InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 677
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2017

Re: None

Tuesday, 10/31/2017 7:44:06 PM

Tuesday, October 31, 2017 7:44:06 PM

Post# of 5507
Did I miss something? I thought the Cexense deal was done. Also, does everyone remember the 100k the company received from the Canadian company? If that deal is real, there is a revenue source. If the company actually has developed the "hub" that would truly allow a subscriber to have search access from one central source for all the streaming services and provide real time local and national viewing of chosen providers, then it seems to me that there's a viable service to sell. The company would get subscribers revenue plus revenue from the participating streaming services such as Amazon and Netflix. I can see why a current tv provider would want to own it. If this hub can really learn my preferences and show me what I might like, accurately, then that would be a game changer and a market differentiator. If I am missing something then please enlighten me. Granted the company could absolutely make a statement regarding progress, which brings me full circle to where I started this morning - who is deliberately shorting this stock with tiny trades trying to motivate current shareholders to dump low. The only answer I come up with is an insider, not necessarily cclx, but there would be others with inside information if a buy out is in the works. I don't believe that an emergency shareholders meeting can force them to reveal an, as yet, unsigned deal. For this reason and the company's obvious lack of communication, concern, even basic respect for our investments has me leaning towards making a request for investigation from OTC Markets. If someone here wants to go for the emergency meeting I will wait a few days. If not, I have personally experienced a very similar situation, which is why I won't sit idly by while I see what I consider to be such obvious manipulation. I'm preparing my request and intend to submit by Friday or Monday at the latest unless the situation changes. It is very sad but I have seen firsthand what greed does to people. The fewer shares being held at the time of the buy out means more money for the others to split. Let the OTC see who and what that person's relationship is to the company. A violator of insider trading rules would have to pay the consequences. We have all seen some ridiculous sells at bids recently. A 100 shares sell at .0125 for a whopping $1.25 cents when it was trading at .0149. These efforts aren't paying off in the sense that current shareholders aren't dumping volume at bid, but it's not for lack of trying. Enough is enough.