Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
C-20, my brother is a perfect example of what happens when you take Remdeathisnear...it shut down his kidneys and ultimately killed him. It's a horrible drug and should NEVER have been considered as a part of the SOC.
Very informative post jimmy667. Thanks for that.
Misiu, I've missed your postings and happy to see you're around. I too am hoping the new CEO will not see a need to do RS. I believe a partnership is close at hand. Time will tell.
C-20, you are absolutely right. The flip side of the coin is this also allows us to add even more at these prices, which I have done and hope to do some more. I don't have deep pockets so I'm a relatively small investor but these prices are allowing a significant opportunity for me. For that, I'm selfishly grateful. I feel bad for those who are allowing this temporary drop in price to scare them out of their shares. I guess it's just a matter of perspective.
Good post bucweet34. I am inclined to agree with almost everything this person stated with one exception. He stated:
Learning53, again, thank you for this follow-up information. Yes, we would definitely prefer Leronlimab but until that becomes reality, and I believe it will, alternatives are worth considering.
Learning53, I forgot to thank you for all of this information. Had a lot going on, needless to say. So, thank you!
You can put me down for $9.50
C-20, sorry to hear this my friend. Prayers...
C-20, thank you...and yes, it makes me angry but anger is poisonous to our health and I keep having to let it go.
Ambersavage7194, thank you so much.
Thank you Learning53.
TheRealMe, I suspect you're right and I'm so truly very sorry to hear of your loss too. I refuse to let them jab me. I believe my wife and I are not carrying natural antibodies to resist further covid issues. That is absolutely horrible that you dad couldn't get LL.
Thank you Chuckles...much appreciated.
C-20, I couldn't agree more. My brother was immediately given steroids and placed on Remdesivir, which within 3 days began shutting down his kidneys, which then caused fluid to build up in his lungs. This was only the beginning of his problems and ultimately what killed him. This was a senseless death. His wife told the hospital (where she worked by the way) that Trump signed the "Right To Try" law into effect and that they needed to help her obtain Leronlimab. They told her they were only going to "follow the science" and got nasty with her placing her in fear of two things. One, she was in fear of losing her job and two that the doctors would stop communicating anything to her about her husband. Out of pure fear, she relented and now he's gone. This did not have to be.
I believe that as information begins to eventually be revealed in other countries, Brazil, Pi, etc...the world will begin to take note, including the US. The FDA won't be able to stifle the world and people are going to find out.
Thank you B52T38 and I'm so sorry to hear you and your wife went through this. I wouldn't wish this on my worst enemy. I wish you and your wife equally speedy recovery. This is some nasty stuff.
Thank you so much Rockleo and for all you do.
Thank you crazyjogger925...
Thank you C-20 and no.
Thank you searching4rainbow.
I've been absent for a while now. To update those who may wonder, I lost my younger brother on December 14th to Covid. He was only 48 years old. Subsequently, my wife and I both contracted Covid and are now, thankfully, recovering. My wife had it the worst and I thought I was going to lose her. We both have fatigue, her more so than myself.
After having gone through all of this I'm even more eager to see Leronlimab be successful. We both had monoclonal antibody treatments (bamlanivimab and etesevimab) and within 48 hours, we began to see some differences and after 72 hours, it was obvious that we were on the mend. I'm praying Leronlimab will make it to market soon for those so badly in need.
I'm curious, I know I've read from, I think it was Misiu, that she liked bamlanivimab but I can't remember. Does anyone remember or how familiar are you with these mAb's?
Unfortunately, the hospital he's in won't even consider anything beyond what "science" dictates. They will not even listen to what we have to say and are choosing to following the mandated guidelines. So, if New Mexico is a Right to Try state or not, I do not know but the hospital is denying his wife the right to try. She works at that hospital too and works in Quality Control. They are being nasty with her and she's in imminent fear of losing her much needed job.
First, let me say thank you to all those who responded with genuine care and support. Here's a brief update. My brother is on a ventilator. Thanks to Remdesivir his kidneys are damaged and his creatin was 5.6. They said if and when it hits 6.0 that they will begin dialysis. He was on max air flow on the ventilator. His heart has been in A Fib. Things have been looking very bleak. I did get word yesterday though that his stats are improving and that his air flow has been reduced. They say this is going to be a long slow process if he's going to pull through. All prayers still very much need and appreciated.
Additionally, my wife and I now have Covid. Our oxygen and temps are good though and today is day 5 for me and maybe day 8 or 9 for my wife. She's suffering with extreme fatigue and can barely walk across the floor. I'm only maybe slightly better. I have some cough but it's drainage from sinuses. We are taking all the normal things D3, Zinc, Quercitin, L-Lysine, C, colloidal silver and a host of other things including ivermectin. We seem to be holding steady and today I THINK I feel slightly better.
If only we knew of a treatment drug that was completely safe, highly effective and readily available. Wouldn't that just be amazing? C'mon Leronlimab, let's go!
I got word night before last that my brother has been admitted to the hospital for serious Covid symptoms. He's now in ICU on high flow oxygen. If he even turns in bed the O2 drops to 80. Otherwise, the O2 is keeping him around 92-93. They have put him on steroids, Remdesivir and Dexamethasone. Today, they did finally see a small improvement, but I don't have any details beyond that. Prayers for him and his wife would be greatly appreciated.
Also, I know I could scroll through many pages to find NP's email address but if someone wouldn't mind providing me his contact info, I would greatly appreciate it. I will forward this information to his wife, who is a Nuclear tech at the hospital where he's at. Many thank you's in advance!
Thanks for the update on your wife's condition and progress. I'm so happy to hear that! I'm quite certain your wife (and you) are glad you went out on that limb. Good on 'ya!
Thanks Rockleo.
Black-Ops, I'm about 80+% certain that USA major media outlets (non-conservative) will never talk about leronlimab's success abroad, regardless of EUA approvals around the world. I believe you'll eventually begin to hear about it in the conservatives news outlets first. If the liberal outlets talk about it, it will most likely only be to downplay leronlimab and Cytodyn. Such discussions will most likely be carefully coordinated and directed by Big Pharma and what they discuss will be limited to discrediting Cytodyn/leronlimab in order to better serve their own interests. Of that, I'm quite certain.
The only hesitancy comes into play if BP decides to bring leronlimab into their folds (partnership/buyout) and tout it as theirs, and most likely inconjunction with another drug as a combo therapy. I suspect they will give most credit to whatever drug (perhaps phizermectin) they use as a therapy/treatment while only giving nominal credit to leronlimab's role in whatever success they tout.
Call me cynical.
Itchy palm, this is true. It would seem though that they didn't even know how to find the house. Instead they showed up in the back alley, found some scraps of lumber and used nails and began hacking away. What they now are beginning to realize is that all the money and effort is only resulting in a coffin, rather than a house, for their beloved non-star team, in which they will be burying their dreams to steal a team from shareholders. It also appears that their baby will need a coffin too, the baby named incelldx. I wonder how this might have gone down had they been completely honest and up front as to their intentions from the start. Also, I can only imagine how it might have gone had they had only pure and altruistic intentions where leronlimab is concerned as opposed to their own baby named incelldx. All imo of course.
I had a great night's sleep. I wonder who might not have slept so well.
You're most welcome Misiu143. You would be correct that some things do not look very legal or proper. I have a suspicion that some of those illegal activities, whether they be from market makers or other large entities, may get some scrutiny. Whether they do anything other than pay a massive amount of money to cover their short positions and face any type of legal actions, remains to be seen.
I think that some of the other shenanigans by those aiding in the process, whether knowingly or unwittingly may also come under legal scrutinization. Just a hunch and only in my opinion.
Like you, I too want to see leronlimab available to ALL (well, maybe there might be a few exceptions?).... I also believe that by this year's end leronlimab may quite likely be saving lives on a larger scale than just trials, in my opinion.
Misiu143, there are two types of shorts, the legal shorts and the illegal naked shorts. Although there can most definitely be some pain felt by the legal shorts, I suspect that the REAL PAIN that is hoped for will be left mostly to the illegal naked shorts.
That is a much more involved topic but, in short (no pun intended - maybe) those who did not locate shares to borrow (which are on the record), sold shares that weren't theirs and had zero intent to locate/borrow. There are holes in the system that allow this to occur and are conveniently ignored by regulators and not ignored by the criminals of said illegal activity.
Because about 1 in 1,000 companies on the pinks actually make it to the big time, those who play the illegal short game are typically, fairly safe. Most, BY FAR, do not take the time to truly investigate a company well enough to know what and who they're shorting in and don't really follow along. Typically, they're banking on the odds after only some basic scrutiny. They see what they believe is a good pattern...or formula. They go short and move on. Many times, those same companies, the other 999, go to triple 0 price or flatline and they NEVER have to cover their positions. Every dime they sold shares for which they didn't own and didn't borrow, never have to be covered. They walk away fat and happy with investors' money.
Once in a rare while though, there is a company, like Cytodyn, who has the goods, something real, tangible and has EXTREME value. When a situation like this occurs, it can spell financial hardship for those who are illegally short and remain short due to their hubris. When this happens, and that company gets REVENUE, and I'm talking real true revenue of an impactful nature, that's when you see the opportunity for a short squeeze that can cause some REAL PAIN. This can also occur with a buyout.
Most want to see the truly 'bad entities' get their comeuppance and yes, they'll definitely be hurt but keep in mind that those same 'bad entities' conducting the illegal naked shorts have been doing this a long time and know how to play the game and absorb the massive losses. They know how to make money all the way down and all the way back up, to mitigate their losses. They've also been making money on all the other 999 companies, which again helps them absorb those big losses like they will most likely experience with Cytodyn, in my opinion. When losses like this occur, they typically consider this as the cost of doing business and move on. Sometimes, the losses can be large enough that some of the lesser entities don't survive.
I think Black-Ops can much better explain the finer details of how the illegals are carried out and how they get away with it. That's not an area that I can effectively address. I've studied it and understood it but it's been too long and, frankly, I don't remember the details. What I do know is that it's real and goes mostly unchecked within a corrupt system. Many good and honest companies get taken down or horribly hurt in the process. There are also some lousy companies that get hurt or destroyed as well. I guess you have to take the good with the bad they say. I love though that there's those diamonds in the rough like Cytodyn that occasionally makes them all pay dearly.
I know I'll continue to rest well.
Black-Ops, perhaps the question to be posed to Grip should be "What if The Wonder Drug Succeeds in Brazil?" At the very least, both questions should be asked and truthfully answered by all concerned on both sides of the fence. This would be a more 'dynamic' approach to asking 'honest' questions. I think it's prudent for both the bears and the bulls to always consider both sides of the question/answer.
Having said that, given the evidence shown to this point, certain logical suppositions can be derived based on said evidence and the additional steps being taken, i.e. additional doses at days 14 and 21 that will be given. Given the stacking effect of the drug and reduction in symptoms in the body shown following the 2nd shot at day 7, a hypothesis can be reasonably given that, at the VERY LEAST, efficacy will remain stable but could improve given the two additional doses over an additional two-week period.
Further hypothesis can be made that if p-value is achieved (shattered?), lives are saved and all is done with complete safety, that a demand for this drug will then be established due to those results. Due to the possible demand, it can be presumed that substantial revenue (contracts) will follow as well as an a significantly upward adjusted share price.
Further hypothesis can then be made that anyone who holds a short position will suffer losses as the share price moves upward. I could continue with additional hypothesis regarding a lack of sleep, etc., but I think that's enough for now.
Black-Ops, thank you for your generous time in answering my simpleton's question. Hopefully there were some, like myself, who learned something in what you said. Perhaps it's not a new concept and probably one that most intelligent folks already understand. I suspect that's the case. But, for others, it's a lesson that may NEVER be learned. What a shame.
I would like to offer one point of consideration. Consider rephrasing "Pure Bull" to "Pure Bear"....<wink & nod>
Great stuff Black-Ops...thanks! Having access to a history professor is kind of like having rear view mirrors in that they're good for understanding what may try to pass you by without you being aware. The mirrors are good for awareness but they don't replace your windshield view of what's ahead.
The situation ahead keeps unfolding and requires path alterations and changes to strategies. Cytodyn / Nader keeps making adjustments to overcome and bypass those obstacles thrown in it's path and is doing so with grace and dignity, in spite of the indignities hurled their direction.
Chuckles759, gosh, I can imagine poor Shorty B. Dumm must be having to consume extra large amount of melatonin, golden milk and probably some cannabis gummies, just to try and sleep better at night. Hopefully she invested in a few extra boxes of tissue as well.
As Rockleo says, "Respect" - good post.
Black-Ops, although I'm most certainly not a short, quite thankfully, I am not sure I understand the meaning of static vs dynamic as relating CYDY and the short positions. Would you mind elaborating? Perhaps some shorts may want to pay attention here as I have a feeling if not, that you MAY learn the hard way? I don't think I could sleep well at night if I didn't know this.
Please, go ahead Black-Ops and thank you. You have the floor....
Rockleo, I hear incelldx hasn't even finished a race yet. In fact, I don't even think it's qualified at trials yet. So, not likely to get an invite to any major event anytime soon.
Not sure I'd be in the market for one of those, especially at a price tag of $250k just to poke your head inside. I might pay a nickel and MAYBE even a dime for a test drive but I'd probably want to wear a helmet, and fire suit, just in case. I'd probably want to try a 1974 Chevy Vega first though. Those were delightful little cars (cough cough) with their aluminum blocks.
Thanks Black-Ops. I appreciate that. At least I was in the 'ballpark', I think. I always welcome the historical references and stories and how they apply to today. You sometimes seem apologetic when relaying such stories but consider that some actually can appreciate what you are saying.
I think sometimes some folks consider this following statement to be a cliché but I consider it always relevant: Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. If we don't have folks in our lives who remind us of the past then sometimes our own hubris will lead us down paths that have already been sought, found, tried and failed. Better to learn from the lessons of others than at our own expense...at least for me anyway.
bwolfy2002,
Black-Ops,
C-20 couldn't agree more. In the last trial, we saw 82% at the end of the 2nd week, day 14. With that, there was what I would call 'stacking' of the drug. In other words, there were residuals from the first dose still present when the 2nd dose was administered, thereby stacking the drug and providing a higher survival rate.
The fact that we now will be able to inject a 3rd and 4th dose will allow for more stacking. By the 3rd dose, most of the 1st dose will most likely be out of the system. However, the effects will then be 'stacked'. The immune system will be in a better state to be able to properly function because the cytokine storm will be less of an issue as it's reduced by leronlimab.
By the 4th dose, there is even more stacking of the positive effects because, once again, the immune system is that much more effective in that it's more able to do its job at fighting and killing the virus since it's not fighting against the cytokine storm.
So, you now have 4 doses instead of two, creating continued stacking of the drug (overlapping) and stacking of the effects by continual defeat of the cytokine storm while the body is then allowed to naturally fight off the virus for the win.
I'm no medical expert but that's my layman's understanding and belief as to how the drug works and will be more effective in this new Brazilian trial.
Go LERONLIMAB FOR THE WIN!!