Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Attention Shareholders I find it really pathetic that since I posted I was on my way to Europe for 3+ weeks , but would continue to post to correct and clarify the bashers misinformation. , bashers are travelling the globe telling us how smart they are and how much money they are making. We real shareholders let people observe their success. We don’t try to
Bully people into believing
one false statement after another.
Aren’t they just desperate to shake shares loose?
?Fascinating a person purported by basher SB suddenly surfaces in full armor of sharing on a Saturday holiday weekend in the summer and does a trip down memory lane? That he is not SB’s earlier moniker? BS and nonsense. Another fantasy trip in Hollywoodland— still in development it looks like. Maybe bashers should checkout ChatGBT?
Shareholders do not believe in coincidences . And the detail and reference of exactly the same issues 10 years ago SB and others are trying to relitigate in order to get their post count up? On the tip of your tongue are they? Same old manipulation.
Interesting and so many tells, like the pretend blast from the past has the same fixation with Management’s
vocabulary as basher-in-chief barber. Just one coincidence after another. Oh and let’s bring up the 10 year old RS also, what a surprise! More convergence.
Sorry, but don’t buy the 24/7/365 bashers reunion revisionist history. Now since DBMM has has 10 wins and made law in the process, they surface their own monikers or even old recruits to reinforce the same crap. Can only bash backward. DBMM future step by step moving into growth mode. Particularly with the LTIs since 2017 who are selectively in the OTC because of their due diligence and the management relationships. (Just like me but much bigger players)
Bashers are deceptive and negative thinkers and only exist on the OTC. They use multiple monikers and self proclaim themselves the only purveyors of knowledge about the OTC. They are always wrong and DBMM knows exactly what it is doing and surely learned the exchanges are the model goals not OTC platforms.
As a portfolio investor who has only 15% of my investments in alternative investments like the OTC, my keenest observation is bashing on the OTC is a job , a platform to use vile language, cartoons and idiotic conspiracy theories because they can, this kind of behavior is not allowed on any proper exchange. DBMM had earned the right to totally focus on a blue chip blueprint and ignore OTC opinions.
SB and TH joined at the hip as one . All of a sudden, yet know each other so well? No coincidences are there? Still No relitigation allowed. No one cares.
Real shareholders going to enjoy the holiday weekend. Ignore the white noise. Shareholders and Company stronger together.
You are a fraud and take the bait to prove it over and over. You never take accountability , tens of thousands of paid bashing posts over 10+ years.
Multiple aliases —desparate to up your post count by relitigating 10+ years events.
Shareholders know consistent pattern of negative, false behavior is
Defamation.
Shareholders know win #11 and #12 are in pipeline.
Shareholders are closing in on the lies you spew. We know threeflight another moniker of yours.
How odd, now he is yet another close source of yours 10 years+ ago? (Ibid)
You are just the grand orchestrator of bashers aren’t you? It will all converge, stay tuned. Your various recruits , the basher brigade weave your tales together, or one voice—the same voice?
Why is it that you have to keep self-proclaiming about yourself? “I have a brain.” Right out of the Wizard of Oz!
Shareholders know.
Yet here you are with dozens of negative posts morning to night. Vitriol, vulgarity , deception and no facts.
The basher’s template to depress pps for shorting and bad actors. Place on ignore.
This hunting ground will not shake shares loose or scare.
Shareholders read Updates and PRs which state the Company will announce results only. No plans or details which are under NDAs as they could reveal competitive advantage. DC is a management consultancy designed around each client’s analytics to increase their ROI through digital marketing.
During every one of the run up to each of the 10 wins your Posts were NEVERS and wanted all kinds of details which you were not entitled to as they were private and certainly not available to the public. That made you a NEVER and you were wrong every time.
Trolls damaged the Company in the past so there will be no disclosure of specific plans. Only results. Irrespective of what you want .
Step by step gets the Company wins, not opinions from anyone. Results will be announced when they occur. Wins #11 and #12 in the pipeline.
https://www.accesswire.com/viewarticle.aspx?id=767290
Shareholders know.
Hello Shareholders, just got home from 3+
Weeks in Europe and did stay diligent to correct and clarify all the basher BS. Long plane ride catching up on responses.
see my response to Posts 322421, 322456, 322458, 322484, 322492 and 322504.
protecting my $DBMM long investment.
Portfolio investors can multitask . I doubt if you even have a passport.
Those of us who are global are used to time differences and Europe is 5-7 hours ahead. DUH . I certainly didn’t intend to let bashers lies stand.
I protect my DBMM long investment.
Shareholders long and new take a short time to note the BS vitriol spewed by the bashers, each and every. Totally worthless in the scheme of things.
DBMM will grow and acquire to get off OTC, the bashers will never get off the platform because no one else will have you.
DBMM will prevail . Shareholders and company stronger together.
There are many posts where you claim to have no shares, more recently 1 share.
1million$ bet? How adolescent. Like the bully in the playground who taunts “I betcha a million !” All he sees is everyones back as they exit. No one cares about the tedious bravado.
The ignorance of regulations , processes and US-GAAP is stunning.
The Company has documented that its reporting follows each regulator, particularly OTCM since they were acknowledged PINK CURRENT and delegated reporting role by the SEC. Updates and PRS have stated they are “following OTCM instructions regarding Uplist to OTCQB “ and regarding business development will announce results when finalized as they did was first 10 wins.
Trolls do damage and have. Bullies and baiting at the behest of self-indulgence. No one cares.
The SEC and PCAOB is very strict about privacy . A Company which is a management consultancy in digital marketing has NDAs in place as that is both principals competitive advantage.
But Idiot as his actual Moniker indicates never had any executive experience, but somehow conjures fictional narratives which he will say should exist because he knows better.
Shareholders know. No one cares.
More revisionist history by the self-proclaimed non- shareholder expert. HO HUM more nonsense.
Another attempt to be very cavalier after the fact to “say” you are right 5 times— and even those are nonsense—after your 18,200+ posts and your other moniker, three flight archived “x” thousand posts .
Those 5 items are opinions and not correct as “right.” Not a long shot.
Corrected Example: Company in testimony cited “hard loans” were necessary until acquisition in midst of Great Recession made business loans almost impossible . TARP report said through 2014.
If no Reaudit in 2013 acquisition leveraged growth was to begin. First mitigating circumstance.
Corrected: PRs in the OTC are always issued under Safe Harbor because they are sometimes changeable . Many were spot on accurate. You and yours are mired down in the past and the Company is not relitigating your crap, in a word. Bashers are desperate , must try and cause chaos.
11/2019 your post “DBMM not long for this world.” All
4 items wrong!
Note: DBMM has stated in PR and Updates that the Company will only PR /Update results as the first 10 wins as building blocks. DBMM has blueprint in place.
Tens of thousands of paid negative bashing 24/7/365 is less than pathetic. It is deceptive and misleading .
More nonsense. Trying to make strident , absolute remarks as if NSS are there or not is simply not accurate.
Sofa bashers have no experience, and their comments are opinions.
The Company and its Transfer Agent have said they have no way of knowing if NSS exist. The regulators principals like the SEC’s Chair, the DOJ, FINRA have given interviews and speeches about the need to “ferret out” NSS as an objective and a priority.
With respect to corporate actions, Form 211 reviews etc. there is no reconciliation of phantom or counterfeit shares or what NSS call commitment shares. Not issued, but due. Again, like Bearer Bonds which are illegal in the US, are used throughout most parts of the world. The timing is only measured if issued. Welcome to the world of options, phantom, if and then commitments, it goes on and on.
No one can state anything but speculate or opine, particularly on a chatroom. If it was that easy the regulators wouldn’t have NSS removal as a priority. It would be an instruction from regulators.
Stop trying to scare new shareholders, longs already know.
Mired down in the past and refusal to see the current and future days leveraged by 10 wins to your/NEVERS -0- . Half your iHub posts are negative bashing on DBMM.
The acquisition of DC as the flagship leader allows acquisition of private entities to immediately increase revenues and client base. Yes JM and other names you call yourself. you got it wrong again. DBMM will be doing the acquiring for companies who want a public presence .
Amidst meeting every hurdle along the way since acquisition, and also previously pivoting entities who
couldn’t meet the Conditions of Closing in agreement until Digital Clarity.
DBMM knows exactly what it is doing.
It is a lie to try and give validity to numbers which do not exist . That is why regulators have a Statute of Limitations. A legal timeline which define the legal boundaries so people like bashers or bad actors cannot infer something that does not exist.
Bashers goal is to depress pps, shake shares loose and increase their post (or word) count. This is like relitigating a legally closed
Court case. Totally irrelevant and only intended to create chaos.
Let me be clear. You do not determine fact or to call people liars or other vulgar names— you and your fellow bashers— not valid for shareholders or regulators. Just to create chaos for those pulling your strings.
Totally fallacious logic and no methodology other than to attempt to embed old , superseded data. Has no legal relevancy. Fallacious is a super word to describe mistaken belief based on deception. Shares do not exist and you can’t conjure them up because you print in color.
Current and new investors do not care about bashers refusal to accept legal data in place , nor do they have any interest in illogical use of information or data which means nothing today.
Shareholders really bored with bashers constant misleading misinformation. No more fictional narratives. Here and now is what matters to shareholders .
Long and strong Company and shareholders
No wonder you bash on OTC. You (and yours) would be banned for both language and data, if exchanges even allowed bashers! Which they do not.
Now you try and aggregate into an absurd meaningless number required nowhere ?? Only to try and pretend and confuse shareholders that it has value? Only in your fever dream Dude.
Going back in time before Statute of Limitations and stating false data as if events did not occur, double counting as you go along.
Bashers do not have language or data as a skill set . Example of obfuscation squared 8-10 years ago.
Shareholders know.
Always repetitive lies. Must increase #’s of posts to get paid right?
The Company never issued
5 Billion or 5+ Billion ad you have stated erroneously many times.
Pathetic to think you can revise history 8-10 years ago well beyond the Statute of Limitations. No shareholder cares it is yesterday’s news.
Just attempts at revisionist history and bashing because you are consistently wrong .
Remember Nov 6 2019? “DBMM not long for this world,” says you?
WHY POTENTIAL SHAREHOLDERS NEED TO AVOID DBMM
THE REAL FACTS:
- DBMM was suspended for failure to file for 2 years and is trading on the grey "Expert" (non-public) market with a skull and crossbones!
- It is facing a hearing for complete REVOCATION shortly!
- No stock has ever avoided revocation after being suspended for failing to file... even if they catch up on filings!
- Read the below passage from the SEC on 10/23/19, DBMM is not long for this world:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152141115
More lies —
AS 5 billion , not OS in 2015
Language and data not bashers skill sets
Research is not ignoring subsequent, evolving facts and say it is accurate , to try and have a Gotcha moment.
Filings evolve , contracts have provisions which span years. Why don’t you read responses? Out of context history is irrelevant.
Bashers love revisionist history , ignoring point in time accounting Superseded extracts, none of which matters.
Shareholders know what matters and what is coming.
There goes your problem with dates again. always omissions , ignoring events. The old’ compost syndrome of yours. You should get it checked out. Acquisition of DIgital Clarity in 2012. Reaudit in 2023 Dismissal 2019/2023. See chronology:
1 . Acquisition completed 2012
2. Reaudit (3yrs) required through no fault of DBMM Nov 15,2013.
3. Asher litigation Feb 2014
4.Company completed Reaudit and filed all Amended K’s and Q’s (see EdGAR) seamlessly and chronologically in mid- Sept 2014.
5. Cost of Reaudit $157,300.
6.Mitigating circumstances caused delayed filings starting with 10-K 2015
7. Administrative Proceeding for delayed filings May 16,2017
8. New LTIs cashflow financing Oct 2017 starting with Cure
9. Delayed Filings cured May 31, 2018
10. Settlement with Asher at 50% discount.Their CDs canceled. June 18, 2018
Bashers have trouble putting sentences together without colors, capitals , cartoons and very vulgar language and name calling.
Try and understand that 2012 comes after 2010. Point in time audited 10-Ks reflect the evolution of the deal. Conditions of Closing is one of the most important segments of any merger or acquisition. Refusal to learn is not an excuse for misinformation.
Since you have never done any M&A just try counting in order. Things change. Repeat : documented 10-K 2012 is 2 years after 2010, one acquisition remained , one rescinded. Documented, and in next year Company changed name , mid-2013.
Try and keep up.
Capital letters and angry name calling 24/7/365 of whining. Half of your total iHub posts of almost 8,000 are on DBMM!
Shareholders are encouraged to read the bashers archives 10+ years and their NEVERS statements—all wrong. You say you know better than an ALJ , attorneys, experts in public entities—they are always wrong and you are right! Never acknowledging superseded events and the chronology of events. Blathering in a word.
No experience in business , no financial credentials, no legal credentials , and no knowledge of an industry far different from manufacturing counting widgets, but bash all day every day. But you still Know better? Like the know-it- all uncle at Thanksgiving who just yells and yells! Hahahaha
Shareholders know the motivation and the cabal driving it.
More date confusion, more basher omission. Classic attempt at misinformation and chaos. 18,200+ negative posts from you alone, over 45,000 all bashers together. What a way to make a buck!
Well before the acquisition of Digital Clarity , the Company was on OTCQB with bad actors selling on every turn and private companies unable to meet the Conditions of Closing.
The lack of proper companies who would have sustainability are very rare on the OTC. DBMM has the right flagship brand in Digital Clarity, regulatory issues all met and in order, exciting times ahead.
DBMM on its way.
Digital Clarity acquisition closed in 2012 after meeting all Conditions of Closing.
You are contradicting yourself, first it was 2011, now it is 2010? You simply do not understand M&A in public companies. Point in time accounting has been raised several times before as is essential in reading financial statements. However, in this case totally irrelevant because it is 10-13 years ago . Fact: A Company has contractual provisos which can span several years, and deal can break up during that period.
As stated in 2012 the Company did a substantial structural review in 2011 after one of its two acquisitions were rescinded, to focus on Digital Clarity.
In fact, two separate companies acquired provisionally in 2010-2011: Digital Clarity was one and all Conditions of Closing met in 2012 and DC became the flagship of the Company and the parent company did a name change to DBMM in 2013.
The other 2010 acquisition rescinded and canceled—as if it never existed , “nunc pro tunc” Rescission of Share Purchase Agreement. 10-K 2012.
That is why one full year after closure, the 2013 10-K filing was intended to launch the acquisition with growth capital. Instead, the Reaudit Mandate occurred Nov 15, 2013. That began the mitigating circumstances which ultimately led to delayed filings and a Final Order of Dismissal on June 2, 2023.
These Basher Gotcha moments are wrong every time. DC’s closing date unimportant and moot. The 2012 date is controlling closure date.
FACT:
Filings are iterative and evolve every filing. That is particularly the case in M&A. You don’t go back in time, you go forward. The 2012 DC closing date is controlling.
Trying to create chaos with misleading info is what bashers do, ignoring how information evolves and is superseded.
Shareholders and Company go forward stronger together.
Wrong, wrong and wrong.
This has been your argument on many legal issues. Extracting from something earlier which was evolving or clarified or argued or revised later, cannot be cited as a fact. Only a point in time. It is deal which evolved over 2 years, concluded in 2012. You neither have negotiated any M&A , nor ever understood that absolutes rarely prevail.
A deal is not concluded until all contractual aspects completed. These details have no relevance in the future or where DBMM is today.
But focus on arcane provisions all superseded and well beyond the Statute of Limitations is useless waste of time 10 years ago. It doesn’t matter . No one cares.
It is whacky for you to think you know better , for no reason and for no impact . The Reaudit was still mandated Nov 15, 2013!!
As I have said zillions of times, I am a portfolio investor. I buy and hold (approx) 85% of investments in exchange type companies, leaving 15% in Alternative/Higher Risk DBMM caught my eye and I am a real shareholder focused on its success after doing an enormous amount of due diligence as suggested initially by LPink. I asked the question early days and LPink directed me to do my own due diligence.
The intriguing driver is the hurdles overcome and the future in a growth industry.
FACT and WARRANT:
I am neither affiliated with DBMM, nor have I ever been paid in any manner, shape or form for posts or anything associated with DBMM.
I’m betting on the “blueprint” referenced in last Update.
Shareholders know.
Real Shareholders have noted before that bashers desperation around trying to relitigate amongst each other around superseded events and write a new narrative has no standing. Weaving new scenario much? Does not matter. Lots of people made lots of money in early days trading on every tick, buying a Porsche in between, others summer houses. They didn’t like something, moved on. That is what adults do.
Gotcha moments are not such when transparently in filings . 2 examples: The Company followed SEC instructions via filings. The RS 2015 included in 3Q filing 2015 as dated and occurred coincident with filing.
Of course Management has PS as they do in most public companies. Difference Management doesn’t trade. No sales, hold . No point but usual whining.
Long shareholders and new shareholders do not care about nonsense. Nor do LTIs providing cashflow financing. Loans to grow prosper and get to NASDAQ. They care about the future and getting there with relationships since 2017 with long-term investors in it to win it. 10 wins Company, NEVERS-0.
Wrong, your revisionist history is deliberately misleading. 2011? Total BS. The acquisition of DC not completed until 2012.
Ignoring the actual acquisition and the mandated Reaudit is not disingenuous, it is dishonest.
Such crap! The only thing the bashers keep regurgitating is superseded nonsense .
Reposting correction provided previously. All documented.
Shareholders know.
Reminder of facts:
1 . Acquisition completed 2012
2. Reaudit (3yrs) required through no fault of DBMM Nov 15,2013.
3. Asher litigation Feb 2014
4.Company completed Reaudit and filed all Amended K’s and Q’s (see EdGAR) seamlessly and chronologically in mid- Sept 2014.
5. Cost of Reaudit $157,300.
6.Mitigating circumstances caused delayed filings starting with 10-K 2015
7. Administrative Proceeding for delayed filings May 16,2017
8. New LTIs cashflow financing Oct 2017 starting with Cure
9. Delayed Filings cured May 31, 2018
10. Settlement with Asher at 50% discount.Their CDs canceled. June 18, 2018.
Bashers talk to each other to reinforce the attempts to depress pps , their employers and self-service the Company is depressed under $0.01 .
Then “cratered …?” Not hardly, hyperbole thy name is Barber, 18,200+ times.
Go DBMM, shareholders and Company stronger together!
Bashers desperation apparent.
Concierge in building wouldn’t let you above lobby? That’s what happens when you have no standing and certainly no good will .
Shareholders appreciate DBMM’s prudent management in growth phase post-Dismissal . The Company utilizes virtual office space in the heart of mid-town Manhattan , in the midst of hedge funds, family offices and financial services and a likeminded postal zip code. When financial executives aren’t working from home they are in commercial NYC. Here is a photo of the high rise building—
Regus has over 10,000+ virtual offices around the globe and their services meet the administrative needs of many types of companies. As shareholders know from filings, Updates and public information, for DBMM, its brand, Digital Clarity, and operations are in UK and US holding company in New York City, midtown Manhattan.
Perfect example of basher nonsensical innuendo from their template. There is no understanding of DBMM as a digital marketing management consultancy company in a digital technology industry. All negative behavior intended to damage the Company and satisfy short sellers and bad actors.
Shareholders have commented before that you are well named. Only an idiot would believe your nonsense. All intended to depress pps and shake shares loose.
The Company stands behind all of its Filings and Updates. Bashers, individually and collectively , simply do not know how the legal system works. DBMM knows exactly what it is doing. Listen and learn.
Stop at Fox in Rockefeller Center and ask them how defamation works. Hahahaha
Unequivocal BS. Self-congratulatory projection. Any moron can pick issuers on the OTC and claim they are scams. The OTC is full of them, like the 2800+ OTCM threw off the platform on Sept 28,2021 coincident with 15c211 amendments. Conversely, DBMM is not one of them. Your attempted conflation and revisionist history simply is illogical and your opinions irrelevant . No one cares.
DBMM conversely has met every test by regulators and has support of long term investors. Company checks rear view mirror and you and your cabal are in it.
No issuer has 20+ bashers, many recruited by you, false statements from Renee who “advocated” at the behest of you (SB), for shareholders to write to management and Counsel to intervene for revocation when the Company had already had a market maker and FINRA clearance, and posts nonsense 24/7/365 and is looking out for shareholders? Company has Final Order of Dismissal on June 2, 2023 , following its Standing Order of Dismissal by ALJ Foelak. Someone with nothing but opinions and a paycheck and non-professional deflections of cartoons, et al. Absolutely absurd for any thinking shareholders.
The Company has stated consistently that all shareholders should do their own due diligence. We believe in the Company.
Your pejorative words like “pumper” is supportive of your career gig to get paid to bash for short sellers, bad actors and agents for bad actors. Your cartoons and non-accurate or superseded information is misleading and false.
Your whole narrative is false. “30 years ago, blah, blah, blah. No documentation , just your endorsement of yourself. Shareholders in DBMM are with LTI’s and are in it to win it.
18,200+ negative posts over a decade + is proof positive of your paycheck motivation. Always wrong. Shall we use your Nov 6 2019 post as perfect example of your manipulation ? “DBMM not long for this world.” Yet 6 days later ALJ Foelak Dismissed case. New investors check it out. See below
Shareholders know that Company has prevailed and will continue to win. The “blueprint” rolling out.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Post# of 316745
WHY POTENTIAL SHAREHOLDERS NEED TO AVOID DBMM
THE REAL FACTS:
- DBMM was suspended for failure to file for 2 years and is trading on the grey "Expert" (non-public) market with a skull and crossbones!
- It is facing a hearing for complete REVOCATION shortly!
- No stock has ever avoided revocation after being suspended for failing to file... even if they catch up on filings!
- Read the below passage from the SEC on 10/23/19, DBMM is not long for this world:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152141115https://
As always, with the pyrotechnics of color, font, print size , capitals and cartoons, is irrelevant as you have no credentials or evidence to claim actual fact. Give King Kong et al a rest , it is intended to distract and is just boring. Your “truth” Only a wish and an opinion.
The public info available from regulators interviews, articles and presentations; have stated the objective of DOJ, FINRA, SEC is to ferret out NSS. They are often counterfeit, phantom or a number of nefarious back door tactics, which generate NSS.
Just like bearer bonds which are illegal in the US, they are issued and utilized in most other countries.
The regulators will find NSS their way. Bashers are just constantly trying to create chaos and shake loose shares.
Shareholders and Company will continue to win together.
As usual, totally irrelevant. Bashers only want to try and conjure up some new fiction for revisionist history to augment your bashers paycheck.
Shareholders know the AS was 5 billion and the OS never was. One again bad data.
It seems data is as much of a challenge as language is.
Shareholders are long and strong.
Back to the past again— all over and done—
You have always been the apologist for the DOE position since the beginning. The extract was from DOE overreach motion. The FULL transcript is NOT available to the public . By regulation, only available to DOE and DBMM . A basher should not be misleading trying to use transcript only available to parties.
Nevertheless, you want to , once again try on revisionist history of superseded extracts from the Company’s August 2017 testimony with deletions and omissions?
There was no evidence of CD notes submitted at the time. The actual notes were from 2012 as Counsel clarified later by Company. Asher opportunistically sued because it couldn’t convert in 2013 because of reaudit mandate by SEC.
Another error you included, Civil Court Judge threw out default claim, ( see 10-K 2018 Legal Proceedings) because Asher knew of SEC Mandate. (Transcript wrong on that point as well, later clarified)
All this is yesterday’s news . Company won, NEVERS wrong every time. No real shareholders care as the Company won a Dismissal from ALJ Forlak after all new evidence provided under Confidential Cover to Judge Patil in Feb 2018/Release 5543 following the remand and order to vacate served by SCOTUS in Dec 2017.
Cherry-picking superseded info is dishonest and an ongoing ploy of bashers. All deflection, all intending to mislead.
DBMM on its way to exciting times , finally with no hurdles. IMO No one can stop the Company now.
Can’t stop laughing Dude!
I’m always someone else , first I’m LP and now management ??—in your mind—but is the height of desperation. Shareholders know who I am .
Agreed, my vocabulary far exceeds name calling, vulgarity, cartoons, memes and other forms of deflection. Bully in the schoolyard nonsense.
How utterly pathetic. Fallacious is a word I use over and over. It is a perfect word in the circumstance and has been very obvious so many of the bashers comments are
FALLACIOUS —note definition:
“Incorrect, wrong, mistaken, false… Fallacies are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument. Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack the evidence that supports their claim.”
Listen and learn. Shareholders know.
Deflect as bashers do, I am neither management nor am I LP. My facts are 100% correct.
What I also am is a 100% supportive, real shareholder who has done an enormous amount of due diligence .
On holiday in Europe on 3+ weeks but determined to call out false statements and revisionist history because Company shareholders are gatekeepers and excited about the future.
IMO, the Company has brilliantly navigated 10 wins and it will continue to grow the Company organically and by acquisition—with no hurdles. Will be a series of wins .
Shareholders know.
Dude, wrong, wrong wrong and wrong.
The Asher CDs were from 2012. Never another to Asher. Once Reaudit mandated , line in sand.
You have such limited knowledge of contracts, governing regulations that you weave fictional tales in your simple, non-executive mind of what occurred.Unfortunately just like all your NEVERS, they are never accurate. NEVERS -0- , Company Wins -10-
Shareholders know the chronology of events not your fictionalized version which has chronology upside down, yet again.
Try to follow the factual events -in chronological order
2012
1. Acquisition of Digital Claricompleted 2012
2. Last CDs were 2012
2013
3. SEC Reaudit through no fault of DBMM Nov 15, 2013. Company immediately non-compliant under reaudit completed
4. 10-K 2013 due Nov 30, 2013
2014
5. Asher sued in Feb 2014 because they could not convert the CDs because of the reaudit. Company position was Asher knew of mandated reaudit and was suing to steal the Company. Court threw out/dismissed Default claim on that basis.
6.Note: In order to convert any unregistered shares in CDs to shares must meet all criteria of Rule 144 which means shares must be held for a minimum of 6 months and Company must be fully compliant with SEC reporting.
7. All Reaudited amended filings in EdGAR for 2011, 2012,2013, in EDGAR mid-Sept 2014
8. $157,300 was Cost of Reaudit documented with SEC in Feb 2018 as mitigating circumstance
2015
9. Delayed filing began 10-K 2015 Nov 30,2015
2016
10. Note: Company had choice to pay for 2015 audit or hold off Asher. $25k held off Asher
11. Asher signed Consent Decree with SEC in Oct 2016 attesting they would not seek shares in public companies or their subsidiaries
2017
12.The lawsuit because a key mitigating circumstance in the delayed filings OIP May
2017. Particularly breach by Asher and Curt Kramer of Consent Decree.
13.DBMM retains SEC (iconic) litigator Oct 2017 (Previous attorney terminated few months earlier)
2018
14.Delayed filings filed May 31,2018 in EDGAR
15. Settlement with Asher at 50% discount June 18, 2018
Put a pin in it. These are the facts.
Wrong, wrong, wrong. For the zillionth time. Your gotcha moments never work because you have never negotiated or prepared public company financial documents nor run a public company. Legal documents prevail, the language is legal. DBMM prevailed—yet again.
Asher litigation CDs CANCELED . Your capital letters wrong as no shares ever issued.
Original suit reduced because Default requested dismissed by Judge July 2015.
The Judgment was face value plus interest July 2015.
Settlement paid in cash at 50% of debt . Debt was face value + interest of $122,891.87 . Interest from July 2015-June 2018 compounded was an additional $ 48,500. was $171,391.87 , plus ancillary costs all in $180K.
All in $90k is 5O% and all
Waived charges deleted from balance sheet. Very good negotiation on the part of DBMM. The judgment satisfied via Settlement. Asher did not win as settlement was 50% of debt. DBMM dictated the terms as would have taken Asher to Federal Court as in breach of Federal Consent Decree.
Get it? Pull out the Dummies Guide to reading financial statements and settlements. There is also a Dummies Guide for Corporate Law.
So full of crap as the template of omissions. DBMM acquired Digital Clarity in 2012. Company pivoted until then among situations which ultimately could not meet the Conditions of Closing. Details in 10-Ks for preceding years.
Company always protected shareholders. Post Dismissal Company ready to Rock n Roll! See chronology of hurdles met since acquisition —without them Company could have been on NASDAQ by now.
Here are the documented facts:
1 . Acquisition completed 2012
2. Reaudit (3yrs) required through no fault of DBMM Nov 15,2013.
3. Asher litigation Feb 2014
4.Company completed Reaudit and filed all Amended K’s and Q’s (see EdGAR) seamlessly and chronologically in mid- Sept 2014.
5. Cost of Reaudit $157,300.
6.Mitigating circumstances caused delayed filings starting with 10-K 2015
7. Administrative Proceeding for delayed filings May 16,2017
8. New LTIs cashflow financing Oct 2017 starting with Cure
9. Delayed Filings cured May 31, 2018
10. Settlement with Asher at 50% discount.Their CDs canceled. June 18, 2018.
More evidence of inability to read documented Court Papers. This Company has documentation on its facts, you cannot try and do revisionist history without looking like a complete fool.
DBMM settled a toxic lending case on their terms for 50% of judgment and interest. They won the Asher litigation . All documentation summarized in DBMM Legal Proceedings 2018 10-K . See below
Take shots at a document prepared by a professional source whose business is securities research? From the cheap seats on the sofa you know better? Hahahaha
In your fever dreams .
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (2018 10-K)
1. The Company was involved in a litigation, Asher Enterprises, Inc. v: Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc., Index No.600717/2014, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau. The Plaintiff alleged $337,500 breach of contract principal and damages arising from an untimely periodic filing in 2013. On September 14, 2014 the Court declined to grant the plaintiff's application for default judgment and Linda Perry was removed as a defendant. The Court awarded judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on July 15, 2015 in the amount of $122,891.87, which did not include $25,000 paid in a subsequent settlement in February 2016.On June 18, 2018 the matter was settled between the parties with an Addendum to the Settlement Agreement, for a final payment of $65,000 which was paid in full on the same date. A Stipulation of Discontinuance was filed with the Court ending the litigation. A Satisfaction of Judgment through the Settlement Addendum was coincidently filed. The litigation is closed.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=13109460&guid=86N-kKOw442mB3h#DBMM20180831_10K_HTM_3