Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanks, I googled too.
To interpret the screen shots, you really have to omit some of the “noise” that was presumably not part of the study.
Gotta compare apples to apples.
In this case, Mailchimp with vs without nFusz tech. That’s the point.
Google/cpc and organic are different modalities that do not relate to the hypothesis being studied. They just happen to be on the screenshot.
You seem to have a good handle on the study results. Can you explain what google/cpc and google/organic mean?
He’s a bit busy now. You do understand that he has priorities...
You’ve been here long enough to know what to do.
You don’t need us to push you.
So much anger in this world...
Good call
There could be an update but there isn’t. There hasn’t been one since 2016. Must have been a stagnant past couple years in the digital marketing landscape. But they they did write a new article titled “24 Of The Best Online Video Marketing Tools in 2018”. nFusz is discussed. Hope that suffices. They also did a Powerpoint presentation regarding nFusz a few months ago. Beyond that, you’d have to ask Ignite about how they are doing with nFusz. No one here knows.
Sue for fraud then
To argue your point, common sense, instinct, psychology do not pass as “strong” evidence, especially in science. Otherwise, people would still believe that the heavens revolve around the earth...
Yes
Human psychology
Not only for the investigated but the investigator himself as well
Presumptions galore, “truths” in one’s mind but perhaps not in reality
Your questioning is fair but seriously tainted by editorialization based on presumptions and biases...
Be a scientist.
To discredit research, a scientist doesn’t brush off results that seem too “odd” or too coincidental. Instead, they try to replicate the experiment. If no one can replicate it, then well...
Ok great, you arrived at a conclusion
NOW you must be so convinced enough to finally close your position since I don’t see you touting anything positive about this company except Rory’s earnestness
As long as folks invest (or not invest) based on their own research while not resorting to subversive tactics for their own personal gain, things should be hunky-dory.
EMA a little brazen in trying to exercise warrants while litigation ongoing but I am not a lawyer.
Are we certain it hasn’t been refiled? Was assuming delays due to holidays and such but I don’t know.
No one can force Rory (or any party) to sign a contract even if negotiations are done.
And some ongoing activity with major companies has already been disclosed in SEC filings although you gotta find it.
What you call “holdup”, others would call “typical business proceedings”.
The account has been deleted. Who knows why...
Most coherent post I’ve read all day...
Congratulations
Trust your own research and projections...
Oh dear, I hope people aren’t expecting something magnanimous to happen on 1/2/19. If so, there is a risk of a huge letdown. This is a process, not an event.
Let’s pump the brakes a bit (no pun intended)...
Inventory clearance
Everything must go!
As of 12/14, FUSZ short position down almost 10%.
http://otce.finra.org/ESI
There are plusses and minuses, depending on who you ask. Trust your own due diligence.
Good luck
Fair enough. Can’t argue against your rationale. Best of luck to you too!
Nobody said that this would be easy...
1:2 RS is fine by me...
If they find a catchy quote from a famous figure stating such, maybe they will!!
Nah
A bunch of their tweets are about continuing through adversity. Damn, I feel inspired!!!
Awesome
Thanks for your feedback
I agree, a PR not only would be good to get the word out but also detail the benefits of this partnership.
Thank you! Now I see the light!!
Clutch my pearls!
I’ve got the vapors!
FUSZ short position still fairly unchanged, down only about 3% as of Nov 30 compared to Nov 15.
http://otce.finra.org/ESI
Yeah bye
Holy moly Bill!
Thanks Bill!
Isn’t it in the 8K? Been a while since I looked at it but they did note increase in digital revenues.
I thought it was against SEC regulations to report news in a fashion to consciously affect stock price? Does omission of that detail imply intent of stock price manipulation? Are all companies who omit that detail manipulating as well?
You imply mal-intent through the wording.
I don’t think so.
I don’t recall other companies breaking down between paying and non-paying customers. How can you expect a different reporting verbiage from nFusz/SC?