Retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
2can$ ....... That was about as awesome a post as ever I've read. It took a good person to say what you said. Well done, my friend, and best of luck with your investment.
L.O.L. As flattering as it may be that you're of the opinion that I, or anyone else for that matter, has an "intrest"(sic) in you, you may rest assured that said intrest is strictly for amusement purposes. Insofar as your purported 39m shares is concerned, one would think you would be as proud to display proof of ownership as you were to ballyhoo said position. Ironically, it was one of your buddies who referred to me as "an F'n liar" when I refused to produce proof that I sold my millions for a tidy profit. Yeah, as you said, "are we close like long lost family members" when I asked you to prove your position. Thought it would be interesting to turn the tables, so to speak. Everyone's an F'in liar here except your and your ilk, would that be accurate? And why might that be? I'd be interested to know. It's not like you know me or anything about me. You got 39m of this "company"? Well, good for you. Not calling you a liar. Just thought you'd like to know what it's like to have everything you say doubted and ridiculed. N'est-ce pas?
I repeat, if your lot in life is to play Superhyperman on this board, spelling and grammar would go a long way to elevate your self-appointed stature. Just sayin'.
Tell you what, toucan. If you and a few others here would remove the words "liar" and "lie" from your vocabularies, you'd be functional illiterates. Speaking of 'lies', you say you've got 39m shares? Screenshot, please?
I tend to try to stay neutral but when someone like yourself passes judgement predicated upon idle stock board chatter, it's genuinely simple to ferret out the 'dipshit'.
Turning into "One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest" here lately.
Don't let those 2 bashers breath(sic)? You being a trifle extreme there, toucan?
Trouble is, on THIS board, and many others, I would opine, there is no distinction between the two terms; i.e., Bears/Bashers.
Well, so much for that idea.
Hopefully, at some point, everyone here —- especially YOU, Poo, are going to have to stop all the bullshit and let the company sink or swim on its own. Talk is cheap and is getting cheaper.
Oh, please do explain in what way, shape or form dbmm identifies as a "sophisticated business model".
My post was directed to someone other than you. But, thanks so much for the interest.
Not today, huh? (Growing up, that is) Well, maybe tomorrow.
You make my case for me perfectly! Get over yourself Grow up!
Well, it's not gonna be me to go thru past posts to see whose feelings were first hurt. Quite frankly, I would have to plumb entirely new depths to care less as to who threw the first stone. Reality is that, you're right, the depravity on both sides is pitiful. What's more pitiful is that it's not going to end -- not until the company begins actual progress towards producing tangible results.
There was NO name-calling -- either side -- prior to the 'new and improved' format. Further, "bashers" don't have a corner on the name-calling market. Contempt breeds contempt.
JMO, I'm thinking you're mis-reading the "acquisition" sentence. All they've acquired is a new customer. Good luck.
Attacking the dreaded "naysayers" as opposed to making the case for the company that you hold so dear is also a constant. N'est-ce pas?
Coming from one who won't answer the question as to your association with the company, your "credentials" are more than a little suspect as well. You began your "life" here as a shy, demure investor with seemingly honest interest in dbmm but turn into a self-appointed speaker eager to thwart anyone and everyone whose opinion isn't to your liking. Just sayin'.
Funny. Those of us who've waited 15+ years are thrown under the bus for stupidity. Can't win for losing (or loosing, as some would say).
You forgot to add 'misogynists'.
For your personal edification. No need to thank me. Have a gusherful weekend.
Post#
332112
of 335436
To play 'devil's advocate' for a brief second ---- Linda HAS kept her company from blowing away in the wind. That is all. Out.
Strictly FWIW, I plugged in the post Number that I was responding to, which, as you so astutely observed, was by another poster. I'm old, I got confused, shoot me. The CORRECT post number in response to that post of SB's is No 332112. Being the demanding consumer that you are, you might have even ferreted that out on your own had you realized I had made a mistake. But, that would poke a hole in the narrative, wouldn't it? Anyway, my bad but 332112 should satisfy....... but prolly won't.
Responding to "prove it" demands are, as you are so well aware, bullshit. However, it didn't take much research to come up with the following: My Post No. 332105, 326907 and 326379 in response to Post 326378 by one of your boys.
What kind of trains do I like? I guess that would result in a "prove it" comeback as well. Not going there again, Scooter. You've got to come to the realization that not everyone here who's not of the same opinion as yourself is the boogyman. Nope. Just doubters enriched with a solid sense of where this is headed based on where it's been --- and been --- and been.
If this missive isn't sufficient to slake your appetite for controversy, well, DILLIGAF? If it is, an apology would be appreciated but not expected.
Why I am here shouldn't be any of your or anyone else's concern. Your sole focus appears to be on those at odds with your, et al, personal doctrine. Maybe concentrate on posting positive juju about your favorite company, perhaps? Oh, and the "not once has any of the Bashers acknowledged the company doing anything positive" statement, methinks you wouldn't have to delve too deeply to find that to be a trifle far-reaching.
Meant precisely what I stated, Scooter. No animosity intended or inferred. If pointing out indiscretions that have occurred over and over and over is a crime, okay, that is your and many others' opinion. So, what is left? The company! Ah yes, the company. The reason we're all gathered here. The company whose track record is as dismal as anything on the exchange. Their "ten wins" were only brought about by their filling the hole that THEY themselves dug. But, in accordance with your most vociferous cheerleader, the "metrics are in place". Maybe so, prolly not. The so-called 'metrics' haven't changed in two decades. The 'disruptor' is yet to disrupt.
On the flip side, of course, are all the Positive Petes who won't, for one brief moment, admit the possibility that dbmm IS a cesspool into which many, many thousands of dollars have been poured predicated only on hype -- not performance. See how that works? Two sides to every issue.
C'mon, T! Anyone can take a bad picture. Cheap shot, dude!
To each, their own.
Pithy and to the point. Huzzah!
Your quote, Poo:
Congratulations! It's not often that you focus on the company itself vs slamming those that don't match your philosophy. Have a great New Year!
Oh, I would hazard a guess that when --- and IF --- those counterfeit shares are proven, there'll be plenty of conversations on the issue. Happy Birthday and welcome.
"Uplisting to QB then onto NASDAQ step by step, after all criteria met."
What would be your best guess as to the timeline for said criteria being met? Taking into consideration, of course, that the QB upgrade (by year's end or before, if memory serves) has already been busted.
In light of the QB forecast failure, would that be considered a lie?
Just one very simple question: IF the portended short theory never comes to pass, does that make you a liar?
Just thinking out loud re: Harvard degrees. 1) Linda's degree proves one thing -- she has/had money. 2) I wonder how many of our esteemed politicians are Harvard Law grads.
In spite of the daily discord, wouldn't it be nice to take a few days off to celebrate that which IS important: Christmas, family and friends. Sooo, let me say: Merry Christmas to all and to all let's not fight ('til Tuesday).
Tit for tat.
After viewing that photo of Linda Perry, it seemed to me she looked familiar. Anyone here watch Fargo?
I don't remember him ever making that statement. Could you provide a link, please?