Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
ps. but thanks for giving me the opportunity to purchase lower
ps. I would anticipate a plus $1.00 price with a reverse split IF ANYTHING.. More to the point, if this is as big as VAN has reported in his newsletter...
WE WILL SEE $1.00 or substantially more through organic growth OR proof of practical application of technology...not .03 and a gazillion shares...
ERICSON is NOT A SMUCK...he walked away with $500M from the last company he invested in and financed.
ZERO..double checked...your DEAD WRONG..nowhere is there any evidence that the company will SPLIT the stock. Absolutely absurd.
You apparently are mixing up the concept of "Authorizing Additonal Share" FOR SALE...to accomidate Warrants or straight sale) with authorizing additional shares for Forward Split.
Foward Split is for the most part done when share price it TOO HIGH for market or wish to give shares as a dividend.
You are ASSUMING that "AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL SHARES" is in ANTICIPATION of forward split...total ILLOGICAL and BASELESS CONCLUSION.
What you might have done is created a buying opportunity with your mis-information...by causing some equally uninformed investors to sell...
ZERO...have no idea how you arrive at a FORWARD SPLIT...from the 8k or eslewhere
As I recall, months ago company approved authority to do a REVERSE SPLIT...if the Board so decides.
THAT makes sense ...going from .10 to $1.00,(not .10 to .03.) for many reasons...
More sense would be organic growth or outright takeover offer for technology at Tens of Multiples once practical application is in the market.
Believe it adjusts for the color of container too... just my understanding...
Sorry Brooklyn, but Van doesn't have to reveal who the funds are, who might be buying. He could have introduced funds to the company and technology through his monthly newsletter. They might have bought. If they told him, that is his and their business; it is not your business who they are.
I introduced two funds months ago to DSNY and another this week. They might have told me they are buying or not. That is between me and them, that is, if they want to tell me. I dont ask, I just introduce.
How different is it from a poster, posting here and saying they bought or if they tell friend they bought?
If I know they bought I certainly would not reveal their names on this board out of respect for their privacy.
Van doesnt need to "pump" DSNY or other companies he covers. Read his newsletter... he only give you tid-bits here... He sells his newsletter to funds and individuals, and you guys get it for free...
Maybe he should stop posting and make you buy his independent/non-compensated "research".
In the end, you have the to judge his credibility if you want to listen. You can choose not to listen. I certainly don't consider it "pumping". I read him and listen to him very carefully.
Investing takes patience...many other stocks out there to daytrade if you are not patient.
Weak Hands get washed out... Take-down before the take-up
Call the company attorney...the rights to the liver trial outcome would have been transferred.
Also... IMHO...the last settlement with investors was financed with "toxic financing" agreement. Who knows how many shares they actually received at this point. Was in there interest to keep the share price down at .08 /.09 area...
It might be over as there does not seem to be an effort anymore to keep it down...except perhaps by shorts...
for reference on Toxic Financing:
Toxic financing usually refers to a convertible financing deal that is done with an adjustable conversion price, that is based on the share price...or the number of shares that can be exercised is unlimited. In this case the creditor received a note which entitled them to their money in increments based upon what they received as they sold their shares. The lower the price, the more shares they were entitled to.
Sometimes the company holding the financed debt will short shares of the stock at current prices in hopes that they will put such pressure on the stock and will be able to receive more shares (cover their short) at lower prices.
The lower the price the more shares they receive.
It is also called death spiral financing.
Typically these companies will front money to the desperate company and then sell/short shares to get their initial money back. They will then use the balance of their shares to short a company into oblivion...hoping that the company goes bust.
Who knows how many shares have been issued or whether they are shorting or continuing to short...
The shares of BVI traded entity of PROT LTD (effective 1/18/13)...were not distributed and PROT and Transfer Agent were enjoined from distributing them by FINRA. FINRA is taking the position that it was not a properly authorized "transfer of assets". PROT was appealing to the SEC to permit them to proceed.
That is the last I heard about 6 weeks ago.
Unless and until SEC over-rides FINRA or PROT sues FINRA in court and wins, there will be no transfer of assets to BVI.
The balance of what you state is my understanding too.
1/18/13 "effective date" might be the date for the company...but with FINRA not permitting the actual transfer to happen...the "effective date" means nothing as a practical matter right now.
Raises all sorts of sticky questions I won't go into here about who bought and sold on what representations...hummmm
You dont want the EUROshare company to receive the Biotech assets of PROT...that means the value in PROT has been stripped out of the company...bad for holders of PROT...
FINRA has enjoined the company from the transfer and the company is appealing it to the SEC...hopefully the SEC support FINRA and will kill that deal with EURO company, because if it goes through any holders of PROT would be bag holders...
The longer the biotech assets remain with PROT.. the better a chance of positive test results and will remain a PROT asset ... once that happens while PROT is still the older of the IP...it will never leave PROT which is good for PROT and Euroshare will be worthless.
lol...throw techicals out when "news" can fundamentally change the value of shares....
my last big one had a "sell" signal at $5.35...then three days later Roche bought them for $23.50...nice "sell" signal for those who sold or shorted...lol
ps...warned a retail buyer who sold at .13 for a "trade" to buy back cheaper... "this one will blow buy you...why make a few pennies when you can make multiple of dollars?"
...he's crying now..
Most of weak hands out after very long basing... From this board..there might be a couple of stupid weak and uninformed hands left (or just trying to buy cheaper...you dont bash and put a bid in unless you are being disingenous with your bashing)
go with the money...a big boy who has made 1/2 billion dollars does not bring in other reputatable big boys into his fold without having something very special...
follow the money...still very cheap down here...will still be cheap at $1 imho
meant.. "buyers"... and some retail are already crying..."I sold too soon"
Van...I agree...the buyer (volume) are waiting in the shadows for the weak hands and traders to drop their shares.
They are very willing to give retail their money and run. DSNY management very smart ... contrary to some retail investors views.
Company does not have to announce its stategy and execution of it as it goes along, especially when they do not want to alert its competiton.
When the magnitude of DSNY's technology is finally comprehended by the uninformted (and impatient) the opportunity down here will have wizzed by and we will hear on this board...
"could have, should have ..." or they can tell their kids or friends in a year... "I had that one at $1.50, and I could have been very wealthy"...
LOL...
everyone wants it to go straight up but if it holds here and basis for a couple of days, it will give basis for new lift...
smart buyers are going to see if they can pick it up here or lower...rather than continuing to drive it up on the bid...IMHO...
Sell at your own risk...
Stop losses will probably be gobbled up...
Just holding and not looking at every day movement for a trade...One major announcement and you will be left in the dust...IMHO
Don't forget...this really is not out on the street yet...
Someone on this board mentioned top exec went to England this week. As I recall one of the largest ad agencies in the world HQ there...perhaps a significant contract coming...to boost DSNY's 63 PE...
same with Clipstream G2 watermarking... copy a movie with a camera in a theatre...and the watermark can be detected on the copy made from video recording
van would be better to answer that ...but the anwser is YES...
what people do not realize is that the Watermarking technology is not only for digital transmission but also analogue...
over the radio...or digitial radio
I wouldn't sweat it...I do not expect DSNY to be around as a stand-alone company long enough for any of that speculation to matter...
The platform and technology is worth much to much for it not to be swallowed up well before those other events to occur..just IMHO
It would not be an "if" iRadio receives the 3 Major labels songs vis PlayMPE... Since the majors "format" (for their own "security" reasons) in the PlayMPE format/watermarking... there will be increased revenues...
DSNY gets paid on "transfers" not songs played. Every radio station is still going to have to receive all songs from the Major Labels, if they are to remain relevant.
win win ...for DSNY IMHO
It looks like someone believes the affirmative on both those questons
DSNY has the three majors and they are transferring releases through secure PlayMPE as announced...
I would assume the 3 Majors would necessarily be doing the same with AAPL...tranferring songs using the PlayMPE format WITH WATERMARKING secured technology.
Basicly DSNY will be in the Face of AAPL...
Would that entice AAPL to use PlayMPE/Watermarking on all iTune transfers?
Could this also be an introduction to AAPL of DSNY Clipstream?
Real Question...is what does AAPL's announcment on "iRadio" and signing the 3 major labels... Have to do with DSNY if anything?
This sounds like a perfect fit for PlayMPE secured transmisson...
How could it fit in with AAPL?...
DSNY already has a relationship with the 3 Majors for secured transmission of songs...I see three labels requiring secure transmission over iRadio using DSNY PlayMPE transmission format. Just a hunch
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-major-labels-signed-iradio-133953455.html
try 10 year high
DSNY has a monoply on secrure transmission of digital and analogue /music/radio transmission and contracts with the three major labels. It is DSNY technology that which the labels used to destroy Nabster. "Watermark" every song digital and analogue...over the air. See Apple announcement today: How could it fit in with AAPL?
I see secure transmission over net radio...http://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-major-labels-signed-iradio-133953455.html.
Selin..that is "continued listings" for entry I believe company needs $2 for 30days plus the remainder of the requirements...which DSNY has.
I believe the silence on DSNY's part was by design...but now since cats out of the bag...we should educate investors in possible "suitor" companies the upside potential here.
Small Nasdaq Uplisting: DSNY needs a share price of $2, I believe for 30 days, which should be quite achievable and then they should apply for a listing.
DSNY already meets all of their qualifications other than share price.
but when it makes sense by laying it all out...dumb not to take notice... The brains behind TCPS..owns no stock what does that tell you?
Hinkling gone... chase him not TCPS
Article out today:
Smoke and Mirros…this article believes so.. Interesting points..
1. “TCPS..has been attracted attention of late, mostly thanks to message board buzz ‘CREATED BY AN AGGRESSIVE UNOFFICIAL PROMOTION’ “. … paid promoters by a third party..
2. “There are many problems with TCPS. They fall into two categories: SCIENTIFIC…and INFORMATIONAL/REGULATORARY …”
3. “Discovery of New Patient granted to Ronald Hickling, once CTO of TCPAS…speculated his return”…NOT SO. HICKLING owns NO STOCK as of last 10-K
4. Patent assigned to Softwaveradio, Inc. run by ..Walter Brooks who has nothing to do with TCPS. Run out of a private residence.
5. No proven technology …”have a Patent ,not that what you invented actually works, or is useful even if it does.”
6. Promises by Pignatello that “he intends to fix all that quickly” …then “make some OTC filings, and take it to the AMEX…6 months”… “THAT WILL NOT HAPPEN”.
7. Even with “MASSIVE REVERSE SPLIT” to get price up…stock will not support “asset “requirement.
8. “Probably there’ll be news of some kind, there may even be a OTCMarkets filings. Just keep an eye on the abundant red flags.”
http://promotionstocksecrets.com/tcps-breakthrough-technology-or-smoke-and-mirrors/
Smoke and Mirros…this article believes so.. Interesting points..
1. “TCPS..has been attracted attention of late, mostly thanks to message board buzz ‘CREATED BY AN AGGRESSIVE UNOFFICIAL PROMOTION’ “. … paid promoters by a third party..
2. “There are many problems with TCPS. They fall into two categories: SCIENTIFIC…and INFORMATIONAL/REGULATORARY …”
3. “Discovery of New Patient granted to Ronald Hickling, once CTO of TCPAS…speculated his return”…NOT SO. HICKLING owns NO STOCK as of last 10-K
4. Patent assigned to Softwaveradio, Inc. run by ..Walter Brooks who has nothing to do with TCPS. Run out of a private residence.
5. No proven technology …”have a Patent ,not that what you invented actually works, or is useful even if it does.”
6. Promises by Pignatello that “he intends to fix all that quickly” …then “make some OTC filings, and take it to the AMEX…6 months”… “THAT WILL NOT HAPPEN”.
7. Even with “MASSIVE REVERSE SPLIT” to get price up…stock will not support “asset “requirement.
8. “Probably there’ll be news of some kind, there may even be a OTCMarkets filings. Just keep an eye on the abundant red flags.”
Of course they (MM)can drop the bid...its a phoney bid ...anyway..they fill 5K and run ...MM will play ball with who pays them to support stock...but they will not be left holding the bag...when people wake up and decide they will take their .0005 stock and run....
that's where I want to be...follow the Hinkling...for the gold...
too much manipulation...today up ..tomorrow dump...and they are not filling the bid...
dont like the way this one smells...good day boys and girls..
Real manipulation to the upside by CSTI...trying to sell at the bid and they will not fill...must be paid to keep the bid up...tying to hit the bid at .44
sure he hasnt been waiting around for 5 years...for FCC
Is the Brains of the company and techology Hinkling still with this company?
Patience...bought in 20K more shares at .42 at 15:28...glad I didnt chase it..
WHAT NON-SENSE HERE...this company claims to be selling in Europe and had NO REVENUE?...and $13k in the bank!....Dump and Pumper...
wow..its like these guys put one of these POS out there every two weeks and you guys pile in...last one out gets burned!