Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The coordinated pump was easy to see. Been following this stock a longggg time.
Made some good money on the run up - so I guess I need to thank the pumpers for that.
Might get another run or two out of it yet.
Looks like the coordinated pump is done, and the dump fully underway.
Amazing to watch it all go down. Who was the coordinator is the question.
Good satire! Thanks for the laugh! I enjoy reading humor about MJ and legalization/politicians.
When will the new website be up? I think one more week.
Go Long And Prosper.
They still haven't fixed the location of the TRTC extraction lab in the article you linked.
Has to be an editing error.
I had to go read it again to see what you referring to and definitely there is some mistake in the article.
They need to edit it to CA instead or OR.
Someone should contact them and let them know, as it is indeed a substantial error.
Thanks for the tip on the new PRs.
Thanks! I had not seen the PRs.
Now I will go see what the great new news is!
WOW! 3 PRs!!!!!
A lot of profit taking just occurred in the last 30 minutes.
You think revenue and sales have not gone up since end of the reporting period (30 Sept) with report out later?
With all the new dispensaries now participating? Revenue is rolling in, and IS being re-invested as REQUIRED with non profit status!
Non profit legal status means all proceeds after expenses rolled into growth and expansion.
You can easily do what he is doing. Start calling dispensaries selling the product. Start walking into dispensaries selling the product.
If he publically post who he spoke to, the poor dispensary owner will get SWAMPED with phone calls and people arguing with him about his own business!
Don't give up sources! Don't burn bridges!
A very profitable non profit - rolling the profits back into the company, expansion and building the future.
Money pouring in, being reinvested as required of a current non profit.
Once legally profitable, ALL the ground work and ALL the needed investments already paid for!
Thanks for you perspective on what a great thing is happening as we converse!
An organized organization?
Great! All organizations should be organized!
Good. More profits!
TRTC = profits!
IVXX = Profits!
2016 = profits!
2017 = MASSIVE PROFITS!
NV Buildout making progress on final inspections - under slab plumbing approved. http://www5.lasvegasnevada.gov/checkstatus/Details.aspx?id=563270 and click on inspection status.
Go Long And Prosper!
I will continue to accumulate through 1st quarter of 2016 if share prices remain this great of a bargain.
8s, 9s, 10s, 11s for sure will be 10 baggers by end of 2016.
12s thru 14s probably will be 10 baggers by end of 2016 as well.
Edible Garden improving financials and expanding, IVXX improving financials and expanding, Nevada buildout, future expansion into more states being eyed.
Go Long And Prosper.
It says never buy nor sell in first 30 minutes after market open. (some say not in the first 60 minutes).
A caution well known to many.
Amazing! The first 5 minutes of trading now define the stock market!
This portion certainly applies: "and prospective economic opportunities. "
And the very BEST way to profit in 2016 and 2017?
Buy more shares of TRTC at these ridiculously low levels available in the month of December 2015!
So much on the horizon for 2016!!!!!
Go LOng And Prosper!
Tortious interference claims are designed to tackle tortious interference with contracts, business relationships, and prospective economic opportunities.
Another member of the tortious interference family is a claim for tortious interference with business relations.
Perhaps the most obvious distinction between this claim and its sister claim is that it is not necessary to establish the existence of any actual contract
Instead,
the plaintiff must only show that the plaintiff had a business relationship with a third party and the defendant knew of that relationship and intentionally interfered with it, the defendant acted solely out of malice or used improper or illegal means that amounted to a crime or independent tort, and the defendant’s interference caused injury to the relationship with the third party.
The Tort interference was by Anson interfering with a business relationship between TRTC and Clark County, and prospective economic opportunities.
I am not a lawyer, nor are others commenting on the case.
I agree. It didn't apply to the discussion at all.
Tortious interference claims are designed to tackle tortious interference with contracts, business relationships, and prospective economic opportunities.
Another member of the tortious interference family is a claim for tortious interference with business relations.
Perhaps the most obvious distinction between this claim and its sister claim is that it is not necessary to establish the existence of any actual contract
Instead,
the plaintiff must only show that the plaintiff had a business relationship with a third party and the defendant knew of that relationship and intentionally interfered with it, the defendant acted solely out of malice or used improper or illegal means that amounted to a crime or independent
tort, and the defendant’s interference caused injury to the relationship with the third party.
Nice!
I paid slightly more at .0994.
I accumulated more shares today. Great pps to add.
Tortious interference claims are designed to tackle tortious interference with contracts, business relationships, and prospective economic opportunities.
Another member of the tortious interference family is a claim for tortious interference with business relations.
Perhaps the most obvious distinction between this claim and its sister claim is that it is not necessary to establish the existence of any actual contract
Instead,
the plaintiff must only show that the plaintiff had a business relationship with a third party and the defendant knew of that relationship and intentionally interfered with it, the defendant acted solely out of malice or used improper or illegal means that amounted to a crime or independent
tort, and the defendant’s interference caused injury to the relationship with the third party.
Yes, I misinterpreted. Many things get misinterpreted on this board everyday.
There is indeed a fail involved.
I will wait and see what occurs regards TRTC and a lawsuit against Anson.
I will wait and see what the lawsuit and lawyers say.
Hard to confirm from your post true legalities, or what the lawsuit will actually say.
Volume: 1,922,287 @ 3:59:21 PM ET
Almost 2 million shares were purchased today.
Hmmmm, is that more than NO shares being purchased? LOL!
"The key to the scheme was the written attack (the "Article") on Nobilis' business which the defendants prepared and anonymously posted under the pseudonym "The Emperor Has No Clothes" to the website "Seeking Alpha" (www.seekingalpha.com) ("Seeking Alpha"). The Article made numerous statements of purported "fact" about Nobilis' business that were false and defamatory"
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/nobilis-sues-anson-funds-anson-162403898.html?soc_src=mediacontentstory&soc_trk=tw
One major difference is that in the Nobilis case there was no Tort Interference with a government agency.
With TRTC, a Clark County Commissioner has already confirmed he had changed his intended yes vote to a no vote based upon the malicious email tort interference.
So in all actuality, the TRTC case proves even more damage and more malicious intent by manipulation by Anson Funds and the short/short(s) who acted on Anson's behalf.
Now the question remains will TRTC file suit, and if they do will they win. Since they have since been awarded the 2 provisional licences that were originally denied due to the interference perhaps yes, perhaps no.
That does not change the parallels between the two cases.
Those were not my words. It is in the quotes. Check it out.
But even so, everyone knows what is being discussed.
I do look forward to the lawsuit. I believe it is important to clear the air once and for all.
Not to mention there "may" be a serious financial gain for TRTC from a in court judgement, or a out of court settlement.
Nice.
I especially like:
Chance of the TRTC CEO posting here is about .05 percent in my opinion.
Why would you flip at bottom? Shouldn't you flip at the top?
Time to buy now, flip later. Better plan.
Did you listen to the CC today? Or was it yesterday? Which day was it again?
I'm still waiting for information about that CC yesterday. You know, the one I was unaware of due to my poor DD.
Hey, did you listen in on the CC that happened today?
But I learned so much here today.
ZERO shares were purchased today! NONE!
AND, yesterdays conference call was a TOTAL FAILURE! (even though there was no CC yesterday).
This is don't miss content here!
You must have your headphones in listening to the CC so you can learn what is being discussed on the CC underway right now, correct?
I mean otherwise.......
Since we educated all that called yesterday's CC a total failure (even though there was NO CC yesterday) with the actual date and time, they are now tuned in and actually listening to the CC happening even as I type.
Right?
I mean you would not want to deem it a total failure without actually engaging in DD to listen to the real actual real world non imaginary event correct?
It should be embarrassing enough to claim total failure for something that never occurred yesterday, without repeating the mistake again today by judging something without checking on content - right?