkZHWmc/view?usp=sharing
'The benefits of statins have been exaggerated and their side effects downplayed'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3570732/The-benefits-statins-exaggerated-effects-downplayed-Expert-claims-healthy-patients-medicated-trials-sponsored-drug-companies.html
Scripts Update Week Ending 22-04
V
TRx: 14.403 {vs 15,019; -4.10%} Sector -2.08%
NRx: 5,746 {vs 6,070; -5.34%} Sector -1.68%
Ref: 8,657 {vs 8,949; -3.26%} Sector -2.33%
L
TRx: 2,643 {vs 2,723; -2.94%}
NRx: 895 {vs 870; +2.87%}
GenL
TRx: 58,898 {vs 59,815; -1.53%}
NRx: 22,528 {vs 22,726; -0.87%}
V TRx Market Share: 18.97% vs 19.37%
V NRx Market Share: 19.70% vs 20.46%
V Ref Market Share: 18.51% vs 18.69%
Short Interest Update -13.76%
Short Interest @ lowest level since 15-March-2012
15/04/16: 16,448,462 Change: -2,623,557
31/03/16: 19,072,019
No it does not. Just the total of Loavaza and Generics
Almost 70% of the volume yesterday was short
http://www.shortanalytics.com/getshortchart.php?tsymbol=AMRN
I seriously do not understand why would you short a sub $2 stock ?!?!
U know yourself, please spare us the dilution parrot talk
Thx JL, yeah things can get messed up on the Internet. Need to double check from now on. As for wasting my time, don't you worry about that, not gonna happen any more
I appreciate all your posts and I've learned a lot from you and other valuable members of this board
Something is wrong, I showed earlier exactly the number I wrote, the 5million+ increase. Now it's back to the old reporting number
Oppenheimer funds inc just released the 13F, checking whalewisdom, it seems that they increased their position in AMRN by another 5,350,450 shares, now having a total holding of 10,646,720
Can you please double check this.
That is quite bullish and goes along things said in here regarding smooth silent accumulation. I know this will drive MOG crazy and he'll be mumbling bla bla bla for the rest of the week, getting scared for his short position and his master's position
Scripts Data for Week Ending 15/4
Market Share @ All Time High across the board
V
TRx: 15,019 {vs 14,987; +0.21%} Sector -1.57% - ATH
NRx: 6,070 {vs 6,084; -0.23%} Sector -0.48% - (ATH=6,191)
Ref: 8,949 {vs 8,903; +0.52%} Sector -2.23% - ATH
L
TRx: 2,723 {vs 2,701; +0.81%}
NRx: 870 {vs 863; +0.81%}
GenL
TRx: 59,815 {vs 61,107; -2.11%}
NRx: 22,726 {vs 22,863; -0.60%}
V TRx Market Share: 19.37% vs 19.02% --- ATH
V NRx Market Share: 20.46% vs 20.41% --- ATH
V Ref Market Share: 18.69% vs 18.17% --- ATH
V Graphs
STS, SFF & Others
As requested by sts, you can all check the historical monthly graphs for V (Retail, Inst & combined) in addition to L & GenL
Good trend, hoping for a real steep curve either via Red-It interim or full 1A Effect
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1gB2YESBJV7WHBTYzJ2ZkphdHc/view?usp=sharing
Q1-2016 vs. Q1-2015 (Retail + Institutional Data)
V
TRx: 187,231 {vs 122,663; +52.64%} – Sector +1.79% --- ATH
L
TRx: 61,632 {vs 173,541; -64.49%}
Gen L
TRx: 862,586 {vs 795,710; +8.40%}
V Q1-2016 Retail + Inst. TRx Market Share: 16.85% vs 11.23% in Q1-2015
Total Monthly Retail + Institutional Data March-2016
V
TRx: 68,440 {vs 60,526; +13.08%} ATH – Sector +7.86%
(Inst # 4,187 vs 3,680)
L
TRx: 20,401 {vs 19,314; +5.63%}
(Inst # 7,766 vs 6,654)
Gen L
TRx: 298,506 {vs 279,295; +6.88%}
(Inst # 27,709 vs 25,205)
V Monthly Retail + Inst. TRx Market Share: 17.67% vs 16.85% --- ATH
yep Bio,
By Wednesday next week we will get the final number for the month of Mrach (Retail + Inst.)
Numbers are looking good and historically the numbers usually picks up way more after May. So far we've added 2.47% in TRx market share since beginning of the year (16.55% 31-12, 19.02% 08-04) which is way better compared to same date intervals in 2015
Scripts Update for Week Ending 8/4
V
TRx: 14,987 {vs 14,563; +2.91%} Sector +1.90% - ATH
NRx: 6,084 {vs 5,911; +2.93%} Sector +1.73% - (ATH=6,191)
Ref: 8,903 {vs 8,652; +2.90%} Sector +1.99% - ATH
L
TRx: 2,701 {vs 2,862; -5.63%}
NRx: 863 {vs 946; -8.77%}
GenL
TRx: 61,107 {vs 59,904; +2.01%}
NRx: 22,863 {vs 22,445; +1.86%}
V TRx Market Share: 19.02% vs 18.83% --- ATH
V NRx Market Share: 20.41% vs 20.17% --- ATH
V Ref Market Share: 18.17% vs 18.01% --- (ATH=18.24%)
Q1-2016 vs. Q1-2015 (Retail Data Only)
V
TRx: 175,210 {vs 115,630; +51.53%} – Sector +0.20%
L
TRx: 38,780 {vs 136,476; -71.58%}
Gen L
TRx: 786,496 {vs 746,412; +5.37%}
V Q1-2016 Retail TRx Market Share: 17.51% vs 11.58% in Q1-2015
PS: Retail Data Only. Total will be more as we will be adding Institutional Next week
Total Monthly Retail Data March-2016
V
TRx: 64,253 {vs 56,846; +13.03%} ATH – Sector +7.45%
NRx: 26,575 {vs 24,061; +10.45%} ATH – Sector +6.20%
L
TRx: 12,635 {vs 12,660; -0.20%}
NRx: 4,273 {vs 4,380; -2.44%}
Gen L
TRx: 270,800 {vs 254,090; +6.58%}
NRx: 105,300 {vs 99,760; +5.55%}
Monthly Retail TRx Market Share: 18.48% vs 17.57% --- ATH
Monthly Retail NRx Market Share: 19.52% vs 18.77% --- ATH
Short Interest Update;
Numbers are out on Bloomberg, not on Nasdaq Website;
31/03/16: 19,072,019
15/03/16: 18,956,615
Change: +0.61% (115,404 share)
PS: The Monthly Retail Rx are due today, 2 hours ago but still nothing has been updated yet
Bio
Next Tuesday we get the total Retail Rx for March-2016. On Wednesday 20th, we get the Inst. numbers and can get the exact total numbers of Rx
Scripts Update for Week ending 1/4
V
TRx: 14,563 {vs 14,272; +2.04%} Sector +2.24%
NRx: 5,911 {vs 5,819; +1.58%} Sector +0.04%
Ref: 8,652 {vs 8,453; +2.35%} Sector +3.63%
L
TRx: 2,862 {vs 2,646; +8.16%}
NRx: 946 {vs 855; +10.64%}
GenL
TRx: 59,904 {vs 58,715; +2.03%}
NRx: 22,445 {vs 22,615; -0.75%}
V TRx Market Share: 18.83% vs 18.87%
V NRx Market Share: 20.17% vs 19.87% --- ATH
V Ref Market Share: 18.01% vs 18.24%
Adam Feuerstein, ohhhh Adam is still alive.
One day hopefully we see him in a cell next to Martin Shkreli and all his HF Buddies manipulating the bio stocks
Wishful thinking, but never say never :):)
Thank you AVII, now we know all the steps. Personally I'm glad as I learned something new :)
'Statins will become USELESS in a decade': Soaring obesity could render the drugs useless - leaving gastric bands as the only option
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3518649/Statins-USELESS-decade-Soaring-obesity-render-drugs-useless-leaving-gastric-bands-option.html
"Worldwide, some 200 million take statins to reduce the risk of strokes and heart attacks, according to a paper in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology."
Scripts Update Week Ending 25/3
Good Numbers for a short week
V
TRx: 14,272 {vs 13,933; +2.43%} Sector –1.40%
NRx: 5,819 {vs 5,635; +3.27%} Sector -2.38%
Ref: 8,453 {vs 8,298; +1.87%} Sector -0.76%
L
TRx: 2,646 {vs 2,826; -6.37%}
NRx: 855 {vs 972; -12.04%}
GenL
TRx: 58,715 {vs 59,945; -2.05%}
NRx: 22,615 {vs 23,396; -3.34%}
V TRx Market Share: 18.87% vs 18.16% --- ATH
V NRx Market Share: 19.87% vs 18.78% --- ATH
V Ref Market Share: 18.24% vs 17.77% --- ATH
HCW Coverage back in February 26, 2016...Any thoughts guys ?!?!
In their analysis, For Placebo of 5.20%
RRR///967 Event///Data Analysis///Interim Verdict///1612 Event///Data Analysis/Data
15% ///Feb 2016/// 4-5mo/// Jun-Jul 2016/// Nov-17/// 4 mo / Mar-18
20% ///Mar 2016/// 4-5mo/// Jul-Aug 2016/// Dec-17/// 4 mo / Apr-18
For Placebo of 5.70%
RRR///967 Event///Data Analysis///Interim Verdict///1612 Event///Data Analysis/Data
20% ///Feb 2016/// 4-5mo/// Jun-Jul 2016/// Jul-17/// 4 mo / Nov-17
30% ///Mar 2016/// 4-5mo/// Jul-Aug 2016/// Aug-17/// 4 mo / Dec-17
For Placebo of 4.68%
RRR///967 Event///Data Analysis///Interim Verdict///1612 Event///Data Analysis/Data
10% ///Apr-16/// 4-5mo/// Aug-Sep 2016/// Feb-18/// 4 mo / Jun-18
Amarin also announced that the onset of approximately 60% of the target aggregate number of primary cardiovascular events within the REDUCE-IT study has triggered preparation for a pre-specified interim efficacy and safety analysis by the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). Amarin currently expects the independent interim analysis to be conducted in approximately six months.
Amarin Corp plc (AMRN) Hit Enrollment Target for REDUCE-IT; Interim IDMC Analysis Planned
Amarin Corporation plc (Nasdaq: AMRN) announced that target patient enrollment has been reached in its REDUCE-IT cardiovascular outcomes trial of Vascepa (icosapent ethyl). Amarin also announced that the onset of approximately 60% of the target aggregate number of primary cardiovascular events within the REDUCE-IT study has triggered preparation for a pre-specified interim efficacy and safety analysis by the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). Amarin currently expects the independent interim analysis to be conducted in approximately six months.
Enrollment Target Achieved
The REDUCE-IT study was designed to enroll approximately 8,000 patients. This enrollment target has been reached and Amarin is winding down patient enrollment on a country by country basis. Since the study commenced in 2011, over 20,000 patient years of study have been accumulated in REDUCE-IT.
"We are pleased to announce that we have reached the target enrollment in REDUCE-IT, the first multinational cardiovascular outcomes study prospectively designed to investigate whether there is a meaningful reduction in the occurrence of major cardiovascular events when EPA is added to statin therapy in high-risk patients with elevated triglycerides," said Steven Ketchum, Ph.D., president of research and development and chief scientific officer at Amarin. "Vascepa demonstrated a broad spectrum of favorable effects on lipid, lipoprotein, and inflammatory biomarkers compared to placebo in Phase 3 studies focused on patients with high triglyceride levels after statin therapy and on patients with very high triglyceride levels. Through long-term study of patients treated with Vascepa in REDUCE-IT, we aim to provide a robust dataset to determine whether the effects of highly-pure EPA omega-3 prescription drug therapy will lower the risk of cardiovascular events in the high-risk patient population studied."
Interim Analysis Expected in Approximately Six Months
The REDUCE-IT study's event rate continues to track to prior estimates. A pre-specified interim efficacy and safety analysis was designed to be conducted upon achieving approximately 60% of the 1,612 aggregate primary cardiovascular events within the study. REDUCE-IT patients are in the process of completing a study visit over the next several months, after which additional time is required by the contract research organizations to finish collecting and preparing data for transfer to and analysis by the DMC. As is typical for large-scale, multi-national studies, regardless of the strength of the study results this data preparation and transfer process is expected to take several months. The DMC's analysis is anticipated to occur in approximately six months.
Amarin will remain blinded to the interim and ongoing results of the REDUCE-IT study until after the study is ready to be stopped either at the interim analysis or at the final analysis. Guidelines for the independent DMC to recommend stopping the study for overwhelming efficacy require that the study achieve statistical significance on the primary endpoint and generate robust findings on certain, pre-specified secondary outcome measures. Given the high thresholds of overwhelming efficacy required prior to a DMC recommending an early stop to a cardiovascular outcomes trial like REDUCE-IT, Amarin continues to expect that the DMC's interim analysis will result in a recommendation to continue the REDUCE-IT study as planned. Such a recommendation is most common for cardiovascular outcome studies.
First Multinational Outcomes Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Benefit of High-Dose EPA Therapy as an Add-on to Statin Therapy
Heart disease remains the number one cause of death in the United States. REDUCE-IT is the first multinational outcomes study being conducted to evaluate the cardiovascular benefits of treating patients with high cardiovascular risk who, despite stable statin therapy, have elevated triglyceride levels.
"In many high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease, substantial residual risk for events remains despite optimal LDL-cholesterol reduction with statin therapy," said Deepak L. Bhatt, M.D., M.P.H., Executive Director of Interventional Cardiovascular Programs, Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and Principal Investigator for REDUCE-IT. "By design, the REDUCE-IT study has enrolled patients with high cardiovascular risk and elevated triglyceride levels despite statin therapy and will provide important information regarding the potential for high-dose EPA-only omega-3 therapy to confer incremental cardiovascular benefit beyond statin control of LDL-cholesterol."
Amarin believes that the REDUCE-IT study is positioned for success based on extensive review of existing data from clinical, epidemiologic and genetic studies. With the study's event rate tracking on schedule, the onset of the 1,612th primary cardiovascular event is expected to occur in 2017 with the publication of results anticipated in 2018.
MOG, you never replied back to me & what i wrote and asked you directly answers your recent post....im still waiting, 6days 2hrs 58min and 5sec without a reply, and counting.....
24/03/2016 @6:54:16am
"Mog,
Going along with your logic about need of financing;
you say this will remove the financial overhang BUT now they will be forced to dilute at horrible horrible prices....etc
So supposing Red-It wasn't stopped @ Interim (among other things, one of the Positive thing of this will the a confirmation of No futility) & AMRN decides to raise capital...thus removing a financial overhang, Not just that, it is now supported and market knows that Red-It is working, no futility, and will most probably achieve the minimum required 15%....combining in your own logic these together, i think the financing will not affect the stock, on the contrary it will have a positive impact just like the double digit increase in CPXX Case
Looking forward for your feedback and i am interested to read the twist in logic that you will use to prove your point while bashing the stock - company & management"
Scripts Update for Week Ending Week 18/03
V
TRx: 13,933 {vs 14,035; -0.73%} Sector –1.04%
NRx: 5,635 {vs 5,856; -3.77%} Sector -1.05%
Ref: 8,298 {vs 8,179; +1.45%} Sector -1.03%
L
TRx: 2,826 {vs 2,819; +0.25%}
NRx: 972 {vs 933; +4.18%}
GenL
TRx: 59,945 {vs 60,657; -1.17%}
NRx: 23,396 {vs 23,633; -0.58%}
V TRx Market Share: 18.16% vs 18.11% --- ATH
V NRx Market Share: 18.78% vs 19.31% --- (ATH=19.36%)
V Ref Market Share: 17.77% vs 17.33% --- ATH
Mog,
Going along with your logic about need of financing;
you say this will remove the financial overhang BUT now they will be forced to dilute at horrible horrible prices....etc
So supposing Red-It wasn't stopped @ Interim (among other things, one of the Positive thing of this will the a confirmation of No futility) & AMRN decides to raise capital...thus removing a financial overhang, Not just that, it is now supported and market knows that Red-It is working, no futility, and will most probably achieve the minimum required 15%....combining in your own logic these together, i think the financing will not affect the stock, on the contrary it will have a positive impact just like the double digit increase in CPXX Case
Looking forward for your feedback and i am interested to read the twist in logic that you will use to prove your point while bashing the stock - company & management.
Celator Pharmaceuticals Inc (NASDAQ:CPXX), a pharmaceutical company developing new and more effective therapies to treat cancer, announced the pricing of an underwritten public offering of 4,000,000 shares of common stock. The shares of common stock are being offered at a price of $9.50 per share.....
Despite that fact the share is up 13% today.
That's the way it should be done !!!
JL,
Yup good numbers but i guess AMRN should also focus on Inst.
Inst. only constitute between 5% & 7% in V's case (8%-10% in Gen L), but the market share of Inst. is still low, around 10%-11%
Giving Inst. more focus will surely help in the selling process.
It is weird that L sells 6K+ on a monthly basis to Inst. while V only around 4K
There is room to further increase sales by targeting more Inst.
A humble opinion
All in all, V is gaining momentum and give 1A max one quarter and sales should increase in an incredible way