Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That was a different type of Receivership:
Building up the receivership gig in my opinion(or what then?):
Thanks for making it easy. The collection net grows larger. Just "Curious" as to the "Future" of the targets. The lack of FINRA oversight keeps getting more pertinent. It should have stopped there. Look at how the costs spread out to others with regards to fees et al.
Those cats want some/all of that money back.....and are apparently not going to stop...eh? When that Judgement becomes final...and the clock starts ticking......look to Nevada(imo). Thanks again.
Yeah....I'll find it.
I guess I missed this:
Believe you me!..........I had a lot more to say. Biting my upper lip here:
I know I am..but that person is a bit off with that. this just isn't correct:
CRQE knows they need to file an S-1 for financing from Kodiak and they know they could never get an S-1 done and approved by the SEC. In other words they have no plans on ever doing an S-1 or ever getting the financing.
That's just bull. The past and deceased CEO arranged that. The issue of shares is payment for underwriting the S-1. The assumptions are a little out there....how does that individual know that...eh?
What CRQE gains is a nice press release about millions of $$$ in financing which leads to forward looking plans about acquisitions, expansion of operations, big revenues, etc which is great for pumping a stock while insider (mostly toxic note holders) dump shares into the hands of all the suckers buying the financing agreement, etc.
Again...just plain bull. This company was/is not like that at all.
They stalled all the note holders . They were not current for all of 2014..and half of 2015.......so.....no.
Some individuals group all into the conspiracy thing........just not even close here.
Yeah....and why this is so strange:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=11037792
Not that it is a big deal..because it' not. It's just fn' weird.
You didn't miss it. It's a rough 3x lower it's previous value circa 1/01/2016.
I do not have any predictions with regards to this tomorrow.
sorry.scratch.wrong board
scratch that..again.sorry wrong board....jeesh..it's the wine
Didn't you tell me that you used to book venues...mid to smaller by nature? or was that someone else?
On the other note....I believe in Mr. Silverthorn. In my opinion, he has never wanted this short term lending....and has had a rough time getting the capital required. We came very close to something amazing. But...even though we were close ... if it was to be realized.....there would have had to been a consolidation of shares. So what...eh? I just do not buy equities at this level. The last time was roughly 12 years ago. $16k in...$3k out.....and never bchd' about it. We need the TA to "not" be gagged for as long as possible....wait for the outstanding to reach it's limit(or near)......then make a decision.
Point being...."selling" ... is as stupid as ... "buying" currently. Just my opinion.
To be fair, I shouldn't put all of that on the short term lenders. The company, knowing that a conversion(or plural) is about to take place, would also benefit by that research report(so called/if such). By means of creating stability.
See how that worked?:
mm....excellent. Was just listening to a bootleg Live in Kansas City-74'(damn good copy!). Nothing "tragic" about the band either. Same type of people crapped on bob when he grabbed "The Band" and went electric
31:15 Keep On Rubbing 4:59
Just above.... looking down on you.
How?.eom
It is a bit funny...but it's the truth. It's the only reason why the company is current at this time. Read the filing(most recent).
It is 900 million. The chances of it being raised is highly doubtful. More precisely....not going to happen. The short term lenders would have to threaten the company, and in turn, pay for all those expenses via escrow.
It's not a dead horse and those that received such should review statutes, be it, collection practices. It would be to all's benefit regarding such.
Running around 41% relative to turns(wow!!). Ha!...normally that's really..really... bad! but in this current scenario...that's what we want. Oh the irony...!
Bollocks..eh? That happened before..awhile back. Different handle...posted a couple of times...different story. What's so sad is the fact that this company isn't about selling them...it's about PPA's..etc. How fn' sad......and childish(amateur)
100?....ha!
That is good to hear. Nice job.
You know.......from memory.....you are not a young buck(just saying you are not in your 20's/30's.eh?...40's)......but still....I have no idea what that type of text means(see it often). Still can't figure out the hashtag thing among other sudo illiterate quips.
What's sad is not knowing who was involved just recently...and why it fell through. It is very hard to find nano-cap securities on the OTC that have such "square" legitimate players with great up side potential.
Richard was the one testing the DGU...and presented such in October. Hard to say here, given Mr. Silverthorn's priors. If those members were not so legitimate....it would have been an easy decision long time past. I think(big question mark) they can still file a 15 and issue shares until not current. Have to review that.....but if possible Mr. Silverthorn..et al.. should file such with what ever money that can be scraped together. The preferreds are there no matter........and connections of two shareholders are Akuo and SSOE. Akuo being the most prudent. Closure is the greatest thing.....and until you have that(no matter what)........well...........piss.eh?
First off..what a crap game! On the matter...I doubt that . You have to first go back and read the transferability requirements regarding those specific preffereds.
Linkedin............think it's time to scrape up some cash and file the ole' FORM 15 ....given that they are current.
Silverthorn's the dagger(also Cote). He(richard) joined cirque before Wilcox went bankrupt. Cote(previous Wilcox until 2011) started it along with Silverthorn circa 2009. Richard joined after Wilcox circa 2011 when Midland was on line.
FYI...Fosgitt is out.eom
Everybody was beating up on ETrade, when in fact they provided protection. I think COR wants a collection list. When you have a completed list, you can then separate it into piles of probability. If they pursue what I mentioned, they will be somewhat ahead of the game(can't believe I said ahead). The probability comes into the amount distributed applied to costs of collection(individual judgement(if needed)..etc).
It just seems to costly to pursue.....but we are not in that circle. Crazy continues
Well, it has gone past the "situation" scenario..eh? But again:
Hey Janice, was just catching up on some light reading and noticed COR is pursuing ETrade for client information. Should I assume ETrade carried the weight of distribution? Just wondering because as I noted about Receivership before COR filed for such(well...not the type I meant).... I still thought about that play given the fact that COR is the largest creditor...and can force a liquidation. The question regarding that is ?how, given the fact that there is nothing to liquidate. Therefor, how can it be applied? The only way I see how lies within the assets distributed via cash dividend.
Anyhow, COR really wants that information.
Sure........but just understand this;
Here's the first hit:
No..... they never used them for that. They would have had to file a S-1. They did borrow around USD50 thousand from them though. Kodiak is a bit off though..eh? They will commit to funding...but you have to pay them in shares(before anything)....and then they will underwrite the S-1. I have only ever seen a few companies(at most) actually put the S-1 into "EFFECT". Then after a few "puts"....the company pulls out and withdraws the S-1 RW.
The company was never in the position to use them anyway. You can not use something like that unless You are around a dollar plus. Even then, when comps have used them....it's quick...and the S-1 is always withdrawn.
I believe TYP was in event of default(but figure 4.9). But that really doesn't matter. They will probably run out of room and may require a third party to pitch it up. Then it gets slimy. I was reading another board and someone posted a pitch from another site in disgust. Wish I could find it. The kid(narrator) in the video was spewing some garbage about how the pick had been studied for over a year(or something)....went on to say that it could only go up...why you may ask? The price was .0001 .. uh yeah. Wish I could find it.............because it was ridiculous and laughable.
Nice language son. Don't worry I saved that one.
? What are you talking about. You seem to miss the point. There was not anything positive in what I said. I simply stated that there is no money to pay for an 8-k.
Further, with regards to departure::
? .... really. Why?.... two issues:
...did he depart?
...and secondly........who's going to pay for the 8-k?
So in combining the two.......if he truly is "solely" working for SSOE, why state such if not needed to.
....by the way...he was and still did work for Cirque while he worked for SSOE....so? ...get it?
...reads the filings...MOST importantly..read what you yourself posted with regards to the last two 10q's.