Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
if not known ,but only "assumed" he'd need a way to prove who actually had the certs ...no?? certainly justifiable in my point of veiw
how do you know he "didnt know" lol this could go on for ever i respect your diligence jan but lets just agree to disagree on this pleeeese im in the middle of makin dinner and givin a 4 yr old a bath ... :)
if people werent so quick to let anger blind them they wouldve seen that they were no part of the accusations in question
its obvious that when you file asuit in which 99% defendants are not responsible for certs then the motive must be entirely diff than the obvious public perceptions
maybe they did? who's to say
who said he hadto
who says it was wasted??id say it was used strategically
apparently they got the info they were trying to flush out ? hopefully this gets us moving,anyway
youll find out when you get my "sealed"info
your entitled to yourinterpretation no matter how wrong it may be goodnite and good luck
better yet.. hold your breath till you see my info
you are entitled to#1 respond , #2 see the plaintiffs claim #3 see the judges response...period!! my info my deal my settlement is and will always be none of YOUR nosy ass business
mmmkaaay:)good luck with that ...but get used to disappointment lol
ha,Depository Trust & Cleaning Corp lol how true that is ...cleaning us all out
ILL BET YOUR LAWYER GETS SQUAT my friend--- my case is none of you or your att 's business you are only entitled to plaintiffs documents and judges rulings my case is my business unless your att is representing me! also just because we're all defendants does not mean we're all in this together...it aint no class action dude, you are not entitled to my case info !think of it as 1275 individual cases against one plaintiff each case is sealed between bcit the judge and the individual ps rulings in each individual case should be displayed
exactly tex ..my premise is basically about keepin confidential info ..acc# and such sealed ;as far as tactics and diff strategies; they should be shared for the good of all defendants
sound's like a good deal kodiak no fees plus they have a better chance of gettin sh when distribution of the 205's starts !!gl
i am thinking that we are all being sued "Indivually" under one headlineSUIT [otherwise how could one defendant be dismissed and others not?]my case against plaintif has no bearing on the next guys case my info is for plaintiff and judge only.if there was only 1 rebuttle attorny for the collective group"class action",however then info should be shared!
what second summons??
WCHG 180% today from .001- .oo28 plan mite be commin together check it out AWESOME!!!
WCHG-180% today .0028 from .001 startin to come together ...nuthin from mgmt but did find this on aristos site:
“Waste to Energy” Plasma Gasification Project
Aristos Partners developed the business plan and pro forma for an innovative energy project and successfully obtained state agency support for tax-free bond financing.
yo heLLOOO that would put the onus on ameritrade thats the whole point pat oh and by the way... only you would equate a little spankin to an assault and battery "WIFE BEATING" now i know what mentality youre comming from
HOW DARE THEY john post news on freetrading stocks.. who the hell do they think they are~!!!! bloomberg?? an outrage i tell ya lol
exactly tex lol
its all in the summons whacker read it closely over and over and you will see the intention behind it
bob you are a pro thats why i dont want to insult your intelligence... its ten bucks to reply if your not guilty youre clear ....car goes by its...GAME ON
whats it really cost you emit 10 bucks for a return reciept in exchange for the thousands of dollars you hope to make for a pennystock trade ,/hoping for a money for nothing type trade ??? be honest with yourself dude!!
C'mon bob he's tryin to prove to the dtcc that they're fucked cuz they let too many unsubstantiated sh slipp by !you are a pro trader ....even YOU can see that
ohh stopp it was provided as a courtesy to those that want out notEXTORTIONas you have"PUBLICLY" alleged
you dont realize you're punching yourself in the face in the process your, proud arrogence will come back to bite you in the ass dude its also blinding you to the truth...its like gettin a spanking from your father you aint gonna like it but its for your own "IGNORANT" good
blind faith is one thing ,seeing beyond the veil is another ....why would anyone start an unwinnable lawsuit unless there were an alterior motive ...why cant some people see beyond their own noses... nevermind i knowww,..... later!! all - shuttin all this off for the nite too frustrating to read ..obstinence for the sake of obstinance appalls me...../lawsuit is just like a vaccine; yeah they hurt ,but its for the good of all
even a caveman could figure THAT out!!lol
those that dont get it are the ones that saw fire for the first time and thought it was from the "EVIL" gods
i hear ya more regulation- lose volotility-lose the percentage gains then there is no market for pennies really is a tough call but if it means less scams im all for more regulation just have to trade smarter i guess....all in all ???i just dont know,jan
your right jan but it does show what needs to be fixed in the system
xactly ,i dont care if i recoup as long as the flaw in the system is exposed
But , when i bought it was with the hopes of getting a piece of the good sh left out there ; if they didnt settle, the sale wouldve been void and that wouldve been that ,...sorry -no good sh available no big deal the trade shouldve been canceled : buying cash- back in my account minus transaction fees ; no big deal ...not the case though soooooo????
i dont care what it cost or if it ever trades again... im not givin up my rights to legit sh just on the principle of the matter ....ps thats just a way out for ssssmall shholders that dont wish to be botthered w/all this
f1-mytrack/cleared-held by Penson fwiw thx again
There are specific exceptions for the record allowing the use of personal records[2]:
* For statistical purposes by the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics
* For routine uses within a U.S. government agency
* For archival purposes "as a record which has sufficient historical or other value to warrant its continued preservation by the United States Government"
For law enforcement purposes