Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
CP, I have been listening to these excuses for years. Dozens of ground breaking, upcoming events that were going to propel us forward went by with a yawn (or a tear).
As they occurred (with little or no increase in share price) excuses were made (sabotage, out performing control arms, etc.) and the share price has continued to decline to the tune of dropping 80% of its value in the last 2+ years.
This is followed by multitudes of glowing posts of our hidden value and how the next event will be "the big one", however it never is.
Diatribes do not change this.
Bavi, to date, has failed. Whether it has potential to Market remains to be seen, but with the Blundering management of this company I think the window is rapidly closing. Similar (possibly better) drugs are catching up, and some have advanced further. No patent by PPHM is going to prevent that nor replace the progress lost due to the bungling that has occurred here.
All the glowing talk of monetary partnerships has also failed. Those speculations of multiple deals "in the works, some for two or more years" are (IMO) delusional. If we had one serious monetary offer it would have been taken.
I stay neutral, but grounded. I'm not here for fantasies.
I'm not sure any BP wants the "New" Bavituximab, given the repeated failures of the "Old" Bavituximab......
Yep!
Another BIG Pump and Dump!
Have fun with that........
He's gonna surprise you, all right.
Steve King has done a self-serving, pathetic, pitiful job.
Everyone thought they were at the "buy low" stage years ago when it was trading over $2.
Don't hold your breath on it now.
I do not disagree with you that Bavi may have a future; that is the primary reason that I am still here. I disagreed with the point that the BOD's make up and past decisions have little reflection on future performance.
Their dismal performance to date (IMO) has and continues to be a hindrance to the movement of Bavi to the marketplace.
I do give them credit for the apparent success of Avid but hold their actions accountable for not bringing Bavi to market sooner. I question whether they can perform any differently moving forwards.
This is why I believe that they play a HUGE role moving forward and do not agree that they are of minor consequence.
To go further, as stated in my prior post, I feel like the current PPS is a reflection of their past performance and cannot be shrugged off as " not mattering" either.
"The current share price, the make up of the BOD, and what happened years ago is of very little meaning".
I'm not insulting or complaining, but I think that analysis is WAY OFF THE MARK!
Given the history of the BOD's and the fact that almost everything we know about this company comes from what they release, I believe that the BOD's and their make up have a HUGE meaning to the future of the Company. When they have damaged their reputation by repeatedly making bright predictions that fail to "come to fruition" (sorry, I couldn't help myself) and repeatedly fail to meet their stated (and published) goals they gain a reputation as untrustworthy.
In addition, if their future is so bright, I believe that the pitiful PPS also carries huge meaning to their future.
As to what happened years ago, refer to the paragraph above about the BOD's.
I have no idea what that has to do with PPHM's failure to bring Bavi to market or my explanation of why I don't believe that sabotage is the reason for that failure.
On a lighter note, I don't think that the world will go away but I do think that your oxygen supply will!
I don't deny, nor do I believe, that "sabotage" is the reason that this company has been (and continues to be) failing. Please don't try to put words in my mouth.
Sabotage as described here is illegal and merits remuneration. In addition, it merits criminal charges regardless of whether PPHM pursues it.
Management has never used that word in published correspondence (that I am aware of) and has failed to convince the courts that it occurred. In addition, criminal charges were never pursued.
Until stronger evidence appears, I will believe the Courts and the Criminal Justice System more than I will believe the staunch beliefs and accusations made on a public message board by anyone who has access to the internet (and additionally cannot provide any solid evidence of it occurring).
Hopefully that helps you understand my view of this topic.
CP, the billions invested didn't go into PPHM's bank account, it was lost to the market (maybe all of those nefarious shooters!).
I will not argue your opinions with you CP.
Facts are inarguable.
CP, it is ABOLUTELY AN OPINION AND NOT A FACT!
Your statements are all your opinionated "conclusions" (your words) based on your perception of a series of events that may or may not be true (in other words, NOT VERIFIED).
It is just as easy to say that they do not "have the goods" based on the failed trials and the inability to receive approval from the FDA based on the current FACTS that are available to them.
I appreciate your knowledge in this arena, but that does not make your opinions or conclusions FACTS.
You stated just as strongly that there would be no R/S, which is clearly not a fact. It may or may not, but when you state opinions as facts (and then try to justify them with "Sabotage" and "an outperforming control arm") it further reinforces this as a perception.
Sabotage has never been confirmed, nor stated by management.
If PPHM were to release a PR with your "facts" that you have arrived at (as your conclusions) they would be ridden out of town on a rail (which may not be that bad of an idea).
No, it is ABSOLUTELY NOT a fact.
A fact can be measured and quantified and is easily verified.
This is an opinion (or conclusion) based on a personal belief. Opinions can be argued (which seems to happen here a lot lately) but a fact is irrefutable.
"PPHM is such company that without any doubt has the goods and of which the PPS is artificially low."
That is an OPINION but stated as a fact. The II's and the market seem not to share your "Opinion".
It is clear from the financial statements that they are a scam, not factually reported and CLEARLY NOT MAKING A PROFIT!
Gross income is trivial, however they further trivialized expenses so as to appear to have a net profit. If memory serves me correctly, expenses were less than 10K per quarter.
Where is rent expense? Officers salary? Shipping costs? Company vehicles? Utility expense? Repair and maintenance? Attorney and CPA (Professional) fees? Employees salaries? Accrued taxes and insurance?
The statements are fraught with typographical errors.
If these things are not enough to convince ANYONE that this is a scam then there is nothing that can be said here that will change their mind.
A few years here, so to some I'm still a newbie, however I must express my disagreement of your evaluation of SK.
He has done a HORRIBLE job (along with the rest of the board) in protecting shareholder interests and advancing the platform. I've seen many companies like this do the same thing, but they did not have a viable product. What is shameful here is that I believe that they DO have a viable product, plus the (apparent) success of AVID to advance it.
Their inexperience in this arena, along with the profits that they have realized to date, has led them to continue to seek the Golden Apple at the expense of others. I truly believe that they are nearing the tipping point and that their near term decisions (3-12 months) will govern success or failure of this company (hurts to say, but it won't be the first time I've gone down with a ship like this).
Saying "he's the best we've had" is not a defense of the progress (or lack of) that PPHM has exhibited to date.
All above, in my opinion. If I didn't believe that they still have a chance I would have sold by now and I sure wouldn't take the time to express my opinion here.
Moffitt Cancer Center and immunotherapy:
http://web.tampabay.com/news/health/moffitt-cancer-center-plans-800-million-expansion/2303257
This has ZERO to do with PPHM.
This is a PPHM board, not anything to do with Cancer or PS.
It would be nice to see a direct theory as to involvement in lieu of abstract hopes of a connection.
What in the World does this have to do with PPHM?
Don't spin an abstract thought, please give me something factual that can be verified that ties this to our investment.
Mine is by (paper) loss.....
Is he our new Security Expert?
Not necessarily. I'm not painting blue skies but just saying.
If that investment in Avid does begin to pay off and create revenues it provides a greater opportunity to advance the platform.
That is IF the BOD's begins to smell the coffee and does an about face.
Good chances of that? Probably not. I wouldn't buy in to it, but unfortunately, I already have.
I choose to hold.
Using ATM funds for a Manufacturing Operating Cost (if you mean building and expanding Avid) might just be what pulls their fat out of the fire.....
Go PPHM!
(OK, now I'm a Pumper)
I think it's because everyone looks at the first sentence of Bios Class of Anything to do with Anything.
Not an attack, I love Bio, just an observation.
The company behind the RS is the same company that drove it into the ground, necessitating the RS!
LOL, RS is a neutral event........NOT!
I take exception to #4.
They currently have at least two products that we know of, one of them in (or to be in) multiple studies.
And that, my Friend, we both whole heartedly agree!
Thanks, and I don't have my "dander up", I am just trying to understand your reasoning.
I am not a believer of the dark forces, family, sabotage, naked shorting, big pharma, etc. that some people believe has been a concerted or collusive effort to bring this company down or hold it back, nor am I believer of the repeated "doom and gloom, there is absolutely no hope" view that others hold.
As stated before, I am holding and hoping to recover a portion of my (paper, at this time) loss before it truly becomes a monetary loss.
I guess I fall in the crowd that mainly believes the company has the pieces to succeed but also has a BOD that don't know how to assemble them.
What's sad and ironic to me is that (IMO) they have mismanaged this company and unjustly enriched themselves at the expense of shareholders but could have made just as much or more AND had the shareholders profit as well had they just acted in a more prudent manner rather than losing focus of what their jobs really are. I don't mean to imply criminal intent, I think it is more a lack of qualities that you would expect to see from a successful management team. Maybe they just don't have the knowledge and skills to make this work.
Not sure I worded that correctly but I hope you get the gist of it.
Why do you think that 6,000 reads means great things are coming?
A person could equally say that 6,000 reads means terrible things are coming.
I'm not criticizing, I would just like you (for once) to offer a rational explanation as to why you believe that an extraordinary number of reads has anything to do with the success or failure of PPHM.
The repeated inability to answer this question indicates that it has NOTHING to do with success or failure and is only background noise.
This is a fair question. If you truly believe that there is a correlation then you should be able to offer an explanation.
Unless what? Enlighten us.
I'm trying to understand why you think board reads are significant to the stock price.
In my mind it has no relationship (not blow back, just my thought pattern).
Can you please explain why you think that reads on this board have any correlation to the success of PPHM?
It is clear from the financial statements that they are a scam and not factually reported.
Gross income is trivial, however they further trivialized expenses so as to appear to have a net profit. If memory serves me correctly, expenses were less than 10K per quarter.
Where is rent expense? Officers salary? Shipping costs? Company vehicles? Utility expense? Repair and maintenance? Attorney and CPA (Professional) fees? Employees salaries? Accrued taxes and insurance?
The statements are fraught with typographical errors.
If these things are not enough to convince ANYONE that this is a scam then there is nothing that can be said here that will change their mind.
I'm just trying to understand why you think it is significant.
In my mind it has no relationship (not blow back, just my thought pattern) so I was just trying to understand why you think it is.
Maybe he will keep the Directors from stealing shares.
Hope, you acknowledged prior that the number of reads on this board has zero effect on share price.
What significance is it that you think the number of reads has?
Isn't that what you said before the presentation last month?
Cancer Drugs Might Cause Heart Damage
https://www.google.com/amp/www.nbcnews.com/health/cancer/amp/new-cancer-drugs-may-damage-heart-n677071?client=safari
We'll just have to disagree on that one. When the SEC filings of a publicly held company contain a statement from its CEO that says "we cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, that may result from this matter" I can hardly see how it could be of "no concern" to the company, its investors or its partners (or those considering partnering).