Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"IMO these current 3 are settled." If that is true -- and I do not believe it is for a second -- his recent video crosses over from ill advised to deliberately misleading.
Yeah, but that was then. They have cash now.
I can't imagine why they would have gone the contingency route given that (a) the Microsoft settlement showed they had a valid patent claim and (b) they had five million bucks in the coffers.
I didn't?
Do we know for a fact that the lawyers for the Centrify, Duo and Trustwave lawsuits are being paid on contingency? If so, why? The $5 million from the Microsoft settlement was already in hand before those suits were filed.
Yes, there are five states voting on recreational use. Another four are voting on medicinal use. I was responding to a post that specifically addressed the California initiative.
I agree that there will be a certain amount of stupid money around. How much remains to be seen. We'll know in a few weeks.
The use of medical cannabis -- which is OWCP's bailiwick -- has been legal in California for 20 years. Proposition 64, which is on this year's ballot, concerns recreational use.
I'm sure that he isn't sweating out that "advisory, non-binding" vote anymore today than he was yesterday.
Bingo. The video sparked the selloff that would have followed the shareholders meeting, an event that has every indication of being completely perfunctory but was being hailed as a pivotal event.
Your first link is to the 10-Q/A with the "clerical error."
There was an 8-K also. http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=72732362
No, that O/S is from the 10Q filed on 8/29. That number stands.
I do not think that the actual O/S is high.
My only point is that the much touted 15 million share reduction was a crock.
8k filed today: "At October 24, 2016, the Registrant had 135,305,475 shares outstanding as a result of the conversion of all outstanding convertible notes during the period from September 9 to October 3, 2016." So much for that ballyhooed share reduction.
I have read them. Neither the Qs nor the K show any change in the O/S this year. None.
The O/S was 81 million on 8/29 also. At what point between was it higher than that?
Your DD Package posted on 10/17 (#msg-125833495) states that the O/S was 96,799,955 on 9/23/16. Could you please tell me the source of that number?
The O/S was 81,460,875 on 8/29 and an identical 81,460,875 on 10/18.
I believe that this was the relevant part of your post:
"That is huge OWCP DD." Not only is it not huge DD, it isn't due diligence at all. It is a revised, amped-up version (here is the original: #msg-125817986) of an unsubstantiated conversation with anonymous persons on a beach.
Raise your hand if you believe that OWCP has "several patents that will kill pancreatic and lung cancer."
Yeah, for now I think I'll file in under Meh also.
You seem like a fairly reasonable if somewhat acerbic type, so let me ask you something. Did you find the scheduling of the stockholders meeting -- 4:00 PM on a Friday afternoon -- to be even mildly curious? I'm not suggesting that it portends something good, something bad or something in between, it just struck me as unusual. Maybe it isn't.
Regardless of what bing com/news might have reported, the Supreme Court has not ruled in Samsung v. Apple. The court heard oral arguments last Tuesday (10/11). When the ruling will come down is anyone's guess.
Terrific. If I ever need to write a dissertation in pidgin, I'll know who to call.
It's on today's FINRA Daily List. http://otce.finra.org/DailyList
From the last 10-Q...Outstanding at May 16, 2016: 2,282,957,407
I saw a single trade of 100000 shares at .0015 @ 9:30:06, six seconds into the trading day.
It's here:
Note 11 – Other Income
On March 28, 2013 the Company initiated patent litigation against an outside party. In March 2015, the case was in full discovery, the pre-trial hearing was held, and the deliberations were continuing. Mediation took place in May 2015 to discuss a potential settlement, and on January 15, 2016, the parties reached a settlement in the matter. As part of the settlement, the Company received a payment in January 2016 of $9,750,000 and incurred fees related to the settlement of $4,187,257
"THESE ARE AUDITED NUMBERS FOLKS!" In the 10-Q? No, they're not. It states so explicitly.
Almost three years. From the 10K:
For what it's worth, Amazon now lists both Strikeforce products as being "In stock on May 3, 2016."
Something every penny stock player should remember:
"It got up to .04 after that." Yes, it did, but we must keep in mind that the O/S in 8/15 was minuscule compared to what it is today.
I saw your post from earlier this morning with the CEO's comment that "nothing I can do about it." #msg-122245533 Considering that this supposed "glitch" with the nation's largest internet-based retailer is now in its third week, it struck me as being somewhat cavalier.
That doesn't even look like the same product. The Amazon page for the Strikeforce mobile version still says "temporarily out of stock."
http://www.amazon.com/Strikeforce-MobileTrust-Keystroke-Encryption-Devices/dp/B019WHYU7U/ref=pd_sim_sbs_65_1?ie=UTF8&dpID=51byZQA7mgL&dpSrc=sims&preST=_AC_UL160_SR160%2C160_&refRID=05M7V2A9Q874D7350ZA9
I suspect that there are pieces of this particular puzzle that will never be revealed.
Let's see. In Software, it's the #88,841 most popular product. In the sub-sub-category of Software > Networking & Servers > Security, it's #521. It must have become "temporarily out of stock" very soon after it became available.
Re: "there are no filings on pacer" My question is, "Why not?" They've known they had a settlement with MSFT since 1/15. That's three months ago. If they're aware of additional patent infringements, why have there been no additional filings?
How could they possibly miss lilly-finance, the blatantly pumping PinkPanther alter ego who was the fifth most prolific poster on the board?