Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
lightened up on the popper today...more into XXII thanks to the jumpers...
plenty of time to get into the jumper...may not be much time to take advantage of (thanks to the jumpers) XXII...
(tough choice between ciggy and spiffy)...both were nice opportunities today...
if any, more likely monday...not a friday afternoon.
my point on the need for "news"
best thing to do is call the company and find out if this is the day...IMHO the date should be public based upon dates....
one day a year...company pays 1/2 purchase cost for officers to purchase up to a certain amount... it would be good support for a move up...if news monday...otherwise ... a one day wonder...
need news to keep going up...
employee purchase plan...to support the stock...better than no support.
There is a balance between diluting SH and raising capital to propel a business plan...(which should include hiring an experienced and connected COO Director of Sale (management)to drive a business)
...Vans suggestion was sound. "Bring in management" (Director of Sales and Marketing)to get her done. There is an obvious "execution gap" between the role of Chairman....and Chief Technology Officer.
If that means accepting capital by issuing shares...I believe most "informed" shareholders would support it ... the end game is getting to the market and producing revenue.
...two years holding a stock is NOT HOT MONEY...
ps. as an associate of mine called me this AM before the maket..said..."this launch was more disappointing then Obamacare"...he has 5k shares left and cant get out fast enough...I suggested he hold the last 5k shares...and said "no thanks" the other two are much more promising (in his opinion). (But then again no big deal....some would consider him a "Hot Money" investor...only 1 1/2 years...
quite right Timorr...lets see what our other does...I hope it is as professional...
This is "kick-butt" marketing: http://www.sphere3d.com/assets/docs/CantechConference2014.pdf
very impressive marketing....this is what our other pick is missing...
difference between professional marketing/graphics and cut and paste graphics of our other friend...
Professional vs. In-house...lets hope the other one copies it (the best form of flattery)
Likewise...Good Post Lambert
Z...squeeze when RS is executed...not Friday. Friday means nothing...unless some positive huge announcement made.
No question...Steve over-promised and under-delivered...when he promised it would "launch" by the end of November...(not intentionally but at some point he knew it wasn't happening). We all expected and were led to believe it was to be a "marketable" launch...he gave a "beta" launch. It was announced at the 11th hour in hope that it could slide as a "technical" launch and be defended as "fulfilling" the representation (after a long wait).
It did not cut it. When SH realized it was really a beta launch, it hurt him and the company. He lost a lot of credibility with key and long term supporters...not my opinion...a fact. The SP is reflective of it. This short had little to do with it...he just had to wait for the reaction. The company did the work for him this time.
I would hope he has learned from the experience...and can get it together and build credibility back with SH.
He still has a lot to do in terms of building a Sales and Marketing team. Word of mouth may appear to be an "inexpensive" way of getting a product out there...but you usually "get what you pay for".
Think about it...what high end and very experienced Director of Sales and Marketing for the tech companies (he alluded to), would jump onto the DSNY team without first having a contractual commitment for the right sized budget, personnel support and marketing team, necessary to make him/her and the launch a success. The only kind I know would be the inexperienced and desparate ones.
When that financial "support" and commitment comes then we will see progress within the expected time frame. Meanwhile...without it ...IMHO will see more drifting...at best.
ps. A RS and Short Squeeze does not get Clipstream into the market...but many here probably wouldn't care at that point...they would be gone. As I have said before...I will add shares at $3
pps. And I am more pissed off on behalf of those investors who I was responsible for suggesting to look at DSNY and who bought up to $2.60...I got in 2 years ago...
ppps...and for those angry at Van for his suggestion of a shake-up...IMHO...you just dont like to hear the facts...That is what you get when an analyst isn't paid by the company...the truth.
did you include coffee breaks?
yes...organic growth...question is how quickly will it appear on the bottom line? Guess we won't know until it starts...
Still a very interesting piece of information...the "commencement" appears to be in reach...
Steve pretty much forecasted no significant revenue...in this quarter...which raises the question...will this be a slow organic build (because of lack of funds to blow out marketing and hire proper personnel) or will it take in an equity partner (and hopefully a customer) to help fund it?
Interesting to hear what investors would prefer...
we really dont know...but I do know Steve knew nothing about Sony's new video venture...so I tend to believe it is only for PlayMPE...which in and of itself would be big in that area and lock the 3 big into DSNY from the music transmission management side.
It appears that if SNE coming to DSNY it is for PlayMPE...which Sony as an "entire" company is not currently using. It would be very big win. Obviously once they are captive, I am sure Clipstream would be discussed...except generally speaking, unless you have Sony's top tech guys in the room, the Music side would not be like talking to the Video side...so I would surmise that word could get back...but not be the "main" mission of the visit.
...The 500lb Gorilla in the room (the tenacious Short) was not "seen" by anyone in the room...and therefore not Directly discussed....
...but you could say it was addressed briefly and indirectly discussed via RS discussion... which also was not discussed at length...everyone really knows the reason for the RS and management has expressed its reason for doing it..."to get the SP up to uplist" but it did not addressed the cause for the price suppression, i.e the Gorilla Naked Short.
Lets face it ... with a 1 for 5 RS the short would have to get the current SP price down to .599. It would have to further naked short tons (yes a technical term) of shares by dumping these non-existent shares on the market...eventually they would have to cover or DSNY would have to go out of business...which will not happen...
very interesting to see how this turns out...
Dagshah...the net effect would have been the same, (warrant vs. option exercise) except management appears to have secured an "informal" commitment (which is in the option holders best interest) not to sell the shares they receive "net" (over 1M) into the market when they are exercised shortly.
The practical net effect warrant vs. option on potential of over 1.8M (netted out to over 1M) being "dumped" into the market could have been the same...but as noted...Steve represented that the "insiders" will not do so...for obvious reasons. They are holders (per Steve)
...few if any SH had their eye on this issue...good that it was addressed at CC.
I wished he had for a more basic reason...
very interesting post...
lol...answer yes...but it you do so you are a slave to the screen...shifted strategy (except for an occasional nibble)to "get a life"...and found you can get to the same place taking different roads...
Yes...when Steve emails some less knowledgible investors and they "interpret" incorrectly...then rumors circulate as they did re: warrants (vs. employee options)... I reported that there was a "belief" which was circulated incorrectly and was clarified on the CC by a direct question on the issue.
Rest assured...I know the difference between Options and Warrants...having day-traded both instruments for 14 years. lol
IMHO...it will be a race between Clipstream getting "traction" vs the RS...if not sufficient Clipstream traction displayed...RS would be implemented,...there would be no other choice to get to $3.00
Really becomes a question for each investor of allocation of funds or adding funds into different opportunities and the timing of the fruition of those opportunities...IMHO..."time(ing) IS money".
Bottom line...Steve does not know what SONY is up to ...but he believes it NOT to be cross platform which Clipstream will be ...so he is not worried and it is just another "confirmation" that no one else has the solution DSNY has...
That's fine...fantastic...I agree..."best thing since sliced bread"...but I will look forward to SP moving up "in 3-5 months" or when RS is implemented ...
I agree with Jock, but also am of the opinion...outside investors will have no urgency to buy...until more evidence of fundamental improvement and traction...
...lots of work to be done and slow build...but I dont doubt it will get done...
Meanwhile...SP???
Early or any uplisting is going to be dependent upon hitting and holding the $3 mark for 5 day...
IMHO...a decent win will be required to get it there and it did not sound like Steve expected that for 3-5months well after the AGM in Feb.
Therefore...(without a major win which could propel SP) the 1-to-5 RS...looks like THE realistic means to get there...in March/April...at the earliest
Meanwhile...?
Nice steady climb since $1.00. Price and volume before news?
As I recall, there was commentary by the company that the NASCO acquisition was being made as insurance and backup for the Goodrich inspection and MSA approval process...(since NASCO was already MSA approved)...with that, wouldn't we be waiting just for the NASCO merger approval?
I requested iHUB to correct this message board to reflect SENR messages not PCC.
to the contrary Peter...Alfred E Neuman was my role model ... I considered him an astute mentor...on all of life's major decisions. :0)
ask Van, he setforth the amount in his alert over the weekend, including within the time period they would have to be exercised.
a boatload and soon!
Peter...IMHO..not "savvy" but trading/investing style. Nothing wrong with "gambling" as long as you wish to take the calculated risk...larger you go ...the greater risk both to the upside and downside.
I agree with you...at this point in the news cycle...it appears to be a greater risk being out...even for a trade...
been there done that...when you are trying to build up an account it is a legitimate strategy as long as you weigh the timing risk.
I had a feeling you were going to allude to that...that is why I conditioned my comment...
Doubt it...my understanding is mostly employees and others holding the warrants...should be a good thing...but they too need to get up the money to buy them ...and will probably sell some...so net net...could be selling pressure when it happens...
key is tomorrow and how SH respond to what is reported..
ah...yes that would be an issue. But if you are a "trader" and file as such...earnings can be used.
There are traders and investors...traders will look at where it has risen and think, it will go down (people scalping / taking profits) and not look at fundamentals which investors will look at...dont sweat it ...has nothing to do with the fundamentals...
in the end shorts have to cover...and will be on your side unwillingly