Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Took the bike out yesterday for a bit. Might do a ride today before the rain gets here :))
yeah...and his mom is a real piece of work as well.
oh good lord...could they PLEASE catch this freakin' criminal before he REALLY hurts someone?!
wow. real grammar. You soooo should write the next PR :)))
anything is possible...Good and bad :)
Nope.. no precedent whatsoever. That's why it's fun to let the mind wander. I have a feeling that a lot of new precedent will be set by the BCIT case. Hopefully for the better of shareholders, and not to their detriment!!
I've always felt that way. The dirt is so deep, the web so tangled...to corruption SO obvious...arrrrgh.
Sure...we'd all love to see it trade on the open market..but, reading between the lines of the current 'get your filings up to date' document, as well as the Burns emails..
I think, at some point, when Megas does indeed complete this request for more filings (and the DTCC/SEC inevitably finding 'something' not quite right with them)....we may end up seeing a 'settlement" being forced on us...
...a backroom deal between SEC/DTCC and the brokers basically forcing the brokers to buy our shares back for $ xxx before a certain date, at which time the stock will be revoked permenantly..if you don't take the deal, you lose everything.
MOST people here won't/don't want that to happen, and will do everything to fight it....but I can certainly envision that kind of scenario unfolding, whether we like it or not.
ahhh..to good old days :)
I think we're waiting for the Film Library.
:)
I'm a big fan of cutting through the BS. But, at a certain level..ya gotta play the game. Words are important ;)
oh fine..rub in the ECNC stuff :) I got out WAYYY too early.
hahaha...arrrgggh matey.
wow
the best part about 'precedent', is that somewhere along the way, it has to get set.
perhaps that's the plan :)
in the back of my mind, however...I keep hearing the phrase 'too big to fail' as it relates to other financial matters our country has faced in the recent past. Just a thought to ponder.
I'm not one of them.
aww..come one, man...I never said the glass was 'half empty'. Pointing out glaringly horribly grammar in a PR that many have waited YEARS for -should- make people think...just a little...about who actually composed the text and who approved it.
I sat for a whole 10 minutes are did some editing for clarification, punctuation, and clarity. I thought about posting it here, but I'm sure someone somewhere would get confused. I'll be more than glad to PM it to you, just to prove my point.
I know..it's mundane, mostly irrelevant, and just silly to be fussy about it. On the surface..it's dumb. But..if you think a bit deeper about it, it's important.
kinda like that pissed off email :)
nah...plenty else to talk about :) I'm just overly picky about how words are composed and presented to the public. Especially from a CEO.. Like I said..the content is there. Just oddly written...which makes me speculate as to who actually composed it, and if it was approved for release by the new Legal team. If they approved it as written, without being properly edited, that kinda scares me.
"it`s a masterpiece of coherence"
seriously...it's really written pretty poorly, from a grammar and punctuation pov..., even though all the salient points are made.
lololol. As long as we don't see a PR ending up on www.engrish.com, I suppose it's all good :)
never said some shareholder wrote it...just someone with poor English skills :)
no idea...one would think that the attorney would have to approve ANYTHING that went public, since Megas has been silent for so long. If that's what happened...yikes :)
I'm actually torn. The content of the PR is to the point..the expression of that point is done poorly. And...while I do want to see the fight continue, I agree a bit with Kruy's earlier post as to the potential negative effects.
If a lawyer wrote that PR, they should be fired. The grammar/punctuation/run on sentences are atrocious. A first year English Major would have done better. The PR gets the point across just fine..but, sheesh..it's brutal on the language arts ;)
just curious...why isn't the Shareholders Website mentioned at the end of the PR as a 'for more detailed information regarding the timeline of events, please visit the xxx website"
Sure wish Megas would hire a Proof Reader/writer for future PR's. Or at least an English Major :)
kinda wish the 'gross negligence' would have been described in detail a little more..
I think ECNC made a big run as well..and that CEO ended up behind bars.
yup. I'll make a little contribution.
But..sheeesh...the lack of proper grammar and punctuation really drive me nuts..Surely someone from the Law Firm could have proof-read the thing and cleaned it up a bit, eh???
I believe that's the crux of the problem, and he needs to be gotten rid of it. I agree...I'd rather sell a LOT more machines at a much lower price..The more that are out in the field, the more the exposure. I hate stupid business people that run companies into the ground.
FDA or not..this company should be in a LOT better shape than its in. It's really time for someone else to take over.
Well, it's been a few years..probably time to break out the old 'Movie Library' PR's :)
Valid point....same, but different. First, I wouldn't use the term 'blindly threw" regarding the lawsuit. I totally understand how people could justify the legal fees in their own defense of a lawsuit (rather than rely on internet posters 'just say this in your response' posts.
And, I also see the value of spending money on an attorney to go after the DTC, etc. However, the difference to me is not being able to have direct contact with the attorney (and the whole PayPal issue), and the lack of Megas addressing his shareholders.
One was a defensive move, one is an offensive one. Both valid in my mind, just different.
Actually, if someone is requesting I contribute my MONEY to something, I feel like I can demand as much as I want in order to make me happy with my contribution.
One could stretch this theory to the $$ we gave our stock brokers who were unable to deliver what we paid for, no matter how much we demand that they give it to us.
I'm glad Megas has stated things to you (and obviously a few select others) via email. All I think we/anyone is asking is for him to state things publically to the rest of us who are also out our money.
I'm gonna side with you on this one. I gave SERIOUS consideration, after ALL we've been through, of sending a little $$ to The Fund. But I won't until:
1) Megas makes a PUBLIC statement to his shareholders of SOME kind
2) I won't use Pay Pal. Never. I'd send a cashiers check payable to the Firm only.
3) Three camels walk near my yard. :)
agreed.. And, not to disparage the Legal field, but, I can't imagine that enough $$ is being raised by shareholders to make this lawfirm do much (other than pass it off to some junior/1st year staff). Unless, of course, Megas is paying a lot as well.
Is there a Settlement Contingency fee in place?
Maybe Megas should offer them a LOT of BCIT/Energy Source shares (maybe some 144 Restricted) as an incentive to get it trading.
just some thoughts.
I think the best thing to do to have your questions answered is just to call Pete (hasher). He's there every day. We spoke today. There's a lot happening, and it's just (as usual) a matter of time and patience...which, understandably, many have run people have run out of.
but..he's still there. I'll backburner it for a bit and let it all just play out.
Hasn't BCIT stated all its intentions in past filings? I would hope that WHEN the filing are made current, again, that everything is in there.
me either. wtf?
nope..is tied into some else I might own from a previous RS or Ticker change??
hey!! good to see ya. I have no idea what's up with this thing.
sheeesh
yeah..I don't think I have any
hell..I don't even know why I'm reading this board..I don't think I hold any of this stuff! did it used to be something else?