is currently solvent and making every effort to stay that way.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
When the market is volatile (up or down) I walk away knowing that very thing- I can't beat the algos. I take or shed positions knowing that upfront...
I'd like to think/hope sooner rather than later too
Institutional buy Brown Advisory added 40K shares last Q: 13F-HR
Me too
"Can you find any record of Lou ever having held any SEC License? Bloggers aren't required to demonstrate their expertise by passing rigorous exams"
I dunno Duey, can you prove he doesn't??
I suspect we will retest lows again imo.
It sure did. That's why I'm kicking myself for being stubborn and not chasing it further...
My father-in-law had one of his Gibson guitars AND matching case that were made in Kalamazoo (we live about 30 miles from Kazoo). Don't know whatever became of it. I know he bought and sold many (collectors) guitars in his lifetime so someone is sitting pretty.
I see Gibson cases are now made in China...
another great episode... those were the good years
I pro'ly shoulda paid up 😖
I tried for some more ATOM in the 12s but chased it to 13.10 and just quit...
"Is this the same Paul_Cho that got busted for being a fraud over on ST?"
No clue. I don't follow him although I do follow joe iniowa. I did like the exchange between The_Great_Correction and Cho basically calling Cho out. Regardless, the point Cho made regarding the correlation of Tsu-Jae King Liu being a co-patent inventor with ATOM and an independent director on Intel's BOD is none-the-less somewhat compelling imo.
"...looking back on this message I think people might get the wrong idea, I'm talking about cow puckies, manure. Need it for the vegetable gardens. It seems that an ethanol or is it methanol? plant sprung up and all the shit goes there now."
ya lost me..? We have an ethanol plane here where I live and it's made with corn. In fact, a LOT of the local corn grown here heads there...grrrr. I admit to being a little slow so maybe I'm not catching your drift about the "cow puckies, manure"??
I stated this two years ago regarding covid19 and still stand by it: #msg-154061665
"It's a virus. It will spread like all other viruses. Every time you get a "cold", flu "bug", or whatever viral crud du jour is present, you have been exposed to something that you haven't built an immunity too yet. Most people are going to come down with this eventually."
...as well as this:#msg-154051451
"Total bullshit. New cold virus (manufactured or not) shuts the world down out of fear and the media hyperbole has everybody wringing their hands and gnashing their teeth. And the reality is, NO ONE is going to be able to stop its spread. This is the only time I wish I was still working and not retired cause I would be layering in this market left and right. Eventually, people will wake up."
"Thank you mass media for confusing the situation so that I can easily pick up the right test for the right reasons."
I wasn't aware that there were name "variations" for the at-home covid testing kits. I would be more interested in reading the label of each as to HOW those tests differ? (IF they even do). IMO, they are one and the same unless otherwise stated. Maybe this will help: CDC
Because there are many coronavirus types, referring to it simply as "coronavirus" is very general. The CDC and World Health Organization (WHO) encourage experts to use COVID-19 when referring to this new disease, a novel (or new) coronavirus that has not previously been seen in humans. In COVID-19, ‘CO’ stands for ‘corona,’ ‘VI’ for ‘virus,’ ‘D’ for disease and 19 indicates the year it was discovered.
Just as the general public has become familiar with this terminology, officials have also begun using SARS-CoV-2 in connection with the recent outbreak. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, shortened to SARS-CoV-2, is actually the virus that causes COVID-19 (the disease). As the name indicates, this virus is genetically related to the SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) that caused an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2002-2003, however it is not the same virus.
How do all these terms fit together? "Coronavirus" is a generic term that includes a large family of viruses, similar to saying someone has the flu. SARS-CoV-2 is a specific virus that can cause COVID-19, a disease. As WHO explains, this is similar to differentiating HIV and AIDS — HIV is a virus that causes AIDS. Outlined on their website, "People often know the name of a disease, such as measles, but not the name of the virus that causes it (rubeola)."
There was a time I woulda said this is all a bullshit conspiracy...
...then they elected dementia Joe...
... I believe...
$ATOM ...and more @ $14.22
$ATOM ...and more @ $14.22
$ATOM Interesting exchange: Stocktwits conversation via Twitter
Paul_Cho
Bullish
55m
$ATOM @HTM13 Atomera You can feel very confident we are working with Intel. No question about it. $INTC
When a board member for Intel not only co-invents Atomera patents, but then co-authors multiple peer reviewed research papers on Atomera technology feel assured we are working with Intel.
10 Likes
HTM13
Bullish
52m
@Paul_Cho I’m not convinced yet , but do believe they would be a perfect pairing.
Paul_Cho
48m
@HTM13 @Paul_Cho
Ok man. Well I am not going to spend all day trying to convince you. I know we are working with Intel. We will leave it at that. Have a good day.
5
The_Great_Correction
15m
@Paul_Cho @HTM13 @Paul_Cho
For the record... you don't really Know.
You strongly suspect.
Good Luck.
1
Paul_Cho
14m
@The_Great_Correction @HTM13 @Paul_Cho
How do you know what I know? Who I know? For the record, you wouldn't know who I am if I was standing in a room right near you.
1
HTM13
10m
@Paul_Cho @The_Great_Correction you got inside information ?????????????????????????? !?!?
Paul_Cho
9m
@HTM13 @The_Great_Correction @Paul_Cho
I already said my peace.
$ATOM Interesting exchange: Stocktwits conversation via Twitter
Paul_Cho
Bullish
55m
$ATOM @HTM13 Atomera You can feel very confident we are working with Intel. No question about it. $INTC
When a board member for Intel not only co-invents Atomera patents, but then co-authors multiple peer reviewed research papers on Atomera technology feel assured we are working with Intel.
10 Likes
HTM13
Bullish
52m
@Paul_Cho I’m not convinced yet , but do believe they would be a perfect pairing.
Paul_Cho
48m
@HTM13 @Paul_Cho
Ok man. Well I am not going to spend all day trying to convince you. I know we are working with Intel. We will leave it at that. Have a good day.
5
The_Great_Correction
15m
@Paul_Cho @HTM13 @Paul_Cho
For the record... you don't really Know.
You strongly suspect.
Good Luck.
1
Paul_Cho
14m
@The_Great_Correction @HTM13 @Paul_Cho
How do you know what I know? Who I know? For the record, you wouldn't know who I am if I was standing in a room right near you.
1
HTM13
10m
@Paul_Cho @The_Great_Correction you got inside information ?????????????????????????? !?!?
Paul_Cho
9m
@HTM13 @The_Great_Correction @Paul_Cho
I already said my peace.
Never fails right?
13F-HR/A filed by Goldman that confirms a drop of 1.47K shares from 20.12 from last Q but that amount seems irrelevant (imo).
Algos are still in control and until the company can show actual revenue as opposed to potential, we will be at the mercy of the shorts and the cyber algorithms...
Nice timing. I wasn't around today or I might've added some more too.
Added @ $15.50
Added @ $15.50
$ATOM- New(er) Institutional buy:
Cutler 13F-HR
ATOMERA INC COM 04965B100 97 4,825 SH SOLE 0 4,825 0 0
ATOMERA INC Call 04965B100 14 17,500 SH Call SOLE 0 17,500 0 0
ATOMERA INC Put 04965B100 22 6,800 SH Put SOLE 0 6,800 0 0
** Means they purchased 4825 shares @$20.10/share
17,500 Calls @ $0.80/contract
6,800 Puts @ $3.24/contract
New(er) Institutional buy:
Cutler 13F-HR
ATOMERA INC COM 04965B100 97 4,825 SH SOLE 0 4,825 0 0
ATOMERA INC Call 04965B100 14 17,500 SH Call SOLE 0 17,500 0 0
ATOMERA INC Put 04965B100 22 6,800 SH Put SOLE 0 6,800 0 0
** Means they purchased 4825 shares @$20.10/share
17,500 Calls @ $0.80/contract
6,800 Puts @ $3.24/contract
$ATOM Today's Needham webinar was encouraging although I was looking for more. Until I go through the call transcript/video again, I will share my thoughts and impressions from my recollections of the call as I heard it live.
1) Listening to Scott Bibaud explain their (Atom's) position and potential, one gets the impression that he wants to say more. I've noticed and commented on that same observation in the past. These soundbites are what I jotted down on the fly so-to-speak:
a) "Lots of partners in phase III"
b) "...we will eventually be getting royalties..."
{Notice he states we will. He did not lead off with that statement- it was in the middle of an explanation of current revenue and future revenue based on current phase placement (staggered) of their partners (plural) Some partners are further along in Phase III than others}
c) "...when we start revenue..."
{Not if- Again, this was in the middle of a an explanation of how Phase placement affects revenue}
d) "We are working with mostly larger fabs..."
{This was in reference to a question regarding which size chip/wafer were they more focused on.}
One point of interest that bothers me (and is not their fault) is the covid related chip shortage that has forced suppliers (fabs) to concentrate on existing work/chips and not on new product development. Until they (fabs) can catch their breath, they are reluctant to take away resources to develop the "new" product/chips. Of course this is where ATOM promotes their EPI tool and TCAD capabilities which appears to have gained some traction.
Just as an aside, they did again give out Q3 numbers:
$13 million OP-EX
$31.8 million CASH
23.1 million shares OS
Today's Needham webinar was encouraging although I was looking for more. Until I go through the call transcript/video again, I will share my thoughts and impressions from my recollections of the call as I heard it live.
1) Listening to Scott Bibaud explain their (Atom's) position and potential, one gets the impression that he wants to say more. I've noticed and commented on that same observation in the past. These soundbites are what I jotted down on the fly so-to-speak:
a) "Lots of partners in phase III"
b) "...we will eventually be getting royalties..."
{Notice he states we will. He did not lead off with that statement- it was in the middle of an explanation of current revenue and future revenue based on current phase placement (staggered) of their partners (plural) Some partners are further along in Phase III than others}
c) "...when we start revenue..."
{Not if- Again, this was in the middle of a an explanation of how Phase placement affects revenue}
d) "We are working with mostly larger fabs..."
{This was in reference to a question regarding which size chip/wafer were they more focused on.}
One point of interest that bothers me (and is not their fault) is the covid related chip shortage that has forced suppliers (fabs) to concentrate on existing work/chips and not on new product development. Until they (fabs) can catch their breath, they are reluctant to take away resources to develop the "new" product/chips. Of course this is where ATOM promotes their EPI tool and TCAD capabilities which appears to have gained some traction.
Just as an aside, they did again give out Q3 numbers:
$13 million OP-EX
$31.8 million CASH
23.1 million shares OS
$ATOM- New institutional buyer:Baldwin Brothers
$ATOM- New institutional buyer:Baldwin Brothers
I hadn't even considered that- you're right- lucky girl.
I suppose the question is actually rhetorical but as long the meaning is clear, I'm good
$ATOM- FORM 3
Ramnath Suja's initial restricted stock compensation.
$ATOM- FORM 3
Ramnath Suja's initial stock awardance... (is "awardance" a word?)
Correct- (aside from the $400,000 for the initial JDA).
Are the front skis even necessary LOL!? ...or even useful??