Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You could add one more to that list. Right now, it appears that Management has entered the Bermuda Triangle.
Unfortunately, it wasn’t a first hand account. But he was credible given his position within the intelligence community. He also confirmed the Coneheads consume large quantities of beer, having personally removed the empties from a crashed spacecraft.
With AI and such, the stock market is really not meant for retail investors. Basically a two lane country road turned into the Indy 500. And there’s no going back.
only shaven off twice in about 50 years
I think that’s right. The high frequency trading platforms are likely programmed to spoof across the the market on nearly any stock, provided the right conditions exist to trigger the spoofing.
Not clear to me if this is good news in the short term since the MMs will want to fight and drag this out for as long as possible, especially since this could easily turn into a class action lawsuit like those for tobacco and asbestos. Long term it might mean a larger settlement, but only after many years.
That explains the attempt to sell me that bridge.
Never trust a man with a mustache.
As I’ve said in one form or another, it’s better to be lucky than good.
And assuming this works out at some level, then it’s almost pure luck this didn’t go entirely off the rails.
The price for recycled cardboard has decreased over time.
But not a bad idea, really.
Crash, I’d also like to buy a few more shares, but my broker won’t accept food stamps.
So Foogie, we know you’re not a disgruntled long, but like to play one on TV. Playing along, why don’t you just sell your shares and move on?
Entirely agree with that. There’s a decent amount of expertise from various fields and investors with access to L&L on this message board. But the company just seems to makes everyone who supports them look foolish, regardless.
There should be a NWBO Foolishness Hot Line (1-800-Foolish) set up so that investors can be talked through and counseled on the various embarrassments caused by this company.
Where do I go to get back the 5 seconds of my life from reading such cut and paste drivel?
To someone else’s question about RAs reading there portion of all 1.7 million pages of submissions, my guess is beyond the aggregate numbers and SAP analysis, they likely randomly sample the pages for accuracy to come up with a statistical threshold for reliability and to validate the data, similar to audit sampling in accounting.
I know that’s their fear.
I actually had them pegged at the ASM, and the price had gradually declined by over 40% since that time in any event — so there’s your big drop in the share price anyway; but it in slow motion. They would have been better taking the full hit upfront, and then becoming more proactive with their communications going forward to improve shareholder confidence in the company’s outlook. Granted, there’s no perfect alternative, but shareholders do have a right to reman informed. Right now, the trend is downward and there’s a lot of fear.
Also, after reading the message board this weekend, if you weren’t a long term investor and new to this stock, would you buy any shares, or buy at least as many as you might otherwise? The information about this company and its stock is a sh** show right now. And my guess is the answer is no.
This also gets to the lack of buying versus the fear that results in selling. Maybe less uncertainty and better communication would encourage more buying that would offset the selling that we’ve been experiencing?
What Linda and Les are doing now is not working.
Would more communication help the stock price
Thank you for that clarification, and providing just a bit more insight and nuance with the vaccine relative to the review process.
Describing the status in terms of a final review makes much more sense than what’s been described to date.
Fair enough response. I’m not questioning the validity of submitting 1.7 million sheets of paper. What I’m simply asking is what would otherwise be considered typical for filing an application for a biologic with a patient size of less than 400 with relatively short term survival? Is the average application for a biologic in the UK 100,000 pages, or 200,000 pages, or 300,000 pages and so on?
When Les talks about “proof reading,” what does he really mean? Is it dotting eyes and crossing tees, or is it also recalculating everything in the SAP to make sure the calculations are correct? Or even something more than that?
Les is tricky that way.
I hear you Vator, and certainly respect your perspective. I honestly hope you’re right, ‘cause air conditioning is very expensive for someone in my impoverished financial and overall state of being.
Personal Factoid — My minor in college was History and Philosophy of Science. And was a big fan of Karl Popper and his theory on empirical falsification. The science ultimately has to prove itself right or wrong. In fact it might be the reason why I stayed invested in NWBO, because I bet on the science over managerial incompetence. But apparently Karl Popper never met this management team.
Science is a methodology, and certainly holds plenty of instances where it’s come to the wrong. Like population growth would result in the world running out of food. But the predictions on climate seem to be consistent with what we’re experiencing, even if it’s not unfolding within the same time King Charles described. I can’t get used to calling him King.
Vator, that’s exactly my view on this!
Maverick 1, I know as much about capital raising and underwriting as you know about Tennis.
The only thing Woodford was asking for was accountability and assurances that the allegations in the Phase V report had no merit. Not an unreasonable ask — In retrospect, Linda handled that situation terribly.
Bigger seems to be going down the same road, but we’re much closer to the finish line compared to the time of Woodford. So Bigger’s meltdown is probably more a tempest in a tea pot. The Ondra stuff is pure nonsense. Someone was guilty of writing copious notes!?
I actually have had some level of interaction with experts in the field. Strangely enough don’t recall whether any were from California. The 99.9% is peered reviewed, while 97% cited by others includes scientists that are non-peer reviewed.
Please see link to NASA — I know they faked the moon landing (laugh), but I’d like to think they’re otherwise a credible source.
https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-climate-change/
I have many friends that are climate change deniers, and oddly enough I’ve remained friends with them. Last week one friend blamed sunspots, and I said to him: what are you talking about, the world is actually on fire — I doubts it’s sunspots. He said come jump in his backyard lake if I get too hot. Most of my friend would like to drown me, it’s just not on this message board. So probably won’t take him up on the offer.
The question is what’s the average amount of data in the form of the number of pages for drug and biologic RA submissions for a trial with a modest number of patients? Is 1.7 million pages typical for a trial of less than 400 patients?
NWBO sometimes acts like they’re the first biotech ever to submit a BLA application to a regulatory body.
Almost 99.9% of peer reviewed climates scientists across the globe agree that climate change is largely caused by human activity that increases greenhouse emissions. And those same scientists have been predicting for decades the dramatic change in weather patterns that we are now experiencing.
Glad you decided to come clean; honesty is always the best policy. No harm. Not sure I would have bought the bridge from you anyway. Crash offered to sell me the Statute of Liberty instead; but only if I could prove worthy of Lady Liberty by singing the Star Spangled Banner. Told him I can’t sing, and he said that he might be willing to look the other way if I’d just hand over my car keys.
Hey Horse, I’m sensing something is just not right. You seem just a bit too eager to sell me that bridge.
The Brooklyn Bridge has 150,000 vehicles that cross it everyday. If I just charge a $10 per vehicle toll, a practical bargain for that Manhattan crowd, that’s nearly $600 million a year in revenue. Add revenue from the trademark, and movie and copy rights, the Bridge has got to be worth at least $20 billion on a DCF basis.
So why are you selling me the bridge for so cheap? Are you telling me everything I need to know? Something about Lower Manhattan? Is the growing trends in e-bikes the reason you want to unload this iconic over pass? Just not getting it. Climate change? We’re friends, so give it to me straight.
Doc, this company has had such problems with its reputation and all the troubles that surround it — real or imagined— that they would likely need to form a Newco when they’re ready to up list.
As I said to my close friend Crash while kibitzing: Oy! Who would buy a house in a rough neighborhood that has a reputation for being vandalized? And Les is not shy about telling the world that NWBO exists in a crime ridden ‘hood, and has been repeatedly vandalized by the local street gangs. Reminds me of Horse’s old neighborhood.
Would you buy a house if the seller told you all the doors and windows are broken because of all the criminal activity that goes on in the neighborhood?
Hoff you’re ruining it for everyone.
Hard to believe Crash pays you.
Interesting that somebody who posts under multiple aliases would suggest anyone is a liar.
Inbred imbecile.
There’s an awful lot of “what ifs” and what would be pages worth of forward looking potential risks in your post. But factually the share price is 53 cents as we “speak” and those what-ifs haven’t happened yet, and may not for a long time, if at all.
So, if a tender offer for $10 a share were placed on the table today — in real time — it would be hard to image that the majority of shareholders wouldn’t jump at it. I certainly would. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
Having said that, nobody has made that offer. In my opinion, this is just a theoretical and academic exercise.
And institutional ownership is almost non existent (institutional ownership of 0.00003 as a fraction just doesn’t cut it). That speaks for itself.
Whatever Hoff.
Again, only an imbecile would try to make the case that there’s institutional ownership in NWBO based on 0.3%.
I’m actually laughing way too much.
You must be some type of inbred imbecile to use 0.3% as evidence that there’s any institutional ownership in NWBO.
I guess so moron.
More Yiddish, I feel verklempt.
OMG. The reported institutional ownership is 0.3 percent!
Sorry, I rounded down to zero. But thank you for that number. I’ll remember to cite that going forward.
Imbecile.
Imbecile.
Under any Alias you use.
So the number of $15b you came up with is an insult on science!
“baseless ambulance-chasing schmucks”Lol!
Didn’t know you spoke Yiddish.
You’re hard to dislike.
Crash, since it’s manifestly obvious there are many discontented shareholders as evidenced by lawsuits and comments by shareholders including Bigger and those on this message board, it’s only in your delusional mind do you believe that stakeholders are aligned. Yesterday we were discussing $10 a share, and now you’re talking pennies on the dollar. What changed?
When Horse and I head out to New Mexico to trip on some peyote, would you like to join us? Probably much better and more natural than what you’re using now.