As it should be

How could this happen? One share was traded today? Was it an insider?

It’s been like that for awhile. It’s 10 billion common and 10 billion preferred.

Hey WTF should be the ticker symbol in place of QPRC

No.

So it has a faint pulse?

Big1Card always makes me laugh. That’s over 20 years old.

I got in yesterday so it will go to 50 and I can get some more at lower price. Every stock I buy tanks so playing into my strengths

That’s new seeing 500k shares bought on the high side at the end

Yes I remember the name. I can’t remember what my name was back when the chatter was on raging bull. Think it was sop. Actually the model now is kind of like the initial product incubator. Where are those sunglasses? I do remember buying the phase out product just to see what it looked like. Wonder how much Sol Wynn is making here.

And don’t worry, twenty years goes by fast.

Better call Saul

First time ‘on the hook’

I am wondering if this covid19 is going to spoil possible good news. Though the spread seems to communicate lack of interest?

Give it twenty years. They’ll come up with a new model and maybe it will get bss as ok to 4 cents. Heck maybe Trendtrade will still be posting his rage his exuberance of eloquence

CXT is losing the case?

Yes 10q 10k. Wonder if they will grow from astronomical one time settlements.

“...Although we intend to seek to develop portfolios of intellectual property rights that provide us for a continuing stream of revenue, to date we have not been successful in doing so, and we do not anticipate that we will be able to generate any significant revenue from licenses that provide a continuing stream of revenue...”

Have there been official reporting of the valuations for these settlements? The value stream they will contribute and the lifecycle periods for revenues? I don’t recall any disclosure or breakouts of $$ received by settlement. One would think some disclosure would be provided if $$ exchanged hands or qualified per recognition guidance. All I conclude is agreements reached on court cases but no significant $$. That may be why sub penny. No one knows what’s going on so difficult to determine valuation of stock.

Nothing is going on

Too bad. This should have already hit the dollars level and held. Unfortunate that it’s just an intellectual property stock. People can’t comprehend that along with the majority of those involved are lawyers.

QPRC Revenue Recognition:
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Under Topic 606, revenue is recognized when there is a contract which has commercial substance which is approved by both parties and identifies the rights of the parties and the payment terms. The Company adopted Topic 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method, with no impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.

No it’s not for you.

Apple motion to move hearing to CA denied.

I keep thinking this should be in the dollars realm of share price. If we get some insight into value stream of Amazon and Apple on horizon plus all the other retail companies like ASUS and Huwae etc. This just seems to be extremely undervalued. Like they have no advocate.

Feels more like below zero temperatures.

I’m only comparing how they’ve been performing this year. It’s obvious they need 5 million in 4Q to match last years annual revenues. Hopefully good news comes in the 4Q annual report.

For the three months of the 3rd quarter Quest generated 600k+ of revenue. For the total 9 months combined of quarters 1 thru 3 they generated 2 million. On average 3Q generated less revenue on a quarter by quarter basis.

Quest Licensing - delivering automatic update information to mobile devices

quest licensing corporation
The Quest Licensing portfolio consists of three issued United States patents and one pending application relating to the automatic update of information delivered to a mobile device.
Licensing Activities:

Quest Licensing Corporation v. Bloomberg LP et al
Quest Licensing Corporation v. The Charles Schwab Corporation et al
Quest Licensing Corporation v. FactSet Research Systems Inc.
Quest Licensing Corporation v. Interactive Data Corporation
Quest Licensing Corporation v. SunGard Data Systems Inc.

Quest Net Tech is the subsidiary that merged with the Wynn subsidiary that previously was not part of the consolidation reporting. Wynn gets 35% of the goods from my reading of that merger. Quest Net Tech has the case with Apple. This deals with payment/financial systems and should be significant IMO.

Quest Nettech corporation
Quest NetTech Corporation is the owner of US Patent No. RE38,137 a reissue of US Patent No. 5,859,419. The invention describes a universal financial data system which allows its holder to use the device to access one or more accounts stored in the memory of the device as a cash payment substitute as well as to keep track of financial and transaction records and data, such as transaction receipts, in a highly portable package, such as a cellular device. The inventive universal data system is capable of supporting multiple accounts of various types, including but not limited to credit card accounts, checking/debit accounts, and loyalty accounts.
Licensing Activities:
?
Current Licensing Programs:

Quest NetTech Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Top section lists the pending license programs in work i.e. the ASUS one is in that list. Bottom section are the settled “completed” cases

Semcon IP Inc.
The Semcon IP Inc. portfolio consists of four United States patents that cover fundamental technology for adjusting the processor clock and voltage to save power based on the operating characteristics of the processor; and one United States patent that relates to coordinating direct bus communications between subsystems in an assigned channel.
?
Licensing Activities:
?
Current Licensing Programs:
?
Semcon IP Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Semcon IP Inc. v. AsusTek Computer Inc.
Semcon IP Inc. v. TCT Mobile International Limited et al
Semcon IP Inc. v. Kyocera Corporation
Semcon IP Inc. v. Louis Vuitton North America, Inc.
Semcon IP Inc. v. Shenzhen OnePlus Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
Semcon IP Inc. v. Michael Kors Holdings Limited
?
Completed Licensing Programs:
?
Semcon IP Inc. v. Huawei Device USA Inc. et al
Semcon IP Inc. v. MediaTek Inc. et al
Semcon IP Inc. v. STMicroelectronics Inc. et al
Semcon IP Inc. v. Texas Instruments Incorporated
Semcon IP Inc. v. ZTE Corporation et al

Gloater

Gloater

I can’t access the filing so can’t see what the reason is for the extension.

Lawyers, more billable hours to consume revenues.

Nov 15

I’m not holding my breath. Doesn’t the whole show involve lawyers? ??

Pennystockinvestoralerts is pumping

It’s changing my typing nickle to buckle. Too funny

Buckle = nickle

Your values just get it to a buckle range. I’m expecting something more representative of a company with maturing its balance sheet beyond penny stock pump and dump fluctuations. Hopefully that is what the forthcoming 3Q and annual report will reflect. If it demonstrates Nasdaq potential the 400 - 500 percent is not worth my position. If the share structure is not improved and no significant improvement to net profit then shenanigans will be suspected. That’s just my take based on the history of last 20 plus years. 400 - 500 percent gain is probably good for folks that bought at current price and below.