Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you for the information, :)
Talk to us please. What is happening?
Let's say, hypothetically, that there's a deal with another company whose stock price is lower than ours. Would we be bringing up their stock price or would they be bringing ours down? Or is the news big enough to move both companies significantly higher?
Skinny, if eating crow is what it takes then please serve me 3 large plate fulls. But do it soon, really, really hungry here,lol.
Last week when you stated that the stock price would likely rise at the beginning of this week, I, and possibly others, assumed that something presented by cclx at the CES would be the catalyst. Why did you make that predicton?
And in the meantime maybe they will have a better day and sell 40 cents of stock, smh.
Wow, one whole trade for 20 cents. Impressive performance.
Well said. Some news would be excellent about now.
Hey Skinny, I'm hoping you can look into something and post a response. The cable clix website is now showing a very early version which has misinformation on it. The IHub board is feeding off of the website apparently and therefore also is wrong. Please call someone and get a reason for this. Thanks.
I believe in the company as well, the people and the product vision. Looking forward to the day we see it go not just into the teens on cents but on dollars. When they finally launch, IMHO, that is possible to happen and quickly too... :) For my part, confidence is relatively high.
Well bravo to you Skinny. I sure do appreciate your efforts and success. I truly do understand how many moving parts there are behind the scenes and hope that the others get it as well. I believe we can handle snags, delays if the lines if communication are there.
This is Jay, son of Bj106, also an investor - While I am glad that the set top box is gone the idea that this will be bundled as the app in smart TVs is concerning. Does that mean this will be marketed as a new TV set and new service provider combo? That can't just be it. Is it going to be an app that runs on top of other smart tv apps? That would still mean people need a smart tv. Or will it be a usb extension, almost like chromecast or roku, that you can plug into any tv modern enough for a usb port. That would make the most sense, and I do appreciate any sort of current info, but hearing that the set top box is gone leaves a bit of a void that I'm concerned about.
LOL, LOL. Well done Skinny. Love to see your humorous side. Glad to hear the boxes were dumped and I do speak for some other investors I know personally. As for the rest, your humble opinion, lol, sounds like a plan. Appreciate hearing from you. When you get a position there, please fix the phone number situation. That would make everyone much more at ease I think, just my opinion.
Good grief Skinny, I hope they don't put you in charge of customer service, lol.
I agree with you regarding why many of us may have been initially attracted to this company. I also agree that Mr. Bayliss probably does have a stellar reputation. However, respectfully, I must disagree with your assessment of current management. I believe that the situation that developed with the company is likely due to an unfortunate dispute about the business plan, best use of company assets, and a disagreement between the company principals. This would not be the first time that a difference of opinion in a start up operation resulted in an unfortunate public dispute. I believe Mr. Bayliss should have used more appropriate legal or other channels to air his grievances or issued a brief statement simply stating that due to a difference of management opinions he was resigning. His concerns regarding false statements should have been addressed through the proper investigative channels, and if found to be true, then by now this stock probably wouldn’t still be active. I still stand by my opinion that it was for the best that he left. The failure of current management to keep their shareholders somewhat informed and to correct the incorrect phone number listed on their website is truly pretty sad and absolutely does reflect poorly on them. That said, I still believe there is more here than meets the eye. Many fledgling companies and management make some poor choices in early stages and that doesn’t necessarily mean they are about to go defunct or out of business. The company has some innovative and seriously networked players affiliated with them on the product development side. My impressions from reading all the posts and watching the share price and volume is that they are trying to obtain the funding needed and I strongly suspect they are conducting down round financing. For this reason I don’t want to see this stock shut down by any governing body. I believe that they are quiet while they try to obtain the funding they need to move forward. The fact that no one can speak about current testing of the product just makes me think that, based on their PR dated March 16, 2017, Jason Schoch took the testing to a private group of testers. This would not be an unusual thing to do. The link posted previously (#3847) to 2 videos are enlightening. I strongly suspect that they have finished development and testing. Skinnybundle recently pointed out, correctly so, that they are current on all of the required filings. You don’t replace your lawyer, generating need for updated reviews and filings if you think you are going under.
Although I have taken issue with some statements Skinny has made on this board, let’s face it, he has been put in an untenable situation. If he issues a projection statement based on his beliefs and then it doesn’t materialize he is slammed for that. If he says nothing, he’s slammed for that. He is not an authorized spokesperson for the company and none of us should have taken his statements as gospel. Perhaps he should have prefaced each statement with “IMHO”, but too late now, everyone is riled up. My sense is that he thinks his projections of news were founded but it is up to each shareholder to make their own decisions and act accordingly. We each have to bear the full responsibility for our decisions. My extensive business experience is allowing me to remain patient and committed, frustrated, but committed. In fact, I know people still buying in and having no trouble doing so, therefore, I don’t believe the company is buying up all of the shares. They are out on the west coast where the venture capitalists thrive on speculating in new technology companies. The reputations of all of the key players are strong so why would they ever run a deliberate scam or admit defeat and become the laughing stock of the industry? That just doesn’t make any sense at all to me. What does make sense is that they cannot, and therefore will not, make a statement regarding the launch until they have finished these down rounds, as to do so would be irresponsible. They don’t have to raise the needed cash through the public trading either, as they can, and probably are doing behind the scenes stock transactions in large volume. Also, to announce a launch this close to Christmas would just mean their ads would be lost in a massive blur of retailers ads. IMHO, they will get it together before they have to go dark due to lack of financing. Skinny, I personally would love to hear if you think that perhaps I am getting warm. I won’t hold you to anything, just your personal opinion is ok with me.
Yeah, no kidding. There's jokes and bad jokes, that was definitely a bad one. I just checked the website and it still has the same information on it, including the bad phone number everywhere.
Just called correct number and got the usual mailbox. Left a message congratulating them on such a fine job, posting incorrect phone number all over website.
Interesting conversation with OTC. Recommendation made. Following through. Midas will have details later.
No statement. Moving ahead as discussed.
Sometimes I personally find silence can speak volumes. For myself and those who I watch stock accounts for, we are holding. I do find it interesting that the wrong phone number on the website appears on the who we are page yet the correct phone number is on the investor page. Mull that over. Incompetence or deliberate effort to quash the interest of new stock buyers?
Yes indeed, on all points Midas. Gotta go, unavailable for the rest of the afternoon. Later.
I agree with you that the more of us the better. However, I will be moving ahead at 9 am tomorrow no matter who joins in or not. Only an announcement by cclx can halt this, not any other source claiming to explain behind the scenes matters. I have had enough. Also, all of the people who I have trading authorization for will sign a request for SEC investigation and when I return from a long meeting this afternoon I will be calling every one of the people I know that bought in to ask them to sign up also and they can call people they referred in to this nightmare. We will have signatures.
Interesting observation. 9 am tomorrow is when I contact the SEC. I will be asking them to investigate the phone records between cclx principals and IHUB board promoter as they specifically relate to board statements made.
Where are you at Skinny? Why don't you answer Midas' question?
If you go to the website for cclx, under investor package, the phone number of 888.421.2549 is shown. No matter what option you select there's no live person to speak with. On their website under the "Who We Are" tab their phone number is shown as 888.421.clix (2849) which is incorrect. They can't even post the correct phone number on an extremely crappily done website.
That's an excellent idea.
Message received. I will call you later.
I agree. If you still have my information call me this morning.
Amen to that.
Message received. Agree on all statements completely. Can't currently reply privately, but we should talk. Please provide contact info and I will call immediately. I have news I will not post.
Any insider caught manipulating the stock price would be wide open for individual or class action lawsuit against all business and personal assets. Food for thought. Either watch the company go defunct apparently or find out through proper channels if someone is liable for inside trading. I have made my thoughts on the matter perfectly clear. I do know how to instigate a class action suit if that's the way it goes.
I can't disagree with you.
I wonder as well.
The silence from the company speaks volumes. What can they say that will explain the odd, putting it nicely, stock actions that we are seeing? I don't need to have someone insult my intelligence any further than they presently are. I may be wrong, but all factors considered, what I am seeing is sending up red flags all over the place to me. If the company wanted to they could call a shareholders meeting or send us an email if they aren't ready to make a public statement. Unimpressive and unacceptable.
I will be unavailable from 10 to about 1 pm today. Don't want anyone to think I am ignoring questions directed towards me. Feel free to call the company and ask them for an explanation. I would really like to be pleasantly surprised when I get back today with an intelligent acceptable response they provide to any of you. I have written and left messages and never received a response.
Most unfortunately, it may result in another Caveat Emptor.
The implications can vary depending on what the investigation reveals. This question would be better answered by an attorney well versed in security laws. If an insider is caught manipulating the stock price for personal gain well that would likely result in jail time. And by insider, remember that others outside of cclx employees, such as someone who works for a company negotiating to buy cclx, and attorney involved, and bank employee, etc. I can't emphasize enough that I am accusing no one in particular, just giving examples. It is the job of the OTC to determine if any malfeasance is at play here. Remember Martha Stewart? It is a difficult decision to make which is why I would have preferred to privately discuss this with some of the shareholders. However, since watching this stock is like watching a candle flame peter down and die out while suspecting there is a bad person advancing in the increasing darkness, I feel the only alternative at this point is to raise our concerns regarding these disappearing large trades and deliberate miniscule trades that occur every single solitary time the stock moves up. Who knows, maybe some person with too many free trades and a highly warped sense of fun is screwing around with it. I seriously doubt that though. When you see smoke it is time to look for fire. This is not something I relish doing but I can see no alternative. If the principals at cclx were as concerned as we are they could ask the OTC to look into it, thereby indicating it isn't them. But I don't have any reason to believe that our best interests are being looked out for at this point. The silence of the dead is deafening and perhaps quite revealing. Just my humble opinion.
Will do. Also, about a week to a week and a half earlier I saw a bid for 1 million shares disappear from the bids at the same time the volume of shares traded jumped up by 1 million. Then the shareholders volume dropped back down, losing the 1M. Then it appeared again for a minute or so, then disappeared again. It definitely struck me as well but I didn't get a screen shot and by the time you made your post I couldn't say which date it occurred on. Someone else made a post about disappearing trades also. If anyone sees it happen again I hope a screen shot is taken. I won't miss the opportunity again if I see a similar situation.
Did I miss something? I thought the Cexense deal was done. Also, does everyone remember the 100k the company received from the Canadian company? If that deal is real, there is a revenue source. If the company actually has developed the "hub" that would truly allow a subscriber to have search access from one central source for all the streaming services and provide real time local and national viewing of chosen providers, then it seems to me that there's a viable service to sell. The company would get subscribers revenue plus revenue from the participating streaming services such as Amazon and Netflix. I can see why a current tv provider would want to own it. If this hub can really learn my preferences and show me what I might like, accurately, then that would be a game changer and a market differentiator. If I am missing something then please enlighten me. Granted the company could absolutely make a statement regarding progress, which brings me full circle to where I started this morning - who is deliberately shorting this stock with tiny trades trying to motivate current shareholders to dump low. The only answer I come up with is an insider, not necessarily cclx, but there would be others with inside information if a buy out is in the works. I don't believe that an emergency shareholders meeting can force them to reveal an, as yet, unsigned deal. For this reason and the company's obvious lack of communication, concern, even basic respect for our investments has me leaning towards making a request for investigation from OTC Markets. If someone here wants to go for the emergency meeting I will wait a few days. If not, I have personally experienced a very similar situation, which is why I won't sit idly by while I see what I consider to be such obvious manipulation. I'm preparing my request and intend to submit by Friday or Monday at the latest unless the situation changes. It is very sad but I have seen firsthand what greed does to people. The fewer shares being held at the time of the buy out means more money for the others to split. Let the OTC see who and what that person's relationship is to the company. A violator of insider trading rules would have to pay the consequences. We have all seen some ridiculous sells at bids recently. A 100 shares sell at .0125 for a whopping $1.25 cents when it was trading at .0149. These efforts aren't paying off in the sense that current shareholders aren't dumping volume at bid, but it's not for lack of trying. Enough is enough.
Lol, yeah okay. Don't know about the others you mentioned but I have Verizon and their streaming sucks imho. If I want to watch HBO then I have to go to HBO'S website and log in as a Verizon customer. Then I have to do the same with other networks. Pain in the butt. But, yes I am a bit older, still can't you think of some other potential players who may want into the arena or who need serious improvements to what they currently have. Oh, Verizon updated, supposedly improved their on demand feature. What a joke, they need work.