InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 134
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/12/2009

Re: SquidTrader post# 102831

Wednesday, 03/24/2010 5:24:13 PM

Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:24:13 PM

Post# of 127409
I agree with snowdog. Interference is not DD.

The company has published a perfectly legitimate reason for remaining quiet. Shareholder interference with the business should not be an expected consequence. If a shareholder doesn't like what the company is doing, they should sell. That is the limited right of a public shareholder of common shares. The current share price reflects this, and it is what it is.