Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Agreed. This company has been flapping its wings for quite some time now without ever getting aloft...I certainly hope that changes before this month draws to a close, but who knows?
Sort of like an NFL quarterback with multiple pre-snap reads who can't make up his mind which direction to head in(?). If we can just secure enough financial backing to get these projects off the ground perhaps we'll be the darling of Wall Street someday? Or is it something else?
I concur heartily on all points and hope this turns out well for all of us--shortly....
Agreed, sadly. I bought my original stake of shares some time ago when SMME was trading in the very low trips and dumped most of it at a profit which allowed me to keep a small remnant of free shares...Good luck to anyone still hoping this company will deliver transformative wealth in the months or years ahead...For the sake of those who've taken a bath here I sure hope that it does, but it at this point it seems unlikely--at least it does to me.
Dude you couldn't be more ignorant if you were born an hour ago...
Look, if it's too deep for you to see that the metaphor of flapping wings without ever getting aloft refers to the entities who are supposedly trying to breathe life into this dead corpse of a company (aka the CEO or other administrators) then I'd suggest a crash course in common sense or freshman English--not that either one will do you much good based on your brain dead attempt at a rebuttal--if I can even call it that...
What gives you the idea that I'm "involved in this scam"? I shed my shares ages ago because this stock has always flapped its wings without ever getting aloft--which I thought I implied in my comment about the administrators forever 'preparing and never arriving'--or did that part of the remark go over your head, Einstein?
Flippers and fools? Always preparing...never arriving~
No. I shed my Bio shares incrementally quite some time ago and have a comparative pittance left...
Like most bulletin board companies this stock has turned out to be little more than fodder for flippers since I first bought into it a long time ago--a status which falls considerably short of the expectations I once had for it. That said, can we still make money here? Of course, but considering all of the products in their pipeline and the rosy predictions made for them I was hoping Bio would someday develop into one of those Diamond-in-the-Rough\'Set it and Forget it' stocks...Maybe it will at some point but I'm no longer betting on it...
Thanks for this explanation...
That explains a lot...And your thoughts about the likelihood of Athena helping to secure buy-in from potential suitors in government, Pharma or the military?
Paying close attention to between-the-lines info is always advisable when it concerns stock purchases--particularly those that trade on the OTC. But that still leaves the main question unanswered: Why would major universities like Mississippi State, and ASU, et al, waste their time--and funds--on research projects for a company they hadn't thoroughly investigated beforehand? Perhaps there's a logical explanation but that doesn't make sense to me...
That's undoubtedly true. But the fact that he's likely in profit already as a result of those centi-million dollar contracts with military suitors decreases the exigency of solving the mess he and his CFO had a hand in creating right from the start due partly to lax Series B documentation--penalizing his shareholders and tarnishing his image as a result...(if that even matters)
The sad fact is that as long as Cyberlux is making money anyway via Pentagon (and other) contracts, there's much less urgency or incentive for Mark Schmidt to suss things out with the OTC regarding the unfathomable length of time it's taken thus far to put this caveat emptor issue to rest once and for all...
Good point about the incremental rise in share price sans significant news...Fingers and toes crossed that it continues into the teens prior to the much anticipated news on contracts and (military?) funding...
Soon after the restriction was imposed, didn't Mark Schmidt tell us that he'd be providing weekly--or at least monthly--updates related to his progress in removing the Caveat Emptor designation? If so, what happened to them? (And WHY, more tellingly...) I mean, he may actually be trying his damndest to make things right with the OTC through his attorneys but we ought to be hearing SOMETHING from him as to where the company stands with its efforts...
Based on this stock's history that sounds plausible, but then I'd have to ask how Halberd's paper tiger status escaped notice during the vetting process initiated by Mark Darrah at Athena GTX--not to mention the science administrators at MSU? What would drive either of them to form a partnership with William Hartman if they felt that Halberd's research and, derivatively, their products were fraudulent or nonactionable? Just curious...
Is it?
Few here would have guessed that...Thanks for the clarification...
Yet you're still invested in it?
If you still have residual stock in this company hoping that you can cover previous losses in the event of a spike in price, constantly bashing BABL and the investors who have a stake in it doesn't figure to achieve that...But if you don't have shares in Buildablock then why in f*ck's name are you posting the same redundant vituperations over and over and over again? Just curious. (Slightly...)
At this point my Inner Cynic feels that Cyberlux will continue flapping its wings indefinitely without ever getting aloft. As far as I'm concerned Brett Rosen can take his 1:20 RS proposal and go straight to hell. But if Mark Schmidt wants to atone for his poor stewardship of this company--from an investor's point of view--which resulted in the current restrictions on our stock, the least he can do on our behalf is to shelve the reverse split talk and allow the proceeds from the contracts he's reportedly signed with the Pentagon to lift the stock price on its own over time since we've been waiting this long anyway....
Okay. Message received...DumbMetric is a bare faced scam...WE GET IT...So why else are you here?
Do you currently own shares of Halberd? If so, bad mouthing the company is counterproductive, to put it nicely...But if you don't have a stake in Halberd, then why are you here?
Accounting gimmicks like reverse splits almost always f*ck small fry investors out of a chance to secure transformative income not easily obtained by working 40 or more hours weekly at a conventional job. So if an investor had 100,000 shares and thought he had a chance to pay off his house when the stock price bloomed, a 1:20 reverse split would pretty much kill that...And if they held 20K shares a fractional split like that would leave him with a paltry total of a thousand shares...I think I'd lose my mind...But instead of growing the stock organically bulletin board companies do cheap corner cutting stuff like that all of the time...
How long ago was this video shot?
The $78 million dollar DOD contract--among other commercial successes achieved by this company-- represents both a glaring contrast and a disturbing disconnect with Cyberlux's almost microscopic PPS...Again, I'm not optimistic--and won't be until the CEO comes out of hiding and provides a cogent explanation for the thirteen month delay in expunging the dumpster fire that this company has become.
Brett always sounds enthusiastic when he's in front of the camera. But what else is he going to say to investors here? That the entire venture is a thinly veiled, haphazardly run crap shoot and that he's helping to facilitate it? Fat chance--and FWIW I'm not the least bit optimistic...
Thinking that Kevin Damoa was a smart ex-military guy I originally jumped in with both feet here, and I still have a small stake left in GEGI....For a variety of reasons their concept seemed like a great idea, but I dumped most of it as time went along because I just didn't see them navigating their way through the thicket of state and federal regulatory hurdles that would confront (and likely derail) them--pun very much intended. I also feel this company is poorly managed--in addition to being poorly connected in this sector and poorly funded--and I doubt Genesis will amount to anything in the foreseeable future. But that doesn't mean you can't make money off of the speculative frenzy that figures to ensue in the months ahead...Good luck to all of you in that regard; I could be wrong but I think you'll need it...
I think the main reason for the tepid enthusiasm with IGPK is the failure of so many bulletin board stocks over the years to live up to the grandiose predictions of success made for it by well meaning(?) administrators and investors trying to hit the Mother Lode once and for all...Good luck to everyone invested here...Myself included...
True enough as to when sh*t shares (of any stock) can be dropped in exchange for a write off...I just never dreamed that Cyberlux would have been one of them--at least initially--given their technology and the perceived ongoing need for more firepower in global conflict zones...GLTU & GLTA...
A year or more ago I remember posting here several times that CEO Mark Schmidt felt like a charlatan who was mainly interested in prospering himself at the expense of the shareholders, and that Brett Rosen was his principal enabler. And I also recall being shouted down by a few people in this forum for being 'negative'. So this morning after several months of not paying attention to Cyberlux I decided to take a look and see if anything had changed for the better, but evidently the same arrows are pointing downward with no real reason for me to conclude that better days lie ahead. We're now seeing the false hype and false hope for what it really was all along: an expensive soup sandwich cooked up by a chef with no conscience...I'm not even disgusted anymore--just glad I bailed when I did and hope others whose confidence was misplaced here did so as well before it was too late...
This transaction should propel our stock price into the stratosphere in the weeks ahead.....or when fish climb trees...Take your pick on the odds of either one eventuating...
I can no longer recall, but does it really matter?
What kind of company goes dark on their investors? One that's poorly run, poorly funded, poorly conceived and headed for the exit in the foreseeable future...Again, since I'm heavily invested here I hope I'm 1000% wrong...
I'd like to believe that but my Inner Cynic has seen far too many bulleting board busts over the years that looked and sounded just like BioAdaptives to bet the farm that things will suddenly turn around and reward us handsomely for our patience. Of course I hope I'm dead wrong, but time will tell...It always does, doesn't it?
Agreed...Even though it provides exposure to large institutional investors who don't normally look at bulletin board stocks, being listed on a senior exchange isn't the automatic ticket to prosperity many think it is...Over the years I've seen a number of bad companies on the NASDAQ and the NYSE and a number of good ones that trade on the upper tiers of the OTC (QB & QX)...As long as we're well run, well capitalized and well connected this company should do well whichever trading platform it lands on...(JMO)
I heartily concur...After hearing about Rick Jordan and Yuengling in a different forum I opened a small position in this company since they're in an underserved sector of the economy with the potential--if well managed--for significant growth...Because I'm a bit late to the party this question may already have been asked (and answered) but considering their IT focus, is a name change to a title reflecting their new emphasis being contemplated? Just curious...Thanks!
You're right San'...I was given incorrect info yesterday by my broker, ironically. The markets will be on regular schedule...Good luck to us now and in the New Year with all of our investments...