Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Y'all talked it into reality:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-4FLTZB1hVe1THWFuUT6krU14oZR-5Xr/view?usp=drivesdk
Not sure, but that would seem to be a really smart move at this point.
The first part of the post was from chanbond vs atlantic. Broke Agent was correct. Essentially the judge granted us the time to file a sur reply.
The second part was Chanbond vs Cisco. Nothing was delayed. Everyone should have known by the amount of times it was mentioned that oral arguments are August 6th. This was essentially both sides submitting which lawyer would be arguing for each side.
Does anybody actually read?
ORAL ORDER: Defendants argue the proposed sur-reply is simply a rehash. If so, there is no harm in permitting it. If not, Defendants can file a sur-sur-reply of no more than two pages by July 29, 2019. The sur-reply is ORDERED to be filed. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/15/2019. (nms) (Entered: 07/15/2019)
Cisco:
Response to notice of oral argument from the Appellee Cisco Systems, Inc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10GDa5dimRuLPnLuoSgstS1r6SX8MUKgx/view?usp=drivesdk
Response to notice of oral argument from the Appellant ChanBond, LLC. [620946] [18-1886] [Robert Whitman]
https://drive.google.com/file/d/10IWRY6b19vS9QcXF2O1nH437posiNN4w/view?usp=drivesdk
Lol
Also pacer update today. It's a sealed letter to the judge it looks like. Not sure who from either. Pacer will update later with a least a title.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140400951
or
Deposition of Comcast IP SVP / Proving Willful Infringement / treble damages (3x):
April 10, 2018: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139940185 ;
September 15, 2017: http://www.reexamlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ChanBond-Complaint-ded-1-15-cv-00848-1.pdf ;
I like the theory here. Just not sure if I'm fully convinced thats what this is yet..but it interesting to connect that to the fact Charter,Time Warner,and Brighthouse motioned (outside the other defendants) for summary judgement.
This response was from us:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/107HW9YVp6rkS_t1kjfNrZaqlGVw87veV/view?usp=drivesdk
Same.
If virnet can win 500 million from apple with no support from PTAB.
We are working with a massive revenue stream and have support at PTAB.
Wonder if it will be more like Qualcomm and apple recently.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/appleinsider.com/articles/19/04/17/qualcomm-keeps-quiet-about-apple-deal-value-following-lawsuit-settlement/amp/
Can we flat out stop the charting?
I am truly surprised that people think you can chart a grey market stock.
If you want to chart COMM, go chart it on the COMM page. I understand AJ's angle of how that PPS relates to UOIP but I am sure there are other factors with COMM that have led to that PPS decline.
*PACER Update for Cisco**
Good Night / Good Morning to all you longs. I finally found this:
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 1908F. Case scheduled August 06, 2019 10:00 a.m. at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Howard T. Markey National Courts Building, 717 Madison Place, NW Washington, DC 20439), Courtroom 203. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 07/15/2019. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [616183] [MJL] [Entered: 06/21/2019 05:21 PM]
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-xNELgceOGXLg9CARuwUYM20Wtl3ShJY/view?usp=drivesdk
Just some other input of mine:
1.Motion for Summary Judgement from the defendants.
- After years of the back and forth in this case and given the judge's attitude in the past, I cannot imagine that he would grant this motion. This is important because from what I have read this only increases the settlement offers.
https://law.stanford.edu/2013/06/18/sla-2013-06-18-the-cost-of-discovery-and-summary-judgment-motions/
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148109696
I read an article called the efficiency of summary judgement, googled and found that Magnus posted this previously
"Perhaps the most important feature of summary judgment is the
"settlement premium" set forth in this Essay. When a motion for
summary judgment is denied, the nonmoving party achieves a form of
premium that enables a case to settle for an additional amount. Put
simply, the settlement value of a case increases when a motion for
summary judgment is denied. Denial of summary judgment motions up
the ante in the litigation game.
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/motion-for-summary-judgement-of-70167/
Looks like judge Andrews not afraid to deny, that's not to say he has not granted these motions ever, but as we know each case is unique.To me it is yet another stall tactic. I can't fathom the 13 lawyers truly believing their case is so slam dunk. I also find it comical the 3 players attempting a partial summary judgement, with new arguments.That should be tossed easily.
2.Valuations and royalties being discussed is always nice to see!
$ UOIP $
Great Explanation
Huge Thanks to those who contributed!
As AIF previously mentioned, I gathered all the Pacer documents (with the exception of sealed docs) starting just after Khenry’s sudden disappearance (Please let us know you are ok!) I believe the last post from them was 5-8-19 (Pacer Document 387 and 388 respectively).
This list is going in the same order as we were previously: ( Link First followed by What It Is)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LTPzhFbkk7jgCvkaFSZdpp_M3QiQxRk0/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 389 - MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Motion Regarding Invalidity Combinations (D.I.353 ) is GRANTED WITH CONSTRAINTS (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/14/2019. (nms)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wRDmO-0lVCordG8CTM4-PtYP7d9oJRjc/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 396 - ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re367 MOTION to Exclude the Expert Opinions of Cathleen Thomas Quigley Regarding Written Description and Enablement, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment filed by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC,
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-R3QmxsypFr5WqdrhibGxABldkajt1dh/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 401 - REDACTED VERSION of392 Answering Brief in Opposition, by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Szw0Q9sClxnw5U7lmrZonFAcSr-uBWu/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 402- REDACTED VERSION of398 Answering Brief in Opposition,, by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-WAKmjvG6M3iwcRkNjLqvlqtupNo_qVU/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 403 - REDACTED VERSION of394 Answering Brief in Opposition, by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-bvGn9V9OLeQtjLah0uFVWMHyZZrSkNv/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 404 - REDACTED VERSION of399 Declaration of Krishnan Padmanabhan, by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC.(Ying, Jennifer) Modified on 5/23/2019 (nms)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WQdCmlGQygNUl_lQ4wmglzK5D3KG2tU_/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 405 - REDACTED VERSION of390 Answering Brief in Opposition, by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-dyWlhh-OSe6iZpyARwY0SwhURhiH7Ja/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 406 - REDACTED VERSION of393 Declaration, by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-go7wUOdk7adueNho6noqPpAY6GM_JtF/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 407- REDACTED VERSION of395 Declaration, by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-lSqLhvghW6T2LWRMMXYZ74rSQYHXFax/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 408- REDACTED VERSION of391 Declaration, by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-1Q8QdxIWMH43qDXu84gzTUCEQma5qo7/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 414 - REPLY BRIEF re358 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,941,822 and 8,341,679 filed by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC. (Ying, Jennifer)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-nHcpIWWkLKPlj9w965_YVj7VZtGx98i/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 419 - REDACTED VERSION of410 Reply Brief, by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC. (Ying, Jennifer) Modified on 6/20/2019(nms)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-nJ9QRF0LTuB_t8eVNNbtbq40CQy5sMj/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 420 - REDACTED VERSION of412 Declaration,, by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC.(Ying, Jennifer)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-pXlDh_p7Ue_Qu1zpGkEQGVS-uRh3P9K/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 421 REDACTED VERSION of415 Declaration,, by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC.(Ying, Jennifer)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-puNEG7OVMrNuedYYcSJx2TChXiOHt2b/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 422- r REDACTED VERSION of416 Reply Brief, by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC. (Ying, Jennifer) Modified on 6/20/2019(nms)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-s005JZ2RDyXqbqxWOcn1DEEU_g2z0AB/view?usp=drivesdk
Doc 423 - REDACTED VERSION of417 Declaration, by Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC, Bright House Networks, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cablevision Systems Corporation, Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, Cequel Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Cox Communications, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation, RCN Telecom Services, LLC, Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC, Time Warner Cable Inc., WaveDivision Holdings, LLC, WideOpen West Finance, LLC.(Ying, Jennifer) Modified on 6/20/2019(nms)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-sRzMFWJN169AyFwrbBjFRarbgHpdan0/view?usp=drivesdk
Doc 424 - REDACTED VERSION of413 Reply Brief, by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-Gg5HT5JN4v4qXfN4ixl9Lcpwr8hT8Ij/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 425- REDACTED VERSION of409 Reply Brief by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-729DhY6VzrSjPyHclLuvsRXFhUiSzh4/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 426 - REDACTED VERSION of411 Declaration by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-6Mr53j9Bt4C7sMf23x7DbsL2UcX459e/view?usp=drivesdk
Document 427- Letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews, from Jennifer Ying, regarding requesting oral argument on motions. (Ying, Jennifer) Modified on 6/20/2019 (nms)
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=73510771559197577197
Document 428- Letter to The Honorable Richard G. Andrews, from Stephen B. Brauerman, regarding request for oral argument. (Brauerman, Stephen) Modified on 6/21/2019 (nms)
This should give you folks some good reading until the next update which may be out today. For any real sticklers out there that actually notice, Document 400 was meaningless and 418 was just a notice of service, nothing of substance, so I didn’t include them.
We should have extra funds moving forward after numerous posters were overly generous. We can pump the brakes on donations for now. The last thing I want is to be accused of anything.
LONG AND STRONG
UOIP #UOIP $UOIP$
If anyone wants to really contribute something to the board moving forward...
Chanbond vs Atlantic Broadband is the case
Search on Google and go down to Docket Bird website.
You can get docs for 3.99 a pop. I have done this quite a bit in the past. One can decide to share the doc from there with the group if they so choose. Sometimes its best to check PACER first ( despite it updating later in the day in my experience) because I believe I made the mistake of purchasing a sealed document. If I remember correctly, on PACER you will still have a credit but on Docket Bird I think you are just SOL.
TLDR: Need a go fund me account for the true longs here. Everyone chip in 5 bucks and we can actually read wtf is going on in the case instead of just speculating on the title of the PACER.
$ Pacer Updates Comin $
I saw the RPX supreme court news. Where are all the law articles and blogs regarding this? Normally there would be a couple after an event like today.
$ Pacer Update Coming $
Great Post
Commscope shouldnt be able to initiate an IPR I would hope
Looks like a redacted doc coming on to pacer today
(presumably from a previous sealed item)
There are a couple pacer updates today. I've been paying for each doc 5.5 each. Not doing that today lol. Looks like our response to the previous pacer.
ICE or KHenry, can you come in with the assist?
**Scratch that-they are sealed**
Looks like a new pacer update coming
Hey now! Great find on a Saturday
redacted documents can still have good info > sealed you cant see anything, redacted usually has certain lines blacked out
This shouldn't be a concern my dude.
1. Case should be decided before OCT 2020...thats a year and half away
2. There is details / a process for what happens after that time which I believe BrokeAgent has eluded to before.
K Henry on deck?
I missed this who is Dick Snyder?
nice timing going into a long weekend
Looks like other new docs updated today
Love it
STICKY
Khenry you are on deck. I see court docs today
Anything on the slate today? I saw one site showing a redacted doc posted today 4/2 but checked pacer and didn't see it
please dont show up at the party in elk creek
Please Sticky