Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Some pages of the SentinelRenewableEnergy.com web site are still accessible (minus the home page which is effectively disabled), but there doesn't seem to be any site changes happening:
http://google.com/search?q=site:sentinelrenewableenergy.com&filter=0
The Sentinel logo was changed to MEG, which is inconsistent with the the latest filing if SRE will continue as a separate entity.
I'm guessing Phase 1 on this page never happened:
http://www.sentinelrenewableenergy.com/current-projects-strategy.php
I suspect that the entire SentinelRenewableEnergy.com web site will be replaced at some point.
I agree with snowdog. Interference is not DD.
The company has published a perfectly legitimate reason for remaining quiet. Shareholder interference with the business should not be an expected consequence. If a shareholder doesn't like what the company is doing, they should sell. That is the limited right of a public shareholder of common shares. The current share price reflects this, and it is what it is.
According to PinkSheets.com (now OTCMarkets.com), there are no market makers on this stock (see the warning note here):
http://www.otcmarkets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=BEHL
Any trading is with actual retail buyers/sellers.
Since I've been in it, the trading has always seemed like that, with wide bid/ask gaps at times just like a big-board stock trades in after hours where there are no MMs, but buyers and sellers are welcome to trade amongst themselves.
I haven't sold a single share, and (check my previous posts) I bought millions more over the past few weeks, single-handedly responsible for most of the day's volume on two particular days recently. Time will tell if I'm a smaht boy or a complete dumb-ass.
I alone am still awaiting 750,000 dividend shares from TDA.
I think "the Company" in that particular statement refers to SYNJ (past tense) which "had now evolved", compared to the earlier creation-of-MEG reference "The Company is to operate as..."
It is confusing that "the Company" is used that way, referring to SYNJ and MEG in the same paragraph as "the Company", and further confusing that this a document about past activities but written closer to the present with forward-looking statements.
Notable statements in the filing at:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/otciq/ajax/showFinancialReportById.pdf?id=29933
Page 9, Note 2 - "... At the 3rd Quarter close, the Company had cash resources of $589,110, which the Company believes will be adequate resources along with the expected stream of revenue to cover its operating costs and to allow it to continue as a going concern."
Page 12, (MEG) - "... the Company had now evolved beyond its development stage activities and was engaged in the process of purchasing assets and moving toward revenue generation."
IMO, One doesn't often see statements like this in Pink/OTC filings where it is often seen other companies' statements like "substantial doubt in the company's ability to continue as a going concern" by comparison. I think, in general, the "continue as a going concern" statement is a good indicator of their own confidence.
I think they are still on track towards revenue.
IMO, the trades we've been seeing the past few weeks can be accounted for just by trades from folks that posted on this message board!
Good luck with that. I tried the Contact Us page a couple of times recently, got an undeliverable bounce-back email.
TDA, today: "Opening transactions for this security are not accepted."
Still no dividends in my TDA account from Oct 2009 either.
TDA: Opening transactions for this security are not accepted.
When I bought in recent weeks, they went through as 9-million blocks.
Oh great, so now we're going to start badgering the CFO.
Can't we just let these guys build the company that we think they're building so that there will be REAL value here?
Got it, but "worthless until October" is still different than "worthless", which implies they will always be so.
I'm splitting proverbial hairs now, so let's move on.
My main point was that there's the impression here now that Brian actually told Tufan that the dividends were worthless, but not according to what Tufan wrote. Just trying to sort fact from rumor/hearsay. Once stuff gets repeated, it's hard to stop.
Who know what really happened. Perhaps Tufan can chime-in on this and clarify.
Lumping you in with those added thoughts was not intended. I have limited posts, so I spewed a bunch of thoughts.
For the record, Tufan didn't write that Brian said they were worthless dividends:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=47286948
I think "worthless" was added by a discussion board member referring to Tufan's conversation, then it's been carried forward since as if Brian said it.
And I agree with Brian about this discussion board.
I bought the stock KNOWING that they weren't going to communicate until they were good and ready. I'm still okay with that, and I want them to have every chance to develop actual business without interference. I don't need a news pacifier. I want actual business developments however long it takes to get it done.
I actually had someone buy something from me once on eBay, then leave me negative feedback because I didn't offer free shipping. REALLY!?!? The terms were quoted in front of them, they paid, then complained publicly after they already knew what they were getting into in the first place. This discussion board lately reminds me of that experience.
And my rose-colored glasses are actually blue.
I don't recall the company promising more frequent PRs, but I might've missed it. Do you have the link to that promise? As I recall, it was just hearsay on this discussion board.
Yes, but by whom. I can definitely see shareholders reading this, seeing members of this discussion board threaten to go to FINRA, legal action, etc. and saying to themselves "I'm outta here!", hence an explanation for the selling volume today. You won't hear from them, because they're gone now.
Some of us still believe that the company is actually trying to build something quietly here for competitive reasons, and as the company has stated as much that they will announce what they will announce when they're ready. I've said before that the price is where it is because of the silence and the unknown/uncertainty is built into the current price.
If they have a plan, I'm willing to let them follow it, whatever it takes. I actually don't blame the CEO for being upset, if folks here are interfering with the business plan, whatever that actually is.
This is definitely a risky venture to buy and/or hold this stock, but I'm in for the potential reward. I really don't care what the price is now either. If they think they can have 2B worth of business in a few years (from MEG site), then WOO HOO!
I don't see dilution here. I know have been responsible for a majority of the daily trading for 2 days out of the past 2 weeks (all buys), and I think today's trading can be accounted for just by the sentiment on this discussion board today. That's 3 days volume I can reasonably account for in just the past two weeks. Just doesn't feel like dilution IMO.
My TDA streamer is still showing a bid of .0002 even after restarting, yet the TDA quote page (and Zecco) have a bid of .0004. I wonder if the .0002 has triggered some TDA stop limit orders, causing the trades at .0004.
Correction: TDA's streamer is showing .0002x.0006. Their online quotes and Zecco's are .0004x.0005. Must be a data problem with TDA's streamer.
Hmmm ... TDA shows .0002x.0006, but Zecco has .0004x.0005. Strange.
I'm finding it hard to believe that ANYONE would be holding a short position on a stock at $0.0005, unless they are 98% sure that it's going to zero.
[raises hand] That's me. Now I have 8M more shares.
Granted. I should have said the company SEEMS to be doing what they said they would based on the PRs.
Nonetheless, there is definitely activity happening as has been uncovered here for months by discussion board members from publicly available information. Obviously, there is no way to publicly confirm private financing. IMO, there is likely more happening that hasn't been revealed yet.
I'm in now based on what information there is and the risk vs. reward. I think that's also reflected in the share price.
What has changed here? The company is doing what is said it would:
From 23-Dec-2009 PR: "The current Company P/R Policy is restricted and will remain that way through our initial funding approval process. Government agencies are particularly sensitive to the mere appearance that they are being used in a marketing or news campaign. For this reason, until we receive initial financing from one of our sources, the Company will continue to restrict its P/R's."
From latest (Jan) PR: "Company will continue to pursue multiple sources of financing however, we are extremely excited about this particular arrangement. The Madrid finance group is already considering finance packages for additional projects in our Energy City agenda, specifically the Palmetto Gas Pipe Line. They are reasonable in cost, faster and more predictable then the government"
So, the company stated they would be silent until government funding process is done. They got private funding, but IMO the government funding is still in play, hence the silence.
I'm glad that they are working on these efforts, and probably the SRE/MEG web site designers messed up. The MEG site is clearly not ready yet as this page http://marshallenergygroup.com/aboutus.php refers to Marshall Energy Group, LLC formed in 2007 and is also "a security consulting company" which is not right.
I see no reason for the company to announce this if it's not ready just because IHub people say so. The PPS is where it is due to the risk of this investment and the information known.
The company has previously stated that they are keeping things quiet during development stages so as to not tip-off major potential competitors and for the government financing reasons also stated more recently. Granted, the company could very well be "dark" for other devious reasons, but that is the risk, and it hasn't changed since I bought last year.
I for one plan to hold these shares until all plays out and may add more over the next few weeks as I did last week. IMO, the risk/reward is in the buyer's favor at this price.
This is futile. Most brokers would cancel such a transaction (100 times the current price) as unrealistic by the end of the day. I tried this with a GTC order with TDAmeritrade several times, and they always canceled the transaction shortly thereafter.
I'm starting to be believe that placing high sell orders to thwart shorters is just an old folk tale told on these message boards.
That's the only explanation. Very interesting. The MMs must be shorting this on anyone buying.
I hope so! I was responsible for 63% of the volume today, and I now seem to own more than a factional percent of the company. I'm either a smaht boy or a wicked jerk.
That SYNJ buy was my first-ever trade with Zecco -- not sure how fast they're supposed to be on execution. I'm so used to TDAmeritrade's speedy routing.
I changed the 20,000,000 buy @ .0004 to a 10,000,000 buy @ .0005, and it executed in less than 5 min.
Will someone sell me 20,000,000 shares @ $0.0004? That's my buy sitting on the bid all day.
Ahhh. That's it! It works in the trade center only. Thanks.
SYNJ still doesn't come-up on the quote/search bar though, signed in or not.
Sorry to distract the board with this Zecco issue, but I'll be buying SYNJ at the opening bell! Woo Hoo!
Oh, I'm not trying to start anything. I've been a SYNJ holder and buyer since April 2009 and (stupidly or not) never sold a share.
I'll find out if I can buy on Zecco tomorrow when my wire clears, but I'm pretty sure I can buy based on comments by others here.
What I said today is true though: I can't get a quote on SYNJ at zecco.com. ANYONE can try this: go to zecco.com, type SYNJ in the quote box, and press [Enter]. You'll get the same result I saw. Then start typing "syndication", and "SYDI Syndication Inc." will come-up.
I've tried several different ways on Zecco.com to quote SYNJ, and it doesn't exist. If I search for "syndication", it pulls up an old quote for "SYDI Syndication Inc." and the message: The symbol you requested is invalid. Please check the symbol and try again.
I tried changing the URL for SYDI to SYNJ, and got it:
http://www.zecco.com/quotes/SYNJ/default.aspx
but I shouldn't have to do that!
Zecco has a disclaimer that their quote data is provided by QuoteMedia, but QuoteMedia.com shows SYNJ correctly, so who knows?!?!?
Thanks, but on Zecco I'm still getting:
Sorry, but we could not find any symbols or companies matching [SYNJ]. Please try your search again.
I don't understand why so many here this weekend and today are so upset with the company for not PR-ing just because a new website is under construction. Clearly, it's not even done yet, even now full of errors resulting from the initial search-and-replace done on the SRE web site, which is an ACTUAL complaint: why were publicly visible changes even made to the SRE site??
Actually, now all 3 web sites look like they aren't being tended to properly:
http://www.sentinelrenewableenergy.com - MEG referenced but not announced, search-and-replace errors rampant.
http://marshallenergygroup.com - obviously under development, search-and-replace errors rampant.
http://syndicationinc.net - Oh, where do I even begin! PLEASE stop the music!! MEG references now incorporated by way of the SRE site references.
I would not want to see a PR until all of this is cleared-up, and I don't think we will. A web site is one of the first things people see about your company, and it needs to at least be coherent.
Meantime, since I can't buy SYNJ on TDAmeritrade, I opened a Zecco account today and moved my funds from TDA. One of the first things I did was to try to get a quote on SYNJ, and IT DOESN'T EXIST according to Zecco!! Ugh. Does anything work right??
I just tried to buy on TDAmeritrade: Opening transactions for this security are not accepted.
NO MUSIC at all!
Web browsing is a largely silent activity. Even when I'm alone, when I stumble upon a site that plays music or any noise without my initiating it, I close the site and never visit again.
If BEHL wants to have music or talk or whatever noise on the site, give the reader enough respect to have the option to start it themselves.
Well, someone is. I placed a 3.5M buy order at the bid of .0005, and it got filled in its entirety.