Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The FLCX merger was cancelled, What is the connection of FlooidCX to QE?
They have posted financial statements, not 10Qs but quarterly reports. Last quarter ending 9/30/2023 they had $2.1M Cash.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QREE/disclosure
It's their own published material they put out on their Youtube Channel. I really don't get this point - How is recorded video and memorialized writing subject to interpretation in a way a phone conversation can't be? How are 1:1 statements on the phone better than polished material they have chosen to put in a press release or financial filing?
https://www.youtube.com/@QuantumEnergyCorporation/videos
They put out demonstrations and investor presentations on YouTube, it's their own material not just stuff "from Youtube". Dorick is not the source of my opinions, its Quantum statements on their own videos and published press releases.
They put out written descriptions and video of their devices and plans. Why do you emphasize calling the individuals so much? What are they going to reveal in personal calls that hasn't been publicly released? It's a public company, they can't just give out proprietary or material info in call to anyone.
Can you explain why the FLCX merger was canceled?
FLCX Merger has been canceled.
FlooidCX Completes Third Licensed Distributor Agreement
What is the relevance of being a nonpracticing bar member? - You get the newsletter and can list that on a bio?
Which Arizona case are referring to they won in 2020?
Look at Resource Recovery Corporation v. Inductance Energy Corporation, they (Inductance/Hinz parties), paid $2,048,653.11 to RRC.
How is a settlement where the Inductance Energy parties paid money a win?
I find no Viridis Energy Partners, Inc filed in Michigan corp listings or website. Does anyone have a professional bio for Tom Wiegman the engineer or Paul Swinkey?
Not manufacturing cost, economic viability - an inside photovoltaic panel can't be cost effective compared to outdoor solar, its adds nothing. There's reasons people don't put solar panels inside.
The 0 recovery - Indoor solar panels aren't engineering efficient, they cost more than collected energy vs any other power source.
Checks to cash, signed by Danzik's wife & daughter IE/QE employed as bookkeepers? Using the company card at casino restaurants and the movies? This is not being clumsy, lack of internal controls in a public firm is very concerning. They keep changing focus before having commercialized any of tech they describe. You couldn't ever order the rare earths they listed for sale...
There's a lot to be wary about, and what is there is go on beside statements QE insiders choose to release?
So, the engine is flywheel energy storage? Does it produce net energy or only store power put in from another source?
I think I have the relay setup now, try atlinfo-FLCX@yahoo.com again.
Could you email me so we can go over WyoTech/IEC? I've read alot the lawsuit material on their activites before Quantum.
Have you seen anything on the collecting power from USB/Ethernet?
atlinfo-FLCX@yahoo.com
ATLInfo-QREE@yahoo.com
I studied undergrad physics at Georgia Tech, I have been evaluating public companies as an investor since I've had a brokerage account, and my motive is to determine the potential impact of the devices IEC/QE has announced.
I am not Dorick and the lab tour is available on Youtube. Have you not noticed our writing styles are rather different? If I go on the tour, then still belive its not legit, would that change anything for you?
Awesome, I was gunna pitch an expose to the Georgia Tech student newspaper with all I have, and if you could add narrative that would be great.
Let's just pick a time to show up in the same free public chatroom or whatever and save the $.
Right, I'm not expecting fresh info from you, but we might come up with something combining our perspectives. I've read alot of the lawsuit material. There's ways other than posting your email: private channel, social media account...
We should coordinate on revealing IE/QE, I don't have premium so if you want to send me a message, or we can find a way to connect without posting email on here.
Because its a discussion forum for discussing viewpoints about the company. Why are you posting asking why ppl are commenting about a microcap stock on an investing forum called InvestorsHub thats for considering positions about an investment?
Yeah, Why wouldn't someone just acculumate stock while the company has a market cap in the millions instead of offering billions out of nowhere. It's the kind of blatant false statement business people know to put in a call vs writing.
Wow!
Even their own supporters can't explain the role solar panels provide. It's a clear simple question: If the magnetic propulsion provides the power/torque, What does sticking a solar panel to supply a few watts by collecting interior light. You can't get net energy by putting a photovoltaic under a LED using electricity - Its like Kevin's "Big Mac Idea" in The Office; There's no overall gain of material.
Kevin is a Secret Genius
The Suprock lawsuit continues to grind along. They had a 3rd settlement conference on Mon with attorney David Timchak, QE CFO & Suprock parties, but no agreement yet.
I am interested in the pro-QE position if you would explain it rather than declare.
Could you just cover why inside solar panels are useful? Solar Irradiance = ~ 1361 W/m2, vs less from interior lighting.
What is the base source of the energy? Rare Earths, Solar? Does it need the solar panels or are they supplementary to the motor/engine/flywheel? Why did they keep murmuring defamation, hire IP lawyer David Lin to pickup the phone to say "I'll connect with the client" then never get back to me about their claimed reputational damage?
https://ilawco.com/attorneys/david
I have done the DD, I've read the Suprock, Meyer-Inductance, & Wyo Tech Lawsuits, as well as they're presentations, but there fundamental unanswered questions - Seeing the Danzik devices in-person would not provide novel information.
Seeing buildings they own/rent and the Danzik devices would not tell me more than the videos. Having access to offices and a checkbook does not clarify anything about the technology.
Lack of negative press about an non-launched product provides no information.
PR firms are not an engineering certification. Did Theranos have a "highly rated" press relations firm?
I am not going on a tour because the guy (D. Danzik) doxxed me after he wasn't able to trick me into showing up to be handed a lawsuit.
These are all claims of future events, Was there anything compelling to someone who wants to see observable outcomes, not words or documents?