Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thanks! That did the trick. I appreciate everyone's help.
Thanks for the reply, but that won't correct the issue. It's actually not a bug/problem...just something new they started that I would rather have a way of disabling. It's definitely something to do with Chrome.
Using Chrome browser and this just started today. Have not changed any options whatsoever. I'm sure there must be something simple to change it. Was curious if anyone else had noticed the change.
Sorry...forgot to say I am using the Chrome browser.
If you have Google set as your default homepage...there is new stuff. Instead of taking you to the normal search screen. It opens to a page of your last 8 visited websites, or it opens to a selection of Search Page....Youtube...and 2 other options. I just want the default search page. I don't care about those other options.
OMG!!!! Is there a way to turn off this new Google thing? It totally sucks and I hate it. Please...anyone?
Not seen that before. Thanks for posting it.
As you stated, all presumption and speculation at this point. Confirmation is needed.
The $25MM if true is not all profit of course as you say. But, again IF true, it would be nice to see as a revenue stream. As opposed to little to no revenues. Confirmation would be nice.
Obviously not. Since it said right in the PR that it had to be refueled.
Since you are an accountant. How about giving the board a breakdown of all the bad things in the SEC filing. If you don't mind.
I agree be_real. Just saying until there is an actual NAME and DOLLAR amount attached...it means nothing IMO.
Until there is an 8-K filed with the SEC, or a PR put out by the contract partner. The last PR means nothing. Red Cross? Maybe....but that could be over reaching by many posters on this board. Just look at the earlier PR about Global Gemini Group. They are the "nation's premier business development firms, Gemini Global Group ("G3")"
Show us the money for a change....not hyperbole.
What did the DoD say they were going to do? I must have missed that PR. Can you fill me in?
Just out of curiousity...but did ya notice the date?
You don't. They are on IHub forever. All that you can do is hide them.
That is the point Hogman.
And maybe you are just jumping to conclusions as usual? Without any info....it's all conjecture.
I-Hub did an April Fools joke. Apparently you didn't get it. It was 4/1/12 when that occurred.
Still 300MM shares left at this point. And now they actually have cash on hand via the LJ financing. So I don't think any increase in AS is in the near future. JMO
So...do you think they should pay the execs in cash instead? Ya know...reducing what little cash is available? Or give them shares in lieu of cash where they have a vested interest to make something happen? Just curious about your opinion on this...because it makes little sense. Think about it...they aren't gonna work for free. So it is, use up the cash on salaries...or issue shares. What do you prefer?
And your reasoning for that ridiculous post? Please provide details if you have the chance!
You just realized that?! Wow...If you ever read the TOU it says that SUPER clearly. I guess you have been under a misunderstanding all this time.
LOL. Have you even read the financing agreement? Apparently not. Has WSGI even gotten any funding from La Jolla yet? So what are you talking about?
Yes...this board is great. Glad you agree yet again!
PS: How about hopping that Greyhound so we can see what is really going on in Nevada? TIA!
Not seen a current update on that testing. Maybe you can hop Greyhound with your trusty camera and let the entire board know of the testing progress? TIA!
I am glad you agree with me! Thanks!
Because they aren't pumping. Hence the ineffectiveness at pumping. Pretty simple for most to comprehend.
Simple...a call comes into the Sales center....a sales person makes a few mouse clicks(distribution) and the order goes to the manufacturer where it is sent direct. I know it's complicated...but maybe you'll get the hang of it.
LMAO! Of course you will. Hair on a gorilla! Really? Oops...never mind...I forgot about that picture you posted. Sorry...my bad.
So there should be separate locations? Why? A computer click sends the order to a manufacturer who in turn ships the product . I see nothing amiss about that. Only you do apparently. This is the computer age cat. Why have numerous separate locations when all can be accomplished from a single locale?
Damn...guess they forgot to inform you personally of their plans again. Guess those WSGI execs just don't realize they are dealing with WB Jr.
So when is your "quinceañera"?
Not a PR...didn't hit the wires. Just a company newsletter.
I second that!
And you don't? And why would that be?
Sorry...you actually DO have to hunt down a restored post on a board that you Mod(in manage mode). It WILL say who restored it. Be it a MOD...MS...or ADMIN. But there is never a reason given. I can only assume that who restored the post has a different interpretation of the TOU. But if Admin or MS restored the post, a regular MOD cannot re-delete the post.
Ok...here is your original post on this subject.
Would it be possible to add a feature that allows the board moderators to see who restored a deleted post, and to know whether a deleted or restored post has been reviewed by an Admin?
The mods can't always know when a deletion has been appealed for review, or whether a post has been restored by another moderator or by Admin.
It would eliminate any uncertainty whether a deleted/restored post was reviewed by a Higher Authority or not.
All the issues you ask about are covered. Maybe you should PM an Admin. Or read the MOD handbook.
PS: I'm not being snarky, just trying to help answer your question
Again that feature is also already available. Go to Manage board, click on a Restored post, it will say who restored the post. If you are looking for an explanation of why a post was restored, you'd have to ask the Mod or Admin who restored it. I don't think IHub is gonna create a seperate set of Options for the reason a post is restored for Mods to select. Best bet would be as I said to contact the Mod or Admin who restored the post to get an answer. Because there could be numerous reasons one way or the other. JMO
PS: If the post was restored by Admin...then there is no recourse. But by being in Manage Mode and if you try to delete the post it will tell you if Admin restored the post. Hope this helps. GL
Actually that feature is already in place and has been for a long time. If you are a Mod on a board...go to Manage Board...then click on a Deleted post...it will show who deleted the post and the reason.