Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don't see MTLS going much deeper.. I believe Q1 results will bring this above $8 easy and will end the year closer to $11-13 range if not higher, great value down here
Thank you for your response!
So the idea is to prove the technology with Honeywell to organizations such as "Underwriters Laboratory (UL) and ASTM F42" so that the DEFORM process gains universal acceptance..while also showing a higher efficiency of post-build assurance than traditional methods (CT/US)?..What do these organizations do with this information assuming they like what they see if they are not apart of the standards facilities?
Thank you!
I guess what I'm really asking is do you think this is the first step towards national quality standards in AM or is that reliant on different institutions not affiliated with these?
JJ
Could you comment on your post made on reddit with some more information? What specific qualifications is SGLB trying to obtain with Honeywell? Is this more of a private demonstration for certain individuals tasked in standardizing qualifications in AM?
"Sigma Labs and Honeywell will present DEFORM to the Rapid Standards & Compliance audience. The presentation will discuss DEFORM’s advantage over conventional X-ray CT and coordinated measuring machines (CMM) in the ability to measure complex geometries afforded by AM. DEFORM will be presented to industry leaders such as Underwriters Laboratory (UL) and ASTM F42, organizations active in developing standards for AM. Back to back presentations from all involved, May 20, 2:00 - 4:25 pm."
http://www.reddit.com/r/SGLB/comments/30ose0/sigma_labs_and_honeywell_to_present_deform/
Thank you!
I added 10k shares at .183 and was thinking of getting even more this morning but next I looked it jumped to .216 and gave me a quick 20% so that's my boom
Boom baby!
Added to my MTLS because my SGLB has grown so much
Doubled my position at .18 today... Not sure who's selling but I'm buying anything under .20!
Loading before the gap here..
Could you explain this form?
What software do you use? I like the layout a lot more than everything I can find
The past 6 days has shown very low shorting:
http://otcshortreport.com/index.php?index=SGLB&action=view#.VQLoYor3anM
Good signs, I believe we are at the bottom, unfortunately I am maxed out and can't/won't add to my position, but I don't see this falling too much more since shifters are covering/do not see much potential at this level
Why is GPH3D not listed as one of your picks on here??
They don't?
Very true and that's an extenuating circumstance that would change every valuation of the company. Hopefully that day comes, but until then I see GE adopting PR3D, and begin self-certifying their AM products to be used in LEAP, last time I checked GE has been granted authority to certify their parts to engine standards without the presence of a governing body. I think that will show the first step before any NIST standards are declared.
I don't think it will do much to PPS as shareholders are away that it should be finished soon. Revenue is the only thing to help us at this point, no more news
Thank you for each of your replies! I'll be researching this weekend when I have more time to do so before just diving in. Once again thank you!
Correct, but point is they did not pass and it will be reflected in pps soon enough I'm still long on BLTA but I put too much money into the stock in anticipation for succeeding last night to where I would rather take it out for the time being and continue following.
It was not BLTAs fault at all and in fact they performed well once again, it was chute packing facility like I've said and with the amount of volume today there will be dumping in the near future before they get another go for the mini. I still have a decent amount in BLTA because I believe they will pass, however I made the mistake of buying the anticipation and wanted out while the pps is still at these levels, if they suddenly PR a success I will make everything back that I lost and more with the shares I still own. Like I said I'll be watching and adding when the pps is a little cheaper
I just sold strong majority of my position, called the company and asked what happened. 3/5 chutes deployed properly, 2 did not and again got the "1-2weeks" answer so I'll add again when cheaper shares present itself which they will
I stalked both of you from BLTA board after citri stalked you to blta...Wanna give me a quick synopsis of what SYN has been up to? I am in the medical field so I will be able to understand the goals here if you can point me in the right direction of DD
Someone's selling.. Just hit .017s
Sky is the limit if you're long, short term I hope to see .04-.05 approaching EoW assuming PR is made, and by month assuming proving flights begin soo after the success of the mini. Post-certification looking for .20+... My personal plan is to wait this one out and maybe play the dips here and there if the opportunity presents itself, but absolutely not selling a single share this week if PR is announced. Assuming they passed tonight that should double the current PPS, but give it another month to let this plane take us to new heights once they have the FAAs stamp of approval. Blta has been a laughing stock for a little while, but their management has been spot on with their expectations of the company. Remember blta has been around for quite some time, and yes a couple hiccups here and there but they are the next airline in-line to get certified by the FAA. Assuming tonight was a success, proving plights should begin shortly after, hopefully they are already loading her up with cargo and can begin revenue from cargo during the proving flights.
Thank you for all your efforts FS!
www.otcshortreport.com
37.5% or 643,000 shorted on 1.7M volume
And that's exactly what new pictures show!!
Thank you for clarifying!
Last two pictures show deployed slides, I'm wondering why they are not deployed on both sides of the plane, and only on the left (far) side
Was messing, new pic is up but only time will tell on the outcome. Hopefully we have "unconfirmed" good results shortly but the site has been crashing due to the amount of refreshers
She's in the air! New pic!!
I'm not certain so LT will have to clarify, but I think he meant that Baltia will begin proving for International flights once 9 days (or a percentage of the total 100hrs) of domestic proving flights are logged, then they may begin with international proving flights.
Maybe I missed something, but what legal complaint are you making against SGLB and the DoD? That the DoD has been colluding with Sigma through the American Makes contract? Not sure if I'm following you're logic..
You're statement here:
"my complaint will center on the contract with DoD being a potential end customer and supported with such findings (that are publicly available) ensuring I note the connection between American makes/Sigma and DoD being a potential customer."
If you don't mind rephrasing..please do so
Moldgind is just Goldmine's 2nd account, ignore him and/or block him
Do not get me wrong, "blabbering" was not meant to be derogatory. I am not upset with Chris ignoring portions of my email after speaking to him. Similarly, I wish you take it upon yourself to give him a call directly.
He always sent a reply, and ignored portions of the email, specifically my request for comment about the transfer agency, Interwest. He told me this has nothing to do with SGLB and ignored because his emails are constantly being copy/pasted to message boards and taken out of his original context to pursue an individual's agenda.
My major concern was and has been the involvement of Vivek and the SEC and whether or not this has anything to do with it. Chris confirmed to me over the phone that one has absolutely nothing to do with the other and that the transfer agency "issue" has nothing to do with SGLB.
Like I've said, I suggest you call him directly to get your concerns answered, as blabbering everything on your mind in a single email is pretty easy to ignore.
All the best
I think it's very important, but nowhere on that article was SGLB mentioned, only the fact that the SEC is investigating transfer agencies. Therefore it's outlandish to tie an unrelated SEC investigation tactic to a specific company without any cause for accusation.
As far as outstanding shares are concerned, Chris said that there has been no additional shares granted and the only threat for dilution would be a reverse split prior to uplisting. As any IR would he said that they need the right amount of news and momentum in order to successfully be implemented on an up listed market. If a reverse split were to occur it would occur during an appropriate time of news to hold the affect of the reverse split, otherwise investors will get hurt. He also said they are "working" on updating the otcwebsite via email, but like I said got a much better response from him via phone call.
I know you just angered by a lack of response to an investor, but the board members do not need to become aware of a random SEC tactic that is unrelated to the company, Chris will answer any concerns in a very quick manner for me, I hope the same to you and if you still do not receive a response send me your concerns and I will personally call him.
I suggest both of you call Chris. He is much more receptive of investor concerns via phone call, and specifically ignores outlandish emails drawing claims that have no ties to the company. (Interwest issue) I emailed him 2-3 times today and was personally frustrated with his lack of response, until he asked to call me. (He kept giving 1 sentence answers and ignored half my email) He was able to clear up my concerns which included these issues. Please email him requesting his phone number if you do not already have it and he will be glad to discuss any concerns! I won't post his response as that is a major reason why he has stopped replying to some outrageous emails, saying that his intent can and will be skewed for personal agendas on message boards.
Role Summary/Purpose The Additive Manufacturing Fuel Nozzle Process Engineer will utilize expertise in additive manufacturing and conventional manufacturing processes such as EDM, heat treat and non-destructive test, to support business goals, programs, and processes for aircraft engine components. Essential Responsibilities In addition you will:
....,
"Ability to make data driven decisions and utilize Six Sigma / Lean tools or equivalent quality tools"
"Six Sigma training or equivalent Quality training"
Name dropped again!
Should be SGLBs contract :(
I checked 6 months ago and def did not look like that... My mistake if it did then