Looks like the Emergency Injunction was granted today after all. If so, I will post the link later.

So the injunction petition against CBAI was granted then a continuance was set for 21 days from now?

Yes! The prediction of CBAI to $100 per share came from here so I know it must be true>

MrLong Friday, January 14, 2011 10:23:20 AM
Re: nuubie post# 49578 Post # of 49605

I am well versed in speaking in three's past, present and future and live in 3D. If all I present were fully operational today then we would be discussing $ shifts and not fractions of a cent shifts; it's a future outlook or vision. If your version is correct then why would Genzyme a $16 Billion dollar company have anything to do with CBAI.OB through it's partner Osiris; a past and present known fact? Why would BCBS name MSCs as the next cure for SCI, heart, and other ailments; presented Jan 2011? I listed the links to backup the vision... it's a future vision from the triology. Tooth pulp MSCs + placenta MSCs are the future for CBAI. MSCs have been the future for Genzyme/Osiris; fact! Osiris hasn't turned a profit yet it has a $16B dollar backer; fact! Osiris and CBAI have since Jun 2010 enjoyed a donor MSC collection effort; fact! Is it for phase III prochymal; future?
Some will be living through the next run in present tence of wealth. Others will be discussing in past tence the one they had but sold and I will be here till my future prediction of $100 pps happens. I say maybe within 2011... with links.

Did someone's lawyer say CCEL's case against CBAI will get dismissed (thrown out) today?

"very little to do with CBAI" You got that right, maybe it's just a morale booster or a support group of sorts to counteract the reality of being down 77% in 2010.

Oh! Now I get it, all news in the stem field specifically relates to CBAI. Wow! CBAI is way undervalued and should be trading at $10 per share after seeing that fact! Yes indeed, you are correct!

It just seems like every time news is dispersed in the stem field some think it specifically relates to CBAI when in reality it does not. Can't blame you for wishful thinking though.

JAVO .0101 x 12 +20% radar.

Why did CBAI close in the red at .0041 when good news is supposed to be delivered tomorrow morning after court?

Yes, "more than likely", "guaranted" or whatever, CBAI is in discussions with Pfizer to store stems and CBAI is in the process of doing that right now as we speak without a doubt. Agreed, right you are!

Oh! Now I get it, CBAI and Pfizer's membership to AHIP magically guarantees CBAI providing stems to Pfizer. Yes, you are correct, thanks for pointing that out.

"In fact, CBAI and Pfizer could be talking to each other right now."

Show us the evidence which supports that statement. If no evidence, then Pfizer could just as easily not be talking to CBAI right now.

"Pfizer is a AHIP partner. So who is suplying the stems... CBAI? Wouldn't that be something! Athersys/Pfizer(Type 0 Multistem) + AHIP(1300 Insurance Groups) + CBAI (Stem Storage for Type 0 stems) = PPS Explosion!!!"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58752361

This is where the discussion started. There is no link saying or proving Pfizer is getting stems from CBAI.

I'd like to see the link saying Pfizer would be interested in doing business with CBAI. If the link is ever availiable please post it.

Any specific press releases from either Pfizer or CBAI stating they would be interested in doing business with each other?

Would Pfizer really be interested in doing business with a non FDA and AABB accredited company like CBAI?

Speaking of money, what money does the company have readily availiable at this point in time to move forward?

Have you heard anything in so far as the company getting the $14,000,000 it needs to close the deal in Mexico?

Knowing the real news will come tomorrow, why did the company waste time and money with a dental pulp PR today?

"failure to join INDESPENDSIBLE party"

in: held by or within the confines of

de: undoing

spend: to pay out or disburse

able: having adequate power

The attorney for CBAI wants to dismiss the case (according to his spelling) on the grounds of holding undoing paying having adequate power.

Classic CBAI.

For the CEO (or any CEO) to describe a lawsuit as a 'nuisance' is unprofessional. Matt seemed to have been speaking to a message board audience rather than addressing the entire investment community as a whole.

I still think the CBAI lawyer made the spelling mistake, if it was me in Matt's shoes I'd fire that attorney immediately.

As for the other lawsuit you speak of that is what the courts are for to seperate fact from fiction. Some could easily come under Department Of Justice scrutiny for thier 'opinions' as well.

XMDC .0057 x 58 +9% radar.

I think the misspelling occured from the company lawyers and not the court staff. 99.999% of the time inputed the information is exactly as it is presented to them because they read it directly from the court documents. It sure looks like CBAI hired a not so competent attorney. Laughable indeed.

CBAI lawyers need to learn to spell correctly>

"INDISPENDSIBLE" is supposed to be spelled *indispensable*.

1 NOTH 01/11/2011 DEFENDANT NOTICE OF HEARING 011411 9:00 F
2 MEOT 01/11/2011 DEFENDANT AMENDED MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO: EMERGENCY MOTN F
3 AMED 01/11/2011 DEFENDANT AMENDED MOTN DISMISS FAILURE TO JOIN INDISPENDSIBLE PARTY F

No wonder there was a lot of shares selling at the bid today.

Could be Matt selling his 121,000,000 shares vested on 12/31/10 or Joe selling his 61,000,000 vested shares or maybe someone with Friday court date jitters.

Matt disposed (sold) of 25,528,428 shares.

Common Stock 06/01/2010 06/16/2010 D 25,528,408 D

E&E Communications statutory requirements in CA>

How was I to know that I had to file a Statement of Information?

By statute, the entity is required to file a Statement of Information on an annual or bienniel basis, as applicable. In addition, the Secretary of State mails a reminder postcard to a business entity's address of record approximately three months prior to the date its filing is due. If a business entity then fails to file the required statement, it is provided a notice of delinquency and an additional 60-days in which to file. Note: It is a business entity's responsibility to submit a statement even if it did not receive the reminder or the notice of delinquency.

http://www.sos.ca.gov/business/be/faqs.htm

OOAG .0075 x 83 +21% radar.

Paul Knopick's E&E Communications isn't registered with the California Secretary of State. Any clues as to why the company's IR guy isn't registered within the state he is doing business in?

I looked in CA SOS business entities and nothing was listed.

Thank you for your straight answer deseng. A knowledgeable poster is hard to find here.

OOAG .006 x .62 +3% radar.

I was hoping to be corrected if I was wrong, so far that hasn't happened yet.

Correct me if I'm wrong but on Grant Date 7/13/2009 Matt received Option Awards (# of Cord Shares) of 241,096,000 shares at a excercise price of .003 which he cashed in for $723.288.

Grant Date 12/31/2009 Matt received Option Awards (# of Cord Shares) of 242,929,000 shares at a excercise price of .01 (during the grand opening run) which he cashed in for $2,672,219, in addition to the bonus of $49,500 plus his $165,586 base salary.

NTUR .0325 x 38 +40% radar.

I don't recall changing my mind. Pennyland still could be on the horizon.

Matt made $348,910 more than the company's total revenues in 20009. I can't say you don't have a point.

Matt's total compensation was $3,586,093 in 2009. He received a annual base salary of $165,000 through July 14, 2009. It's in the 2009 10-K.

Matt receiving $3,586,093 for 2009 does seem a tad lop sided compared to the company's $3,237,183 total revenue for 2009.

Indeed, Matt mistakenly projected the company being cash flow positive by June 2009.