Patch Marimed. Health resources, NASDAQ and PPSI. Dalton Bryant, Sugar Ray. Agrimed Agrimed, EagleForce. Patch 19, vaccine. OTCM Peoples....Edgar Grant, And lets remember to not forget to remember 15-12g.

Any questions?

I think the name has been changed to Univec Conglomerate Inc.

Those sites don't all change the name of a company because someone called in a prank.

Even Delaware SOS shows the new name.

The disbelief about the name change....IMO....is coming from the order in which it's appearing. It's not on any of the sites that directly affect the ticker because when we uplist to NASDAQ, all that information will be changed at once. It's appearing on all these other sites first because they are not directly tied to the actual trading market for UNVC.

Taking big steps though. Next step will be a big one, IMO.

Popcorn has been refilled, in case anyone is keeping track of my popcorn consumption! At least we have a company worth refilling the popcorn for!!!!

Did they claim to be gurus, or did they flat out deny it?

Come high or stay home. UNVC

Home is where the heart is.

If that's the way you want to interpret that, you've got my +1, LOL.

Right on, different name!!!!

Dormant tickers don't change their name.

Inactive tickers don't have daily volume.

Garbage tickers don't appreciate 7,500% over 3 years.

Yes, Conglomerate is in the newly changed name!!!! These major market sites don't just change the name and description of a company because they were bored.

From Reuters website:

https://www.reuters.com/companies/UNVC.PK

About Univec Conglomerate Inc
Univec Conglomerate Inc, formerly Univec, Inc. (Univec), is an integrated licensing, manufacturing, and marketing company operating two divisions dedicated to providing safer health products to patients and caregivers worldwide. The Company’s syringe division develops, licenses and markets auto-disable and safety syringes worldwide. The physician and pharmaceutical services division assists pharmaceutical companies in marketing, fulfillment and tracking drug samples via an online system connecting pharmacies and managed payment providers. The Company also manufactures and markets sliding sheath syringes designed to protect patients and healthcare workers from needle stick injuries, in compliance with the federal needlestick safety and prevention act of the United States government.


At .03, with volume every day for at least 3 years, and a 7,500% increase over that time, the ticker doesn't fit the description of "worthless".
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/worthless?s=t


form 15-12g filed in 2010 allows the company to proceed without reporting. Having a form 15-12g on record, shows us that the company does not fit the description of "delinquent".
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/delinquent.asp

Dalton has taken steps to legally remain a non-reporting company. Therefore, no laws have been broken, no duties shrugged, and no contracts defaulted on, so "delinquent" is an inaccurate description.
Form 15-12g for Univec: https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=7572008&guid=FlP6UW6KYoCBkyh

Yes Conglomerate:

https://www.reuters.com/companies/UNVC.PK (Reuters)
https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/?symbol=UNVC (CNBC)
https://money.cnn.com/quote/profile/profile.html?symb=UNVC&77513 (CNN)
https://research.tdameritrade.com/grid/public/research/stocks/summary?fromPage=overview&display=&fromSearch=true&symbol=UNVC (TD Ameritrade)
https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-dalton-58008952/ (CEO LinkedIn)

Every one of these sources shows the name as: Univec Conglomerate Inc.

LOL




Volume every day for the last 3 years, and a 7,500% PPS increase since this time 3 years ago. Not things I would expect from a dead ticker.




See volume information above. Activity does not fit the description of "dormant".
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/dormant?s=t


Nope. Form 15-12g filed in 2010 legally allows the company to proceed as a non-reporting company.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=7572008&guid=FlP6UW6KYoCBkyh

Even the Hindenburg had some successful journeys!!!!

Holy shit, the Goodrich Blimp!!!!

Is that "MNGG" printed on the side?

I suppose, if there is another two weeks wait, the people who believe your story will sell, and the people who believe the actual facts will continue to hold.

BREAKING NEWS!!!! I predicted this months ago!

Everyone thought I was off base back then. Well look what we have now!!!!



****Disclaimer: This information came from the internet, therefore it has to be true.

That was pretty impressive. If that happened 5 seconds sooner I would have missed it. I just sat down and BOOM! LOL

When this happens, the only explanation is the obvious.

GO TIME FOR UNVC!!!!

I posted information that was related to the information you posted. I gave a generalized example of a type of abuse, not related to SDRC.

I agree with your post 100%.

Another thing to consider is the extreme volatility in the metals markets lately. I've been watching precious metals for a long time, and I've never seen this kind of volatility.

Volatility aside though, and even after the huge hit gold is taking today....it's still just off its all time high, and well above the spike in 2011.

SDRC is in a booming sector! IMO, they are positioned to grow within the sector. I think .25 is just the start. The SS is conducive to some quick PPS swings when volume comes in. If there was sustained heavy volume over a few days, and if the news that triggered it was strong, I think it could make quite an impressive move.

I don't like to make PPS predictions, so lets reevaluate when we get around .25....?

These small outstanding share increases are insignificant. The total authorized shares is 500,000,000 (five hundred million, or one half billion). Even if all of those moved over to outstanding shares, it would still be an amazing share structure.

I think the company is adding to the o/s very responsibly and at a rate that is on pace with their business plan.

When we see companies with multiple billion shares authorized, who are adding 100s of millions at a time to the o/s, with no real business plan, or company even....that's an example of when a company is using it's ticker to generate money to line their pockets.

We obviously have a business running here, verified projects, actual proof of legitimate business activities, filings, etc.

Assuming all of those 36 million shares in the last two o/s increases were sold into the market at .05, the amount is $1,800,000. That looks to me like an honest amount of money the company may or may not take from the market, in order to sustain/advance business operations.

It's only dilution if the company sells the shares into the market. If they just change the SS numbers, it's pretty meaningless, especially since the changes are so small and the SS is so amazing. But if they do dilute this little bit, it will help them to quickly get to a point where the stock will be worth a lot more than it is now.

The stock market is a place where companies sell their stock to the market and collect money for business operations. I see nothing out of the ordinary going on here that alerts me that this company is abusing the system. I'm very happy to buy the shares they make available to the market.

It seems like it's gearing up for some large volume. If the little bit of buying we've seen lately is in preparation for an event we don't know about, the coming volume could be huge.

Why would anybody be consistently buying this ticker? This is the sixty-four thousand dollar question.

Follow all this paperwork back to the beginning....where did it all start?

Maybe as a scientific experiment, someone will try to print the whole offer in one buy?

Bleen.

I think we can officially say....something is up. Look at this volume. Lots going off at .0001, so retail is involved, and the other 5 and 6 decimal prints are institutional on at least one side.

So MMs and retail are trading MNGG today. Interesting.

But this is for the patch. Somebody told me they abandoned the patch years ago and were never ever in a million billion years going to bring it to market.

Now we have the patch? It must be a stolen press release from another company that somebody got all buddy buddy with a jar of white out and a fine tip pen. Only explanation I can think of, because I've been told Univec will NEVER have a patch.

Not a damn thing....LOL. Shit!

As far as I know, huge partnership with Euromed, Univec Conglomerate, and others in the Israeli cannabis/CBD production space, which will then be marketed to European, and hopefully someday Asian markets.

Morris was supposed to give us news a number of weeks ago, but he's gone silent, just like all the other associated companies that are holding back on their news and IMO are planning a huge rollout together.

That's my take on it, just in a nutshell. I know others have arrived here from a different DD path, but that's all good. My extensive DD and long-term holdings in Univce Conglomerate brought me to this company. I've gone into it a bit in past posts, and there's some good information in the iBox, if you can view it from a desktop machine. I don't know if the iBox works on the app yet.

Hey that's a $4.25 trade today. The money is starting to move!!!!

I posted the screenshots so everyone can see the lie that was posted on the board.

It's not about discussing other users, it's about exposing one of the problems on the boards that deliberately generates hostile and confrontational situations/posts.

Shelly, what's your stance on users posting such blatant, outright, and provable lies on the boards? Does that fit into the definition of "civil discussion"? If it's a provable lie, it's not opinion or personal sentiment....it's a lie.

Like if you say "xyz" and I screenshot your post stating "xyz", and then a few minutes later, on the same board, somebody (a mod in this case) says "nobody ever said xyz".

How is that not considered an abusive statement?

Am I not allowed to post screenshots here of a board moderator posting lies on a board?

I can prove the person is lying/has lied, but I need to post the screenshots here. Can I please do that?

That wasn't part of the question. For the sake of actually answering an asked question, let's answer the question and not make up a dozen imaginary "what ifs".

Question: How many times can a poster (mod or not) post the same untrue statement on a board, knowing full well the statement is untrue and the post will generate replies of a hostile nature?

How many times can I post something I know to be an outright lie, on a stock board, before my posts become TOS violations for being hostile and/or abusive? One time? Ten times? Seventy times? Forty thousand times?

Where is the line between posting what is perceived to be sentiment and opinion, and posting with the intent to draw hostile replies?

What sounds strange to me is, someone saying the company changes their name frequently, but the company has no history of name changes for a decade+.

One name change in all that time does not constitute "frequently".

Sorry to hear about your local medical facility changing names. Are they a penny stock? How frequently have they changed their name in the last 10 years? For comparison purposes of course.

Ok, thank you for the explanation about companies who change their name frequently. I am not aware of any such history with UNVC.

Here's the information I'd like to have from you, if you'd like to talk about your statement that UNVC is a scam:

Why do we see the name changing to "Conglomerate" on all the various brokerages and news platforms?

How could someone perpetrate a scam so colossal that they managed to change the name and description of a company at places like Reuters, Ameritrade, CNBC, Fidelity, etc?

How does a scam of that magnitude get picked up by so many professional agencies and presented to the public as fact?

****EDIT:
Why do we see the change to "Conglomerate" on iHub if UNVC is a scam? Has iHub been scammed into posting false information?

Why do we see the name changing to "Conglomerate" on all the various brokerages and news platforms?

How could someone perpetrate a scam so colossal that they managed to change the name and description of a company at places like Reuters, Ameritrade, CNBC, Fidelity, etc?

How does a scam of that magnitude get picked up by so many professional agencies and presented to the public as fact?

All serious questions. I'd appreciate your insight on what I've asked. Thanks.

I know. It describes the behavior moderators are expected to maintain. If you read the general rules, then the moderator rules, you can see that moderators are expected to have a higher standard of posting than a non-mods.

But why the huge push to have mods rules be more relaxed?

Now you're diverting attention away from the topic, and burning up my posts for the day. This is a prime example of the situations we encounter on the boards every day.

Person brings up a valid topic that warrants discussion, other people divert, distract, and destroy the topic with nonsense, and the original topic is lost behind dozens of irrelevant posts.

I want the TOS rules to apply to everyone equally. Not just be enforced against the people who are standing up for their right to have civil and respectable discussion on the forum.

Sorry but that is incorrect. Moderators are held to a higher standard of posting than non-mod posters.

http://ihwiki.advfn.com/index.php?title=Handbook

The Moderators' role is simple to define for company-specific boards:

To promote the civil exchange of on-topic dialog that complies with the Investors Hub Terms of Service.

Posting on the Board as a Moderator
The way a Moderator chooses to post on the board is often perceived to be a guideline for other Users. If the Moderator frequently violates the TOS others are going to feel it is permissible for them to do so also. It is not acceptable for either the Moderator or Members. Moderators who are also Premium members should use PMs to communicate with board Members about their conduct, such as a reminder to "stay on topic." If you are unable to send PMs, please ask a Site Admin to communicate the message to the member. All Users can communicate with the Site Admins via Private Message (PM).

Moderators should never threaten other Users. For example, a public post or a PM stating "Get on topic or your posts will be deleted and you will be banned" is not healthy and usually just inflames the situation.

Deletion of Moderator Posts
Frequent or multiple deletions of a Moderator's own posts is considered abuse of Moderator privileges. Think before you post, and if it's a Terms of Use violation or you would rather it not be in the public domain, please don't post it.

Awww. Maybe if the playing field was equal it would be easier? Like practicing things like being "sentiment neutral", instead of just saying it and then taking every basher's back who ever typed one post on the boards.

Stop allowing rogue mods to take control of boards and desecrate the posted forum rules. Moderators are supposed to be example setters who promote the civil exchange of on topic information. So why are rogue mods who use their position to crush all forms of civil exchange regarding on-topic information being protected, while the honest investors who want to use the platform for its intended purpose....to talk about relevant DD in an orderly and civil manner....are targeted with personal attacks on the board, victims of PM attacks, and then nit-picked/deleted/warned when they break a rule or two trying to defend their right to have orderly discussion.

Something is ass backwards here! The published rules are not the set of rules admin follows!

If you (the person I'm replying to) think we can all just get along when there is this kind of systematic rule breaking going on, then you're not seeing it from the viewpoint of the honest, good natured, investor who has a right to discuss things civilly and respectfully here....but cannot.


****By the way, admin disabled my signature 2 years ago, so whatever I wrote back then is cast in stone forever. I cannot change it. Not that it needs changing, but it's a funny situation considering what's going on.

If you agree with the offending person that it's ok to post images of hate against certain genders and ethnic groups, then it will be the suggestion of admin that I also place you on ignore. Sad but true.

Now here come all the distraction tactics. I did not refer to content of the PMs, only said I received them.

I will absolutely run out of posts before much longer, so why doesn't admin get on the ball and remove all the offending images, and remove the person from moderating a board where he has expressed extreme bias towards women?

Putting this on ignore, is not a solution.

If this is not corrected on this end, I will be in contact with some people here to see what they think of this situation.

https://now.org

Thanks again, but if I wanted to talk to a professional stock manipulator, I'd post on the UNVC board.

Maybe an admin....someone who has the authority to remove the demeaning pictures....can help out?

All you are doing is what you are famous for, distracting the attention away from the facts and spewing out nonsense.

This is a matter for admin to deal with, unless you have the authority to correct the situation, please let the matter be discussed with people who do.

Kinda difficult for me to hit "Report TOS" on over 8,000 (that's eight thousand) individual posts also.

Maybe there is a better solution for removing all the degrading images at once?