Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm trying to buy A LOT more shares of EIGH. Anyone wanting to sell, I want to buy.
yeah, I believe its a dot com or something like that.
I picked up more shares today. Thank you sellers. Will be back tomorrow to buy more. Looking for many more.
Have any specifics on who dumped into the pump?
Insiders always know, don't they. lol
I'm trying to buy more if you hear of anyone trying to sell. Have orders in from .005 to .01.
Thank you HR & TR. Excellent charts and a great link for ALL to check out. IMO the prices just keep climbing as foriegn countries keep buying as much as they can get. Thank you again for the excellent information that you folks have provided and gathered. It has become very clear who has facts on this company and who has nothing.
Cool. Thank You.
Thank you Janice. I do appreciate you answering my questions. So can I ask for some clarification?
So if they say there's no significant short interest, there isn't.
Who is "they"?
The SEC would probably tell those shareholders to get together and hire an attorney, as happened with SPNG. If the attorney could come up with credible evidence suggesting that their holdings was greater than the o/s, then probably they'd do something about it. I think what they'd do would be to turn the matter over to FINRA.
IF the SEC saw the TA's book and confirmed the o/s, and had seen actual account holdings that equaled a significantly higher number than the o/s, would they still tell the shareholders to get an attorney? In other words, if the sec had seen what appeared to be at that time at significant short position, would they still tell the shareholders to get a lawyer?
Obviously you did not read my post. I gave specifics and asked questions on those specifics. If you are going to enter a conversation that you were not invited into, I would ask that you stick with the specifics that were asked and not change them to match an answer that was obviously given to deflect away from the original post, proving that you do not know the answer, which is why I asked Janice and not you.
Hi Janice,
I have a question? If enough (not all) share holders could produce copies of their account holdings on "ABC" stock at the request of the SEC, and those accounts equaled substantially more than the o/s, would the SEC have to persue the matter? Just curious. If the answer is yes, what would be the next action taken by the SEC? If the answer is no, why? Thank You.
Looks like rent is cheap for cdiv. Keeping overhead down is a good idea in this economy.
Congratulations on the results. Happy New Year to you.
Sounds like they need to find a price that they can find some shares to sell.
Just a little? Me thinks a little more than that.
We like the other one. There is just something "special" about it. Thank you!
Your post makes for a great screen shot. Will enjoy sharing it as a wall paper for some. Will be great to refer back to it when SEC makes a decision. Thank you.
Hey, don't say that out loud. They are top secret.
Many of us on the top secret skype call have orders in to buy. Any looking to unload?
Merry Christmas LoneGrey. Hope your 2011 is more blessed than your 2010.
That seems odd to me. You pride yourself on busting the scams but yet you "go to bat" for a criminal. Your choice. Your descision. Just seems odd to me. Have a good evening.
But you still feel that Elgindy was a crook that got caught.
Janice, you like uncovering scams and letting the public know about it. (reader digest version from what I can tell) Why would you write a letter for a crook at his sentencing? I assume it was on his behalf?
So, he's a crook that made mistakes?...and got caught because of those mistakes?
No, just curious why he keeps bring up Elgindy? Wasn't he a crook? Serving time now, or something?
He does bring up that individual a lot, doesn't he? Did you testify for Elgindy or something?
He would have gotten more miles using Capital One, IMO.
I cannot help but wonder how he paid for it in cash ...
I keep telling you that he doesn't need the FLD money because he is an awesome daytrader. Of course there will be much criticism for this from folks that have never learned or seen his strategy for daytrading, but that is their right....to criticize something they have never seen.
Exactly how many lawyers did he get? Where did you get that information?
And, if that house and aircraft were paid for with proceeds from selling out of the "FLD plays," then Mr. Williams had better be afraid that the bad men are going to get him,
That "if" is driving a lot of people nuts. LOL
I hear you have been using Monk's system for trading. How's that working for you?
Posted from my DROID
Janice, it's all good in my book. You and I agree that the SEC will decide if anything needs to be brought to court and examined further.
No doubt, some sold shares. I never said that. I will stand by my statement that Monk didn't sell, just like you will stand by your belief that Monk did sell. Your belief comes from a history of dealing with crooks. God knows, there are many out there. My belief comes from my history with Monk. You are entitled to your belief and I am entitled to mine. It's all good except for all the insulting, threatening PM's that I get for my belief. Why does that happen?
Maybe that's because he front loads his picks, pumps em and then sell's em.
You use the word "Maybe", because you don't know that to be a fact. Which brings me back to my original point. You spend a lot of time harshly criticizing that which you have no proof of. That is a real shame when you could be using your drive in making a difference in something you know as a fact and harmful to people. That would definately be a cause worth pursuing. Good luck to your pursuits of justice. If you come across something that you know to be true, let me know. I will definately help spread the word and do some research if you need. I love a good cause that helps people.
That is excellent news. Hopefully others will come forward that received money from him, and help the victims. This is very good news.
Exposing lies and scams that harm people is a worthwhile pursuit.
That is definately a worthwhile pursuit. If you have verifiable proof that he did that, I would do all I could to help you. But you don't have it. No one does. Not even the SEC. Because Monk didn't sell. So your next question is how do I know. Well, a few reasons. I know Monk well enough from a perspective that not many can claim and I know he didn't sell. Monk makes more money daytrading than most. He doesn't need the money from the FLD's and he doesn't need the money that he invested in them because he never invested more than he could afford to lose, something that he has preached many times. I also know that anytime the SEC can have cameras rolling showing that they busted someone, they don't waste any time doing it. Kind of helps their image after the whole naked people viewing that they did. (Now this last reason, even you can't deny.)
Some day, hopefully you will realize how much time you spent hateing, when you didn't know all the facts and things didn't turn as you thought they would. Hopefully it will be soon, so you don't waste your whole life doing it as some have regrettably done.
As far as your description of Monks rules: if those were his rules, I wouldn't claim Monk as a friend and I would do whatever I could to expose him. And I would also spend my time hateing him like you are doing. But since I know better, I, unlike you, will not spend any time, hateing something that is not true. Life is way too short and there are other things that are true that I could spend my time hateing and trying to make a difference in.
I admire your drive. Just wish it was towards something that you know to be absolutely true and something that we both find disgusting. Then we could spend what little bit of time we have here fighting to make a positive difference for the world in something we both know as true, with verifiable facts.
Money is just a bonus for me. The friends that I have made since finding the Den means more to me than all the money I have invested. You folks keep talking about a dump. Yet NO ONE has been able to prove that dump. Why do you boast about something you can not prove. You have no link and the SEC has not charged Monk or told some other department to charge or fine him. And that info would have been very clear once the SEC looked at his trading account, assuming they did. I'm not sure I understand your last sentence or question. It's difficult for me to read. If you are asking if I need a PHD to follow Monk's rules for trading, the answer is no. His rules for trading are very simple to follow and If I understand them, anyone can.
I understand things not being about the money a lot more than you, fortunately, will ever know about.
It's all good. I like what my DD has found out in the last 24 hours. BTW- I'm still buying as many EIGH shares as I can find. Let folks know that are selling that there are still buyers out there.
Come on now Janice, we were having a perfectly polite and somewhat funny exchange about my lack of intelligence with those letter things on the front and back of names and you have to inject that sec stuff. I have no regrets as of yet. But life is short, so who knows what will happen before mine ends. As of now, I'm riding high on the wave.