Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OT: I encourage everyone to read this link today (Christmas)
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=15784160
Great discussion guys. I needed this reminder of why we need Christmas viewed differently than a lust for material things
Sound Advice on enjoying Christmas dinner:
1. Avoid carrot sticks. Anyone who puts carrots on a
holiday buffet table knows nothing of the Christmas
spirit. In fact, if you see carrots, leave
immediately. Go next door, where they're serving rum
balls.
2. Drink as much eggnog as you can. And quickly. it's
rare. You can't find it any other time of year but
now. So drink up! Who cares that it has 10,000
calories in every sip? It's not as if you're going to
turn into an eggnog-alcoholic or something. It's a
treat. Enjoy it. Have one for me. Have two. It's later
than you think. It's Christmas!
3. If something comes with gravy, use it. That's the
whole point of gravy. Gravy does not stand alone. Pour
it on. Make a volcano out of your mashed potatoes.
Fill it with gravy. Eat the volcano. Repeat.
4. As for mashed potatoes, always ask if they're made
with skim milk or whole milk. If it's skim, pass. Why
bother? It's like buying a sports car with an automa
tic transmission.
5. Do not have a snack before going to a party in an
effort to control your eating. The whole point of
going to a Christmas party is to eat other people's
food for free. Lots of it. Hello?
6. Under no circumstances should you exercise between
now and New Year's. You can do that in January when
you have nothing else to do. This is the time for long
naps, which you'll need after circling the buffet
table while carrying a 10-pound plate of food and that
vat of eggnog.
7. If you come across something really good at a
buffet table, like frosted Christmas cookies in the
shape and size of Santa, position yourself near them
and don't budge. Have as many as you can before
becoming the center of attention. They're like a
beautiful pair of shoes. If you leave them behind,
you're never going to see them again.
8. Same for pies. Apple. Pumpkin. Mincemeat. Have a
slice of each. Or if you don't like mincemeat, have
two apples and one pumpkin. Always h ave three. When
else do you get to have more than one dessert? Labor
Day?
9. Did someone mention fruitcake? Granted, it's loaded
with the mandatory celebratory calories, but avoid it
at all cost. I mean, have some standards.
10. One final tip: If you don't feel terrible when you
leave the party or get up from the table, you haven't
been paying attention. Re-read tips; start over, but
hurry, January is just around the corner. Remember
this motto to live by:
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the
intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well
preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways,
chocolate in one hand, body thoroughly used up,
totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"
Have a great holiday season!
I hope all the Magic Makers have a wonderful Christmas. Those visiting with family cherish the time. Be safe and no re-gifting that tie or fruit cake. I am looking forward to a prosperous new year for all of us....
The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid-term. The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues via the internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.
BONUS QUESTION: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proof of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.
One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives us two possibilities:
1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.
2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So which is it?
Well, if we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you!" and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore extinct, leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."
THIS STUDENT RECEIVED THE ONLY "A"
Sounds like a lot of day traders now in, which is fine, but the long term looks bright for a Roth or IRA. I have 55k and have been tempted to sell, but with my luck news would come out and I may have to pay more to get back in. Actually wish I had sold some but that's hindsight, so I have debated with myself and decided since they were in retirement accounts I would let it play out.
IVXX you remind me of a nagging wife. Most days you are bashing this stock, but every once in a while you think its ok and and wish everyone the best with this, then its back on your rants. You have now joined 2create on ignore
yea I know, it just wasn't worth responding. I left out the I. Moderator here isn't worth much to let IVXX continuously to bash and then claim OH MY I am just telling the truth. Anyone who posts here can expect a personal attack from him like with Ruff, and according to Ihub rules he should be banned. Ruff's was by PM, not a public rant. Reminds me of too many other RB boards and some here on Ihub.
Lets just say 3 people marks for IVXX, 7 for Crow3, and 495 for Ruff. This is penny land and we already have a mother or daddy and we don't need another one supposedly constantly watching out for us and my investments.
this board needs to be renamed the IVXX board. Your rants about truth is getting soooooo damn tiresome. Do you even own LYRC?
TXFIQ bouncing; wonder why?
PLRO having a nice day. They make a sulur free emmision motor oil. May be a good play with Dems coming in as anti-oil. +.30 to 2.35
would have been nice but not our DTEK
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=15724832
thanks for the reply...first Jeko (Chineese merger) and now Majink (Isreali)...nobody knows it seems
What makes you think this is our DTEK?
About Magink Display Technologies
Magink Display Technologies Inc. is a privately held company founded in
2000
with offices in Israel, United Kingdom and the United States
Has ISYX been in the pile for a time...thought I would follow you but now order has to be called in to Etrade
10Q still dealing with closing up shop on MQPH
still have some dry powder to average up or down....waiting on DPDW is like watching paint dry...I just hope evryone's expectations aren't too high, mine included.
I have been watching since .04, so I decided to buy 25k at .08, should have pulled the trigger before...now that I'm in, I am sure it will pullback
From CROSSY on SI
thought worth reposting
re: "naked shorting"
if you believe this "conspiracy theory" stuff, no one can help you. Most of the time what appears to be "naked shorting" at first is later identified not as really naked shorting but as an arbitrage strategy against a derivative.. convertible preferred, convertible debenture, warrants .. etc.. .. most dangerous are those types of convertibles where there is no ex-ante fixed conversion price .. the so called "floorless" instriuments. They usually carry a "death spiral" effect on the underlying common with them (I can point you to two threads originated by one of the most intelligent posters on SI .. Zeev Hed .. Entirely dedicated to these kinds of situations)
oftentimes this happens in anticipation of a finaning. works like this: the company and a financing (PIPE) group agree on a formula .. we take x% new shares to be issued at the average trading price over the next month. Well, turns out that at the same time the PIPE group shorts up-front to bring down the share price and reduce their costs. if not a fixed amount of shares but instead a fixed DOLLAR SUM is agreed upon then this type of agreement might have a small "death spiral" effect, limited to the time when the financing is agreed and the point it is affected.
Even worse than this is an "Equity line of credit" agreement where the "dangerous" time horizon for such manoevers are stretched and controlled by the PIPE group.
What I ask you and other "naked shorting" afficionados is not to engage in naivety but to look at the facts and the filings of the underlying company, Go to Edgar and look at the S-3, S-8 and S-1 and 10K/20-F).
MQPH is now DPDW in my Etrade account...that didn't take long to change
HLUN.PK up...anyone know anything about it?
you bet your life or rather someone else's life...sweeeeet
Pissed...I had an order in at the open for 7500 at .55 and 26900 went and I got zip and now 51x59
New investing opportunity? I did not know about this....
Late in Life, Finding a Bonanza in Life Insurance
By CHARLES DUHIGG
Published: December 17, 2006
Marvin Margolis, an 80-year-old Manhattan financial consultant, is looking for investors willing to bet on when he will die.
Golden Opportunities
Cashing In
How Spin-Life Works
Two years ago, Mr. Margolis bought a large life insurance policy. Now, he’s considering selling it to a group of investors, a deal that should give him as much as $2 million to enjoy in his final years. In return, the investors will get the policy’s $7 million payout when he dies — which they hope will be soon, so they can stop paying his premiums.
“This is a wonderful opportunity to use my body as an asset,” Mr. Margolis said. “I deserve to be able to benefit in some way from my age.”
Trading in life insurance policies held by wealthy seniors has quietly become a big business. Hedge funds, financial institutions like Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank, and investors like Warren E. Buffett are spending billions to buy life insurance policies from the elderly. Other investors are paying seniors to apply for life insurance, lending them money to buy the policies, and then reselling them to speculators.
This nascent market illustrates one way that investors are hoping to make money from a large and wealthy generation of Americans as they reach retirement age. These aging baby boomers and those even older offer both opportunities and risks for many companies, investors and swindlers seeking to capitalize on their final years.
Insurance executives, for instance, say transactions like Mr. Margolis’s may cripple their industry and make it harder for the average senior to buy life insurance in the first place. Insurers are worried because they count on many customers canceling their policies before they die, usually because their children grow up and no longer need the financial protection, their pensions kick in or premiums become too expensive. If far more policies result in payouts, the insurance business becomes much less profitable.
Indeed, industry analysts say they expect the cost of life insurance to rise as companies prepare to pay out more claims.
“If payouts increase, the cost of insuring people is effectively going up, and that will definitely increase the price of policies,” said J. David Cummins, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
While that may be the case, many people have come to rely on selling their policies to provide urgently needed money for medical care and living expenses when their bank accounts run dry. However, insurance executives say that the market that has emerged could be ruinous.
“Life insurance is a way for individuals to protect their families,” said C. Robert Henrikson, the chief executive of MetLife. “If someone profits from a stranger’s death, it stands the whole purpose of life insurance on its head. Anything that disrupts the economic processes underlying this industry will drive the cost of life insurance through the ceiling.”
Policies like Mr. Margolis’s cause particular concern. It was originally paid for with a loan from speculators who will get their money back, plus a profit, if it is sold to another group of investors, according to public documents. Even if Mr. Margolis does not sell, the loan will be repaid from the death benefit when he dies.
Such policies are known as speculator-initiated life insurance, or “spin-life” policies. Investors estimate that spin-life policies worth as much as $13 billion will change hands next year.
The deals are so lucrative that older people are being wooed in every fathomable way. In Florida, investors have sponsored free cruises for seniors willing to undergo physical exams and apply for life insurance while onboard.
For insurers, such cruises are a financial Titanic. Over the next decade, the insurance industry could be forced to pay out unexpectedly more than $100 billion in death benefits as spin-life policies come to maturity, investors estimate.
In Minnesota, according to lawsuits brought by insurers, an 82-year-old named John R. Paulson bought life policies worth $120 million from seven companies and resold many of them before insurance companies realized what was going on and sued, saying that Mr. Paulson had lied on his applications.
Life insurance companies, in particular, rely on policies lapsing before the policyholder dies. Last year, for instance, insurance companies reduced their financial exposure by $1.1 trillion when 19.8 million policyholders stopped paying premiums, according to the Insurance Information Institute. In comparison, the industry paid death benefits on only 2.2 million policies.
If those lapsed policies had been sold to investors rather than canceled, insurance companies could have eventually paid out as much as a trillion dollars, say analysts.
In an attempt to mitigate such risk, some insurance companies are trying to make policies for seniors harder to buy. The biggest insurer in the United States, American International Group, earlier this year increased prices on some universal life policies for buyers more than 70 years old in an effort to thwart spin-life deals.
“We don’t want this business, and we’re taking steps to discourage those purchasers from coming through our doors,” an A.I.G. spokesman said.
But such moves may be too late. The market for purchasing life insurance policies from seniors is an outgrowth of the so-called viatical industry that began in the 1980s, when investors bought up life insurance policies of AIDS patients. In the last two years, as interest rates and stock market returns have declined, the number of buyers seeking seniors’ policies has soared.
That growth was fueled this year when the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued rules permitting investors to record purchases of policies immediately as a profit, rather than forcing them to wait until the policyholder died.
Critics contend the industry punishes the young and healthy, by driving up prices, but many people who have sold their policies say it offered their only way to avoid calamity.
“If I hadn’t been able to sell this policy we would have lost our house, all of our savings, everything,” said Andrew Schneider of Kaysville, Utah. Seven years ago his wife, Karen, learned she had breast cancer. Her expenses exceeded the Schneiders’ medical insurance by half a million dollars. Mrs. Schneider sold her life insurance policy for about $250,000 and used the money to buy medicine and pay bills, he said. The investors who bought her policy received a $500,000 death benefit when she died last year.
“Selling that policy extended her life for years,” said Mr. Schneider. “If this market hadn’t existed, we would have become financially destitute.”
Finding enough life insurance policies to satisfy investor hunger has proved difficult. So, in addition to the free cruises in Florida, investors including one large hedge fund have hired a California telemarketing company to call elderly citizens and ask if they would apply for life insurance in exchange for a paycheck.
The insurance industry has begun to fight back. Legislatures in New Jersey, New York and nine other states have proposed laws intended to outlaw spin-life investments or make it more difficult for investors to get payouts, according to the Life Insurance Settlement Association.
Insurance companies have also sued to cancel policies, contending that payouts benefiting outside investors violate the legal requirement that beneficiaries have an “insurable interest” in the policyholder’s life.
But many advocates for the elderly and industry insiders worry that seniors will lose their legitimate ability to sell life insurance policies they have held for years.
“We’ve put billions of dollars in the hands of seniors who were getting thrown out of their homes or needed medication, and their only asset was a life insurance policy,” said Scott Page, chief executive of the Lifeline Program, a company that helps investors buy life insurance policies from the elderly and infirm. “If you make it harder to sell these policies, you’re taking money out of the hands of people who have nothing else.”
Another risk is that seniors hoping to sell their life insurance policies will be stuck in bad deals. In October, the New York attorney general, Eliot Spitzer, filed a lawsuit accusing one life insurance speculator, Coventry Financial, of bid-rigging and other fraud in acquiring more than $3.6 billion in life insurance policies. Coventry said it would fight the suit.
A lawyer who has helped the elderly set up spin-life arrangements worth more than $300 million said that often the terms of the deals prevented his clients from profiting.
“Investors say, ‘I’ll loan you money to buy a new policy, and in a few years I’ll buy it from you,’ ” said Larry Brody, a partner at the law firm Bryan Cave. But a few years later, when the seniors sell the policy, they owe so much in interest and fees on the loan, he said, “it eats up all the profit. And what’s more, they can’t buy another insurance policy, because insurers are unwilling to give them more coverage.”
But those risks are worth the trouble, according to some buyers and sellers. In 2004, Irene Randall, a life-settlement broker in Albuquerque, N.M., set up an $8 million spin-life policy for her 82-year-old uncle with investors who agreed to lend him money for the premiums. In return, she said, the company hopes to buy the policy next year, paying her uncle $1.5 million.
Ms. Randall called it a great deal and said she was setting up a similar arrangement for her 82-year-old mother. She expects both her mother and uncle will live long enough to enjoy the windfall. “The one thing we know is that everyone is going to die at some point,” said Ms. Randall. “If someone is willing to pay you because you’re old, why not try and live it up before then?”
Pat I am impressed that you are #48 on most read member list....Congratulations on your picks and being in the top 50. Thats a lot of respect
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/hot_people.asp
I hope by Monday Etrade has fixed MQPH to DPDW. It shows 0.00 as price in porfolio. Hope its not a number for a week, but rather DPDW. My portfolio took a hit...LOL
DPDW filed 8k also. Will read over weekend. Hoping for news on Mon
http://xml.10kwizard.co.." target="_blank">http://xml.10kwizard.com/filing_raw.php?repo=tenk&ipage=4547508">http://xml.10kwizard.co....
MQPH had a nice close on news that RM was completed and will trade as DPDW.
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dailylist_search.asp?DirectSymbol=MQPH&OTCBB=True
SRYP...I was going to scalp it but did not get filled unfortunately at .16 and did not chase it. I should have given credit for that post to someone else, but after I cut and pasted I went back and could not remember where I saw it. oh well.
SRYP - PPS .30 cash? Am I right?
14A from today:
"2. To vote on whether or not to approve a proposal to dissolve the Company and a related Plan of Complete Liquidation and Dissolution of the Company pursuant to which stockholders would receive approximately $0.30 per share".
OS is 11,320,973
Jeeeeez Derekz thats about 20 messages on FCCN today on this board and cashcow...we get the point that you like it
thanks Wayne
Pat isn't 1 wife enough? LOL. I see Wayne on the TITT board has the same question on NPYC but I can't respond as it's for paying IHUB members only. I'm cheap
NPYC...bought a while back on Wayne's post about being bought out for .45. IR guy was an idiot. I am in at .14 for quite a while. Usually trades less than a couple of thousand in the last 3 months at .02x.04. Today there is unusual volume of 228,000 and up .03 to .06. I am not averaging down, just hope its not the scam I thought and get close to even...unless of course the buyout is true. Please post if anyone knows whats going on
14 Dec 2006
KRG statement on oil and gas press reports
Recently there has been some speculation and false claims have been published about agreements and contracts with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in the oil and gas sector as well as for the building of refineries in the Kurdistan Region.
The KRG wishes to make it clear that there are no such deals or contracts. If any agreements or contracts are signed, they will be announced by the KRG itself. Responsible media organisations and reporters are advised to verify with the KRG any claims made by any party before publishing such news.
To avoid any doubt, the KRG would like to draw your attention to a report published by the Beirut-based Daily Star on 13th December 2006 regarding claims made by Make Oil Company about the building of a refinery in Kurdistan. There is no such deal with Make Oil Company. The KRG does not consider that Make Oil Company would qualify to undertake such an important project in Kurdistan.
The Spokesman
Kurdistan Regional Government
Council of Ministers
Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Email: spokesman(at)krg.org
I also have noticed the website is different from a week ago...
Pat, there is a good board on IHUB and there is some disagreement about actual share count after merger being around 80 million so I am waiting on news and numbers supposedly to be released today
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=7181
Maybe SPRL should be talking to SHELL about cleanup!
A BLACK TUESDAY FOR WESTERN ENERGY COMPANIES IN RUSSIA
By Vladimir Socor
Wednesday, December 13, 2006
First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev An unprecedented flurry of warnings by top Russian energy officials on a single day, December 12, may mark that date as a Black Tuesday for Western energy companies investing in Russia. First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, Gazprom president Alexei Miller, Energy and Industry Minister Viktor Khristenko, and the unleashed “environmental” scourge Oleg Mitvol targeted mainly Royal Dutch Shell; but they also threatened the interests of ExxonMobil, Chevron, BP, and other companies with heavy investments -- or, as may turn out, exposure -- in Russia.
Under the threat of suits by the Russian government for “environmental damages,” Shell is being forced to yield control of its giant oil and gas project Sakhalin-2 to Gazprom. The consortium developing that project since 1994, Sakhalin Energy, currently consists of Shell as project operator with a stake of 55% and the Japanese companies Mitsui and Mitsubishi with 25% and 20%, respectively. Moscow is now forcing a redistribution along the following lines: 50% plus one share for Gazprom, 25% for Shell and another 25% for the two Japanese companies.
The Russian side is not clarifying whether its input would come in the form of investment in the project or a swap of assets. Meanwhile, Gazprom declares that irrespective of any redistribution, the environmental claims to Shell must be resolved first.
In his news conference yesterday, Nature Inspectorate (RosPrirodNadzor) deputy chief Oleg Mitvol, a medium-level bureaucrat fronting for the Kremlin, threatened Shell with legal claims amounting to $30 billion for “environmental damages.” The Nature Inspectorate -- a division of the Natural Resources Ministry -- had in September threatened a $10 billion suit and upped that figure to $15 billion by late November. Mitvol’s explanation for the sudden jump to $30 billion is “advice from [unnamed] Western lawyers.” His governmental agency is preparing to file suits in Russian courts as well as in British, U.S., and Japanese courts and the Stockholm Arbitration Court against project operator Shell for “full compensation of the damages” and plans to hire Western law firms for that purpose. The court cases would go ahead, he warned, even if Gazprom joins the project as intended. The Natural Resources Ministry’s spokesman confirmed those intentions on the same day (December 12).
Moreover, the Nature Inspectorate is announcing a new series of checks next month on the ExxonMobil-led Sakhalin-1 project. Recent checks by the Technical Inspectorate (RosTekhNadzor) have already delayed the start of full-scale exports from that project to Asia-Pacific countries. Mitvol’s agency now seems set to raise environmental damage claims against that project as well. Natural Resources Minister Yuri Trutnev publicly chastised Mitvol’s nominal superior, Nature Inspectorate chief Sergei Sai, for not checking oil firms more often for violations (Moscow Times, December 12).
ExxonMobil, Chevron, and several European companies are also being squeezed on the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) line that carries oil from Kazakhstan to Russia’s Black Sea port Novorossiysk. The U.S. companies built this pipeline in order to avoid control by Russia’s state pipeline monopoly Transneft. In his December 12 news conference, however, Khristenko called for transferring this pipeline to Transneft in trust management. Meanwhile, the Russian government is blocking the expansion of the CPC pipeline’s capacity through extortionate preconditions, even as U.S. companies in Kazakhstan urgently need this outlet for their expanding production.
The Russian government is also set to buy out the private TNK company, partner to BP in the giant West Siberian Kovytka gas field. Environmental claims and license revocation threats have been looming there as well in order to force a transfer to either Gazprom or Rosneft. Apparently confident of the outcome, the Russian government is reserving for itself the ultimate decisions about production schedules and the destination of gas deliveries from Kovytka.
Misuse of state environmental inspections in Russia is beginning to affect large Western investors beyond the energy sector as well. The Nature Inspectorate is now targeting the Peter Hambro company, one of the world leaders in metals mining. It threatens to sue the company’s fully owned subsidiary in Russia, Yamalzoloto, with a view to canceling its licenses on two gold fields and also to conduct checks on other Hambro projects. The announcement in late November, reiterated on December 12, has caused the company’s shares to tumble on the London stock exchange.
Thanks Walker I already have 350k of SPRL and am looking for some estimates on revenue and production to add more. Looks like AURC has also tanked after inital pop on latest unaudited projections. Wish I had taken my won counsel on SERG, another Russian play I mentioned at $1