Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Looks like someone has tried to get the convo started again for UOIP on Yahoo Finance..was dead there for months. The more eyes the better
Long UOIP
This is it > In stickies already
http://www.reexamlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ChanBond-Complaint-ded-1-15-cv-00848-1.pdf
I can get the schedule again. Absolutely Perfect Post Faqt! The other link would be the one that shows the convo's of James Finnegan and them being aware of infringement
So we have:
Mr. Comcast IP Big Wig who gave deposition...that was the sealed doc in pacer I think? I think we have seen the supporting docs for that from 2012 fiasco basically admitting infringing.
Discovery Due June 1
Appeal for the one loss we had to CSCO
"Tear down this wall!"
Looks like another blog post for you this weekend AJ
Holy Wall Batman!
Another Close with no change
June 1, 2018 is close of discover Tony
Its just that brokerage firms problem. Fact is it can be 100% bought on TDA. Not on DTC chill. Discovery was supposed to be done by Apr 30 but they agreed to stretch it until end of May
SO MONEY FAQT!
Love young Vince Vaughn
Love Swingers
Love UOIP
Love The Input Here!
someone broke up their sell > Ask Wall @ .008 Gone
CSTI .0074 236k
NITE .0078 55k
CDEL .0078 204k
ETRF .009 100k
CANT .01 100k
Thanks Great Post
Yea clearly trying to delay as much as possible.
$$UOIP$$
I was looking forward to April 30 Close of discovery
The parties agree that the close of fact discovery is extended for 30 days to complete
already served discovery. The parties agree that no new discovery shall be served without the
consent of the other party, except that the parties shall be permitted to serve new Requests for
Admissions up through thirty days prior to the close of fact discovery. Nothing in this provision
shall prevent a party from supplementing its response to any discovery request.
2 Plaintiff intends to include a proposal regarding trial consolidation at least in view of
identical accused products and common factual questions across defendants, per 35 U.S.C. §
299. Defendants believe consolidation for trial is not appropriate, for at least the reason that the
parties cannot be properly consolidated under 35 U.S.C. § 299 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 20.
Case 1:15-cv-00842-RGA Document 247 Filed 04/24/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 9995
3
Event Current Deadline Proposed New
Deadline
Pre-trial Conference TBA TBA
First 5-day jury trial TBA TBA
Sorry For The Format
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto and
subject to the approval of the Court, that the following deadlines are hereby extended as set forth
in the attached Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Event Current Deadline Proposed New
Deadline
Close of fact discovery1 April 30, 2018 June 1, 2018
Opening Expert Reports for party that bears burden
of proof June 1, 2018
July 2, 2018
Rebuttal Expert Reports July 13, 2018 August 13, 2018
Reply Expert Reports August 3, 2018 August 31, 2018
Close of Expert Discovery August 28, 2018 September 28, 2018
Opening SJ/Daubert Briefs September 18, 2018 October 19, 2018
Answering SJ/Daubert Briefs October 18, 2018 November 19, 2018
Reply SJ/Daubert Briefs November 8, 2018 December 7, 2018
Trial scheduling conference, with parties to submit a
joint status report with their proposal(s) one week in
advance.2
October 31, 2018 @
8:30 am
TBA
SJ/Daubert Hearing TBA TBA
NOTICE OF AMENDED SUBPOENA
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, defendants have served the amended subpoena attached hereto as Exhibit 1 on Deirdre Lane.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on April 23, 2018, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to all registered participants.
I further certify that I caused copies of the foregoing document to be served on April 23, 2018, upon the following in the manner indicated:
Richard D. Kirk, Esquire
Stephen B. Brauerman, Esquire
Sara E. Bussiere, Esquire
BAYARD, P.A.
600 North King Street, Suite 400
Wilmington, DE 19801
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
Mark Raskin, Esquire
Robert Whitman, Esquire
John F. Petrsoric, Esquire
Michael S. DeVincenzo, Esquire
MISHCON DE REYA NEW YORK LLP
156 Fifth Avenue, Suite 904
New York, NY 10010
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
/s/ Jennifer Ying
Jennifer Ying (#5550)
Case 1:15-cv-00842-RGA Document 245 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9988
Pacer Updates As Well
Thin Ask
CDEL 0069 60k
NITE 0072 10k
CANT 0089 200k
CSTI 009 100k
ETRF 0092 56k
ETRF and CANT have .01 on ask
Major Wall .007 - 1,232874 by none other than CDEL
Great Reference
Capital Gains Tax Rates
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) taxes long-term capital gains (that is, on assets held more than a year) at different rates than other types of income. Under the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 (TIPRA) passed by Congress in May 2006, U.S. taxpayers in the two lowest tax brackets (which account for about two-thirds of all individual tax returns) pay no capital gains taxes.
Read more: Capital Gains Tax https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/capital_gains_tax.asp#ixzz5DBJhhCng
Follow us: Investopedia on Facebook
RPX was destroyed
Trial In November > Settlement Could Happen Before > Speculation Will Drive It Higher The Closer We Get
Would a mention of James J. Finnegan be worthy?
That's alot of $$
What's your deal? It's one thing to point out or agree to it being standard language..but you jump at the opportunity to agress? At someone who has always been long, sentiment unchanged, who has had plenty of opportunties to get more. Irrelevant is a strong word given Charter Communications a major cable provider, and what I posted basically plays out what we all want.
Charter 10k Risk Section, I presume this is standard in these filings but still
"We may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses from these third parties on reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, claims of intellectual property infringement could require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements on unfavorable terms, incur substantial monetary liability or be enjoined preliminarily or permanently from further use of the intellectual property in question, which could require us to change our business practices or offerings and limit our ability to compete effectively."
well someone sold into the bid #weak someone push this over .005 and make my day
pretty decent sized bids @ .004 is this the MM playing games with each other or?
Yea definitely needs some re-wording in the SA blog regarding outstanding shares and the line that states "Shareholders on the IHUB board believe that stock ownership approximates 903M shares"
Ram mentioned his draft that hes working on currently. I think he had a good angle to write from and if others can direct any relative input to him, we as a whole can have a solid article on SA that reaches a lot of new faces.
Cable Companies = Monster Revenue...
Revenue derived from infringed patented technology
Holding for settlement #UOIP
Essentially Yes.
http://ir.arris.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=87823&p=irol-reportsAnnual
Just pulled the first 10Q from 2015
Page 47:
"We may face higher costs associated with protecting our intellectual property or obtaining necessary access to the intellectual
property of others"
"We have received, directly or indirectly, and expect to continue to receive,from third parties, including some of our competitors, notices claiming that we, or our customers using our products, have infringed
upon third-party patents or other proprietary rights. We are a defendant in several proceedings (and other proceedings have been
threatened) in which our customers were sued for patent infringement and sued, or made claims against, us and other suppliers for
indemnification, and we may become involved in similar litigation involving these and other customers in the future, including as a
result of our acquisition of Motorola Home. These claims, regardless of their merit, could result in costly litigation, divert the time,
attention and resources of our management, delay our product shipments, and, in some cases, require us to enter into royalty or
licensing agreements. If a claim of product infringement against us is successful and we fail to obtain a license or develop noninfringing
technology, we may be prohibited from marketing or selling certain products which could materially affect our business
and operating results. In addition, the payment of any damages or any necessary licensing fees or indemnification costs associated
with a patent infringement claim could be material and could also materially adversely affect our operating results.
maybe a link to the Arris financials that mention the infringement / litigation as well?
Agreed
Event / Current Deadline / Proposed New Deadline:
Close of fact discovery /1 March 30, 2018 / April 30, 2018
Opening Expert Reports for party that bears burden of proof / April 30, 2018 / June 1, 2018
Rebuttal Expert Reports / June 11, 2018 / July 13, 2018
Reply Expert Reports / July 2, 2018 / August 3, 2018
Close of Expert Discovery / July 27, 2018 / August 28, 2018
Opening SJ/Daubert Briefs / August 17, 2018 /September 18, 2018
Answering SJ/Daubert Briefs / September 17, 2018 / October 18, 2018
Reply SJ/Daubert Briefs / October 8, 2018 / November 8, 2018
Trial scheduling conference, with parties to submit a joint status report with their proposal(s) one week in advance.2 October 31, 2018 @8:30 am TBA
SJ/Daubert Hearing TBA TBA
Pre-trial Conference TBA TBA
First 5-day jury trial TBA TBA