Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The history of what's happened with WNFT doesn't worry you more than what appears to be happening here? WNFT is stuck in a long term litigation loop hoping and waiting for the appeals court to rule in its favor. Then, if and when that eventually occurs, it's clear that their target merger candidate is long gone (I think GS flat out said it in a tweet - correct me if I'm wrong). With GVSI and SRNW, you are much closer to a potential RM. Not saying it will be a large revenue producing company for their RM's (maybe they'll be small potatoes - who knows), but WNFT seems miles away right now in comparison. I think you've put all of your eggs in the WNFT basket and it's probably the least likely basket to make you money.
Why are you still in WNFT? Real response only - I'm not making fun of you or trying to trick you. I own all three so I'm not a WNFT basher. They're all gambling money in my opinion - I like none of them any more than the other. However, it seems to me that WNFT is farthest away from that elusive "promise land." Just wondering why that's the one you love
It's been awfully quiet on that front. SRNW's cancellations were handled quickly. I'm sure something dumb went awry there (that we will all eventually moan about and make fun of), but does it really matter all that much in terms of GVSI's authorized and outstanding shares? The "promise land" as George so artfully likes to call it is the RM. The share cancellation is George's way of trying to punish the former company shareholders that he views as crooks and he doesn't want any of them to profit from his subsequent work when he took over. Just my opinion - let me know if you disagree.
Lots of stumbles along the way here - no doubt, My favorite stumble was when he checked the wrong box on the early filing. Then, there was "we expect to be pink current by Thanksgiving of 2021." How about the infamous "promise land" tweet for WNFT?! There were many more too. I get the frustration that some have. Simple solution - SELL AND GET OUT! The reason many don't (including me) is what I've been posting - High risk/High reward. The reward is still great enough and the risk (in terms of dollars invested to take a sizable position) is relatively small, such that it's worth sticking it out and seeing how it all plays out. Looks like SRNW is very close (GVSI getting closer and WNFT still further away). If you're staying the course, stop being such whiners and wimps about it - OR GET OUT!
The Sky is falling! The Sky is falling! You gotta stop this nonsense. There might be something wrong. There might be nothing wrong. The reality is that neither you nor anyone on this board actually knows the answer to that question. High risk/high reward. Stop being so wimpy
This battle between Hi-Lo and I-Glow is like when the Joker and the Penguin turned on each other. The Evil Axis is fractured!
All different types of investments out there. This one currently is (and always has been) a high risk/high reward investment. When you put your money in GVSI/WNFT/SRNW you should have done so with the mentality that it's likely I'm gonna lose it all, BUT, if I hit, I hit big. Even if you bought it at 3 cents a share, that should have been your mentality. If it wasn't, you don't belong in stocks like these.
Twist and Turns as usual from you bashers. Hokie did not say :it only takes 35-38 days for corporate actions to be approved by FINRA" as you posted below. He said in response to those saying it will take 6 months that he was providing you with an example of a stock where it recently took 38 days.
Just like your co-distorters (Jayman, Chiron, etc.), you are a con artist.
You have to be just a little embarrassed by that ridiculous post. Is that what you've now become - the iHub Chicken Little?!
So my quote of your statement in my response to you doesn't count as a "twist and turn?!" You've lost any small amount of credibility I had afforded you in the past. As I said, the world needs good and bad (you!) or it would be a dull place.
“We're all adults here, well most of us; if you want to call George a liar then that certainly is your prerogative.”
You know quite well that was not my point, but you twist and turn in an effort to:
1 - minimize any reasonable opposition to the negative position of you and many others here; and
2 - to appear clever.
It’s ok - the world needs both good and bad. It would be a boring place otherwise.
Ha! Nice try to twist and turn - as usual. I enjoy the negative ones. You guys are amusing. I’ll give you that.
Ha! Nice try to twist and turn - as usual. I enjoy the negative ones. You guys are amusing. I’ll give you that.
You're splitting hairs to try and defend your position. His liability for non-disclosure doesn't arise out of the existence of any unrelated litigation; it arises from his duty to his shareholders of each ticker not to mislead. The fact that you view his litigation in the WNFT matter against Calasse as being more important than his litigation in the GVSI share cancellation case is just a difference without a distinction - and a veiled attempt to do an end around the real issue.
To support what I am saying, here is an excerpt from the 7/08/2022 press release of WNFT. They are letting you know that they are in negotiations, but no merger is "anticipated" at that time; thus no need to include it on the SEC disclosure form you (or maybe HiLo) quoted for GVSI:
"About Worldwide NFT, Inc.
WNFT is now in discussions/negotiations to acquire assets in the NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) and Blockchain space. NFTs can be exchanged or traded equivalently like other cryptographic assets as they are financial securities consisting of digital data stored in a blockchain, a form of distributed ledger. The ownership of an NFT is recorded in the blockchain, and can be transferred by the owner, allowing NFTs to be sold and traded."
See my reply to Jayman's similar post to yours (apologies for the typos - I'm working and replying here at the same time - not proof reading before posting).
Your quote from thefiling says "either currently anticipated ...." His tweet of 2/07/23 identified didn't say there was a merger "currently anticipated;" rather is said that there was a target company that they would continue to pursue - not that there was a deal in place. The same thing occurred with WNFT - didn't it? He stated in spring/summer of 2022 that there was a target company out there, but no firm deal (around/before the time of his infamous "promise land" tweet); and then recently tweeted that the target company had dropped out of contention. The notification that the target had dropped for WNFT was to show full disclosure in light of his prior tweets to the contrary (and to protect him). If the GVSI's target company mentioned in his 2/07/23 tweet was no longer interested don't you think he would disclose that for the very same reason - to cover his rear end? All I'm saying is that GS certainly has a target company in mind for BLXS - no deal in place requiring disclosure on the filing - but a target company being courted (this is all only IMHO).
So it's your position (and Chiron's position) that the tweet I've copied and pasted below by George is a lie?? Yes it was 7 months' ago, but you think that George is opening himself up to that kind of liability (civil and criminal) by failing to correct it, when last month he made it clear that the primary merger partner for WNFT was no longer in play? You all might not like GS or think he's not capable, but he isn't dumb. He knows he's a target of people like you given his very public attacks on other OTC scams. You think he's gonna leave himself exposed on GVSI??!!
"Now that $GVSI is current, we can move forward with discussions with our target merger candidate, whom we will not identify until/if there is an agreement. $GVSI has no way to know how long this may take or even if an agreement will come to fruition.
9:27 AM · Feb 7, 2023"
·
131.4K
Views
Your posts have gone from bashing to just plain ridiculous. Do you have nothing else to do with your days other than post on an investment board where no one takes you even remotely serious?!
Hey, I'm not afraid to admit if I'm wrong - Looks like you're right and he has only been in GVSI for 3 months. But my underlying point still is valid; membership/posting on iHub is not an indicator of investor prowess.
You know - just because he's only been on this board for 3 months doesn't mean he hasn't owned the stock for 2 or more years. You act like being on this board is some kind of validation of one's credibility as an investor. From what I've read during my brief time on this board, it seems quite the contrary.
And if FINRA accepts the change, will you admit that you were wrong and then permanently just go away????
You say:
"Not sure why you would think it could get that high based on a simple name/ticker change which shareholders have been expecting for months and months now. It's all part of the process for the reverse merger, if there ever is one. I think it MAY get to 2 cents, but that's about it, on that event."
Disagree. I think many are skeptical that the name change/ticker change will be allowed based on past restrictions on the company. Additionally, I think some are questioning whether the name/ticker change was ever even submitted since, although GS tweeted it was to be filed that day, there is no link I'm aware of confirming the filing. Additionally, I said 10 cents based on name/ticker change being allowed PLUS approval of share cancellations. Confirmation of a rev producing RM for SRNW would also help show that GS is actually able to get the job done.
Then, if a legit target company is announced/leaked for GVSI, I think it goes significantly higher (and no, I don't mean dollars - but perhaps 50 - 75 cents which would be huge for longs here.
All of this is just my opinion - could be wrong. Again, I think one of the biggest things holding GVSI back right now is the lack of any link confirming the name/ticker change request was ever actually filed last month.
I appreciate the answer. I think if the cancellations are approved and the name/ticker changes are allowed (I still haven’t seen a link showing they were definitively filed yet), we get to a dime - give or take. If a reverse merger is announced and its with a real revenue producing company, I think we go significantly higher than a dime. Of course I’m giving you a lot of “ifs” here. If the name/ticker change is denied (or worse yet shown to never have been filed), we drop like a stone to low trips.
You're refusing to take off the "bad guy" hat and just answer my question: 1) do YOU think we get to 25 cents if ALL of those things occur; and 2) do you think we go above 2 cents just on name/ticker change)? I know you enjoy the back and forth bickering with the others here who call for the pps to go to the moon every day, but have a real exchange with me on this.
I believe a portion of investors question whether GVSI can get the name/ticker change approved - which is somewhat of a litmus test to whether the RM would be allowed. I know you like to play the role of the bad guy here, but you have to admit the PPS right now is tied to the ability of these corporate actions to be approved. If the name/ticker change go through, I think you'll see the believers starting to come out of the woodwork. Is there any confirmation anywhere showing that GVSI has actually filed the name/ticker changes?? I know George tweeted a month ago (give or take) that they were going to be filed "today," but have we seen confirmation of the actual filing anywhere?
So I know you like to play the bad guy on this board (not sure why you want to do that - can't imagine you're being paid to do it and you MUST have something better to do in your free time), but are you saying you don't think the stock can hit 25 cents IF: 1) the cancellations are finalized; 2) the name and ticker changes are approved and 3) GS tweets specifics as to the incoming merger partner that indicates it's not a no revenue joke of a company?
Look - I'm long on GVSI and still optimistic that I'm gonna EVENTUALLY see a decent profit here, but let's be real, we're not seeing 25 cents per share until we have the share cancellations complete, the name and ticker changes approved, and a tweet from GS that merger discussions are in place (similar to what you've seen with SRNW). Even then, given the number of shares in this ticker, I'm not sure we see 25 cents unless the tweet about discussions gives some indication as to the nature of the incoming merger. Does anyone here disagree with that statement? I just want to be realistic unlike many on both sides here.
SRNW??? Not yet. Hopefully we'll see a little sustained upward movement. But with no specifics on who the target is, we may be in wait and see mode for a couple of months.
So he retires and gets his stable up to 100's horses by spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on GVSI and then losing money on it??!! Sounds like a well thought out explanation and theory to me - lol. Give me a break! It's as I thought, the bashers on this board have some agenda against GS or are so board that they enjoy spending their time arguing on ihub with nameless, faceless GVSI shareholders. Either way, the guy who accused me of bashing earlier this week (can't recall his handle on here) was at least right about one thing, put 95% of the people here on ignore.
But you'd make money too - right - if his "nefarious pumping plan" works?? So what's your problem with that?
So your theory is that he wants to lose money on GVSI to offset taxes on his gains. Do you realize how silly that theory is?! If you think he'll fail and won't find a worthwhile merger partner, that's fine; I get it. But what you're proposing is ridiculous.
Ok - then I'll ask you the exact same question I asked Starlost, why do you suppose that GS is spending so much money on attorney's and accountant's fees filing petitions for share cancellations, motions for service by alternative means, bringing the stock off of the expert market to pink current, tweeting about name and symbol changes, and negotiating the withdrawal of the appeal on GVSI?? Is he doing this just to F with everyone and fool them into thinking he's going to ultimately execute a RM when in reality he has no intention of doing so? Yes, there were the FINRA rulings from the past versions of GVSI - however, do you REALLY think GS has not factored that into his decisions prior to spending this kind of money on a shell? What would he benefit from continuing to pursue GVSI if he didn't believe he can ultimately change the name/symbol and execute a RM. If you tell me how HE benefits from fooling us all then I might give you/Hi/Lo, Chrion, Starlost, etc. etc. some degree of attention. Starlost replied that he thinks GS won't find a worthwhile merger partner - ok, maybe that's right, but that's a far cry from you implying he's lying to us to enrich himself on GVSI. Without you providing a motive and means to enrich himself on GVSI, commons sense says you're here for an agenda - not because you really believe what you post.
How is my post biased?? The negative ones on this board seem to imply (regularly) that GS is "up to no good" and knows this ship (GVSI) will ultimately sink and is stringing us all along. I'm asking what's his motive to lie to everyone and presumably spend hundreds of thousands of his own money on GVSI if he knows he can't get a name/ticker change and RM approved? WHY WOULD HE DO IT??!! Is it possible that he'll fail or that the company he merges with will be another HMBL in the long run - of course, anything's possible. But this guy is spending a fortune - why would he do that if he didn't think he's going to ultimately score on it? It's not a biased question - give me a reason and I'll consider it. Without a reason, I can't take you guys seriously for even a second.
Jayman - I'm going to take a leap of faith that you actually want to have a real conversation on this issue. Why do you suppose that GS is spending so much money on attorney's and accountant's fees filing petitions for share cancellations, motions for service by alternative means, bringing the stock off of the expert market to pink current, tweeting about name and symbol changes, and negotiating the withdrawal of the appeal on GVSI?? Is he doing this just to F with everyone and fool them into thinking he's going to ultimately execute a RM when in reality he has no intention of doing so? Yes, there were the FINRA rulings from the past versions of GVSI - however, do you REALLY think GS has not factored that into his decisions prior to spending this kind of money on a shell? What would he benefit from continuing to pursue GVSI if he didn't believe he can ultimately change the name/symbol and execute a RM. If you tell me how HE benefits from fooling us all then I might give you/Hi/Lo, Chrion, Starlost, etc. etc. some degree of attention. Without you providing a motive, commons sense says you're here for an agenda - not because you really believe what you post.
Exactly!! The only reason these idiots keep incessantly posting is to rile people here. The relentlessness of their negative posts show that they have an agenda against GS. I understand that you are trying to be a check and balance on their misinformation war, but the constant back and forth with them on this board has made the board almost impossible to follow anymore. There used to be SOME value checking this board to see if anything new is communicated - but really there's nothing of value here anymore.
That goes for BOTH sides (not just Norm) of this back and forth nonsense show here every single day. I think Norm posts to keep the score card even so the constant negativity has a counter balance.
Another genius. Whatever - then go and keep
Arguing with the nameless bashers who’s sole goal is to mess with people like you.
Who said I want you to sell your shares!? I couldn’t care less what you do with your shares. Just contribute something of value instead of arguing with the bashers who are clearly baiting you with every post and you bite at the bait each time. You read me all wrong - but that’s not surprising
Hmmm. Yeah because you’ve owned GVSI for 2 years you definitely know what’s going on - lol. We all know we’re waiting for the name/ticker change (just don’t know when it’ll happen or if it’ll be approved. Probably will but no guaranty). We all know we’re waiting for share cancellations - just don’t know when it’ll happen. We all know we’re hoping for a RM with a real asset with actual revenues-just don’t know when/if it might happen. Now tell me what it is that YOU know that every other freaking person on this board doesn’t know. I may be a “newbie” to this board, but I’ve owned this stock just as long as you have and see no unique knowledge being presented here.