Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's 100% speculation (the sector? It's growing massively) and personal feeling which has very little to do with how it performs. I welcome actual data.
Based on what facts etc.?
Last time I looked yesterday it was around 59,000. I saw a few thousand more shares go here and there appeared to be bought. That was total shares moved. 40k seems like an average day with traffic. Didn't seem too odd to me but who knows.
And mark my words that you'll all be buying the stock back because it's not a scam.
I have some pretty serious shares invested, I'm not moving. I haven't heard the next round of announcements and I don't believe this sheriff stuff at all.
You're making a lot of assumptions. You don't know how much Tony makes off of any business. There's something like 4-5 owners at Riverrock. 200 employees.
I'm being serious. I'm assuming these gentlemen need money to live in this area and to do this business. I don't think they can build the sun zero. That's really what you expect them to take for salary? I don't think that's reasonable if we expect these guys to succeed. To keep up in the world of business that this company is attempting to do I would think that you would have to have at least a lifestyle that doesn't look like you're building in the back of your apartment in a poor neighborhood.
Negotiating with pharmaceutical companies is an interesting thing not that I'm saying they're doing that but it seems that they want to be a pharmaceutical company. I live in Denver it's pretty expensive here. They have to make something....
I've been thinking about this. USA today lists Denver as needing $90,000 a year salary to make basic rent in the metro area. What is a fair salary?
I just tried to recruit a PhD for much lesser job than running a biotech and they wanted minimum 275,000+ benefits to live in Denver. I can't really say this pace seems exorbitant I'm not sure what fair pay would be, and that is incorrect, this is a full-time company. I've done some pretty deep diligence.
Let's assume that they are not making money elsewhere. I can find no evidence of any large sum of money being made elsewhere. What would be a fair salary to keep this running?
It's probably not enough for someone to make a fortune on in the week but personally I'm in it for the long-haul. I'd rather see them slowly build steam and get somewhere then build a bunch of hype and sell stock. Either way I have pretty much broken even at this point un less everything goes to hell. I'm just happy to see for once I didn't judge people wrongly. Everything seems to be happening according to company plan.
No GMO I know for a fact. From Tony's mouth. Hunter retired from Monsanto and did financial stuff before GMO was invented. He actually cleaned up land for the EPA.
Where are they linked? I've never heard of this capital group.
If a company is not trying to manipulate it's stock why announce something until the deal is totally done?
Just a thought, I would not make announcements every move I make as I do it, that's risky. Tells competition what's going on etc.
Whoever asked if it's real. I've toured the place, talked to a few people. It's real. Only question is do they pull it off.
John Hunter retired before Monsanto did GMO.
It's pretty easy to look this stuff up, sorry, I'm tired of seeing misinformation. The more this company grows the more interesting it gets.
He appears to be still on the board for the Energizer rabbit oddly.
He's a financial consultant for United Cannabis that's it. I think that's what he does for Energizer too but I don't know for sure.
This information is fairly easy to find, The company does respond to inquiries, at least that's my experience. I do believe lying would be a serious breach of law.
Not affiliated with square one.
Just got off the phone with someone at United Cannabis. No affiliation whatsoever. Totally false. No condo even. No affiliation with square one. If they are claiming it, it's false and the company is probably following up.
The conversations haven't seemed based on fact lately. Glad to see some posts.
United cannabis has products buildings and let's not forget, cannabis, worth millions and millions and millions of dollars. As far as I understand my skin was a spa for rich people with bad skin. I understand why it might be worth a little more after being purchased for a very low sum.
Forbes says unitedcannabis is number three most important Canada stock right now. I expect they did their due diligence.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/caroltice/2014/11/14/meet-the-8-hottest-publicly-traded-marijuana-companies/?partner=yahootix&optimizely=a
I'm in Denver this week and I checked around on the boycot of river rock. I can't find anyone interested in that. The only thing I see is 27 people on Facebook complaining about Monsanto. The website seems to have the original Hunter on it too. I'm not sure what you're talking about Walmart.
Verzura posted something about Vegas on his Facebook page yesterday. It sounded like they had a license there too now and were taking all the affiliates with them. Not sure what it meant. Wish I had a picture.
I know more than I read. Actually call the company and ask them to divulge information. There is no deal with hop on.
Funding. One word. Why you would get on the stock market. If you have big ideas and do not have the money and don't want to be owned by somebody
What is this Hopon stuff?
I've been in since 9 or so. Cnab themselves have never announced a venture I've ever seen, and there was no mention of Hopon ever again past hopons announcement. Hey aren't on affiliates page, if you ask one of the board members the answer is no officiating with Hopon.
Did you guys see the fake unitedcannabis.com that was up,for awhile? People can do whatever they want really. Free speech and all. The story behind the fake company website, god knows who wanted to hurt them but it was nasty.
Have you bothered to research the scientists? He bloody discovered stem cells in humans!
I really don't think he's a scammer
I have no problem waiting three years to find out. That's normal process.
At least I know they're in it for the long-haul.
I toured the labs a few months before this was filed, I'm pretty sure I have an idea what this was filed on, but I really don't have any specific knowledge that's factual so I better not say anything.
Patents are not filed under corporation names, they are filed under the inventors names. I would suspect the provisional is filed under a group and the inventors get worked out as the patent is fought for.
It's real guys. Call and talk to someone in the company you will get info. This isn't top secret stuff. Not my place to post it though do your own research.
patents filed....
http://www.baystreet.ca/viewarticle.aspx?id=422088
I do not agree with you! I have no idea what you are talking about. I think this is a very real company. Ive visited. Please tell me what you are talking about....
What does cannabis paste have to do with cnab? Besides they have access to more cannabis than practically anyone.
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/business/Colorado-firm-partners-with-Jamaicans--to-set-up-medical-ganja-lab-on-island_17680298
This matches what I saw to a T. Glad Jamaica manages to do due diligence.
I personally took a tour of the United Cannabis facilities and the laboratories as I have quite a few shares in this company. I will report on what I saw.
There is much cannabis being grown and processed. More than I could calculate square footage of. The staff was more than adequate for handling the cannabis and processing, I imagine from the corporate structure they must have been riverrock employees. There were products obviously being made that were proprietary to them. Facebook has tons of examples under riverrock of what I saw.
I saw the labs, I have met with scientists, quite luckily. They are real and involved.
I saw no evidence of anything but a company with all the intentions to do what it says it is trying to do. Whether that happens is up to fate. But I saw no signs of anything shady, quite the contrary. Impressively professional operation and team. Working on several programs to combat various diseases quite vigilantly from what I saw very professionally. No evidence of something set up as a pump and dump, quite the opposite really. They seem to be shooting very long term.
Hope this helps someone.
I'm just curious why no-one has looked into who else is working with them. There's some serious names there in science with a lot of patents and credibilty..... is anyone doing diligence or is this just a ceo bash?
I'm in