Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ah, shucks, Mr Dorick. You know how much i need a Danzik doohickey, guaranteed to use more power than it delivers.
Revolutionize Your Energy Bill with the Dennis Danzik Magnetic Generator: The Ultimate Solution for Sustainable Power!
"Introducing the innovative product, the Dennis Danzik Magnetic Generator, designed to provide a sustainable and cost-effective solution for generating electricity. This state-of-the-art generator is brought to you by Jinhua Huilong Machinery Co., Ltd., a reliable supplier, factory, and manufacturer based in China. With the increasing demand for renewable energy sources, the Dennis Danzik Magnetic Generator has proven to be one of the most efficient and reliable energy sources available today. Its unique design uses magnetic fields to generate electricity, which means it has no emission or pollution, making it an eco-friendly option. This magnetic generator is easy to maintain and can operate for an extended period without any interruption, making it a reliable option for homes, businesses, and industries. The Dennis Danzik Magnetic Generator is a game-changer in the world of energy generation, providing an affordable and sustainable solution that meets the needs of today's world. Order now from Jinhua Huilong Machinery Co., Ltd. and experience the benefits of this game-changing product."
For Pete's sake, Mr. PC - stop worrying about what "soon" means, and just ORDER ONE now! How else are you ever going to Revolutionize Your Energy Bill?
Ah, that must be the mythical "magnetic propulsion", soon to be released. I am very impatient by nature and it feels like i have been waiting a lifetime for my earth/photon engine- i thought soon meant soon. Maybe it means never?
Mr. MagnetLover: "seemingly legit website?" The whole website is garbage.
what in the world is this ??? Random page on a seemingly legit website. No corresponding product that could fit the description of the Danzik generator.
https://www.hlm-transaxle.com/dennis-danzik-magnetic-generator/
Mr. MagnetLover: Here’s a technical critique (by Grok) of the statements and claims made by Danzik’s company regarding their SAFEwatt ethernet power adapter and related EET technology, based on the provided description:
Overview of Claims
Danzik’s company asserts that their SAFEwatt ethernet power adapter, part of a broader series of electrical accessories under EET technology, revolutionizes power delivery for devices like laptops, desktops, monitors, and servers. They claim it replaces traditional "high consumption inversion and conversion electrical devices," reducing power usage significantly. Specifically, they state that a typical laptop adapter consumes 140–200 watts from a 110–120V AC wall plug, while their SAFEwatt adapter cuts this to "15–20 volts DC and an average of 60 watts," or about one-third the power consumption. They also suggest this technology scales to over 200 custom adapters for various low-voltage DC devices, which they argue are currently "overpowered" by standard AC sources.
Let’s dissect these claims technically and evaluate their validity.
1. Mischaracterization of Typical Adapter Power Consumption
Claim: A typical laptop power adapter consumes 140–200 watts from a 110–120V AC wall plug.
Critique:
This figure is significantly inflated for laptops. Standard laptop chargers typically range from 45W to 90W, with high-performance models (e.g., gaming laptops) reaching up to 120W. Even accounting for efficiency losses (modern adapters are often 85–90% efficient), the input power from the wall would be closer to 50–100W, not 140–200W. For example:
A 65W laptop charger at 90% efficiency draws approximately 72W from the wall (65W ÷ 0.9).
A 120W charger at 85% efficiency draws about 141W, which is at the low end of their range but still rare for a "typical" laptop.
The 140–200W range might apply to desktop power supplies or other devices, but desktops use internal power supplies (often 300W+), not standalone adapters. The claim lacks specificity and exaggerates typical laptop adapter consumption, undermining its credibility.
2. Confusing Power Reduction Metrics
Claim: The SAFEwatt adapter reduces power consumption to "15–20 volts DC and an average of 60 watts," or about one-third of a typical adapter’s consumption.
Critique:
This statement conflates voltage (volts) and power (watts), which is a fundamental technical error:
Voltage (V) is the potential difference, not a measure of power consumption.
Power (W) is the product of voltage (V) and current (A), i.e., P = V × I.
Saying it "reduces consumption to 15–20 volts DC" is nonsensical without specifying current. They likely mean the adapter outputs 15–20V DC at a current yielding 60W (e.g., 20V × 3A = 60W). However:
If a laptop requires 65W (e.g., 19V × 3.42A), supplying only 60W could result in insufficient power, leading to slow charging or performance throttling.
Reducing power to "one-third" (e.g., from 180W to 60W) implies the device operates normally on less power, which contradicts basic electronics—devices draw what they need, not what the adapter arbitrarily limits.
This suggests either a misunderstanding of power delivery or an unstated assumption about efficiency gains, which they fail to clarify.
3. Applicability Across Diverse Devices
Claim: The technology applies to laptops, desktops, monitors, broadcast stations, and servers, with over 200 custom adapters planned.
Critique:
Device power needs vary widely:
Monitors: Typically 20–50W.
Laptops: 45–120W.
Desktops: 300W+ (via internal power supplies).
Servers: Hundreds to thousands of watts, depending on scale.
A single adapter outputting "an average of 60W" cannot feasibly power such a range. For example:
A 60W adapter might suffice for a monitor but not a 65W+ laptop or a 500W server.
Power over Ethernet (PoE), implied by "ethernet power adapter," has limits: standard PoE delivers 15.4W, PoE+ up to 30W, and PoE++ up to 60–90W per port. Even at 60W, it’s inadequate for desktops or servers.
Scaling to "over 200 custom adapters" suggests tailored solutions, but without details on how they overcome these power disparities, the claim feels impractical and speculative.
4. Misuse of Terminology: "Inversion and Conversion" and "Overpowered" Devices
Claim: The adapters replace "high consumption inversion and conversion electrical devices" and address devices "overpowered by common 110 to 120 V AC and 240-volt AC power sources."
Critique:
Inversion and Conversion: Inversion (DC to AC) is irrelevant here; most devices use AC-to-DC conversion via adapters. "High consumption" conversion likely refers to inefficient AC-DC adapters, but modern switching power supplies are already 85–95% efficient. Any improvement would be incremental, not a two-thirds reduction.
Overpowered: Devices aren’t "overpowered" by wall voltage (110–120V AC or 240V AC). Adapters step down and regulate voltage/current to match device needs (e.g., 19V DC for laptops). The term is misused—wall voltage is standard, not excessive.
This terminology is either sloppy or deliberately vague, obscuring the actual mechanism of improvement.
5. Feasibility of Ethernet-Based Power Delivery
Claim: The SAFEwatt is an "ethernet power adapter."
Critique:
Power over Ethernet (PoE) is a known technology, but its limitations challenge the claim:
PoE standards cap at 60–90W (PoE++), which aligns with their "60W average" but falls short for many laptops, desktops, and servers.
Delivering higher power over ethernet cables (e.g., Cat5e/Cat6) risks heat buildup, voltage drop, or cable damage unless they’ve innovated beyond IEEE 802.3 standards—yet no such breakthrough is specified.
Without evidence of a novel PoE approach, this restricts the adapter’s practical use to low-power devices, not the broad range claimed.
6. Efficiency and Savings Potential
Analysis:
If the intent is improved efficiency (less wasted power in conversion), let’s estimate:
A 65W laptop with a 90% efficient adapter draws ~72W from the wall.
At 95% efficiency (optimistic for SAFEwatt), it draws ~68W—a 4W savings, not two-thirds.
Achieving a 60W input (from 180W) implies either:
A device needing only 60W (unrealistic for many cited devices), or
Efficiency exceeding 100%, which is physically impossible.
Without a radical new technology (unspecified), the claimed reduction is implausible.
Conclusion
The claims from Danzik’s company are technically questionable:
Exaggerated baselines: 140–200W for laptop adapters is overstated.
Confused metrics: Mixing volts and watts muddies the explanation.
Impractical scope: A 60W adapter can’t universally power such diverse devices.
Vague innovation: No clear mechanism justifies the dramatic savings.
It’s possible they’ve developed an efficient PoE-based adapter, but the lack of specificity, incorrect terminology, and unrealistic figures suggest hype over substance. For credibility, they’d need to provide patents, technical specs, or test data showing how they achieve these reductions—otherwise, this reads as an overhyped marketing pitch. If considering their products, demand hard evidence of power savings and compatibility before trusting these claims over established solutions.
Agreed, absolute nonsense.
A series of powerful electrical accessories has emerged from EET technology which includes a new series of electrical adapters, and connectors which replace high consumption inversion and conversion electrical devices. One specific example is the SAFEwatt ethernet power adapter that replaces a wide variety of electrical adapters that power laptop and desktop computers. A typical power adapter for even the simplest of laptops will consume anywhere from 140 to as much as 200 Watts of electrical energy, as that adapter is powered by a common 110 to 120 V AC wall plug. Replacing such adapters with a SAFEwatt adapter reduces that power consumption to 15 to 20 volts DC, and an average of 60 Watts, or about one third the power consumption of a typical computer adapter. The technology also applies to monitors, broadcast stations and computer servers. The Company estimates this product series will exceed 200 custom EET adapter devices for use in mobile phone chargers, laptop computers, desktop computers, desk lighting, computer servers, and a wide variety of other low-voltage direct current consumption devices, that currently are overpowered by common 110 to 120 V AC and 240-volt AC power sources.
Thank you, Mr MagnetLover for your appraisal of the 10k. I only glanced at it and i obviously missed important details.
I went through the last 10K (audited this time), which is quite a read.
The company has 0 cash, zilsh, nada. Pretends to have 6.5M rev for 2023 (with all the unknown distributors that don't have websites... you know the drill). But got 0 cashflow from them. The 6.5M are parked in the receivables section (recognized, unpaid). Wouldn't hold my breath on the repayments of those "contracts"
The Company projects that it will increase its potential installation fees during its 2025 fiscal year to more than $150 million, and that potential recurring revenue contracts will exceed $100 million.
True, but that was several years ago and age continues to advance, unfortunately.
Mr. PC: But I seem to remember that you're the guy who gets called out of retirement to do complicated electrical enfineering work that nobody else knows how to do (certainly including me, of course)!
Thank you Mr Dorick for perusing the 10k and elucidating the egregious errors it contains. I am but an old fogey and i do not have the energy to do what you have done.
Where did you get the information about Holcomb?
As in practically all of his deceptive and fraudulent videos, Danzik refers in his 10-K report to the "minimal input power" consumed by his so-called "Photon Engine" - without ever disclosing the highly material fact that the output power produced is just as minimal as the input power consumed. This is FRAUD BY OMISSION.
Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a)] states:
“It shall be unlawful for any person in the offer or sale of any securities (including security-based swaps) or any security-based swap agreement (as defined in section 78c (a) (78) of this title) by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly,
(1) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud, or
(2) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or
(3) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.”
I now re-allege and incorporate by reference the paragraphs within the section entitled “FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS.”
By engaging in the conduct described above, Danzik, Inductance Energy, Quantum Energy, and FlooidCX, directly or indirectly, in the offer or sale of securities, by use of the means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails,
(1) with scienter, employed devices, schemes, or artifices to defraud;
(2) obtained money or property by means of untrue statements of material fact or by omitting to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and
(3) engaged in transactions, practices, or courses of business which operated or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon purchasers.
By reason of the foregoing, Danzik, Inductance Energy, Quantum Energy, and FlooidCX violated, and unless restrained and enjoined will continue to violate, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77q(a)].
Continuing SECURITIES FRAUD by Dennis Danzik:
Dennis Danzik's deceptive and fraudulent Form 10-K report of 04/15/2025 states:
"Photon Engines- These engines exemplify efficiency, converting minimal input power (typically less than 12 volts DC) into stored mechanical energy, and then converts that stored energy into conditioned and clean electrical energy, (typically 48 volts DC), a hallmark of innovation in energy generation. Danzik’s Magnetic Propulsion discoveries allow a single low speed flywheel to multiply the speed of subsequent flywheels in the engine system, and then the alternator systems, which then rotate at high speeds of 500 to over 5,000 rpm. Magnetic Propulsion refers to the magnetic levitation, and increased speed of each flywheel, with zero contact, permanent magnet drives, that eliminate chains, conventional transmissions, belts, gears and all other physical drive connections."
Scammer Danzik's references to "minimal input power (typically less than 12 volts DC)" and "clean electrical energy, (typically 48 volts DC)" are misleading and deceptive, since neither power nor energy can be measured in volts. Danzik evidently hopes that uninformed investors will believe that an increase from 12 to 48 volts represents an increase of power and energy, which it does not. (It merely represents an increase in potential, which can be achieved by reducing the current, without any increase in power.) He claims that this system involves a "hallmark of innovation in energy generation," which it does not. The system actually uses a type of electric motor (not an "engine" as we normally use word) to drive an electric generator. Far from "exemplifying efficiency," the system wastes electrical energy by converting it to mechanical energy and back again to electrical energy, which cannot be done without losses. This system does not incorporate any new "Magnetic Propulsion discoveries" whatsoever, and Scammer Danzik has never made any new "Magnetic Propulsion discoveries" whatsoever. His years-long pretense and countless claims of having done so are misleading, deceptive, and fraudulent. He is not only a pathological liar, but a very audacious one. No one should believe a single word he says about anything at all, in his deceptive and fraudulent 10-K report or anywhere else, without corroboration from someone who is not a pathological liar.
lol, not a chance.
Truly amazing!!!!!
6 of them.
Maybe it's NOT pixie dust!
I read through most of that 10k- a load of nonsense and abuse of relevant terms on the technical side. They do however seem to have some success selling franchises for pixie dust at the rate of $1.5million. It amazes me that this has gone on so long.
Hi all, i may or may not have previously stated that i have been following two energy scams and giving whatever help of a technical nature i can to those fighting these scams. Well now it is down to one, ie D.Danzik in his many incarnations, as the other one, Holcomb, has bit the dust. The FBI raided them last week and it's all over. The question now is how long will Danzik survive?
Hey, 10K for 2023 filed today......
I fear the rare earth dept of quantum/flooidcx/qqqq is just another pipe dream, like the earth/photon engine.
Now that China has suspended rare earth exports as a part of the trade war, wouldn’t this be a great time for Quantum Energy to unleash its mining and refining capability? Things have been awfully quiet in QuantumLand.
Thanks for your efforts as well, Mr. PC, and you've been a great ally in debunking Scammer Danzik.
Mr Dorick, i commend your activities.
Mr. Bystander: Last year I filed three separate complaints to the SEC, against Inductance Energy Corp, Quantum Energy Inc, and FlooidCX Corp. Then I wrote a single combined complaint against those three companies and Dennis Danzik himself, but I decided that it would be best to wait and file it after Trump's new SEC Chair had a chance to get settled in. Well he's been there almost three months now, so I will go ahead and file it. I also wrote a long supplementary document containing transcripts and detailed critiques of each of Scammer Danzik's deceptive and fraudulent videos (including the ones he removed from his youtube channel), which I will file along with the Complaint. Actually I didn't quite finish it yet, but now I will stop procrastinating and force myself to do so. I continue to be mystified that no one has started a class-action suit yet.
Did you ever file your complaint with the SEC?
Where is the esteemed Mr Szilard these days? One wonders has the "penny finally dropped"?
Long time no see, Mr. Bystander... Scammer Danzik's "Direct Energy" revolution is simply in the "run" phase of his "Take The Money And Run" business model. Unless someone files a lawsuit, it looks like the show's over.
Years ago on Revolution Green an ornery poster named TK posted (regarding the Earth Engine)
“This is the most boringest energy revolution ever!”
He couldn’t have framed it better…this truly is the most boringest energy revolution ever.
One might say his buttons are "soon to be released".
All joking aside, he is a terrible dresser! You’d think a magnet magnate could do better!
He is getting quite fat, his jacket buttons look like a deep breath would pop them!
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Peter_Glatzer,_Elisabeth_R%C3%B6hm,_Dennis_Danzik_%26_Elizabeth_Danzik_%2853695553209%29.jpg
Dennis having a good time I see?
Probably not the well thought out answer you’re looking for to your (reasonable) questions but simply put, Dennis Danzik is a loser.
Your Mark Twain response made me laugh!
The way it was explained to me after I looked it up, investors should probably be asking how does Danzik get from being Bankrupt, having multiple failed (companies), multiple judgments against him from investors in his past failed companies, no money to pay his judgments, a warrant for his arrest and past due tax liens, to this:
Investors having sent millions to this new company, Danziks past judgements and investors in his past failed companies were all paid off, the warrant for his arrest dismissed, the majority of shares in the new company or companies owned by Danzik and his wife, the pattens being issued in Danzik personal name, and the investors in the new company have nothing to show for it but years of promised shares issued in a real company, with a promise of massive results but no audited financial statements and years of nothing reported in sales. Mr. Szilard doesn’t say anything about any of that.
The answer must have something to do with the group of people in control of both Quantum and flooidCX, what the new investor funds were used for, all of these confusing ticker symbols, swapping these company names, and people being unwilling to disclose simple audited financial statements required by the FCC, or issue any shares in the new company or companies to anyone but themselves.
Mr. Szilard is the one that told everyone to look it up, so clearly, he knows all of this.
MsRoxanne: Mark Twain defined a gold mine as "a hole in the ground with a liar on top." This definition would obviously apply perfectly to Dennis Danzik's rare earth mine as well, except that in Danzik's case there is probably not even any hole - just a liar. "Rare earths" are not actually very rare - the problem is that the process of extracting them is so expensive that it's usually very difficult to make a profit while doing so - especially in America, which enforces very strict regulations.
Maybe, now that the Trump/Zelenskyy rare earth deal has imploded, Quantum Energy can swoop in and save the day! I recall QE claiming to have a rare earth mine somewhere in Wyoming? I’m sure the processing facility renovations have been completed by now, right? 😉
I would suggest investors sharing that they exist so they can come together to discuss legal options.
Apart from extravagant living expenses i would reckon a lot of loot has been burned through in the manufacture of all those silly props used by IEC and then Quantum: although of no use to man or beast they do display a very high standard of workmanship and would not have come cheap.
Mr. MagnetLover: Apart from retribution, there's the little matter of returning the ill-gotten tens of millions of dollars back to the investors the companies scammed! It's a mystery why no investor has started a class-action lawsuit yet (as far as I know). I don't know what they're waiting for.
Now that both companies are at 0. The only thing I am waiting for is the retribution for all the malfeasance.
Mr. Szilard pretty much trusted this board while running out the back door. People like Danzik don't just arbitrarily attack attention like on this board without having provoked enough people to start a following. Thirty-nine registered followers wouldn't include any of the follower's that have chosen not to register, and there are probably more.
Instead of trying to create the illusion that posters and investors here are the problem, maybe Mr. Szilard could provide more explanations
for the legit post.
Danzik could have done anything he wanted with technology with his own money, but he took money from investors into a public company.
Now he doesn't like the rules for public companies and wants to blame all of the commotion on people that post here.
Every time i look at the "distributor" map it has increased in number but all look dubious with none having contact details. I reckon he is just trying to sell a distributorship, albeit with nothing to back it up. "Look everyone wants a piece of the action- buy yours now before they are all gone"!!!
Mr. PC: I'm giving Trump's newly appointed Chair of the Securities Exchange Commission, which prosecutes SECURITIES FRAUD, a little time to get settled in. Then some things will start happening and it won't be so quiet.
Has Mr Szilard abandoned us? Oh dear, what a shame.
Followers
|
40
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
1
|
Posts (Total)
|
2913
|
Created
|
04/11/17
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |