Blum Holdings Inc (BLMH)

[AC7880]

Tortious interference claims are designed to tackle tortious interference with contracts, business relationships, and prospective economic opportunities.

Another member of the tortious interference family is a claim for tortious interference with business relations.

Perhaps the most obvious distinction between this claim and its sister claim is that it is not necessary to establish the existence of any actual contract

Instead,
the plaintiff must only show that the plaintiff had a business relationship with a third party and the defendant knew of that relationship and intentionally interfered with it, the defendant acted solely out of malice or used improper or illegal means that amounted to a crime or independent
tort, and the defendant’s interference caused injury to the relationship with the third party.

There is no such thing as tort interference with a government agency.

Tort interference deals with contracts. Look it up. No such thing as tort interference with a gov agency.

The Tort interference was by Anson interfering with a business relationship between TRTC and Clark County, and prospective economic opportunities.

I am not a lawyer, nor are others commenting on the case.