Jim Cramer is in Goldman Sacks pocket is why.

Attorney/client privilege from wiki:

When the privilege may not apply

When an attorney is not acting primarily as an attorney but, for instance, as a business advisor, member of the Board of Directors, or in another non-legal role, then the privilege generally does not apply.[2] Accordingly, the attorney-client privilege is probably not available when an attorney is acting as a tax return preparer. Tax preparation is a service intended to result in disclosure to the Internal Revenue Service and some United States courts have held that the work papers and discussions with clients relative to the preparation of tax returns are not protected.

The privilege protects the confidential communication, and not the underlying information. For instance, if a client has previously disclosed confidential information to a third party who is not an attorney, and then gives the same information to an attorney, the attorney-client privilege will still protect the communication to the attorney, but will not protect the communication with the third party.

The privilege may be waived if the confidential communications are disclosed to third parties.

Other limits to the privilege may apply depending on the situation being adjudicated; for instance, the crime-fraud exception can render the privilege moot when communications between an attorney and client are themselves used to further a crime or fraud. In Clark v. United States, the US Supreme Court writes that "A client who consults an attorney for advice that will serve him in the commission of a fraud will have no help from the law. He must let the truth be told."[3] The crime-fraud exception also does not require that the crime or fraud discussed between client and attorney be completed to be triggered. US Courts have not yet conclusively ruled how little knowledge an attorney can have of the underlying crime or fraud before the privilege detaches and the attorney's communications or requisite testimony become admissible.[4]

Trunk, at one time SNSR had a connection to LTHU, also a provider of safe lithium tech, powering NASA, subs, windmills, formula race car and much more.

Once again, you were not there, you have no idea what altitude has been reached by what.

Cyg, wrong again, you left out the points that showed progress, of course that's what you do every time you post.

Out with the old and in with the new, not in with the old and pretend the new does not exist.

You were not there, you have no idea how high it flew.

Cyg, prove the future. Got a link?

How big of an airship does it take to lift 2500 lbs.?

Cyg, it does NOT say anything of the sort.

Shorts are covering, CNBC gave an excellent plug this morning, good #'s from Ford, great numbers expected for Q4, accumulation will continue to drive SIRI up all year.

Just the beginning.

"It is more than several hundred miles wide". It is often much less.
and only around three miles thick.

Your following statement does not even warrant a response it is so misleading:
"operate @ Parade altitude".

If you are in a jet stream of a 100mph, is it your understanding the wind is going by you at 100 mph? Clearly you are making investment decisions without a clue. I am not giving you the answer.

released ABOVE the jet stream? you are kidding right?

Never said anything about that, looks like changing the conversation is the only way you know how to defend your statement, dodge a point without acknowledging your misleading nature.

The STS handlers will dodge the jet streams or use them like that pilot did.

Stay out of the freaking jet stream, airlines love a jet stream tail wind.

Agreed, time will tell.

Just as much of a fact as anything you have posted, and a more probable scenario.

If there were any body else to squeal on it would already have been used in somebodies plea bargain. Huff is the end of the line, nobody else to snitch out, that is why he is using such far fetched defense ploys. He's dead meat and he knows it.

Don't be too sure about that. Most authors know how to categorize the obsessed, the manipulators, and the jilted, jaded, enemies of companies. Heck, it could backfire on you and the author decides to do an article about a company that came back from heavy obstacles to create a thriving viable company. Such irony would be extremely entertaining.

"I don't think you'll be seeing any further coverage from this publication".

The court. If he does not get his lawyer lined up they will appoint one and the trial goes forward. Kind of looks like this judge isn't allowing any fancy dances. Good.

yup, he's got "nothin' comin'", and it appears that is the way the judge feels as well.

Destan, you have absolutely no information to support your outlandish claims other than an overworked imagination.

Your quote was completely out of context. If that was not a personal attack on all investors I just have no idea what a tos is anymore.

Anybody ever see how some hedge funds and very knowledgeable investors accumulate stock?..........They walk it down as they accumulate. Don't ask me HOW they do it, my grasp of their method is tenuous at best. I have no idea if this is what is happening right now. Very strange how the vast majority of trades are buys and the sp goes down.

LOL! An almost identical reaction here.

Any success shown by SNSR is going to get somebodies panties in a bunch. Imagine the reaction when the SEC matter is resolved or a paying contract comes through. Calling the demonstration a failure when they were not there to witness the other 47 hours is simply not realistic, and blatantly false. Even the simple maneuvers shown in the video were successfully demonstrating those particular capabilities.

imho

"Someone who knows"? Yeah right:

"in 1998 A prototype full scale mock up was constructed, a gondola ring at Cardington followed by a fully scalemockup at Lakehurst NJ. The plans were that a ship would be flying within 4 years, by 1992. but with the problems of funding and delays in providing the finances, the ship was never put in to operation. These delays lead to Airship Industries falling in to receivership in September 1990.

The commercial viability of the Skyship/ Sentinel 5000 never proved as it was the only airship which was planned and almost produced to construction by Airship Industries, yet never flown".

Sanswire is way beyond what John Wood tried to accomplished. Wood made it to the "mock up" stage like Vern Konig. The STS is in a totally different area technologically as well, much more viable to the military and civilian applications.

Of course one who has a short position in SNSR like Acumen is going to vehemently disagree.

We like it when you're wrong on the good side as well mide. :>) Nothing wrong with a little negativity if it's balanced with the positive at appropriate times.

Cyg knows what he is doing, and knows perfectly well volume has been beating the 10 day average yet would still post in such a manner. None of what you mention effects my happiness in any way. The sp will do what it does, it is what it is. Volume will recede as time goes on until the next development, the sp will fluctuate.
To try and pass off positive developments as a negative or a non issue is as misleading as the dark one.

You are misleading people again Cygy, average daily volume is 185.7, currently volume is 122,490, with much time left in the trading day.

Sophisticated investors at that Mide. The U.S. Smithsonian is a publication with upper crust readers.
Not hearing much more about the tests is fine with me. Sometimes less is more.

an article loaded with info. Comparative costs to the Predator has been one of my gnawing questions.
cost of the airship, $3 mill vs. $18 mill. $50 an hour instead of $2,000.00 for the Predator.
10k to 30k for altitude for the STS-111.
Best article in quite some time, Dan E. is excellent at the explanations as well.
In the Smithsonian no less.
Great find bug!!

Doh! Just found it in my in box from Sanswire.

LOL! ok Cygy, whatever you say.

So which competitor of Sanswire are you invested in Cygnus?

Strange, whenever the ask hits .10 on IHUB a sale goes through. Happened every time, not at that amount of course. All the rest are buys, overwhelmingly,

I suggest you wait to buy until after contracts are announced since it seems to be so important to you. At that time you will get some names.

Y-not? You think IHUB sucks?

thanks. Justify your short position any way you like Acumen, it's your money. good luck.


"The greatest achievements were at first and for a time dreams. The oak sleeps in the acorn."

~James Allen

I see much evidence you choose to ignore. Are you feeling me?

Another assumptive mistake you made; I am not MeanMike, that is another persons alias.

Buys; 258,434, sells: 23,703, good enough?

Best of luck with that denial style in making your trading decisions.

Ave. daily is 186K. We keep braking the ave daily almost every day. (Now 250k). ALL BUYS except for the last 2.5k which shows up on the bar one pixel wide. Almost can't see the red...LOL!

So you pay attention to the volume of press releases and not what they have been saying to base your investment decisions on?

ow